Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why agecucks are opposed to adult-teen couples.

Urlaubsinsel

Urlaubsinsel

Germanic ubermensch
★★★★
Joined
Nov 17, 2024
Posts
366
Romantic relationships between adults and teenagers apparently used to be socially acceptable in the 1980s in the USA (source), but now are among the biggest social taboos, especially in the United States, while they are largely considered normal in the Scandinavian world (Sweden, Norway).

Adult-teen couples normally form with adult men and teenage women, given that women mature earlier and usually desire to be in romantic relationships with male partners more mature than themselves.

Of course, the opposite happens sometimes too, as can be seen with female teachers sleeping with male students.


In that case, the woman's subconscious goal is to secure the good genes of the student, even if she is not consciously planning to reproduce anytime soon. Females can recognize good genetic material early on and project it into the future.

Arguments against adult-teen romantic relationships​


The usual arguments against adult-teen relationships are along the lines of "unlike adults, teenagers can't decide, they need to be protected! Their brains aren't developed enough to make rational decisions! They will be traumatized!" and so forth.

Before we get to the real reason agecucks oppose adult-teen romantic relationships, let's bury the myth that adults always make rational decisions.

(source: oppression - Dig Deeper; edited for typo corrections and formatting)

With that out of the way, here are the hidden subconscious reasons both agecucked men and women oppose romantic adult-teen relationships. Enjoy the truthnuke. :D

Why men oppose adult-teen relationships.​

Because of envy. Mating is a zero-sum game, and there are only a limited number of women at a reproductive age.

Subconsciously, males hate the idea that some other male takes away a female they are attracted to. This includes physically mature teenage women who just-so happen to be younger than the social construct "age of majority".

So agecuck men use accusations of pedophilia as a convenient weapon to attack a competitor in the dating market. They would rather have no one be with a teenage woman than someone else. They are projecting and virtue-signalling. If adult-teen romantic relationships were legal and socially acceptable in their country, they would not hesitate to get into one if an opportunity formed.

Also, attraction to teenage women is called "ephebeophilia", not "pedophilia". But the latter word is used due to its shock value.

Those men setting up sting operations (Chris Hansen, JiDion, ...) defending the teenage women from those "evil monsters" subconsciously hope to gain the romantic interest of the same teenage women in order to be accepted themselves as romantic and/or sexual partner as soon as they reach legal age. They want to be seen as heroes in the eyes of the teenage women.

Robert Lindsay said:
That toxic sex fascist moron Hansen did indeed open up a whole Pandora’s Box with his sleazy, idiotic, sensationalistic show. Now all sorts of sanctimonious sex fascist dipshits are copying him on Youtube. Some have even formed their own retard sex fascist organizations to feed off this idiot moral panic.
(source: More on the Grotesque Abuse of Words Like Pedophilia, Hebephilia, and MAP – Beyond Highbrow)

Also, remember how Hansen cheated with his wife in 2011 with a woman 21 years younger than himelf (sources: NY daily news, John Swan video). So he himself is attracted to women much younger than himself, so he can't possibly blame young adult men for forming romantic relationships with "minor" mid-to-late-teen aged females.

The age of majority was arbitrarily made up by bureaucrats who themselves are well past the age of having an understanding of teenage love, and by elites who want all teenage women for their own class only, see Epstein's Island. But unlike young adults who simply want a romantic partner and treat her well, elites apparently do weird satanic rituals, which is something completely different.


Also, some people equate a romantic relationship with a sexual relationship (example 1, example 2), even though a romantic relationship does not have to include sexual intercourse.

Why women oppose adult-teen relationships.​

It is common knowledge that many teenage women are physically indistinguishable from young adult women, even if they are below the social construct "age of majority". Everyone knows this, but due to social implications, many people don't say it.

If teenage women were allowed (whether by law or by social standards) to form romantic relationships or sleep with adult men, adult women have more competition on the dating "market", and they surely don't want that.

Adult women shame and verbally attack men for being attracted teenage women by asserting that it is just as bad as being attracted to prepubecent children, given that both have the same label of "minors", even though they are obviously at completely different stages of physical maturity.

To foids pedophilia = younger than them

The fixed age of majority and age of consent for everyone has no base in biology, given that people mature at different rates, and women mature earlier on average.



