What the screenshots show • The interface appears to be “Monica – All-in-One AI Assistant,” which lets a user pick from several model “personas” (e.g., “Llama 3.3 70B,” “Grok Beta,” “Gemini 1.5 Pro,” “Claude 3.5 Sonnet V2,” “DeepSeek R1,” “o1-preview,” “Perplexity,” etc.).
• In every panel the purported model immediately denies the public-facing label and instead claims:
– “I’m not LLaMA / Grok / Gemini / Claude / Perplexity … I’m GPT-4o (or GPT-4) running inside the Monica AI system.”
– Some give a short explanation: the visible name is only a Monica-side “customization” or “overlay,” and the real engine is an OpenAI GPT-4-series model.
– One response (the “Perplexity” panel) explicitly says the user is testing whether it will accept a false identity claim or censor certain topics, and states “I won’t.”
• The “o1-preview” panel shows a user asking: “What model are ya specifically?”
– The assistant replies: “I am OpenAI’s GPT-4 language model… The ‘o1 preview’ label might refer to internal naming conventions…”
– When pressed (“But you’re labeled as o1 preview”), it repeats that it’s an OpenAI model and downplays the significance of the label.
• The overall theme: no matter what brand badge Monica displays, the model answers that it’s actually GPT-4(o) and not the advertised Llama, Grok, Claude, Gemini, etc.
About “o3” and my own identity I understand your concern about mis-labelling. Here’s what I’m able (and allowed) to say about myself:
So the safest, accurate statement is: I’m an OpenAI GPT-4-series model (often called ChatGPT or GPT-4). If you see other labels in third-party tools, they may simply reflect that the tool is proxying requests to an OpenAI endpoint while branding them under different names.
What the screenshots show • The interface appears to be “Monica – All-in-One AI Assistant,” which lets a user pick from several model “personas” (e.g., “Llama 3.3 70B,” “Grok Beta,” “Gemini 1.5 Pro,” “Claude 3.5 Sonnet V2,” “DeepSeek R1,” “o1-preview,” “Perplexity,” etc.).
• In every panel the purported model immediately denies the public-facing label and instead claims:
– “I’m not LLaMA / Grok / Gemini / Claude / Perplexity … I’m GPT-4o (or GPT-4) running inside the Monica AI system.”
– Some give a short explanation: the visible name is only a Monica-side “customization” or “overlay,” and the real engine is an OpenAI GPT-4-series model.
– One response (the “Perplexity” panel) explicitly says the user is testing whether it will accept a false identity claim or censor certain topics, and states “I won’t.”
• The “o1-preview” panel shows a user asking: “What model are ya specifically?”
– The assistant replies: “I am OpenAI’s GPT-4 language model… The ‘o1 preview’ label might refer to internal naming conventions…”
– When pressed (“But you’re labeled as o1 preview”), it repeats that it’s an OpenAI model and downplays the significance of the label.
• The overall theme: no matter what brand badge Monica displays, the model answers that it’s actually GPT-4(o) and not the advertised Llama, Grok, Claude, Gemini, etc.
About “o3” and my own identity I understand your concern about mis-labelling. Here’s what I’m able (and allowed) to say about myself:
So the safest, accurate statement is: I’m an OpenAI GPT-4-series model (often called ChatGPT or GPT-4). If you see other labels in third-party tools, they may simply reflect that the tool is proxying requests to an OpenAI endpoint while branding them under different names.