Debian vs. Ubuntu: Which Linux distro is right for you?
Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.
ZDNET's key takeaways
- Debian and Ubuntu are similar, but they're not the same
- Debian is more stable, and Ubuntu is easier to use.
- I'd only recommend one of them to users new to Linux.
Ubuntu is based on Debian, and hundreds of distributions are based on Ubuntu. They are both known for their stability.
Ubuntu and Debian, however, are not the same.
Which should you choose?
I've been using Ubuntu-based distributions for a very long time. Currently, my distribution of choice is Pop!_OS, but I've also used Zorin OS, elementary OS, Ubuntu, Bodhi Linux, Linux Mint, and a host of others along the way.
Given that Debian is often referred to as the "mother of all distributions," it would seem logical to think that these Ubuntu-based distros are similar enough to be interchangeable.
That is not the case.
Also: 5 of the easiest, quickest Linux distros to install - and I've tried them all
Debian and Ubuntu have enough differences that make each the best option for certain users.
Let's dive into this.
Debian: Who's it for?
Debian serves as the base for the distribution that underlies many others. Like Ubuntu, Debian utilizes the APT package manager, the systemd init service, the AppArmor access control system, and features a handy graphical installer.
Also: Debian 13 arrives with major updates for Linux users - what's new in 'Trixie'
From there, the similarities start to fade.
A slower pace
One of the biggest differences between Debian and Ubuntu is the pace at which they are released. While Ubuntu benefits from an every-six-month release cycle, Debian does not have a fixed schedule for releases. The Debian development team's goal is to release a new iteration every two years.
Part of the reason for this slower pace is that the developers do a lot of software testing to ensure a release is as stable as possible. This is why Debian has a reputation for being one of the most stable operating systems on the market.
The problem with such a release cycle is that you wind up with software that "seems" out of date -- but that's not actually the case. Although a lot of software that goes along with a Debian release isn't the latest-greatest, it's still very much viable (and still supported). In other words, Debian only includes software packages that are still receiving updates.
A bit more secure
By nature, Linux is a very secure operating system, and Debian benefits from that. However, unlike so many distributions that automatically add your user (created during installation) to the sudo group (for admin use), Debian does not.
To run an Admin task in Debian, you must do so via the root user.
Some consider this an unnecessary step; however, it does add a bit more security to the system. Since standard users are not part of the admin group, if a malicious user gains access to the system, they can only cause damage via the root account. As long as you've assigned a very strong/unique password to the root user, the chances of that happening are greatly lessened.
Limited package management
Unlike Ubuntu, Debian does not ship with one of the universal package managers (Snap or Flatpak), which means APT is your tool for installing packages. You can, however, install either (or both) Snap or Flatpak if you like.
There are several reasons for not including a universal package manager, including philosophical differences, concerns about performance and disk space, and the belief in the power of APT.
This does mean that, out of the box, you have fewer apps that can be installed (especially of the proprietary nature). However, as I mentioned, you can always install either one or both.
Is Debian right for you?
This is what the basic GNOME desktop can look like.
As I said, Debian is one of the most stable operating systems available. If you want unmatched stability in your OS, Debian is the way to go.
However, if you're new to Linux, Debian might not be the best choice. Not only do you have to deal with the root user account, but you'll also need to take care of a few additional tasks, some of which may involve the command line.
My take on Debian is that it's for those who like Ubuntu but have grown out of the simplicity and would like a distribution that uses a more traditional approach to package management. Some might say that Debian is best suited for admins, but I consider it a great option for those who've cut their teeth on Ubuntu and are looking for something a bit more "old school."
Ubuntu: Who's it for?
Ubuntu is based on Debian; however, on the surface, you'd think they were two totally different distributions. Interestingly, both distributions utilize the GNOME desktop environment. However, Canonical (the maintainer of Ubuntu) takes GNOME and tweaks it until it barely resembles the original.
Also: The easiest way to try out Ubuntu Linux
Ubuntu adds a side panel into the mix, so it resembles the Unity desktop that the distribution once used. For many, that side panel might raise an eyebrow, but it's still as user-friendly as any bottom panel on the market.
Release schedule
Unlike Debian, Ubuntu has a much more robust release schedule. Like clockwork, you can count on a new release of Ubuntu every six months. April (.04) and October (.10), and the developers rarely miss a release date.
Then there are the Long Term Support (LTS) and Short Term Support (STS) releases. LTS releases enjoy a very long support window (up to 15 years), whereas STS releases get roughly nine months of support. I would always recommend the LTS releases, unless you want to always have the newest of the new.