Notice how agecucks can not possibly debunk this without resorting to ad-hominem attacks. Example:

Jax said:
[16:17]
He frequently attempted to manipulate the victim by talking about "maturity", and saying that "age doesn't matter, only maturity does", which is a common justification by predators such as this.
(source: Jax)

Notice how he fails to address the argument and resorts to an ad-hominem attack instead.

Obviusly, I recommend no one to do something that puts them at a legal risk, but the purpose of this post is to show how almost everyone has been fooled into denying the obvious.

This is one of several big lies sold to us, others including that circumcision is healthy (refuted), that vaccines are healthy (refuted), and in the past that that asbestos is healthy (it's asworstos) or that cigarettes are harmless (big tobacco's dirty tricks) (W.H.O. anti-tobacco now that everyone knows it is harmful - yet they are pro-circumcision).

We make fun of people from prior times for believing things considered absurd nowadays, yet we fail to look at ourselves and ask "what do we believe that will be made fun of in future?"

See also:




[I hereby release this post into the public domain, CC0 1.0, excluding quotes.]
 
Last edited:
A very good post but also water. Because we and they already know too well that but their are hypocrites who's playing the wolf morality.
 
Also, remember how Hansen cheated with his wife in 2011 with a woman 21 years younger than himelf (sources: NY daily news, John Swan video). So he himself is attracted to women much younger than himself, so he can't possibly blame young adult men for forming romantic relationships with "minor" mid-to-late-teen aged females.
I didn't even know this
 
I’m convinced the ages where female/male genitalia fully develop should be when consensual relationships should be federally allowed, which is apparently around 15/16-18 (basically the age of consent in most U.S States and countries), so any age in that range I would make an argument for why it should be legal.

There could also be an argument for consensual relationships being allowed when hormones apparently fully develop, but that’s possibly up there in the mid 20s and more can be argued about brain development and etc etc, so definitely not in favor of that.
 
Also, attraction to teenage women is called "ephebeophilia", not "pedophilia". But the latter word is used due to its shock value.
Ephebophilia is a word exclusively for faggot men and isn't used for straight people. Attraction to teen women is normal and natural and doesn't have to have a specific word for it, that's part of the agecuck agenda.

Ephebos (Greek: ἔφηβος; pl. epheboi, Greek: ἔφηβοι), latinized as ephebus (pl. ephebi) and anglicised as ephebe (pl. ephebes), is a term for a male adolescent in Ancient Greece

The term ephebophilia comes from the Ancient Greek: ἔφηβος ephebos (from epi "upon" + hebe "youth", "early manhood") defined as "a youth of eighteen to twenty, particularly one who underwent his dokimasia and was registered as a citizen (Athens)", and φιλία -philia 'love'.[4] It has been used in publications by Dutch psychologist Frits Bernard in 1950,[5] and reprinted in 1960 in the gay support magazine Vriendschap under the pseudonym Victor Servatius,[6] crediting the origin of the term to Magnus Hirschfeld with no exact date given.[7] The word was in fact first published in French (éphébophilie), from Georges Saint-Paul's 1896 book, Tares et Poisons: Perversion et Perversité Sexuelles.[8]

Otherwise High IQ thread :feelsokman: :feelsokman:
 

Norwegian here, Adult Teen couples are not normal in norway, And even tho its 16 is the sexual legal age,
You will still get looked down upon if you were to fuck one that age, Good luck getting your life ruined over something legal.

Moralfags will come out of the shadows and tell you "You abused her" "Tricked her" Etc even if it was mutual consent.

And it says anything under 16 is punishable.
 
in the USA (source), but now are among the biggest social taboos, especially in the United States, while they are largely considered normal in the Scandinavian world (Sweden, Norway).
I have seen videos of Norwegian agecucks beating and harassing jbmaxxers. I don't think it's acceptable in any "civilized" countries to date young women and definitely not marry them or procreate with them. Even if the age is set ON PAPER to a more understandable age like 14, the propaganda from the US still has made it socially unacceptable.
 
I have seen videos of Norwegian agecucks beating and harassing jbmaxxers. I don't think it's acceptable in any "civilized" countries to date young women and definitely not marry them or procreate with them. Even if the age is set ON PAPER to a more understandable age like 14, the propaganda from the US still has made it socially unacceptable.
16 is the legal age and yes you will get beaten and crusaded
 
Norwegian here, Adult Teen couples are not normal in norway, And even tho its 16 is the sexual legal age,
You will still get looked down upon if you were to fuck one that age, Good luck getting your life ruined over something legal.

