Skip to main content
Advertisement
Advertisement

Singapore

Late-night volunteers work to dispel myths about rough sleeping in Singapore

Volunteers say sustained, respectful outreach is key to supporting an often misunderstood community.

Late-night volunteers work to dispel myths about rough sleeping in Singapore

Volunteers from Homeless Hearts of Singapore interacting with a rough sleeper.

Listen
4 min
New: You can now listen to articles.

This audio is generated by an AI tool.

Read a summary of this article on FAST.
FAST

SINGAPORE: As night falls across Singapore, a small group of volunteers begins its work.

About once a week, befrienders from Homeless Hearts of Singapore venture around the island, reaching out to people who sleep rough and are often overlooked.

Their efforts come amid growing attention on rough sleeping, particularly on social media.

Volunteers say simplified narratives often overlook the complex reasons people end up on the streets, and undermine long-term efforts to build trust with this community.

According to the group’s volunteer head and outreach coordinator Derek Lim, rough sleeping is often due to family or relationship issues.

“They do share that they feel lonely and by befriending them, we are creating a source of support, which comes in the form of friendships and emotional support,” he said.

Reaching out, however, is not always straightforward.

Mr Lim said younger rough sleepers can be harder to find as they frequently move between temporary arrangements such as friends’ homes or hostels.

Older individuals may be easier to identify, but helping them can still take time if they are not ready to accept assistance.

“If it's just not being ready for help, then we won't force so we'll continue to befriend them and journey with them, which might take a long time," said Mr Lim. 

"But it's also okay, because at the end of the day, it is about the friendships, about accepting them for where they are at now,” 

These outreach sessions often stretch into the early hours of the morning.

Volunteers revisit known locations and keep a lookout for new rough sleepers, offering support that ranges from small gestures such as a slice of cake to celebrate a birthday, to more targeted assistance such as financial or employment aid.

HOLDING ON TO DIGNITY

One rough sleeper, who wanted to be known only as Mr Tan, said he left home nearly two years ago. 

“I constantly fought with my wife, then she threatened to divorce me, so I started sleeping downstairs,” he said in Mandarin.

Another, who spoke under the pseudonym Lucas, lost his family home during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Medical conditions such as vertigo made it difficult for him to hold down full-time work, but he has since found part-time employment that suits his needs – a step towards securing his own flat again.

“I don't actually need help … I'm working part-time, enough money to eat. I can sleep here, under shelter. Raining, no problem,” he said.

“Like today, by right (my dinner) is just the noodles only, but my manager offered to cook beef and extra stuff for me. Work properly (and) people will respect you, even when you are homeless.”

Volunteers say dignity is important and can be easily eroded when rough sleepers are reported to authorities or filmed without consent.

Many fear being recognised and do not want their families or employers to know about their circumstances.

They urge members of the public who want to help to do so through established organisations and proper channels.

Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Social and Family Development Eric Chua, who regularly joins these outreach walks, said trust-building takes time.

“Rough sleeping engagement is not the easiest piece of work to do, because (when) our volunteer groups (are) on the ground … they need to make sure that they have some sense of familiarity with each individual rough sleeper.

“And over time, say a matter of months or sometimes even a couple of years, form that relationship and form that sense of trust,” he added.

The outreach efforts come as new figures show a slight decline in rough sleeping in Singapore.

A total of 496 rough sleepers were counted during a single-night street count on Jul 18, 2025, down from 530 in 2022 – a 6.4 per cent decrease, according to a report released by the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) last Friday (Jan 9).

MSF also announced a S$450,000 (US$349,896) fund to support community organisations tackling homelessness, with applications opening on Apr 1.

Those interested in joining such outreach efforts can find more information on Homeless Hearts of Singapore’s website.

Source: CNA/mp(ca)

Sign up for our newsletters

Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox

Subscribe here
Inbox
FAST
Advertisement

Singapore

Indian singer Zubeen Garg drowned near Lazarus Island after declining life jacket: Coroner's court

A toxicology analysis found that Mr Zubeen Garg had a blood alcohol concentration of 333 milligrams per 100ml of blood, which suggests severe intoxication resulting in impaired coordination and reflexes.

Indian singer Zubeen Garg drowned near Lazarus Island after declining life jacket: Coroner's court

(File photo: Instagram/zubeen.garg)

Listen
7 min
New: You can now listen to articles.

This audio is generated by an AI tool.

Read a summary of this article on FAST.
FAST

SINGAPORE: Popular Indian singer-songwriter Zubeen Garg, who died in Singapore a day before he was slated to perform at a festival, had drowned in the waters off Lazarus Island after declining a life jacket, a coroner's court heard on Wednesday (Jan 14).

