Skip to main content
Advertisement
Advertisement

Singapore

From courtroom to Changi Prison: What happens after an offender is sentenced

Singapore prison officers share about the process of taking a sentenced person from the courtroom to the Changi Prison Complex, and the challenges they face in their line of duty.

From courtroom to Changi Prison: What happens after an offender is sentenced

An inmate scanning the QR code on his wrist tag before making a phone call during a simulation of the inmate admission process at the State Courts Lock-Up facility on Jan 15, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Alyssa Tan)

Listen
5 min
New: You can now listen to articles.

This audio is generated by an AI tool.

Read a summary of this article on FAST.
FAST

SINGAPORE: Working in Singapore’s prison system can sometimes take an emotional toll, having to handle prisoners with a mix of firm action and empathy in the line of duty.

However, it is all in a day’s work for Deputy Superintendent of Prisons (DSP) Teo Seng Boon.

“I try to be professional, so whatever things that happen within prisons, I will leave it in prison. When I go home, I will not think about work,” said the staff officer who handles inmates’ admissions, external movements and releases at Changi Prison Complex.

“This is what I've been telling myself for the last 20 years,” said the 47-year-old veteran.

His colleague, Assistant Superintendent of Prisons (ASP) Muhamad Asfadly Aspar, also shared that such professional resilience is developed over time. It comes with experience and is also down to the personal nature of each officer, he said.

“My years of experience in prison actually helped me to be ready here,” said the 46-year-old team leader at the State Courts lock-up.

ASP Asfadly had prior postings handling the custody and rehabilitation of inmates in prison, as well as serving as a reception operations officer who handled the in-processing of inmates.

DSP Teo and ASP Asfadly are among the officers who play a role in the Singapore prison admission process.

Media outlets were given a behind-the-scenes look at the process on Thursday (Jan 15) by the Singapore Prison Service.

That process begins at the State Courts right after a person has been convicted, and ends with them heading into their cell in Changi Prison Complex.

SHOWING EMPATHY

The most challenging episodes involve first-time inmates, who often enter the system confused, fearful and emotionally overwhelmed.

“We can sense that they may be a bit shocked to come into the prison system, and they may be emotionally unstable, then they will start – start to cry, start to be angry, start to be uncooperative,” said DSP Teo.

Deputy Superintendent of Prisons (DSP) Teo Seng Boon verifying details during a simulation of the inmate admission process at Changi Prison Complex, on Jan 15, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Alyssa Tan)

In such cases, the officer will “try to counsel them and persuade them to follow the rules and regulations”, he said.

Those who have not been in the prison system before may tend to show signs of stress, said ASP Asfadly, as they are unsure about their time in prison.

He recalled an incident where a mother was in distress at the State Courts lock-up, anxious about her children’s welfare after learning that she was going to be jailed.

“The subject really didn’t know what to do. She had issues where at home, the kids are not being taken care of, and so she was actually a bit emotional,” he said.

“She actually asked whether she could be released. Unfortunately not, because the warrant had been given for her to go to prison.”

Prison officers are equipped with the skills to respond with clear communication and restorative practices.

Assistant Superintendent of Prisons Muhamad Asfadly Aspar briefing the media on the inmate admission process during a simulation at the State Courts Lock-Up, on Jan 15, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Alyssa Tan)

It helps the officers show “empathy towards them, to show care and concern, so that they can be ready to go into prison”, said ASP Asfadly.

In the case of the distressed mother, that meant assuring her there was a telephone she could use to contact her relatives or next-of-kin to ensure her children were taken care of, he said.

However, there are also situations where officers have to physically restrain an inmate who is violent or trying to harm himself.

“That's where we have no choice but to intervene to prevent further injury to himself or to the staff,” said DSP Teo, who considers those episodes among the toughest parts of the job.

An inmate getting escorted from the State Courts courtroom to a holding room during a simulation of the inmate admission process held at the State Courts on Jan 15, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Alyssa Tan)

JOURNEY TO CHANGI PRISON

The journey of an inmate typically begins at the State Courts, where they are convicted and sentenced in the courtroom.

They are then taken to a holding room where their identities are verified, before their hands and legs are shackled as they are taken away. Elderly inmates get softer restraints.

They are moved via secured passageways through the building in Havelock Square, where there are no members of the public.

