User talk:Significa liberdade

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|Significa liberdade}}), so that I will be notified. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified. Please click here to leave me a new message.

This is Significa liberdade's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 30 days

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Thanks for reaching out. Replying here, as this Talk page is the more stable. (As we travel, and computing circumstances change, the IP address from which we edit changes. The new temp account system—we cannot say how it and the Talk pages it generates might be impacted, but we would guess they will change as our location and our IP address changes, and so here is the safer place to reply.)

Before answering your questions, beyond the thanks for the outreach, congratulations on your academic achievements to date, and for taking the time to bring the scholarly abilities you are being taught (and I think, if memory serves, your applying them to edit BIO/BLP articles on women). We cheer all of this, and wish you fair winds and following seas in your academic work.

Finally with regard to the specific questions you ask, or what one might infer from them:

First, to be clear, we are not sock puppets or involved in sock puppet-types of behavior (in part because we decline, entirely, to engage in time-consuming content or other disagreements here, which removes, we perceive, the single largest motivation for such illicit behavior); Second, we are, at least some, at a near 20-year marks of participation, but no longer register for a set of substantial, but personal reasons we do not discuss (except to say, we cannot ever see returning to registered editor status at the WP organisation as it now exists); and Third, we decline to discuss our pronouns, generally, but their use encompasses a number of personal needs/circumstances, the one of which relevant to the Admin postings today, are edits that we perform with media/informatics-interested parties looking-on, as we discuss and explain Wikipedia function, and in particular, its Pillars, and the crucial WP:VERIFY policy. You can see in the activity link posted at the Admin site you reference, the type of edits we do as we pursue our interests and commitments (none of which, to be clear, involve paid / WP:NPOV editing).

Does this orient you well enough, that we can discourse about content and such, in future? With kind regard, we are, [Signed, the same as we were in the earlier posts you reviewed.] ~2025-42222-78 (talk) 23:34, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandraaaacs1989: A(n unsatisfactory) response is here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:25, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like you are trying to act like you are some sort of secret group pulling the strings from behind the scenes. The neckbeard cadence is a little odd as well (no offense, I'm just a bit thrown off by this whole thing).

the type of edits we do as we pursue our interests - So then what exactly are your interests...? Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 22:06, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		For over 360 article reviews during 2025. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:02, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, MPGuy2824! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:21, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2025 Top Editor
		In 2025 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:38, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ozzie10aaaa! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:22, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I think you might be online, so could you please be able to see if you think we should revoke TPA here? I'm at a loss on what else to do with them... Blue Sonnet (talk) 02:44, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:47, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Blue Sonnet (talk) 02:49, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I added 4 sources, copy edited, and moved back to main space. Bearian (talk) 05:42, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you added a reference to the infobox of the article for the taxonomic authority. I don't usually see this in biology articles and per MOS:INFOBOXREF this would qualify as repeated (and cited) elsewhere. Additionally, the reference you added is to a database while the body cites the primary source. I suppose there's probably no harm in leaving it, but it stands out as slightly conspicuous to me, given the aforementioned uncommonness of this (although this may be JDL talking). — Anonymous 05:27, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I can remove it. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:19, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I fear I have a bad habit of being a little too overprotective of my articles, but I'm glad we were able to work this out so easily. — Anonymous 17:26, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Infinite Chess(Game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Greedycell (talk) 00:46, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it appears you have deleted my page Infinite Chess(Game). Could you please undo it?

I am not logged in at the moment.(FYI) ~2026-62711-8 (talk) 02:03, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! The article you created has been moved to Infinite Chess. However, the article appeared to cover the same material as the Infinite chess article, so it has been blanked and redirected to that article. If you think your article covered a different subject, please let me know. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:12, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Significa liberdade:

Per Wikipedia guidelines, I have a proposal and I am to start with you.  

The Victor Station entry as it appears now with the multiple entries of “This section does not cite any sources,” etc., undermines the integrity of the content. As a result, how could any reader of that article not be confused by seeing both “This section does not cite any sources” and proper references at the bottom of the article? This does a disservice to the reader. Furthermore, how could this be a good look for Wikipedia – when a reader sees an article that has been properly referenced that also includes multiple “does not cite any sources” statements. It seems to go against the purpose of Wikipedia.  

I do understand that what led to the above was an inaccurate interpretation of what edits are appropriate based on Wikipedia policy and guidelines. I apologize for not having done a better job sorting that out beforehand.

My proposal to eliminate the above noted, adverse impacts to readers and Wikipedia is to return the article back to its original stub prior to my edits. Would you allow me to do that?

Thank you for considering my request.