Mr Garg, 52, was with a yacht party on Sep 19, 2025 and initially wore a life jacket but removed it and later declined to put on a second one offered to him, the chief investigating officer told the court in the opening of the inquiry.

At the time, he was also severely intoxicated and several witnesses saw him trying to swim back to the yacht when he went limp and began floating with his face in the water.

He was promptly rescued back to the yacht and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was administered to him, but he was pronounced dead later that same day.

Mr Garg has a medical history of hypertension and epilepsy, with his last known epileptic episode in 2024, the court heard.

It is unclear if he had taken his regular medicine for epilepsy on the day of the incident, with the evidence of eyewitnesses insufficient to establish that he had actually taken it.

The Singapore police do not suspect any foul play in his death.

CONCERNS BY NEXT-OF-KIN

Before the inquiry opened on Wednesday, Mr Garg's uncle read a statement he had prepared to the court, in which he raised several concerns the family had over the death.

He said that Mr Garg had walked out of his hotel room "alive and full of promise" on Sep 19, 2025, but he was gone by the end of the day.

"Between those two moments lie a sequence of events the family doesn't fully understand," said Mr Garg's uncle.

He requested a full and chronological examination of events, seeking clarity on who planned the outing, who accompanied Mr Garg, and his physical condition and health "at every stage".

He said what troubled him most was why Mr Garg entered the sea, and asked if he did so by his own free will or whether he was encouraged or "insisted" to do so by others.

Mr Garg's uncle also asked whether there was any delay in the administration of medical assistance and said the family members in India "all want to know the truth".

Mr Garg's wife was unable to attend the inquiry but raised similar concerns, which included whether the police's conclusion that there was no foul play included any omissions, failures to act or lapses.

At the outset, State Coroner Adam Nakhoda said some of the facts sought were not relevant to the circumstances that led to the death.

He told Mr Garg's uncle that he was asking for a level of detail that touches on issues irrelevant to establishing the facts that immediately occurred following or before Mr Garg's death.

He told the uncle that he was free to ask questions of the various witnesses who would take the stand. A total of 35 witnesses are slated for the inquiry, including witnesses on the yacht, the boat captain, police officers and paramedics.

CHIEF INVESTIGATOR TESTIFIES

The chief investigating officer told the court that Mr Garg was in Singapore for the North East India Festival in September 2025.

On Sep 19, 2025, Mr Garg left his hotel and boarded a yacht at the Marina at Keppel Bay. There were about 20 people on the yacht, which included Mr Garg's friends and colleagues.

According to the chief investigating officer, the party had some snacks, drinks and alcohol on the boat. Several witnesses said they saw Mr Garg drinking alcohol, with one witness saying he had consumed a few cups of liquor, gin and whisky, along with a few sips of Guinness Stout.

The group dropped anchor between Lazarus Island and St John's Island.

A kayak was prepared for use and Mr Garg donned a life jacket, which was later described by a witness as too big for him and jumped into the sea to swim along with a few others.

During this first swim, he removed his life jacket and later went back on the yacht and was heard saying that he was tired.

When he decided to resume swimming, Mr Garg was offered a second, smaller life jacket, but he declined to wear it.

He entered the water without a life jacket and started swimming in the direction of Lazarus Island alone, said the chief investigating officer.

Members of the group on the yacht shouted at others to bring him back, as he was not wearing the safety equipment.

Mr Garg turned back when others shouted at him to return, but while he was swimming back to the yacht, he suddenly became motionless and floated face down in the water.

He was quickly rescued and taken back to the yacht, where CPR was administered. Within two minutes of receiving a distress call, the Police Coast Guard dispatched a patrol craft, which arrived within nine minutes of receipt of the call.

The police officers took over CPR and noted that Mr Garg did not have a pulse and was not breathing.

The yacht was guided to Marina South Pier, about three nautical miles or 6km away, and Mr Garg was taken by ambulance to Singapore General Hospital, where he was pronounced dead at about 5.15pm.

An autopsy performed on Mr Garg determined the cause of death to be drowning.

Some injuries were found on his body but they were found to have been sustained during CPR and rescue efforts.

Medications for his hypertension and epilepsy were found in his blood, with no other drugs detected.

A toxicology analysis found that Mr Garg had a blood alcohol concentration of 333 milligrams per 100ml of blood, which suggests severe intoxication resulting in impaired coordination and reflexes, the court heard.