An officer taking down the personal data of an inmate during the simulation of the inmate admission process at the State Courts Lock-Up facility on Jan 15, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Alyssa Tan)

The next stop is the basement, where they surrender their possessions and are allowed typically one phone call. 

Those who need to settle their fines or bail matters are allowed two calls.

They also change into their inmate attire: a white T-shirt, clear slippers and shorts – dark blue for jail, and brown for those in remand.

An inmate sitting in the Black Maria, the vehicle used to transport the inmate from the State Courts to the Changi Prison Complex, during a simulation of the inmate admission process on Jan 15, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Alyssa Tan)

The prison bus – known as the Black Maria – then transports them at the end of the day to Changi Prison Complex.

Upon arrival, inmates will undergo screening by sniffer dogs and body scans to detect any contraband items.

An inmate being inspected by a sniffer dog during a simulation of the inmate admission process at the Changi Prison Complex on Jan 15, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Alyssa Tan)
An inmate going through a body scanner during a simulation of the prison admission process at the Changi Prison Complex to ensure that no illegal contraband is being smuggled into the premises, on Jan 15, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Alyssa Tan)see more

Inmates have tried smuggling in items, such as lighters and small bottles, through body cavities such as their anus.

They are then medically assessed by a doctor before finally being taken to their cell.

An inmate having his height and weight taken by a nurse during a simulation of the inmate admission process at the Changi Prison Complex on Jan 15, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Alyssa Tan)

SECOND CHANCES

Despite the challenges, the job is a meaningful one.

DSP Teo recalled an unexpected public encounter with a former inmate that reaffirmed his belief in rehabilitation.

“There was one occasion where I saw an inmate who was having dinner with his family, and he happened to recognise me, and he called out to me, and he actually thanked me for the help that I'd given to him while he was incarcerated,” he said.

Deputy Superintendent of Prisons Teo Seng Boon briefing the media about the inmate admission process at Changi Prison Complex, on Jan 15, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Alyssa Tan)

He added that although it was just a small gesture, “it made me very satisfied that I've helped someone to get back into his life”. 

DSP Teo said that he always tries to look for the positive within inmates, as there must be a reason why they are acting this way.

“I hope that society will also look at them through this lens by giving them a second chance,” he said.

Source: CNA/fk(mi)

Sign up for our newsletters

Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox

Subscribe here
Inbox
FAST
Advertisement

Singapore

First MOM-owned migrant worker dormitory opens in Jurong; new grant for operators to upgrade facilities

NESST Tukang is one of the first migrant worker dormitories to be developed based on higher standards set during the COVID-19 pandemic.

First MOM-owned migrant worker dormitory opens in Jurong; new grant for operators to upgrade facilities

NESST Tukang Dormitory at Tukang Innovation Lane in Jurong on Jan 17, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Ili Mansor)

Listen
8 min
New: You can now listen to articles.

This audio is generated by an AI tool.

Read a summary of this article on FAST.
FAST

SINGAPORE: The first migrant worker dormitory to be built and owned by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) opened in Jurong on Saturday (Jan 17).

NESST Tukang dormitory houses up to 2,400 workers in 210 rooms, and was built in line with the higher standards set by MOM during the pandemic in 2021.

Almost all the beds have been taken as of January and it is expected to reach full occupancy by May, MOM said in a press release.

MOM also announced a new grant under its Dormitory Transition Scheme to help existing dormitories upgrade facilities to meet the required standards.

Singapore raised dormitory standards in September 2021, as the rapid spread of COVID-19 across dormitories attracted scrutiny. Tens of thousands of migrant workers contracted infections amid reports of cramped conditions and unhygienic catering.

All new dormitories are already required to meet the higher standards. Existing dormitories must meet interim standards by 2030, and follow the higher standards by 2040.

NESST Tukang is one of the first dormitories to be developed based on these higher dormitory standards, according to MOM.

The facility is run by NESST Singapore, a corporate entity set up by MOM to manage its purpose-built migrant worker dormitories.

Speaking at the launch, Manpower Minister Tan See Leng said this reflected a "collective responsibility" to ensure Singapore's migrant workforce is housed well.

"For many, many years, our approach towards housing migrant workers was focused on meeting basic accommodation needs. However, the pandemic reminded us of the importance of strengthening our dormitory ecosystem," he said.

"It also underscored our belief that when workers are well-housed and well-cared for, they are better able to give their best at work, and our society benefits as a whole."

