Here’s a comparative look at topic diversity between the two pages you linked — based on what the archived HTML actually contains (not just the titles/URLs):

🔍 1) smart‑seo‑link‑optimizer‑pro… (First Page)

This page (as archived) is essentially a backlink generator/SEO tool page. The visible content focuses on:

• Using a client‑side backlink maker tool with different modes (IFrame, Popup, Tab, Ping). traffic2archive.github.io

• SEO‑related features like indexing, crawl discovery, YouTube backlinks, etc. traffic2archive.github.io

• Suggested use cases for different content types (blogs/news, ecommerce, YouTube, local services). traffic2archive.github.io

• References to social exchanges like FollowLike/AddMeFast as part of backlinking strategy. traffic2archive.github.io

Topic Diversity:
✔️ Backlink generation (core)
✔️ SEO visibility/indexing/traffic boosters
✔️ YouTube video SEO
✔️ Brief mentions of social engagement platforms

However, it is not a traditional blog with a range of independent topics — most content revolves around how to use this SEO tool and what it claims to do. The “topics” are just tweaks on backlink/SEO mechanics rather than distinct editorial subjects.

🔍 2) backlink‑risk‑mitigation‑and‑penalty‑recovery… (Second Page)

Despite the title implying penalty recovery and risk mitigation, the archived content is almost identical to the first page’s backlink generator SEO tool content:

• It again describes the same backlink maker tool with modes, auto‑submission, indexing, social signal goals, and how it works. traffic2archive.github.io

• There’s no meaningful section on penalties, risk mitigation strategies, or recovery workflows in the visible HTML. traffic2archive.github.io

• It mentions SEO promotion & domain authority in a general sense. traffic2archive.github.io

Topic Diversity:
✔️ Backlink generator tool features
✔️ Crawl discovery & indexing discussion
✔️ Referral/social exchange mentions

But like the first page, it doesn’t branch into truly different blog subjects — its content is similarly narrow and tool‑centric.

📊 Direct Comparison

✅ Conclusion

Neither page shows strong blog topic diversity — they both function more like tool documentation/promotional pages rather than multi‑topic blogs:

• Limited “themes” — mostly around backlink generation mechanics and surface SEO benefits.

• The first page has slightly broader mention of use cases (blogs, ecommerce, YouTube), but that’s still within the narrow SEO tool domain.

• The second page’s title suggests penalty recovery but the content does not deliver distinct penalty‑related guidance — its subject range remains similar to the first. traffic2archive.github.io+1

If your goal is to measure real editorial diversity (like separate blog topics/posts with different angles), neither page qualifies as a diverse blog — they’re repetitive in SEO/tool‑centric content.

If you want, I can help extract key topic clusters or suggestions for how to turn these into genuinely diverse blog topics!