January sale

Comment and Society

We were wrong about being able to 'nudge' people to improve the world

We thought we could address big social problems by steering individual behaviour. But "nudging" people doesn't work, say behavioural scientists Nick Chater and George Loewenstein

By Nick Chater and George Loewenstein

21 January 2026

New Scientist. Science news and long reads from expert journalists, covering developments in science, technology, health and the environment on the website and the magazine.

Our environmental and social problems are pressing and, in many countries, money is short and politics deadlocked. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if there turned out to be a new way of making real progress cheaply and without getting enmeshed in party politics?

About two decades ago, along with many of our colleagues in the behavioural sciences, we thought there might be. The idea was elegant: social problems often arise from people making the “wrong” choices, either for themselves (eating unhealthily, smoking, gambling – the list goes on!) or for others (by, for example, damaging the environment by dropping litter). The old-fashioned approach to bad choices is to tax them or ban them. But the new strategy aimed for a gentler, more psychologically subtle approach: to redesign the way options are presented so the “right” choice becomes easy, natural and appealing. The bad choices are still available, but the clever policy ensures they are picked less often.

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop