Advertisement
Advertisement
The Telegraph
Opinion

Trump controls the world, and Britain ought to let him have it

Tim Stanley
6 min read
Add Yahoo on Google
The US President has made his ambitions known. Now our own country can focus on problems that are relevant to us
The US President has made his ambitions known. Now our own country can focus on problems that are relevant to us - Manuel Balce Ceneta

Donald Trump’s crazy Venezuela adventure seems to have persuaded Europe that “everything has changed.” Keir Starmer has gone quietly mad. The PM is negotiating to dispatch troops to Ukraine and Greenland, stretching the army so far that by the time we inevitably go into Iran, we’ll be down to deploying the catering corps. Happily, they do serve Halal.

In fact nothing has changed at all. Trump is very familiar. The radical thing was to run for the White House pledging no foreign entanglements, but America First always conflicted with Make America Great Again, because the latter depends on being top dog abroad. So, when the new administration bombed Iran last summer, JD Vance explained that there will be wars after all but not stupid ones, like under past presidents, because Trump isn’t “dumb”.

We are now explicitly an empire,” isolationist Tucker Carlson told his Maga audience following the arrest of Nicolas Maduro but this was old news. The republic got into the empire game explicitly in the 1890s, when it invaded the Philippines, then rebranded itself as implicitly imperial after taking Cuba, having realised it would be cheaper to let the locals run it on the understanding (written into the very constitution) that the USA could return if its interests were threatened.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The cheeky monicker “Don-roe” doctrine is a corruption of the Monroe doctrine, which gave America a freehand within its sphere of influence, and brighter sparks have noticed a parallel between the arrest of Maduro and Manuel Noriega of Panama in 1989. But what about US-backed coups in Chile or Guatemala, its occupation of Haiti, or even meddling in the far-flung Iran, where America installed a shah, triggering the 1979 revolution that still haunts us today?

Oh, and Harry Truman tried to purchase Greenland in 1946. The compromise was a military agreement that still holds, suggesting Trump isn’t interested so much in patrolling the waters as mining for minerals. I note that Carlson recently attended a meeting at the White House with oil executives who are no doubt looking forward to carving up Venezuela. The line between politics and business remains thin and, in some cases, white.

Liberals have expressed surprise that Trump arrested one alleged drug dealer having recently pardoned another, the ex-president of Honduras, linked to the distribution of 400 tonnes of cocaine in the USA. This moral ambiguity also has precedent. In the 1980s, the CIA was accused of association with the very cartels it was supposed to be fighting, the drug industry’s reach being wide in the golden age of blow. In vice-ridden Miami, Marco Rubio’s brother-in-law worked for an outfit that hid its narcotics trade behind the front of an exotic animal business. Little Marco, then only 16, did odd jobs for his brother-in-law. One was to build animal cages.

To be clear, Rubio knew nothing about the scam. As for the rest of the Trump administration, once the Democrats retake the House in November, there’s several things they’ll likely investigate beginning with the allegation of insider trading. It’s been noticed that hours before Maduro’s arrest, an anonymous gambler laid a $32,000 bet that Maduro would soon lose office. This remarkably perspicacious person made a profit of over $400,000.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What do American voters make of all this? A recent poll found that only a third support the arrest and nearly three quarters worry it’ll lead to long-term involvement. The Republican base accuses Trump of neglecting the economy for foreign policy; it’s possible he has no choice, the GOP control of congress being so slim that it has little to do beyond deporting foreigners (Obama did that, too, in vast numbers). But what we cannot accuse the President of is being opaque: weeks prior to the assault, he blew up Venezuelan boats, sent in warships, and privately invited Maduro to flee to Turkey. He also talked about Greenland in his first term so Europe can’t claim to be surprised about that, either.

It’s all fake. Europe uses the narrative of “America has suddenly become unreliable” as an excuse for decades of atrophy, of failing to build an independent defence or the economy that could sustain one. Note their inconsistency. When Trump ran as anti-war, they called him irresponsible. Now he’s done some mild, war-like things, they call it reckless. What they really want is for him to go on bankrolling their security, while he’s forced to attend a calendar of summits at which Belgians in bad suits talk about a rules based order that died before Trump.

Never forget that it was under Joe Biden that Russia invaded Ukraine. Or that Obama and the Europeans cooked up a nuclear deal with Iran that would’ve kept the militants in power for decades. Trump is challenging a status quo that is violent and not working.

Europe’s hypocrisy is matched only by its impotence, and if Britain had any sense it would accept the Pax Trumpus and politely ask to join it. Instead, MPs will put on a righteous act and demand that we send the few soldiers we haven’t put on trial yet to assert our values and influence over somewhere far, far away.

Advertisement
Advertisement

This is the bane of my existence as a sketch writer. I have to attend mindless debates where the Commons demands we get involved in countries the average MP cannot find on a map, and increase funding for women’s empowerment in Upper Wandugu. Endless wars, along with open borders and excessive foreign aid, reflect a broken democracy in which the state operates in the interests of anyone but its own people.

So, I suggest a new year’s resolution: pick up where candidate Trump left off and embrace a peaceful, self-interested course. Our country is getting poorer; we couldn’t conscript our young because half of them are strung out on Diazepam. Acknowledging that the UK is no longer a top tier power is the first step towards fixing such problems, because it means we can redirect resources and adopt the attitude of a nation starting from scratch. We cannot defend Ukraine. We might, if we try very hard, be able to, say, construct a decent system of care for the elderly.

Let us imitate Thomas Jefferson, abandon empire and build a republic with a king that preaches freedom and honest labour, sublimely uninterested in foreign affairs. Let’s be a nation at peace with itself and with the world.

Try full access to The Telegraph free today. Unlock their award-winning website and essential news app, plus useful tools and expert guides for your money, health and holidays.

Up next
The Guardian

Keir Starmer says Trump’s threat to impose tariffs over Greenland ‘completely wrong’

Geraldine McKelvie and Jakub Krupa
4 min read
Add Yahoo on Google
<span>Donald Trump and Keir Starmer at Chequers last year. The prime minister said on Saturday the UK would raise Trump’s tariffs threat with the US administration.</span><span>Photograph: Leon Neal/Reuters</span>
Donald Trump and Keir Starmer at Chequers last year. The prime minister said on Saturday the UK would raise Trump’s tariffs threat with the US administration.Photograph: Leon Neal/Reuters
(Photograph: Leon Neal/Reuters)

Keir Starmer has said Donald Trump’s decision to impose 10% tariffs on the UK and seven other European countries over Greenland was “completely wrong”.

The US president said on Saturday that the levies would apply from 1 February to Nato members – including the UK, France and Germany – who have deployed troops to the territory in response to growing uncertainty over its future.

Trump said the tariffs would rise to 25% on 1 June if a deal to buy Greenland had not been reached.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Related: Trump to impose 25% tariff on European allies until Denmark sells Greenland to US

In a Truth Social post, Trump said: “Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, The United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Finland have journeyed to Greenland, for purposes unknown … This is a very dangerous situation for the Safety, Security, and Survival of our Planet.”

The prime minister said on Saturday evening: “Our position on Greenland is very clear – it is part of the Kingdom of Denmark and its future is a matter for the Greenlanders and the Danes.

“We have also made clear that Arctic security matters for the whole of Nato and allies should all do more together to address the threat from Russia across different parts of the Arctic.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Applying tariffs on allies for pursuing the collective security of Nato allies is completely wrong. We will of course be pursuing this directly with the US administration.”

Opposition politicians also condemned Trump’s threats.

The Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, said: “President Trump is completely wrong to announce tariffs on the UK over Greenland.

“These tariffs will be yet another burden for businesses across our country. The sovereignty of Greenland should only be decided by the people of Greenland.”

Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democrats, said: “Starmer’s US policy lies in tatters. Trump is now punishing the UK and Nato allies just for doing the right thing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Time for the PM to stand firm against the bully in the White House, and work with European and Commonwealth allies to make him back down from this reckless plan.”

The Reform leader, Nigel Farage, said Trump’s Greenland tariffs would “hurt” the UK. He said: “We don’t always agree with the US government and in this case we certainly don’t.”

