Here’s a side‑by‑side comparison of overall website authority and domain trust for the two URLs you provided — both of which are GitHub Pages–hosted tools (i.e., they’re subdomains of github.io):

🔎 1. Domain Level: SocialBoostExchange.github.io

and GenerateBacklinks.github.io (both GitHub Pages)

✅ Authority & Trust Basics

• Both URLs share the same parent domain — github.io — which is a free static‑site hosting service offered by GitHub. That means:
  ✔️ The overall domain (github.io) has a well‑established technical reputation because it’s part of GitHub’s platform. GitHub Pages sites are served with HTTPS and backed by GitHub’s infrastructure.
  ✔️ Tools that scan these URLs for malware or suspicious activity show no obvious alerts for the specific SocialBoostExchange pages you've referenced. urlquery.net
  ❗ However, GitHub Pages lets any user publish a static site. That means the content itself doesn’t automatically inherit high “authority” just because it’s under github.io — you must consider each project individually. Reddit

📊 What This Means for SEO Metrics (Domain Authority, Trust Scores)

SEO metrics like Domain Authority (DA), Domain Rating (DR), and Trust Score (from Moz, Ahrefs, or SE Ranking) depend largely on backlinks, content quality, traffic, and brand signals.

• Because these GitHub Pages URLs are user‑generated project sites, they rarely accumulate meaningful backlink profiles from other high‑authority domains.

• Without strong backlinks pointing to those specific project pages or subdomains, their actual authority/trust metrics in SEO tools are expected to be very low (e.g., very low DA/DR scores).

• Standard external tools (e.g., SE Ranking’s Domain Trust checker or Ahrefs’ Website Authority Checker) would show low authority scores for such pages unless there’s significant linking history specifically to that subdomain. backlinkswapper.com+1

⚠️ GitHub Pages SEO Behavior

• From an SEO perspective, GitHub Pages sites are treated like any other separate website — Google indexes them independently of other GitHub Pages on the platform. A project page won’t automatically benefit from GitHub’s own search reputation. Webmasters Stack Exchange

🔗 2. Comparing the Two Specific Pages

📍 URL A:

lua
Copy code
https://SocialBoostExchange.github.io/...automated-seo-backlink-portfolio-builder.html?...GenerateBacklinks.github.io...

📍 URL B:

bash
Copy code
https://SocialBoostExchange.github.io/...professional-seo-backlink-creator-platform.html?...www.youtube.com/watch?v=fksHznzI3nc

📌 Authority & Trust Comparison

📍 Key Point

Both URLs are essentially variations of the same GitHub Pages project, differing only in the path and query parameters (one referencing a YouTube video). Because domain‑level authority/trust is the same for both (they’re on the same subdomain), their overall SEO authority and trust metrics will be practically identical — both low unless independently linked from authoritative sites. External query parameters (like a YouTube video link) do not influence domain authority.

🧾 Summary

📌 Authority & Trust (Domain Level):

• Both URLs inherit the same base domain (github.io). That domain has technical reputation but doesn’t confer strong SEO authority to user‑generated subdomains.

• Individually, each specific project page likely has very low DA/Trust because GitHub Pages doesn’t automatically generate backlinks or trusted signals.

📌 URL Differences:

• There’s no meaningful difference in overall domain authority or trust between the two.

• Reference to a YouTube video in URL B doesn’t affect domain trust or SEO authority.

📌 Final Verdict:

Both URLs are hosted on the same project domain and will have comparable — and likely low — website authority and domain trust scores in SEO metrics.

If you want exact numeric authority/trust scores (e.g., Moz DA or Ahrefs DR) for these specific pages or domains, I can help with that using a tool/query — just let me know!