Moralfags will come out of the shadows and tell you "You abused her" "Tricked her" Etc even if it was mutual consent.
Thanks for clarifying! I'm glad to hear from a Norwegian! So the agecuck propaganda wave has arrived there too, sadly. :(

Is this a recent development? Was it like this 5 to 10 years ago?

During my school time, we had a half-Norwegian who said his parents met when his mother was 15 and his father was 21, and told me many women find their men in their mid-teens in Norway. (I don't know which of his parents was Norwegian.) Also, Sweden and Norway have the lowest circumcision rates in the world, so they are among the few places which didn't fall for that propaganda.

And it says anything under 16 is punishable.

I looked into it and it seems it was only recently made stricter. So not even Scandinavia seems to be immune against the agecuck mind virus.


But at least it seems to be 15 in Sweden.


I am pretty sure many teenagers sleep with each other but keep it secret.

Attractive people fuck at 12 already, it's a fact.
 
The legal age is 16 but you will get societal stigma if you fuck her even if legal.
 
Thanks :D

Note that they also have a word for attraction to adults: teleiophilia. But people seem to be scared of any -philia suffix attraction-related words apparently, due to the frequent use of "pedophilia".
 
Thanks :D

Note that they also have a word for attraction to adults: teleiophilia. But people seem to be scared of any -philia suffix attraction-related words apparently, due to the frequent use of "pedophilia".
It's really easy to manipulate normies if you are percieved as an authority. Just look at covid, jfl.
Anything that encourages reproduction isn't a paraphilia and everything that doesn't propably is. It's wild how most people can't look at things from nature's perspective. Humans operate the same as any other animal. :feelsthink:
 
The legal age is 16 but you will get societal stigma if you fuck her even if legal.
I did some research. This seems to be an EU-wide thing.

Fewer teenage women are taken than adult women, so other men subconsciously probably see "hitting on" teenage women as taking an unfair advantage.

BigFreakingZombie (reddit.com) said:
Even in Europe which generally has low ages of consent and a much more liberal attitude towards sex and sexuality than the US 25+man plus teenage girl couples are very rare and the guys that do go for it are considered losers intimidated by women of their own age rather than "based trad fellows catching them young before soyciety corrupts them " .
(source)

It's really easy to manipulate normies if you are percieved as an authority. Just look at covid, jfl.
Anything that encourages reproduction isn't a paraphilia and everything that doesn't propably is. It's wild how most people can't look at things from nature's perspective. Humans operate the same as any other animal. :feelsthink:
Couldn't agree more.

[All of my posts in this thread are hereby released into the public domain, CC0 1.0, excluding quotes.]
 
Last edited:
I have seen videos of Norwegian agecucks beating and harassing jbmaxxers.
On which site? Do you have links to those videos?

I'd expect something like this to happen in the USA, not Norway of all places.
 
Last edited:
On which site? Do you have links to those videos?
I'd expect something like this to happen in the USA, but in not in Norway.
Some telegram channel, i lost my telegram account so idk. I they they are called Active Clubs, they are all over Europe and they beat and harass jbmaxxers to supposedly save the white race. One german one was incredibly bad, since the guy was bloody from the beating and of course these cowards hide their faces.
One video i saw on some gore website where they shawed a nigger's hair off and forced him to eat watermelon in the shower and that was in Norway also, if i remember correctly.
 
No matter how overwhelmingly correct you are you will NEVER convince subhuman NORMSCUM of this.
 
Must read bait
 
The usual arguments against adult-teen relationships are along the lines of "unlike adults, teenagers can't decide, they need to be protected! Their brains aren't developed enough to make rational decisions! They will be traumatized!" and so forth.

I have yet to address the trauma part, so here we go:

The idea that romantic relationships and eroticism are traumatic by default to teenage women (or teenagers in general) is also a social construct. Here is the story of a 15-year-old woman who enjoyed intercourse with an adult man, but was thereafter patronized by the people around her that something horrible was done to her, until she started believing it:

Alanis Morissette said:
It took me years in therapy to even admit there had been any kind of victimization on my part. I would always say I was consenting, and then I'd be reminded like 'Hey, you were 15, you're not consenting at 15.' Now I'm like, 'Oh yeah, they're all pedophiles. It's all statutory rape.'
(source: Alanis Morissette says she was raped by multiple men in new HBO documentary ‘Jagged’ - Business Insider Nederland)

The erotic acts were not what traumatized her - it was the non-stop patronization by her social circle.