The minister also gave an update that construction on MOM's second dormitory at Sengkang West started this month. It will have 7,200 beds and is expected to begin operations by end-2028.

NESST Tukang Dormitory at 1 Tukang Innovation Lane on Jan 17, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Ili Mansor)

FUNDING FOR DORMITORY UPGRADES

Under the higher dormitory standards, each room must have a maximum of 12 residents and there must be at least 1m of space between their beds.

There is to be at least one ensuite toilet, shower and wash basin for every six residents. Each resident must have at least 4.2 sq m of living space.

There must also be ensuite toilets for all isolation rooms, and there are requirements for more single-bed isolation rooms and partitions in two-bed isolation rooms.

The interim standards are similar, except for a smaller required living space of at least 3.6 sq m per resident.

Under the new Dormitory Transition Scheme grant, funding will differ based on the retrofitting needed.

From 2026 to 2028, the grant will provide S$4,200 (US$3,300) for building a new room; S$9,800 for building an ensuite toilet; S$7,300 for adding a water closet to a communal toilet; and S$12,300 for building an isolation room with an ensuite toilet.

The grants will then be lowered from 2029 to 2030. MOM said this is to mitigate potential disruption in the supply of beds due to "bunching" of dormitories being retrofitted.

From 2029 to 2030, the grant will provide S$3,000 for building a new room; S$7,000 for building an ensuite toilet; S$5,300 for adding a water closet to a communal toilet; and S$8,800 for building an isolation room with an ensuite toilet.

About 900 dormitories with around 200,000 beds are expected to be eligible for the grant, said Dr Tan.

They must submit their intended retrofitting schedule to MOM for approval, and must commit to completing the works within the approved timeline.

This is to manage the simultaneous works in multiple dormitories and minimise their impact on bed supply and retrofitting costs, said the ministry.

FACILITIES AT NESST TUKANG

Dr Tan said MOM pushed itself to do better than the required standards at NESST Tukang because the dormitory is meant to testbed innovations for the industry.

A specialist design advisory panel, migrant workers and industry representatives were consulted for its development.

"NESST Tukang Dormitory provides a living environment that promotes the physical and mental well-being of our migrant workers," he said.

Each room has six single beds. The remaining six beds use a loft bed design with independent bed frames to reduce disturbance to those in the lower bunks.

Rooms are north-south facing and have larger windows for natural airflow and lighting. Rooms will have dedicated social spaces, and each floor has communal dining spaces and privacy nooks.

There are also green spaces, cricket practice lanes and a gym for sports and recreation.

Migrant worker Kalai Bilavebdran, 38, has been in Singapore for 10 years. He agreed that NESST Tukang has more and better facilities than other dormitories where he has stayed.

He also enjoyed Tukang's more convenient location compared to Tuas. It takes the residents 30 minutes to 40 minutes to get to Little India by public transport, he said.

Mr Bilavebdran said one feature he and fellow residents missed from their previous dormitories was an ATM, as they still prefer to transact in cash.

A barbershop at NESST Tukang Dormitory, on Jan 17, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Ili Mansor)

PANDEMIC READINESS

Dr Tan added that NESST Tukang was designed with pandemic readiness in mind.

Key public health measures include automated thermal scanners at gantries and wastewater surveillance for early health monitoring.

Multi-purpose recreational spaces can be converted to additional isolation areas, while the central courtyard and car park can also be converted to support healthcare operations in a crisis.

Coloured walls indicate daily routes for residents so that they can more easily transition to safe segregation when needed.

One digital solution being tested at the dormitory is a management system called i-SMART, which integrates temperature scanning and facial recognition at entry gantries to detect "abnormal behaviour" and unwell residents, said MOM.

These are critical health and safety features, said the ministry, adding that residents can also give feedback and book dormitory facilities on the i-SMART app.

Noting that well-being goes beyond physical infrastructure, Dr Tan also pointed to mental wellness and peer leadership programmes to support residents.

These include a partnership with non-governmental organisation HealthServe to raise mental health awareness and encourage health-seeking behaviours.

NESST also worked with the Little India Shop Owners and Heritage Association and food vendor Taste Asia on food options.

Migrant workers can buy familiar household brands and essentials from their home countries at on-site minimarts, and South Indian and Bangladeshi ready-to-eat meals from vending machines.

Despite the innovations and stricter standards, Dr Tan said NESST Tukang was able to offer bed prices below comparable dormitories that meet the improved dormitory standards.

According to a written parliamentary answer in 2024 by MOM, the median monthly rate was about S$450 per bed in 2023.

"This has been achieved through careful planning and a clear focus on ensuring that the designs and innovative features, they are all scalable at a sustainable cost," he said.

"Our philosophy is simple: to uplift living standards without raising costs beyond reach, and to demonstrate that quality housing is available and is accessible to all."

Source: CNA/dv(mi)

Sign up for our newsletters

Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox

Subscribe here
Inbox
FAST
Advertisement

Singapore

News analysis: Should the position of Leader of the Opposition be institutionalised?

Political analysts said that formally entrenching the role in law would properly define the duties and privileges of the office.

News analysis: Should the position of Leader of the Opposition be institutionalised?
Listen
9 min
New: You can now listen to articles.

This audio is generated by an AI tool.

Read a summary of this article on FAST.
FAST

SINGAPORE: Political analysts believe the Leader of the Opposition position should be institutionalised in law, not solely to give the parliamentary role independence from the executive, but because doing so would empower it to better serve Singaporeans.

Presently, the appointment of a Leader of the Opposition remains a discretionary decision by the government of the day, also known as the executive branch.

Speaking to CNA on Friday (Jan 16), three analysts argued that formally entrenching the role in law would properly define the privileges of the office.

Singapore Management University law professor Eugene Tan said the Leader of the Opposition’s office should have “a more secure and clearer status” in law.

This could be done either by making the rights of the role, the process of appointment and removal, the office’s privileges and responsibilities well defined either in the Constitution or in ordinary legislation or both, said Associate Professor Tan.

They were weighing in after several political observers and opposition figures took to social media to express the view that the role should be institutionalised.

Progress Singapore Party chief Leong Mun Wai pointed out on Facebook that the Leader of the Opposition is not appointed by the executive branch in “established democracies”.

Similarly, Red Dot United secretary-general Ravi Philemon said on his own Facebook page that an office that is not grounded in the Constitution or parliament’s standing orders but “exists as a discretionary gift from the Prime Minister” is contrary to the idea of an independent opposition.

Former Nominated Member of the Parliament Calvin Cheng said that institutionalising the role would bring Singapore “in line with other developed democracies”.

“If Prime Minister Lawrence Wong is serious that this position is an ‘important position in our parliamentary democracy’, then let’s institutionalise it. Either put it into the constitution or make it a statute, or create a standing convention,” he said in a Facebook post.

WP secretary-general Pritam Singh was first appointed Leader of the Opposition in 2020 following that year’s General Election by then Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

At the time, Mr Lee said the election results showed a clear desire for a diversity of voices in parliament.

"Singaporeans want the PAP to form the government, but they - and especially the younger voters - also want to see more opposition presence in parliament," he said.

The Leader of the Opposition receives certain privileges, such as confidential briefings by the government on important national issues, and may be asked to take on official state functions, visits and meetings alongside members of the government and the public service.

In parliament, he or she is also given the right of first response and more time for speeches, equal to a minister's speech.

The opposition leader is also given an office in parliament, additional staff support and resources, as well as double the allowance of an elected MP, or around S$385,000 per year.

CNA has asked the WP and Mr Singh about the number of meetings and visits he had taken part in when he was the Leader of the Opposition.

THE CASE FOR INSTITUTIONALISING THE ROLE

Political analysts who spoke to CNA were in favour of institutionalising the role because it would remove ambiguity.

In the two occasions that Mr Singh was appointed as the Leader of the Opposition, it was left up to the government of the day to spell out the duties and privileges of his office, as these were also not dealt with in the Constitution or in parliament’s standing orders.

But should the role be formalised in the law, it would establish clear privileges that can strengthen the opposition’s ability to scrutinise the government, which is healthy for a maturing democracy, analysts said.

“One just needs to consider the air time given to the Leader of the Opposition as well as the resources to enable the opposition to better scrutinise the government of the day,” said Assoc Prof Tan.

“It’s still a relatively new office and how the PM and the WP mould the office at this developmental stage is vital.”

Dr Mustafa Izzuddin, senior international affairs analyst at policy and business consultancy Solaris Strategies Singapore, agreed that institutionalising the office would provide further clarity on the appointment and also show the “continued maturation” of the political landscape in Singapore.