Stella Creasy, the Labour MP for Walthamstow, said: “Trump’s tariffs and threats mean it’s make your mind up time. If we can’t rely on America and we don’t want to cosy up to China, the answer is to get serious about our strategic future with Europe.

“Nato needs this too – the reset must be real, and it must happen quickly for all our sakes.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Related: Greenland crisis: Europe needs the US, but it also needs to stand up to Trump

Lord Peter Ricketts, a former national security adviser and retired senior diplomat, told BBC Radio 4’s PM programme that “the right thing for the European countries is to react very calmly” and “go on making the case that America can have all its security interests served by working with Denmark and with Nato”.

“Remember that in the cold war, America had 10,000 troops in Greenland, so it’s entirely open to the Americans to increase their military presence without going unilateral and these kind of threatening approaches,” he said.

He added that European leaders could in private make clear that “this tariff business isn’t going to work – for one thing, the European Union has a single tariff, so he will find he can’t put tariffs on individual EU countries; it’s the EU as a whole”.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Rather than threatening tariffs, we need to be working together to work out the very legitimate issues about Greenland security – not that China is about to take it over, but that all of us in Nato have Arctic security as a priority,” he said.

“The way to do this is to work together and in the past, I think Keir Starmer and others have been quite effective at working with President Trump privately, not taking him on in public, and I think we need to go back into that routine to get him to see that there are other ways of achieving what he wants without this sort of threatening, blustering language about tariffs.”

Up next
The Telegraph

Starmer: Trump’s trade war on Britain ‘completely wrong’

Connor Stringer
7 min read
Add Yahoo on Google
Donald Trump
Donald Trump accused Europe of creating a ‘very dangerous situation for the safety, security, and survival of our planet’ - AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

Sir Keir Starmer condemned Donald Trump as “completely wrong” for igniting a trade war with Britain in an attempt to force a deal on Greenland.

In the biggest crisis in US-UK relations since Sir Keir became Prime Minister, the US president announced a 10 per cent tariff on all goods sent to the US by Britain and its European allies from Feb 1.

The levy will rise to 25 per cent on June 1, unless Britain and other European countries agree to let him take control of the Danish territory.

Advertisement
Advertisement

On Saturday night, the Prime Minister said he would be “pursuing this directly with the US administration”.

Sir Keir’s measured language came in stark contrast with Emmanuel Macron, the French president, who said of the tariffs: “No intimidation nor threat will influence us.”

Ambassadors of the EU’s 27 member states are set to convene for an emergency meeting over the levies on Sunday afternoon, a spokesman for Cyprus, which holds the Council of the EU’s rotating presidency, told NBC News.

b'

'

Mr Trump’s move will force Sir Keir and other leaders to either suffer the economic consequences of an international trade war or agree to cede land belonging to a Nato ally, threatening the future of the security alliance.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Economists warned that the new tariffs could push Britain into recession if they were kept in place long-term.

Mr Trump said: “This tariff will be due and payable until such time as a deal is reached for the complete and total purchase of Greenland.”

The US president has been ramping up his threats to seize the Arctic island either through force or a deal, saying Europe has insufficiently defended the strategic territory that he claims is coveted by China and Russia.

Along with the UK, the tariffs also apply to Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Finland, all countries which this week agreed to carry out a joint reconnaissance mission on the Danish territory in a show of strength against the US.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Britain deployed just one military officer in the operation known as Arctic Endurance, which appeared to anger Mr Trump for failing to take Greenland’s security seriously.

Danish Maj Gen Soren Andersen talks with British Defence Attach&#xe9; to Denmark Col Matt Smith and other soldiers as they participate in a military exercise in Nuuk
Danish Maj Gen Soren Andersen talks with Col Matt Smith, the British defence attaché to Denmark, and other soldiers as they participate in a military exercise in Nuuk - Forsvaret / Danish Defence

A source close to Mr Trump told The Telegraph that Sir Keir should help the president strike a deal to acquire Greenland.

“Britain has to step up, Trump will wonder why it is not stepping up to get a deal done,” they said.

They added that the tariffs were “brilliant” because they would pile pressure on Denmark to come to the negotiation table while squeezing European support.