Asabuchman Asabuchman (talk) 17:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Asabuchman! You are absolutely free to remove unsourced content, though you should not remove the maintenance tags without adding sources. Per Wikipedia's verifiability policy, readers must be able to connect article content to reliable sources. Generally speaking, each paragraph of the article should include at least one source to indicate where information in that paragraph came from. Otherwise, it is unclear which information is verified through which source -- or whether any sources provided verify the information. I hope this makes sense. Please let me know if you have any questions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:30, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, apologies! I just realized you are currently blocked from directly editing mainspace articles. I can absolutely remove the unreferenced sections. Please note that in the future, you can use the {{edit request}} feature on the article's talk page. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:37, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I am so grateful we could agree on this next step. Also, thank you for the additional editing guidance. Wishing you the best in your literary career. Asabuchman (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for picking up after my attempted merge at John Abbey. I'm still learning the ropes and I appreciate you taking the time out of your day to set up that merge proposal after my clumsy attempt, lol. Take care! :) 21stcenturycoelacanth (talk) 21:31, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Thanks for noticing the stub! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:09, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Significa liberdade,

I want to reedit and reintroduce HD 63935 as a planet hosting star system. Can you move the article back to draft so i can completely rewrite and re-edit it?

Mkmyers45 (talk) 13:21, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mkmyers45! The article is already in draftspace: Draft:HD 63935. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:31, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please grant my unblocking reason and unblock me so that I can edit further if again i will do same fault you may permanently block me but now i want another chance. Thank you Sarthak Sai Mohapatra (talk) 15:26, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to be unblocked, please open an unblock request on your page following the guide for appealing blocks. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:52, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I already did it once but an administrator declined it. so What should i do? Sarthak Sai Mohapatra (talk) 04:28, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You can request a new unblock on your talk page. Just make sure you address any concerns raised. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:30, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have done that on my talk page, pls visit and grant that, unblock me. Sarthak Sai Mohapatra (talk) 04:50, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

As the blocking administrator, I cannot unblock you. One of the other administrators who review unblock requests will review and respond to your request. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:55, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363 Online events: New: Alphabet run: countries starting with B | Black Women | Works by women: theatre, opera, music Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Sports (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet. Tip of the month: Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Welcome to Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP drive. During Phase 1, we reviewed 16,658 articles and 4,416 redirects, and there is currently a backlog of 16,475 articles and 23,782 redirects in the queue. Fantastic job! Completing 22,502 patrols in the first phase made a significant dent in the backlog. Let's keep our foot on the gas for Phase 2, and I hope we can achieve even more reviews than Phase 1. Best of luck!

You are receiving this message because you added your name to the participants list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please in my talk page of spanish wikipedia? Auqui Azulino (talk) 01:05, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I cannot help you with your block on the Spanish Wikipedia. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:07, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Aunque puedes traducir la solicitud porque no puedo editar mi pagina de discusión. Auqui Azulino (talk) 01:24, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No, I will not add an unblock request to your talk page on the Spanish Wikipedia. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:27, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

JuniperChill (talk) 00:02, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Book series introduced in 2023 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:45, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Book series introduced in 2024 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:45, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Book series introduced in 2025 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw that you rated the article Chlorurus frontalis as Start last year. Can you please reassess it, because I think it fulfills all the B class article criteria. Thank you! TrueMoriarty Talk | Contribs 15:12, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, TrueMoriarty! At present, I do not think Chlorurus frontalis meets the B-class article criteria. Based on content, I believe it still qualifies as Start-class (maybe C-class). I'd be fine with you requesting a third opinion, though. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:25, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice! TrueMoriarty Talk | Contribs 04:14, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

Have I edited Apteranthes munbyana sufficiently to remove the unencyclopaedic tone?

Ta

Ceropegius Ceropegius (talk) 04:45, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the quite unpleasant comments that have come from off-site. Reddit being Reddit, as usual. :)

^EF⁵ 15:01, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I second the above kitten given by EF5, picking a kitten for these wikilove messages is one of my favorite things on Wikipedia, hence why it is a must that I send a second one.

– LuniZunie_(talk) 15:03, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, LuniZunie and EF5! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:55, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I can see why the entire subject is heavily controversial and conspiracy-esque, but Wikipedia is not part of that conspiracy nor is it (as far as I'm aware) involved in anything related to the entire case. Reddit likes acting like they are sleuths solving some sort of case (see this case) but in reality it's just unfettered conspiracies, bots, and people who don't know what they are talking about. ^EF⁵ 17:03, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The benefit of these kittens is that they can look adorable without screaming at me about lunchtime an hour before it's due (unlike my actual cats). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My cat learned how to open doors -_-

The screaming never stops in my house. – LuniZunie_(talk) 17:26, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My dogs love jumping up onto a door until it opens; one of these days one of them is going to go through glass. Neither scream but both are loud when hangry. :) ^EF⁵ 17:40, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Congrats on getting Booming Ben at DYK and geting 14K+ views! This was definitely one of the best articles featured on DYK in a while. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 04:35, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thank you! It's just a little disappointing knowing that my DYK turned out to be slightly inaccurate, as discussed on the talk page. I appreciate those who looked into it deeper. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).

Arbitration

• Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2026 Steward elections started on 06 February 2026 at 14:00 (UTC) and will end on 27 February 2026 at 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process for current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.

---