Romantic relationships between adults and teenagers apparently used to be socially acceptable in the 1980s in the USA (source), but now are among the biggest social taboos, especially in the United States, while they are largely considered normal in the Scandinavian world (Sweden, Norway).
Adult-teen couples normally form with adult men and teenage women, given that women mature earlier and usually desire to be in romantic relationships with male partners more mature than themselves.
Of course, the opposite happens sometimes too, as can be seen with female teachers sleeping with male students.
incels.is
incels.is
In that case, the woman's subconscious goal is to secure the good genes of the student, even if she is not consciously planning to reproduce anytime soon. Females can recognize good genetic material early on and project it into the future.
The usual arguments against adult-teen relationships are along the lines of "unlike adults, teenagers can't decide, they need to be protected! Their brains aren't developed enough to make rational decisions! They will be traumatized!" and so forth.
Before we get to the real reason agecucks oppose adult-teen romantic relationships, let's bury the myth that adults always make rational decisions.
With that out of the way, here are the hidden subconscious reasons both agecucked men and women oppose romantic adult-teen relationships. Enjoy the truthnuke.
Subconsciously, males hate the idea that some other male takes away a female they are attracted to. This includes physically mature teenage women who just-so happen to be younger than the social construct "age of majority".
So agecuck men use accusations of pedophilia as a convenient weapon to attack a competitor in the dating market. They would rather have no one be with a teenage woman than someone else. They are projecting and virtue-signalling. If adult-teen romantic relationships were legal and socially acceptable in their country, they would not hesitate to get into one if an opportunity formed.
Also, attraction to teenage women is called "ephebeophilia", not "pedophilia". But the latter word is used due to its shock value.
Those men setting up sting operations (Chris Hansen, JiDion, ...) defending the teenage women from those "evil monsters" subconsciously hope to gain the romantic interest of the same teenage women in order to be accepted themselves as romantic and/or sexual partner as soon as they reach legal age. They want to be seen as heroes in the eyes of the teenage women.
Also, remember how Hansen cheated with his wife in 2011 with a woman 21 years younger than himelf (sources: NY daily news, John Swan video). So he himself is attracted to women much younger than himself, so he can't possibly blame young adult men for forming romantic relationships with "minor" mid-to-late-teen aged females.
The age of majority was arbitrarily made up by bureaucrats who themselves are well past the age of having an understanding of teenage love, and by elites who want all teenage women for their own class only, see Epstein's Island. But unlike young adults who simply want a romantic partner and treat her well, elites apparently do weird satanic rituals, which is something completely different.
Also, some people equate a romantic relationship with a sexual relationship (example 1, example 2), even though a romantic relationship does not have to include sexual intercourse.
If teenage women were allowed (whether by law or by social standards) to form romantic relationships or sleep with adult men, adult women have more competition on the dating "market", and they surely don't want that.
Adult women shame and verbally attack men for being attracted teenage women by asserting that it is just as bad as being attracted to prepubecent children, given that both have the same label of "minors", even though they are obviously at completely different stages of physical maturity.
The fixed age of majority and age of consent for everyone has no base in biology, given that people mature at different rates, and women mature earlier on average.
Notice how agecucks can not possibly debunk this without resorting to ad-hominem attacks. Example:
Notice how he fails to address the argument and resorts to an ad-hominem attack instead.
Obviusly, I recommend no one to do something that puts them at a legal risk, but the purpose of this post is to show how almost everyone has been fooled into denying the obvious.
This is one of several big lies sold to us, others including that circumcision is healthy (refuted), that vaccines are healthy (refuted), and in the past that that asbestos is healthy (it's asworstos) or that cigarettes are harmless (big tobacco's dirty tricks) (W.H.O. anti-tobacco now that everyone knows it is harmful - yet they are pro-circumcision).
We make fun of people from prior times for believing things considered absurd nowadays, yet we fail to look at ourselves and ask "what do we believe that will be made fun of in future?"
See also:
incels.is
[I hereby release this post into the public domain, CC0 1.0, excluding quotes.]
Adult-teen couples normally form with adult men and teenage women, given that women mature earlier and usually desire to be in romantic relationships with male partners more mature than themselves.
Of course, the opposite happens sometimes too, as can be seen with female teachers sleeping with male students.
Another female teaching fucking her Chad students
Article below. Remember she rather fuck underage Chad than give an Incel a chance. Hope she rots https://www.the-sun.com/news/15665328/teacher-arrested-sexual-assault-two-students/
incels.is
The Rate of Sexual Abuse of Children by Adult Female Teachers is Increasing in Western Schools
These kids aren't "victims". They aren't "scarred", in fact quite the opposite. The rest of us are scarred for not having had experiences like this. In all likelihood the so-called "victims" are Lil Chads and Lil Tyrones who went through puberty early and are already 6'2 bad boy hunks in middle...
incels.is
In that case, the woman's subconscious goal is to secure the good genes of the student, even if she is not consciously planning to reproduce anytime soon. Females can recognize good genetic material early on and project it into the future.
Arguments against adult-teen romantic relationships
The usual arguments against adult-teen relationships are along the lines of "unlike adults, teenagers can't decide, they need to be protected! Their brains aren't developed enough to make rational decisions! They will be traumatized!" and so forth.
Before we get to the real reason agecucks oppose adult-teen romantic relationships, let's bury the myth that adults always make rational decisions.
(source: oppression - Dig Deeper; edited for typo corrections and formatting)Dig Deeper said:
With that out of the way, here are the hidden subconscious reasons both agecucked men and women oppose romantic adult-teen relationships. Enjoy the truthnuke.
Why men oppose adult-teen relationships.
Because of envy. Mating is a zero-sum game, and there are only a limited number of women at a reproductive age.Subconsciously, males hate the idea that some other male takes away a female they are attracted to. This includes physically mature teenage women who just-so happen to be younger than the social construct "age of majority".
So agecuck men use accusations of pedophilia as a convenient weapon to attack a competitor in the dating market. They would rather have no one be with a teenage woman than someone else. They are projecting and virtue-signalling. If adult-teen romantic relationships were legal and socially acceptable in their country, they would not hesitate to get into one if an opportunity formed.
Also, attraction to teenage women is called "ephebeophilia", not "pedophilia". But the latter word is used due to its shock value.
Those men setting up sting operations (Chris Hansen, JiDion, ...) defending the teenage women from those "evil monsters" subconsciously hope to gain the romantic interest of the same teenage women in order to be accepted themselves as romantic and/or sexual partner as soon as they reach legal age. They want to be seen as heroes in the eyes of the teenage women.
(source: More on the Grotesque Abuse of Words Like Pedophilia, Hebephilia, and MAP – Beyond Highbrow)Robert Lindsay said:
Also, remember how Hansen cheated with his wife in 2011 with a woman 21 years younger than himelf (sources: NY daily news, John Swan video). So he himself is attracted to women much younger than himself, so he can't possibly blame young adult men for forming romantic relationships with "minor" mid-to-late-teen aged females.
The age of majority was arbitrarily made up by bureaucrats who themselves are well past the age of having an understanding of teenage love, and by elites who want all teenage women for their own class only, see Epstein's Island. But unlike young adults who simply want a romantic partner and treat her well, elites apparently do weird satanic rituals, which is something completely different.
Also, some people equate a romantic relationship with a sexual relationship (example 1, example 2), even though a romantic relationship does not have to include sexual intercourse.
Why women oppose adult-teen relationships.
It is common knowledge that many teenage women are physically indistinguishable from young adult women, even if they are below the social construct "age of majority". Everyone knows this, but due to social implications, many people don't say it.If teenage women were allowed (whether by law or by social standards) to form romantic relationships or sleep with adult men, adult women have more competition on the dating "market", and they surely don't want that.
Adult women shame and verbally attack men for being attracted teenage women by asserting that it is just as bad as being attracted to prepubecent children, given that both have the same label of "minors", even though they are obviously at completely different stages of physical maturity.
The fixed age of majority and age of consent for everyone has no base in biology, given that people mature at different rates, and women mature earlier on average.
Notice how agecucks can not possibly debunk this without resorting to ad-hominem attacks. Example:
(source: Jax)Jax said:
Notice how he fails to address the argument and resorts to an ad-hominem attack instead.
Obviusly, I recommend no one to do something that puts them at a legal risk, but the purpose of this post is to show how almost everyone has been fooled into denying the obvious.
This is one of several big lies sold to us, others including that circumcision is healthy (refuted), that vaccines are healthy (refuted), and in the past that that asbestos is healthy (it's asworstos) or that cigarettes are harmless (big tobacco's dirty tricks) (W.H.O. anti-tobacco now that everyone knows it is harmful - yet they are pro-circumcision).
We make fun of people from prior times for believing things considered absurd nowadays, yet we fail to look at ourselves and ask "what do we believe that will be made fun of in future?"
See also:
[MULTIPLE STUDIES] The REAL truth about the JBpill (attraction to teens is common). Agecucks will hate this (but so will pedos who like 9 year olds).
Since idiots think it's abnormal to find a 17 year old chick attractive and since there's perverts here (who didn't appear until 2021) who think finding a 9 year old of all people is normal (it ain't), I decided to prove the REAL truth about attraction and age, and both groups of idiots will be...
incels.is
[I hereby release this post into the public domain, CC0 1.0, excluding quotes.]
Last edited:
