Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why agecucks are opposed to adult-teen couples.

Urlaubsinsel

Urlaubsinsel

Germanic ubermensch
★★★★
Joined
Nov 17, 2024
Posts
341
Romantic relationships between adults and teenagers apparently used to be socially acceptable in the 1980s in the USA (source), but now are among the biggest social taboos, especially in the United States, while they are largely considered normal in the Scandinavian world (Sweden, Norway).

Adult-teen couples normally form with adult men and teenage women, given that women mature earlier and usually desire to be in romantic relationships with male partners more mature than themselves.

Of course, the opposite happens sometimes too, as can be seen with female teachers sleeping with male students.


In that case, the woman's subconscious goal is to secure the good genes of the student, even if she is not consciously planning to reproduce anytime soon. Females can recognize good genetic material early on and project it into the future.

Arguments against adult-teen romantic relationships​


The usual arguments against adult-teen relationships are along the lines of "unlike adults, teenagers can't decide, they need to be protected! Their brains aren't developed enough to make rational decisions! They will be traumatized!" and so forth.

Before we get to the real reason agecucks oppose adult-teen romantic relationships, let's bury the myth that adults always make rational decisions.

(source: oppression - Dig Deeper; edited for typo corrections and formatting)

With that out of the way, here are the hidden subconscious reasons both agecucked men and women oppose romantic adult-teen relationships. Enjoy the truthnuke. :D

Why men oppose adult-teen relationships.​

Because of envy. Mating is a zero-sum game, and there are only a limited number of women at a reproductive age.

Subconsciously, males hate the idea that some other male takes away a female they are attracted to. This includes physically mature teenage women who just-so happen to be younger than the social construct "age of majority".

So agecuck men use accusations of pedophilia as a convenient weapon to attack a competitor in the dating market. They would rather have no one be with a teenage woman than someone else. They are projecting and virtue-signalling. If adult-teen romantic relationships were legal and socially acceptable in their country, they would not hesitate to get into one if an opportunity formed.

Also, attraction to teenage women is called "ephebeophilia", not "pedophilia". But the latter word is used due to its shock value.

Those men setting up sting operations (Chris Hansen, JiDion, ...) defending the teenage women from those "evil monsters" subconsciously hope to gain the romantic interest of the same teenage women in order to be accepted themselves as romantic and/or sexual partner as soon as they reach legal age. They want to be seen as heroes in the eyes of the teenage women.

Robert Lindsay said:
That toxic sex fascist moron Hansen did indeed open up a whole Pandora’s Box with his sleazy, idiotic, sensationalistic show. Now all sorts of sanctimonious sex fascist dipshits are copying him on Youtube. Some have even formed their own retard sex fascist organizations to feed off this idiot moral panic.
(source: More on the Grotesque Abuse of Words Like Pedophilia, Hebephilia, and MAP – Beyond Highbrow)

Also, remember how Hansen cheated with his wife in 2011 with a woman 21 years younger than himelf (sources: NY daily news, John Swan video). So he himself is attracted to women much younger than himself, so he can't possibly blame young adult men for forming romantic relationships with "minor" mid-to-late-teen aged females.

The age of majority was made up by bureaucrats who themselves are well past the age of having an understanding of teenage love, and by elites who want all teenage women for their own class only, see Epstein's Island. But unlike young adults who simply want a romantic partner and treat her well, elites apparently do weird satanic rituals, which is something completely different.


Also, some people equate a romantic relationship with a sexual relationship (example 1, example 2), even though a romantic relationship does not have to include sexual intercourse.

Why women oppose adult-teen relationships.​

It is common knowledge that many teenage women are physically indistinguishable from young adult women, even if they are below the social construct "age of majority". Everyone knows this, but due to social implications, many people don't say it.

If teenage women were allowed (whether by law or by social standards) to form romantic relationships or sleep with adult men, adult women have more competition on the dating "market", and they surely don't want that.

Adult women shame and verbally attack men for being attracted teenage women by asserting that it is just as bad as being attracted to prepubecent children, given that both have the same label of "minors", even though they are obviously at completely different stages of physical maturity.

To foids pedophilia = younger than them

The fixed age of majority and age of consent for everyone has no base in biology, given that people mature at different rates, and women mature earlier on average.



Notice how agecucks can not possibly debunk this without resorting to ad-hominem attacks. Example:

Jax said:
[16:17]
He frequently attempted to manipulate the victim by talking about "maturity", and saying that "age doesn't matter, only maturity does", which is a common justification by predators such as this.
(source: Jax)

Notice how he fails to address the argument and resorts to an ad-hominem attack instead.

Obviusly, I recommend no one to do something that puts them at a legal risk, but the purpose of this post is to show how almost everyone has been fooled into denying the obvious.

This is one of several big lies sold to us, others including that circumcision is healthy (refuted), that vaccines are healthy (refuted), and in the past that that asbestos is healthy (it's asworstos) or that cigarettes are harmless (big tobacco's dirty tricks) (W.H.O. anti-tobacco now that everyone knows it is harmful - yet they are pro-circumcision).

We make fun of people from prior times for believing things considered absurd nowadays, yet we fail to look at ourselves and ask "what do we believe that will be made fun of in future?"

See also:




[I hereby release this post into the public domain, CC0 1.0, excluding quotes.]
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Urlaubsinsel
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top