It precisely is the opposite of what happens with circumcision (foreskin cutting): something horrible was done to men in their infancy, but they are patronized into believing nothing of value was taken from them.

[I hereby release this post into the public domain, CC0 1.0, excluding quotes.]
 
Last edited:
I oppose them as I oppose all couples because I'm jealous.
 
It's funny how they say that the man is manipulating the young foid, while in reality it's society manipulating the young foid into believing that she was a victim.
 
Agecuckery is non violent genocide
 
I

Its rage fuel to see to catch a predator type videos when the person(s) are clearly truecel or autistic and these htns and chads try to catch them it's infuriating, also makes no sense when jbs fw older guys and Daddy stuff more than anyone it's in their nature to fuck with it and whiteknight cucks try to suppress it, literal clown world
 
Those that can, do!
Those that can't, will hate.
 

Why agecucks are opposed to adult-teen couples.​

Revised edition from 2026-01-28
with more in-depth analysis and some notes on the hypocrisy with transsexuality.


Summary (TLDR): Male adult agecucks subconsciously dislike teenage women being taken by competing men, and female adult agecucks do not want to compete against their younger counterparts.



Romantic relationships between adults and teenagers apparently used to be socially acceptable in the 1980s in the USA (source), but now are among the biggest social taboos, especially in the United States.

Adult-teen couples normally form with adult men and teenage women, given that women mature earlier and usually desire to be in romantic relationships with male partners more mature than themselves.

Of course, the opposite happens sometimes too, as can be seen with female teachers sleeping with male students.


In that case, the woman's subconscious goal is to secure the good genes of the student, even if she is not consciously planning to reproduce anytime soon. Females can recognize good genetic material early on and project it into the future.

And those male students were not hurt or brain-damaged. Actually, the brain damage was prevented, because in men, the lack of sexual experience during puberty causes permanent brain damage.


Arguments against adult-teen romantic relationships​


The usual arguments against adult-teen relationships are along the lines of "unlike adults, teenagers can't decide, they need to be protected! Their brains aren't developed enough to make rational decisions! They will be traumatized!" and so forth.

Before we get to the real reasons agecucks oppose adult-teen romantic relationships, let's first bury the myth that adults always make rational decisions.

(source: oppression - Dig Deeper; edited for typo corrections and formatting)

(The sexual trauma argument will be addressed further down in the post.)

With that out of the way, here are the hidden subconscious reasons both agecucked men and women oppose romantic adult-teen relationships. Enjoy the truthnuke. :D

Why men oppose adult-teen relationships.​

Because of envy. Mating is a zero-sum game, and there are only a limited number of women at a reproductive age.

Subconsciously, males hate the idea that some other male takes away a female they are attracted to. This includes physically mature teenage women who just-so happen to be younger than the social construct "age of majority".

So agecuck men use accusations of pedophilia as a convenient weapon to attack a competitor in the dating "market". They would rather have no one be with a teenage woman they secretly desire than someone else.

They are social justice warriors who are projecting and virtue-signalling. They need a common enemy, a scapegoat to bond and feel morally righteous and superior over. If they lived in a place at a time where adult-teen romantic relationships were legal and socially acceptable, they would not hesitate to get into one if an opportunity formed.

Also, attraction to teenage women is called "ephebeophilia", not "pedophilia". But the latter word is used due to its shock value.

Those men setting up sting operations (Chris Hansen, JiDion, Skeeter Jean, Omma, CC UNIT, MamaMax, ...) defending the teenage women from those "evil monsters" subconsciously hope to gain the romantic interest of the same teenage women in order to be accepted themselves as romantic and/or sexual partner as soon as they reach legal age. They want to be seen as protectors and heroes in the eyes of the teenage women. They are well-disguised simps.

Robert Lindsay said:
That toxic sex fascist moron Hansen did indeed open up a whole Pandora’s Box with his sleazy, idiotic, sensationalistic show. Now all sorts of sanctimonious sex fascist dipshits are copying him on Youtube. Some have even formed their own retard sex fascist organizations to feed off this idiot moral panic.
(source: More on the Grotesque Abuse of Words Like Pedophilia, Hebephilia, and MAP – Beyond Highbrow)

Also, remember how Hansen cheated with his wife in 2011 with a woman 21 years younger than himelf (sources: NY daily news, John Swan video). So he himself is attracted to women much younger than himself, so he can't possibly blame young adult men for forming romantic relationships with "minor" mid-to-late-teen aged females.

