Login or register to continue
Or use

Fractures are starting to show in Trump’s GOP at the start of this election year

Comments 21

WASHINGTON (AP) — For House Republicans, the political year started with a pep rally of sorts as President Donald Trump gathered them at Washington’s Kennedy Center for a stemwinder of a speech. But by the time lawmakers had completed their first week of work this midterm election year, fractures in the party were already showing.

From pushback to Trump’s self-described “Donroe doctrine” of aggression in the Western Hemisphere to breaks in party unity over health care, Republican lawmakers are displaying signs of independence from Trump after spending much of the last year acquiescing to his practically every demand. It showed a new dynamic in the GOP as Republicans embark on difficult campaign to keep control of both the House and Senate.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, speaking at the U.S.-Mexico border Friday with a group of Republican Senate candidates, said that Republicans were “going to be focused like a laser” on issues of affordability and pointed to legislation in the works on housing and health care.

Thune’s border trip and talk of affordability were a nod back to some of the core themes of Trump’s presidential campaign. But the focus in Washington of late has instead been dominated by Trump’s military operation to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, his threats to use military force to take control of Greenland, the release of case files on Jeffrey Epstein and a debate over extending subsidies for insurance offered under the Affordable Care Act — an issue where Republicans have long struggled to find unity.

Recent shootings by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers in several U.S. cities, including one that killed a woman in Minneapolis, have also raised new questions about Republicans’ hard-line immigration agenda and shifted attention away from Trump’s handling of the border, which they see as a political success.

Even so, Trump still has plenty of command over most of the party. That was demonstrated this week by a pair of unsuccessful House veto override votes in which most GOP members stuck with the president despite previously voting for the low-profile bills.

Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who has been one of the few Republicans to consistently defy Trump, said that “there was some bully pulpit intimidation going on” from the president that caused the veto overrides to fail.

Still, Democrats are making the case that Trump is becoming distracted from the needs of Americans, especially after the attack on Venezuela.

“He’s lurching towards another endless, expensive war, all the while American families here are struggling with skyrocketing costs,” said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer.

Venezuela war powers vote draws GOP support

To prove their point, Democrats are forcing votes on war powers resolutions that would stop Trump from attacking Venezuela without congressional approval. Such measures are rarely successful, but a procedural vote on the legislation drew support from five Republicans Thursday, setting up a final vote next week. House Democrats are also pushing forward a similar resolution.

The GOP senators who voted for the legislation tried to defuse the conflict with Trump by arguing their positions were in line with his own campaign promises to scale back U.S. commitments overseas.

“A drawn-out campaign in Venezuela involving the American military, even if unintended, would be the opposite of President Trump’s goal of ending foreign entanglements,” Sen. Todd Young, an Indiana Republican who voted for the war powers resolution, said in a lengthy statement explaining his vote.

Trump reacted with fury. The president promptly called for the five Republicans, which included Maine Sen. Susan Collins, who is up for reelection this year, to “never be elected to office again.”

Republicans are already dealing with retirements from several lawmakers who had uneasy relationships with Trump, and there was worry that such clashes could complicate their campaign picture even more.

“If Susan isn’t the senator from Maine, we’re going to end up with a Democrat,” said Sen. Bernie Moreno, an Ohio Republican. “That would be 10 times worse. But I do appreciate that President Trump is absolutely pissed off.”

GOP pushes back on Trump’s Greenland plans

Trump’s desire to possess Greenland and his administration’s decision not to rule out military force also met significant resistance from GOP lawmakers this week.

Sen. Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who is retiring after crossing Trump last summer, took to the Senate floor to proclaim that he was “sick of stupid.” He specifically criticized White House deputy chief of policy Stephen Miller, who made comments that Greenland should be part of the U.S.

“I want good advice for this president, because I want this president to have a good legacy,” Tillis added. “And this nonsense on what’s going on with Greenland is a distraction from the good work he’s doing, and the amateurs who said it was a good idea should lose their jobs.”

Other Republicans, including Thune and Senate Armed Services Committee chair Sen. Roger Wicker, also gently pushed back on military threats against Denmark, which is a NATO ally of the U.S.

After meeting with the Danish ambassador, Wicker said it was Denmark’s right not to sell Greenland.

“I’m troubled by Greenland. I’m troubled by some of the things he does. I don’t get it,” said Nebraska Rep. Don Bacon, another retiring Republican. “I do feel like Congress should be more independent and should provide checks and balances here.”

Bacon added that Trump still had the ability to “bully” his Republican colleagues, but that Trump’s threats had “stiffened my spine.”