For comparison, the legal limit in Singapore is 80 milligrams per 100ml of blood.

The police also seized a 750ml bottle of Scotch whisky with 43 per cent alcohol from Mr Garg's hotel room that was 25 per cent full.

The bottle had been gifted to Mr Garg before the incident.

The investigating officer said Mr Garg was swimming in the sea off St John's Island without a life jacket despite repeated reminders from the captain to don one, and efforts made by other witnesses to ensure he wore one.

One of the witnesses, who was an employee of Mr Garg and a family friend, said he was concerned about Mr Garg's sleep cycle as he was sleeping less and only during the day.

He was worried about his health due to Mr Garg's history of seizures, which he had been having since 2017.

The court heard that a witness had attempted to visit Mr Garg at his hotel the day before the drowning at 1pm, but Mr Garg was asleep and left his room at only about 8pm that day.

The evidence of several witnesses, provided via their statements to the court, stated that Mr Garg had no suicidal tendencies and that he was not pushed into the water but had jumped in himself for a swim.

The state counsel also played video footage showing Mr Garg in the water, including the first swim, when he removed his life jacket.

The inquiry continues.

Source: CNA/ll(rj)

Sign up for our newsletters

Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox

Subscribe here
Inbox
FAST
Advertisement

Entertainment

Actor-singer Glenn Yong reflects on online negativity he faces: 'People have pointed at me and laughed before'

After backlash over his countdown party performance, the 29-year-old actor-singer talks about online trolls, criticism and coping with negativity.

Actor-singer Glenn Yong reflects on online negativity he faces: 'People have pointed at me and laughed before'

Glenn Yong at Mediacorp Let's Celebrate 2026. (Photo: 8Days)

Listen
3 min
New: You can now listen to articles.

This audio is generated by an AI tool.

Read a summary of this article on FAST.
FAST

Singaporean actor-singer Glenn Yong, 29, is no stranger to negative comments and trolls online.

From being labelled a “wannabe” to having his TikTok videos dismissed as “cringe”, Yong has faced a steady stream of harsh criticism online that would break most people.

In fact, the online vitriol he's faced is so harsh, it has left some netizens so clueless about why Yong receives so much hate so clueless, they started a Reddit thread about it. 

This came after the backlash he received for his performance at Mediacorp’s Countdown Party By The Beach, where he sang his single Break Out, along with duets with singers Nathan Hartono and Lullaboy.

Nathan Hartono and Glenn Yong perform at the Mediacorp Let’s Celebrate 2026 countdown show at Sentosa on Dec 31, 2025. (Photo: Mediacorp)

“What is with us (Singaporeans) hating on other Singaporeans for trying anything different,” the Redditor asked. “I got to say, it wasn’t good, but the amount of hate was insane. Tons of hate comments were bashing him to a personal level.”

“Seriously, why do we hate those who try different things from the usual study to the corporate route? And if we do support them, we only do it when others support or when there's visible success. It's almost like there's no room for trying and failing at all. Really respect those in Singapore who are doing their own stuff coz, MAN the amount of hate from online and those around is CRAZY,” the netizen added.

8days.sg checked in with Yong, who agreed with the Reddit post’s observations.

“I do notice there is this culture in Singapore whereby our own people love to put down other Singaporeans. I am on the receiving end of it, so I think I am quite qualified to say,” he said with a laugh.

When asked if he ever feels he is wronged for trying to achieve his dreams, Yong took a measured view, saying everyone is entitled to their opinions. However, he admits it can get frustrating when people don’t see the effort he puts behind the scenes.

“We don't celebrate people for even trying. And we don't celebrate people for having the courage to take the first step. It creates this very negative energy and environment where it is okay to put people down, and make fun of people for trying, whether they are good or not,” he said.

Glenn also shared candidly that the online negativity has, at times, affected him in real life.

“There are moments when I don’t feel like leaving the house. People have pointed at me and laughed before. On days like that, I just don’t want my mood or day ruined,” he said.

“Those times, I just don't want to deal with the negative energy and avoid getting my day or mood ruined. It’s fine when I feel I have more emotional capacity,” Yong added. 

However, he assured he can filter negativity out better than when he first started out in the business.

“All of us have a limited amount of attention and energy. And in my opinion, my time is really precious, and I just don't want to waste it on all these things. I would rather focus on the people around me, my company, my team, the people who truly care,” he says.

This story was originally published in 8Days.

For more 8Days stories, visit https://www.8days.sg/ 

Source: 8 Days/ba

Sign up for our newsletters

Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox

Subscribe here
Inbox
FAST