Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Evolution’s Favorite Fish Diversify through ‘Noncoding’ Genes

Proliferating cichlids may specialize using regulatory DNA

East African cichlid species.

East African cichlid species.

Javier Millán Photography Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Darwin's finches are perhaps the best-known examples of adaptive radiation—the evolutionary phenomenon in which one ancestral species rapidly diversifies into several new ones, each with unique adaptations for surviving in its own environment. But these Galápagos birds have nothing on the cichlids of East Africa. In the same two or three million years it took for 14 finch species to evolve, more than 1,000 cichlid species diverged from common ancestors in Lake Malawi alone. New research is now revealing the genetic mechanisms behind such rapid and dramatic biodiversity.

Cichlids exhibit a wild variety of body shapes, coloration patterns, mouth structures, behaviors, diets, and more. “When you look at them, they look so starkly different,” says Earlham Institute evolutionary biologist Tarang Mehta. “But when you compare the [protein-coding] genes of these species, you see very little diversity.”

Protein-coding genes influence an organism's major traits. Previous research had already indicated that cichlids' “noncoding” or “regulatory” stretches of DNA—which determine how, when and where the coding genes are turned on and off—evolved more rapidly than their coding genes. These regulatory spans let the same set of genetic puzzle pieces fit together in thousands of different configurations, a phenomenon Mehta refers to as “tinkering.” But scientists were unsure whether this tinkering could drive the evolution of new species.

For a study published in Genome Biology, Mehta and his colleagues analyzed gene expression in the brain, eye, heart, kidney, muscle tissue and testis of five cichlid species from East African rivers and lakes. Using a computational model they developed, the researchers found that changes in the genomes' noncoding regions contributed a “substantial portion of the evolutionary substrate in adaptations” that led to divergence, says study senior author and University of East Anglia biologist Federica Di Palma. For example, the team found that regulatory changes altered certain coding genes' expression to let cichlids see better in various specific conditions. When species shared similar diets or habitats, they were more likely to evolve similar changes to these regulatory networks.

Many biologists worry about the accelerating loss of Earth's biodiversity—but science still does not fully understand how biodiversity evolves in the first place, says University of Basel zoologist Walter Salzburger, who was not involved with the study. The cichlids in Lakes Malawi, Tanganyika and Victoria offer researchers a unique opportunity to peer into that process, he adds.

Mehta's team is now applying the same kind of analysis to tilapia, a cichlid group that includes the world's second-most farmed fish. If the researchers can identify the genomic tinkering associated with traits such as adaptation to extreme salinity or temperature, Mehta says, this could guide the selective breeding of tilapia to more efficiently feed a hungry world.

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 324 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Shape-Shifters” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 324 No. 5 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0521-21

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe

Popular Stories