“It is good for our political landscape … political discourse for there to be a Leader of the Opposition. It should be a permanent feature,” he added.

IMPACT OF THE LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION

As to whether the role of the Leader of the Opposition has had any impact on the political scene over the past five years, Assoc Prof Tan and Dr Mustafa said it had.

“The Leader of the Opposition office has helped to strengthen the role of the opposition in our parliamentary system of government,” said Assoc Prof Tan.

“What it has also achieved is that we have been able to see how a Leader of the Opposition operates in parliament, what kind of access it has, whether it has also enriched the speeches that are made by the opposition,” said Dr Mustafa.

He added that the role has had a “positive impact”.

This was why, when Mr Wong removed Mr Singh from the role, he also invited the party to nominate another person to take its reins, said Dr Mustafa.

“The prime minister was driven by the belief … (that) this is an important position,” said Dr Mustafa. “He was taking into account ground sentiments, he was taking into account what parliament has voted on and of course, the value of the Leader of Opposition position.”

Independent political analyst Dr Felix Tan said that it would also “confer greater official recognition” on the position.

However, he felt the impact of the role “seems limited”, he said.

While there are resources to help the Leader of the Opposition obtain substantive information on policies, Dr Tan said he wonders how forthcoming various ministries or institutions have been with supplying this information to Mr Singh.

“I do believe that there needs to be some clearer guidelines as to how much or what amount of information the opposition can receive, especially given that the opposition MPs do not have any portfolios.”

By formalising the role in the statutes, it would allow for clearer provisions defining the scope of the position’s duties and responsibilities, as well as established procedures to address any breaches, he added.

After all, the Leader of the Opposition serves as the principal opposition spokesperson. He or she can also appoint members of their party or coalition to shadow ministerial roles, said Dr Tan, though he clarified that he does not think the WP is able to do so with its present numbers.

As for comments from opposition leaders that the office should be institutionalised in order to not allow its existence to be subject to the executive’s decision, Assoc Prof Tan said that it should be clear the Prime Minister at present cannot appoint or remove the Leader of the Opposition “based on his personal whim or fancy”.

Said Assoc Prof Tan: “Wednesday’s debate on the motion was important. There is no need for parliamentary approval for what the prime minister intended to do but the debate demonstrated that there was due process and sound reasons for Pritam’s removal.”

WHAT NEXT FOR THE WORKERS’ PARTY?

Political analysts downplayed the suggestion that Mr Wong’s invitation to the WP to nominate another person “soon” will have any effect on the party’s internal disciplinary process.

Assoc Prof Tan added that the WP should not and must not allow its procedures to be influenced by the invitation; otherwise, due process will be compromised.

“The disciplinary panel inquiry and the invitation to nominate another elected Member of Parliament to be the Leader of the Opposition are two separate processes and should not be conflated or for one to affect the other,” he said.

Similarly, Dr Tan said he does not think that Mr Wong’s letter would have an impact on how a WP inquiry panel makes its recommendations to the CEC.

“However, the WP should seriously consider finding a more appropriate replacement (for the Leader of the Opposition) at this juncture because the role … comes with benefits.”

Dr Mustafa said it would be the party’s future and the sentiments of WP supporters and Singaporeans that would be weighing on the minds of WP’s central executive committee (CEC) members.

He noted that Mr Singh’s leadership in the past General Election and the unity of WP MPs in recording their dissent against Wednesday’s motion could work in the WP chief’s favour, he added.

Earlier this month, the WP said its CEC has directed that a disciplinary panel be formed to determine if Mr Singh contravened the WP’s constitution.

“The CEC has concluded that it is appropriate to call the Special CMC (Cadre Members' Conference) after the disciplinary panel has completed its work, considering the need for due process,” the WP said.

The CEC set a timeline that the disciplinary process will be concluded within three months “to prevent undue delay”. The party later said it would “respond in due course” to Mr Wong’s letter after deliberating on its contents carefully through its internal processes.

Assoc Prof Tan said: “I don’t see the WP being in any hurry to have the Leader of the Opposition filled for now. They will wait for the disciplinary inquiry on Pritam’s conduct to be completed first.”

Source: CNA/mt(nj)

Sign up for our newsletters

Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox

Subscribe here
Inbox
FAST