The move was met with anger in Westminster, uniting party leaders against the punitive measures.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sir Keir said: “Our position on Greenland is very clear – it is part of the Kingdom of Denmark and its future is a matter for the Greenlanders and the Danes.

“We have also made clear that Arctic security matters for the whole of Nato and allies should all do more together to address the threat from Russia across different parts of the Arctic.

“Applying tariffs on allies for pursuing the collective security of Nato allies is completely wrong. We will of course be pursuing this directly with the US administration.”

Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said that the tariffs were a “terrible idea”.

Advertisement
Advertisement

She posted on X:

Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, said: “We don’t always agree with the US government and in this case we certainly don’t. These tariffs will hurt us.”

Sir Ed Davey, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, added: “Starmer’s US policy lies in tatters. Trump is now punishing the UK and Nato allies just for doing the right thing.

“Time for the PM to stand firm against the bully in the White House, and work with European and Commonwealth allies to make him back down from this reckless plan.”

Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, said the tariffs would “undermine transatlantic relations and risk a downward spiral”, while Lars Lokke Rasmussen, Denmark’s foreign minister, said the threats came “as a surprise”.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Manfred Weber, the leader of the conservative European People’s Party in the European Parliament, suggested that the EU should halt the approval process of its trade deal with the US as a consequence of Mr Trump’s tariffs.

The president of Germany’s auto lobby VDA said the costs would be “enormous” for European industry.

For Britain, the 10 per cent tariffs will be worth more than £6bn a year, while levies at 25 per cent would be worth just over £15bn.

These figures are based on the UK’s total goods exports to the US, which were £61.5bn in the 12 months to November.

Huge pressure on British business

In theory, these fees would be paid by US importers and consumers, but British businesses would be under huge pressure to absorb much of the cost to stop US demand for their goods from plummeting.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The US is Britain’s second-largest trading partner after the European Union.

Exports of goods and services make up a third of UK GDP.

Britain’s manufacturing and pharmaceuticals sectors will be hardest hit by the new levies. The UK’s biggest goods exports to the US are machinery and transport equipment (£27.8bn per year), chemicals (£14.3bn), cars (£16.7bn) and pharmaceuticals (£10.8bn).

Britain is already understood to be considering sending soldiers, warships and planes alongside Nato allies to protect Greenland from Russia and China.

Government sources told The Telegraph last week that the UK was working with partners in the region to “bolster Arctic deterrence and defence” for the island.

Advertisement
Advertisement

At a Nato meeting in Brussels earlier this month, European nations considered full-blown troop deployment to secure the Arctic.

Other ideas floated by the countries in attendance included time-limited exercises, intelligence sharing, capability development and rerouted defence spending.

Those involved had hoped that significantly increasing their presence would dissuade Mr Trump from his ambitions to annex the strategic territory.

Thousands of people took to the streets of Copenhagen in Denmark and Nuuk in Greenland on Saturday to voice their opposition to the president’s ambitions.

Thousands of protesters took to the streets in Nuuk, Greenland
Thousands of protesters took to the streets in Nuuk, Greenland, on Saturday over Mr Trump’s threats to the island - Sean Gallup/Getty

Mr Trump said on Saturday: “We have subsidised Denmark, and all of the countries of the European Union, and others, for many years by not charging them tariffs, or any other forms of remuneration.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Now, after centuries, it is time for Denmark to give back – world peace is at stake! China and Russia want Greenland, and there is not a thing that Denmark can do about it.”

He signed off his Truth Social post: “The United States of America is immediately open to negotiation with Denmark and/or any of these Countries that have put so much at risk, despite all that we have done for them, including maximum protection, over so many decades. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

Ulf Kristersson, Sweden’s prime minister, said “intense discussions” were under way with European countries to establish a co-ordinated response to Donald Trump’s tariff threat.

“We will not let ourselves be blackmailed,” he wrote in a post on social media. “Only Denmark and Greenland decide on issues concerning Denmark and Greenland. I will always stand up for my country, and for our allied neighbours.”

Mr Kristersson added that this was an “EU issue” that affected many more countries than those being singled out by the US president.

Additional reporting by Antonia Langford and Sabrina Miller

Advertisement