(credit: @Dr. Autismo)

Also, some people equate a romantic relationship with a sexual relationship (example 1, example 2), even though a romantic relationship does not have to include sexual intercourse.

By the way, former Internet predator hunter MamaMax had a romantic relationship to a 17-year-old woman named Lucy back in 2016 (Believe All Abusers - MamaMaxsource[/url], 16:14). Not that I think anything is wrong with it, but it exposes the self-irony. Also, the age of consent at his location, Texas, is 17, but I could not find any source for when they became sexually active. Not that it matters anyway, except to agecucks (source: The Dark and Twisted Reality Of MamaMax - History Deep Dive by TheBritishRunner, at 3:07:25).

Why women oppose adult-teen relationships.​

It is common knowledge that many teenage women are physically indistinguishable from young adult women, even if they are below the social construct "age of majority". Everyone knows this, but due to social implications, many people, if not most, don't say it. This is where the term "jailbait" originates from, after all.

If teenage women were allowed (whether by law or by social standards) to form romantic relationships or sleep with adult men, adult women would have more competition in the mating "game", and they surely don't want that.


Some adult women shame and verbally attack men as "pedophiles" for being attracted to their competitors, teenage women, by asserting that it is just as bad as being attracted to prepubescent children, given that both have the same labels of "minors" and "underage", even though they are obviously at completely different stages of physical and mental maturity.

To foids pedophilia = younger than them

If it wasn't natural for adult men to be physically attracted to teenage women, there would be no need for them to ask young-looking adult women for their age or even government identification. Adult men would simply recognize that a teenage woman is below the social construct "age of majority" simply by not being physically attracted to her. There is absolutely no logical way out of this.

Agecucks also turn harmless and healthy romantic relationships and intercourse in early adulthood into a social and legal mine field, given that there is a possibility that a physically mature teenage woman lies about their age, so an adult man might get romantically involved and sleep with a teenage woman younger than the social construct "age of majority" without knowing it. (source 1, source 2) This actually happened to former "predator hunter" MamaMax (Believe All Abusers - MamaMax, 17:05).

A fixed age of majority and age of consent for everyone have no basis in biology, given that people mature at different rates, and women mature earlier on average. Also, ages of consent vary around the world, even though it's not like californians get into puberty three years later on average than swedes. If the ages of consent had a basis in biology, they would be the same everywhere on the planet.

Are romantic relationships and sex before adulthood traumatic?​

The idea that romantic relationships and eroticism are traumatic by default to teenage women (or teenagers in general) is also a social construct. In males, sex during puberty does not cause permanent brain damage - the lack thereof does.

And women are constantly socially indoctrinated that any "sex as a minor" is traumatic and abusive, until they start believing it (expectation bias), and women who were already sexually active as "minors" change their minds retroactively, even if they originally did not perceive it as such.

Here is the story of a 15-year-old woman who enjoyed intercourse with an adult man, but was thereafter patronized by the people around her that something horrible was done to her, until she started believing it:

Alanis Morissette said:
It took me years in therapy to even admit there had been any kind of victimization on my part. I would always say I was consenting, and then I'd be reminded like 'Hey, you were 15, you're not consenting at 15.' Now I'm like, 'Oh yeah, they're all pedophiles. It's all statutory rape.'
(source: Alanis Morissette says she was raped by multiple men in new HBO documentary ‘Jagged’ - Business Insider Nederland)

The erotic acts were not what traumatized her - it was the non-stop patronization by her social circle.

So intercourse is not traumatic by default to teenagers in puberty, much less romantic relationships. People are ready to get into romantic relationships or become sexually active when they feel ready, not when they have been born an arbitrarily dictated number of years ago.

Nature never told humans "if you have been born exactly eighteen years ago or more, you are suddenly allowed to become sexually active". If it were so, nature would not have given humans sexual desires long before the age of eighteen.

It precisely is the opposite of what happens with circumcision (foreskin cutting): something horrible was done to men in their infancy, but they are patronized into believing nothing of value was taken from them.

(source: Teenager - Incel Wiki, paragraphing added)

Women also enjoy the attention and sympathy they get from their victimhood status. This can also be seen with false rape accusations (Horst Arnold story), the complaints about "sexism", "glass ceilings" (also heard in "Hard out here" by Lily Allen), and the increasingly low barrier to what can be construed "sexual harassment". Even harmless approaching or looking ("stare rape") can be labelled as such nowadays.