Health care votes expose divisions

During Trump’s speech at the Kennedy Center on Tuesday, he urged Republicans to own the issue of health care. Yet when the House voted Thursday on a Democratic proposal to extend expired health care subsidies for Affordable Care Act health plans, 17 Republicans broke with party leadership to help pass the bill.

“People recognize the challenge here, which is to address health care affordability,” said Rep. Mike Lawler, a New York Republican who voted for the proposal.

He still criticized the Affordable Care Act, a hallmark piece of legislation for Democrats, yet the health care debate unfolding in Congress is one that Democrats feel confident making a central campaign issue.

“In this first, full week of the new year, House Democrats — every single one of us joined by 17 Republicans — have partnered in a bipartisan way to protect the health care of the American people,” said House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries following the vote.

Jan. 6 plaque coming out of storage

On the fifth anniversary of the attack on the Capitol, Trump told House Republicans that he had told his supporters to go “peacefully and patriotically” to confront Congress from certifying the 2020 presidential election. The White House also unveiled a website that portrayed the Jan. 6 attack as a “witch hunt” against him by Democrats and some Republicans in Congress.

But the Senate, which Republicans control, this week agreed to display a plaque honoring the police who defended the Capitol — a cause that has become a point of contention with Trump as president. The plaque had been kept in storage rather than being displayed because House Speaker Mike Johnson had said the memorial did not comply with the law.

It was Tillis again who pushed the issue on the Republican side. He said it was important to honor the police and staff who risked their own lives and safety that day.

Democrats who joined in the effort said they were alarmed by the White House’s attempt to recast the narrative.

“It’s so important we be honest with the American people about what happened,” said Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat.

___

Associated Press writers Kevin Freking, Steven Sloan, Lisa Mascaro and Nathan Ellgren contributed.

__

This story has corrected the party affiliation of Rep. Mike Lawler. He is a Republican, not a Democrat.

Groves covers Congress for The Associated Press.

Conversation

|
All comments are subject to our Community Guidelines.
Every post is reviewed before appearing publicly so there may be a delay before it is visible.

All Comments

    1. Comment by SnarkyObserver.

      Eh, I disagree with the premise of this article. Half-hearted reluctance to go along with some truly radical and insane policies, does not constitute 'cracks in the coalition'. The general trend of the past decade is this: 1) Trump pushes for something that's totally beyond the pale, 2) people express they're not comfortable with it, 3) Trump backtracks temporarily, but keeps pushing, 4) people get more comfortable with the idea, because it seems less radical with so much pressure backing it and so many people talking about it, 5) The GOP backs Trump's plan and Democrats stop even trying to resist it.

      I've seen this cycle at least dozens of times. Just because you're on stage 2 of some things, does not mean that Trump isn't still making progress in accomplishing his goals.

      Unless you really understand what animates Trump's movement, then it's a mistake to talk about fractures in it. Policies like the ones discussed in this article are not central to the movement, and are not existential problems for it.

      • Comment by MrsMason.

        "A lame duck president refers to a president who is nearing the end of their term and is not eligible for re-election.

        During this period, the president may have diminished political influence and authority, as their ability to enact significant policies or decisions is often limited. This term is commonly used in political discussions to describe the transitional phase of leadership where the outgoing president may be less effective in making decisions, particularly in areas such as foreign policy."

        The end of Trump's administration is the GOP's way out from under his thumb.

        • Comment by DwightSnoop.

          Did you hear that everybody? " The fractures are starting to show." How many times have we seen this article title?

          • Reply by SnarkyObserver.

            In a broad sense, a few hundred times over the past decade. This article unfortunately doesn't seem to understand the fundamentals of the movement any better than those who've made such mistaken analyses in the past.

            I find this situation exhausting, in large part because so many people (in both parties) are so unwillingly to even try to understand the situation, or their own choices. So many people tell themselves stories that are convenient, and comforting, and that just aren't true. Their defensive anger when you point out those stories aren't true is... part of what makes the situation exhausting.

        • Comment by TheRedMare.

          It is only taking 5 years (non sequential) of horrible executive power for the GOP to begin to show cracks?! Chimps who see, hear and say no evil finally raising an eyebrow? Break through! Please break through the mold that has formed you that way! Release yourself from the mystical fallacy that God works in mysterious ways. God has no hand in this!

          • Reply by sunongrass.

            you're too optimistic.

        notification icon
        Subscribe to our notifications for the latest news and updates. You can disable anytime.
        Stay ahead of the news
        Sign up for free breaking news alerts from AP