Also: While Windows 10 users panic, Ubuntu makes extending support easy - here's how
When you compare that to the five years a Debian LTS release gets, Ubuntu all of a sudden looks like the better option. But then again, are you really going to keep that same operating system on your computer for 15 years?
I doubt it.
The point is -- you can.
Packages, package, packages
Out of the box, Ubuntu uses the APT package manager, but also includes the Snap universal package manager. That means you have more resources from which to install software. Some members of the Linux community do not enjoy this, as they would rather use the traditional package manager, APT.
These are the most common complaints about Snap packages:
- Slow to install.
- Slow to start.
- Take too much RAM.
- Use too much disk space.
- Auto-update themselves without asking.
On the other hand, Snap packages make it easier to install some proprietary apps on Linux, and they are isolated from one another, adding an extra layer of security.
Hardware
Finally, Ubuntu offers some of the best hardware recognition available. This is primarily due to the inclusion of the HWE (Hardware Enablement) kernel, which provides support for significantly more modern hardware.
Debian uses a more traditional kernel, and due to its release cycle, the shipped kernel may seem somewhat outdated.
I've yet to install a modern Ubuntu release on a desktop or laptop that failed to recognize hardware.
Is Ubuntu right for you?
Which is more important to you: Ease of use or stability?
If stability is your priority, opt for Debian. If ease of use is your primary concern, consider Ubuntu.
That's not to say that Ubuntu isn't stable or that Debian isn't easy to use; however, when you compare the two, those issues do stand out. Yes, Ubuntu is stable, but not quite as stable as Debian. Yes, Debian is easy to use, but not quite as easy as Ubuntu.
Both Debian and Ubuntu are excellent operating systems, but I would recommend only one of them to those new to Linux -- Ubuntu.
Open Source
The 6 Linux distros I expect to rule 2026 - as someone who's tested hundreds of them
Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.
ZDNET key takeaways
- Linux is set for a big year in 2026.
- There will be a few distributions that will surprise people.
- These six distros will be on everyone's list by year's end.
It seems I went to bed, and it was just turning 2025. Then, I wake up, and it's 2026. Where did time go?
I can tell you one thing: time went to helping Linux rise in popularity. Okay, the death of Windows 10 also had something to do with that, but everyone in the business of covering Linux knew this would one day happen: the masses would finally realize that there is an alternative OS that's more reliable, safer, and easier to use.
Also: Linux will be unstoppable in 2026 - but one open-source legend may not survive
We may not be declaring 2026 the year of Linux just yet, but several Linux distros are likely to have a very good year. These are my picks for that list.
1. AerynOS
Once you get past the installer (which will be a bit of a challenge for those new to Linux), you'll find AerynOS to be an outstanding, rock-solid operating system that is fully atomic and offers a beautiful KDE Plasma desktop. It is those two last bits that will elevate AerynOS's status among the Linux distributions.
Also: 5 of my favorite Linux distros ready to use out of the box - no setup required
You see, atomic and immutable (those are not the same things, by the way) are the future of operating systems because they provide an experience that will always work. Atomic distributions basically ensure that no upgrade will result in system failure, a broken desktop, or unusable applications. That is important because people depend heavily on a dependable operating system.
AerynOS does atomicity but not immutability. That's important because immutability requires a read-only core file system, and that can confuse users when they attempt to configure something outside of their home directory.
AerynOS does all of this beautifully and even has a very vanilla take on KDE Plasma, which I think is the right way to go. KDE Plasma is beautiful out of the box, and it's incredibly user-friendly.
Also: 5 reasons why Linux will overtake Windows and MacOS on the desktop - eventually
As well, AerynOS automatically manages boot entries, kernel synchronization, and rollbacks. This eliminates the need for the manual writing of configuration files. Even if the EFI system partition is wiped, it can be automatically rebuilt.
All of this comes together to make something pretty special.
2. AnduinOS
AnduinOS is a Linux distribution that, on the surface, appears very much like Windows 10. AnduinOS is based on Ubuntu, which gives it a head start on user-friendliness. Couple that with a UI that is immediately familiar to the average user, and you can see why AnduinOS could become a darling for the coming year.
Also: Zorin OS vs. AnduinOS: How to pick the right Windows-like Linux distro for you
As for the UI, it's based on GNOME, so it's fast. And with the help of GNOME Extensions, you can extend the features of the desktop. Who doesn't want that? Speaking of which, the developers have included such extensions as ArcMenu, Blur My Shell, Dash to Panel, Light/Dark Theme Switcher, OpenWeather Refined, Removable Drive menu, and more. With the help of a handy extension manager, you can enable/disable and configure those extensions to meet your needs.
AnduinOS also does not collect any information from users, which will be a breath of fresh air in a world where user information is gold to so many organizations and companies.
I think the big reason why AnduinOS will become a darling in 2026 is that more and more users will finally walk away from Windows and will want an operating system that doesn't challenge them to learn a new interface. AnduinOS does that better than most.
3. Besgnulinux
Besgnulinux will make waves in 2026.
What in the world is that name? Every time I say it, I think, "Best GNU Linux."
Besgnulinux is the brainchild of a single developer who seems to be on a mission to keep old computers out of landfills, and I find that to be a very noble pursuit. The developer has taken Debian stable and created a user-friendly desktop with the help of the JWM window manager. What this does is create a very fast operating system that's also highly stable and works brilliantly on older hardware.
I tested Besgnulinux as a virtual machine with only 2GB of RAM and a single CPU core. Guess what? The OS ran like it was on a powerful, modern desktop computer.
This distribution will appeal to anyone with an aging Windows 10 computer who doesn't care about having the most modern, eye-candy-laden UI and wants an OS they can trust will run reliably and well.
Also: I rediscovered my longtime Linux favorite - thanks to a spin I didn't see coming
Besgnulinux uses the Calamares system installer, defaults to the Brave web browser, and includes over 40 custom-built tools to control the system's settings as well as the look and feel of the desktop.
4. BigLinux
BigLinux is simply gorgeous.
Simply put, BigLinux makes Linux easy for anyone.
If you've never used Linux, this distribution might be the perfect landing spot for you. BigLinux is beautiful and offers a ton of helpful features.
Here's the kicker: BigLinux is based on Manjaro Linux and uses the KDE Plasma for its desktop.
Also: OpenSUSE vs. Manjaro: Which powerhouse Linux distro is best for you?
Okay, Manjaro is based on Arch Linux, which I wouldn't recommend to a new user. Manjaro Linux is a different story because it makes good on the promise of transforming Arch Linux into something that is user-friendly.
BigLinux takes this one step further by including things like web applications for services/platforms like Amazon Music, Deezer Music, Discord, Facebook, Instagram, Jitsi Meet, Messenger, Netflix, Outlook, all of the Google apps, and more. In fact, BigLinux includes dozens of applications that take up very little space on your drive and help make the distribution as user-friendly as possible.
As well, you get to choose which web browser you want during the OS install. You can pick from Brave, Firefox, Google Chrome, Chromium, Vivaldi, LibreWolf, Opera, or Falkon. Another very handy addition is the Big Driver Manager, which vastly simplifies the installation of drivers.
Also: How much RAM does your Linux PC actually need in 2025? An expert weighs in
I believe there are big things to come for BigLinux.
5. Pop!_OS
This is what the default COSMIC desktop looks like.
It almost seems unfair to include Pop!_OS on this list because it's been around for so long. The thing is, System76 took a big chance on creating its own desktop environment, COSMIC.
I've been using COSMIC desktop since the early alpha stages, and even then, it seriously impressed me. I would go so far as to say that COSMIC is going to become the most popular Linux DE by the end of 2026. That alone helps to make Pop!_OS a shoo-in for Linux darling of the year.
Also: Ubuntu Budgie vs. Pop!_OS: I've used both Linux distros - here's how to choose
COSMIC is blazingly fast and highly configurable. That doesn't mean you have to bother with desktop configurations, because the out-of-the-box experience is amazing.
Given how stable and fast COSMIC 1.0 is, I can only imagine what version 2.0 will be like. I would guess that, by the time the next iteration arrives, COSMIC will have elevated Pop!_OS beyond anything it could have otherwise become with GNOME.
6. ZorinOS
The Zorin OS desktop resembles Windows with a bit more panache.
Zorin OS has already proven itself to be a favorite contender for OS of the year. This came about when support for Windows 10 ended and Zorin OS had been downloaded over a million times in two months (with 78% of those downloads coming from Windows machines).
Also: Linux Mint vs. Zorin OS: I've tested both Windows alternatives, and here's my choice
There's a good reason for this: Zorin OS is exactly what a desktop operating system should be. Zorin OS serves the user, not the other way around.
Zorin OS is based on Ubuntu and gives the user a choice of desktop layouts. If you want a Windows-like layout, Zorin OS has your back. MacOS? Sure, no problem. When a user discovers Zorin OS, they finally understand that an operating system doesn't have to be complicated or overbearing.
Zorin OS strikes a perfect balance of user-friendliness, power, flexibility, and reliability. If there were a single OS I would recommend to those migrating from Windows 10, it would be Zorin OS.