The same people who think teenage women are not capable of becoming romantically or sexually active do not lose a word about male infant circumcision sexual abuse (ICSA). The age of consent for circumcision is zero, even though circumcision causes life-long harm to men. It still is socially accepted in much of the world as a result of decade-long medical propaganda (sources: Dig Deeper 1, Dig Deeper 2), which is re-inforced by circumcised men staying silent out of shame of their own circumcision status, while non-circumcised men have no reason to care given that they are not affected themselves.

Sources:




"Don't have love and sex - die in a war instead."​

At the same time, young adult men are cleared to go fight and die in wars for elites who themselves cowardly hide behind castle walls, and are mentally so weak that they can't even handle being called a "dick" on social media. This actually happened in Germany, where politician Andy Grote sent the police after someone (sources: New York Post, Eine kleine Geschichte aus dem Internet - Jules).

They are as easily offended as preschoolers, yet expect young adult men to handle seeing blood and dead people in ditches, and think it is their business to dictate at what age and with whom teenagers can become sexually active.

In fact, in some jurisdictions, men can fight wars at a younger age than they can become sexually active! For example, in the United States, it is 17 years with parental permission (source), which is below the age of consent in some states and below the age of majority. Strangely, they have no law that allows parents to permit their teenagers to become active earlier. (see also: The draft MUST be the #1 issue - Dig Deeper)

The elites do not want men and women to form healthy attachments, but to turn against each other. Discouraging and criminalizing adult-teen relationships is part of it.



"Sexuality bad, transsexuality good."​

Teenagers below the age of consent are not allowed to engage in sexual activity, regardless of how ready they feel. But a gender transition (sometimes glorifyingly referred to as "gender reassignment"), a life-altering surgery, can be performed even on prepubescent children who feel as though they were "born with the wrong gender". (sources: PBS frontline, Human Rights Campaign)

In Spain, schools teach prepubescent children about gender transitioning:


And in Canada as well:

Gender Report Canada said:
An article in Canada’s National Post last week explored how children can socially transition their gender at school without the knowledge of their parents.

The article received more than 1000 comments, most of them highly critical of the policy to keep a child’s gender change a secret from parents. This practice in schools is becoming common policy, the article noted.




And... wait for it... in California!

The same US state where an eighteen year old man would be punished by law and pillorized on the sex offender registry for harmlessly sleeping with a woman who is 17 years and 364 days old, and would already be considered a mentally ill paedophile for being in a romantic relationship with her, because she is considered a "child" by law, not withstanding that she is physically and mentally indistinguishable from a legal adult woman.


CBS News said:
Parents at a California elementary school are enraged after finding out that teachers created a secret LGBTQ club that children as young as eight could attend without their permission.
(source)

MSN news said:
Mom can proceed with gender-affirming care of preteen son, dealing dad brutal blow after years-long fight
[...]

“I lost all parental rights to my sons. Goodbye, boys. Perhaps, we will meet when you are adults. California Judge Juhas gave my ex-wife authority to castrate my son, James.” Younger wrote, referring to a treatment known as chemical castration.
(source


So heterosexual teenagers must not become romantically or sexually active with other teenagers or adults, even if they feel ready, while the gender of prepubertal children can be transitioned. I see.

And any teenage woman who is ready to become romantically or sexually active is obviously told that she was "manipulated by the evil man", even though, strictly speaking, any method of attracting a mate can be construed as "manipulation", including the cosmetics and make-up women use.

:foidSoy: : "5 year old boys can decide their gender! Let them have the choice to cut their dicks off and ruin their lives!!"

Also :foidSoy: : "18 YEAR OLD BABIES CANT CONSENT!!! THEY ARENT FULLY MATURED!!!"

If the girls didn’t find the 20+ year old attractive, then they would reject them.

Millions of teen foids around the world sexually worship adult boy band members. They fantasize about men in their thirties like Henry Cavil.

This idea that a 16 year old girl is a literal CHILD is hyperbole and fucking stupid. And teenage foids are literally more sexually active than men from an earlier age.
Ashley Jones said:
This is why see so many insane women these days. They never had an older man taking care of them, looking out for them, while also keeping them in line in a loving way. Women need to be guided. Without guidence, they are easily lost.

This isn't their fault, it is built into them. They are emotional creatures, which can be beautiful. However, it can also be abused. The powers that be know this, and have used women's emotions to sway agendas that end up damaging women.

Notice that the feminist movement in the early 2010's quickly lead to the ushering in of transgenderism, ultimately destroying female communities and spaces.
(source: icum.to ashleys legislation, paragraphs added.)

Whenever elites want to create a new law out of thin air, they first use the mass media to condition people into happily accepting it. Then, when the law is passed, the people have the impression that they voluntarily wanted it, which upholds the illusion of a democracy. There is no democracy.

The age of majority was made up by bureaucrats who themselves are well past the age of having an understanding of teenage love, and by elites who want all teenage women for their own ruling class only, see Epstein's Island. But unlike young adult men who simply want a romantic partner and treat her well, elites apparently do weird satanic rituals, which is something completely different.


Elites excercise their will by threatening public figures with destroying their reputations by defaming them as "paedophiles" on the media outlets they own. This only is possible with all of the United States having submitted to agecuck propaganda.


The agecuck normie is having an internal battle with his biological urges, and the laws imposed on him by a privileged minority who rules over him and who break their own laws.

As an American politician, you can bomb thousands of civilians in a war and rest assured that hardly anyone in your country will care, but if the public thinks you slept with one "minor", your reputation will suffer.
If it wasn't for trifling agecucks، Epstein would have never been able to have this level of blackmailing power over politicians getting them something EVERY STRAIGHT GUY wants.

Kevin Shipp said:
They're running blackmail operations, where they're getting very well known government and private industry elite people in compromising positions at the playboy mansion, on Epstein's plane, on orgy island, and they're photographing them.
And after that, it's like "congressman so-and-so, CEO so-and-so, I wouldn't bring that up if I was you, because we got photographs of you with a fourteen year old girl on Epstein's plane", for example, and you talk about shutting somebody up permanently, that's how they do it.
(source: OUT OF SHADOWS, 47:24)



(A similar storyline happened in Cream by David Firth, one of the best animated short films in history. At the end, Dr. Jack Bellifer was labelled a pedophile on television.)

Agecucks attack humans' mammalian nature.​

Agecucks attack the natural reproductive strategy of both men and women, because men naturally desire young women early in their reproductive life, and women only have few reproductive years.

It is natural for males to mate with younger females (what agecucks refer to as "grooming"), and natural for women to get into romantic relationships early in their reproductive life. A high socially acceptable minimum age for a romantic relationship wastes womens' limited reproductive years that they could spend on discovering the right partner and building a trustful relationship and potentially starting a family.

Even where it is legal for men to be in romantic relationships without intercourse with minors, agecucks commonly treat the age of consent as the moral minimum age limit for romantic relationships as well, and going even anywhere near it strongly discouraged and considered "grooming". (source)

An increase of the age of consent from 14 to 18 wastes roughly a sixth of womens' reproductive life. Another increase to 21 would make that almost a third. This is passive genocide.

(credit to @Dr. Autismo)



Notice how agecucks can not possibly refute this but instead resort to ad-hominem attacks. Example:

Jax said:
[16:17]
He frequently attempted to manipulate the victim by talking about "maturity", and saying that "age doesn't matter, only maturity does", which is a common justification by predators such as this.
(source: Jax)

Notice how he fails to address the argument and resorts to an ad-hominem attack instead.

Obviusly, I recommend no one to do something that puts them at a legal risk, but the purpose of this post is to show how almost everyone has been fooled into denying the obvious.

This is one of several big lies sold to us, others including that circumcision is healthy (refuted), that vaccines are healthy (refuted), and in the past that that asbestos is healthy (it's asworstos), or that cigarettes are harmless (big tobacco's dirty tricks) (W.H.O. anti-tobacco now that everyone knows it is harmful - yet they are pro-circumcision).

We make fun of people from prior times for believing things considered absurd nowadays, yet we fail to look at ourselves and ask "what do we believe in that will be made fun of in future?"

We laugh at people for believing in witchcraft, and people in future will laugh at the social construct "age of majority".

See also:




[I hereby release this post into the public domain, CC0 1.0, excluding quotes.]
 

Similar threads

ogreism
Replies
49
Views
1K
Chacalcel
Chacalcel
Shitskin=Shitlife
Replies
36
Views
997
itstoolate
I
Homegrownman326
Replies
28
Views
769
Thugcel
Thugcel
brutalist
Replies
29
Views
1K
AutismHaver
AutismHaver

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Urlaubsinsel
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top