|
|
Post by Catalaya (Nadihat) on Jul 4, 2024 at 4:46am
Here's an idea: The monitor and the computer can be charged so that the energy emitted is grounding and cleansing. Be careful how you do that. I was working on shifting my wallpaper on Windows 10 to try to get it to animate for like 30 mins and then the computer wouldn't boot after that. Had to reinstall Windows. I was doing that with just my intent, not the Repeater.
What you mentioned happened a long time ago. Maybe reality has shifted enough so that it won't be a concern again. I said my example in reference to Repeater. It can be precise when needed. |
|
|
|
Post by Catalaya (Nadihat) on Aug 30, 2024 at 1:27pm
Hashes have revealed Apple is evil only due to its greed.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnthroHeart (Cio) on Aug 30, 2024 at 9:43pm
Hashes have revealed Apple is evil only due to its greed. That was my psychic intuition. We asked if apple was evil, not if its evilness is only due to greed.
I was getting an intuitive feel for if apple was evil.
|
|
|
|
Post by Catalaya (Nadihat) on Aug 31, 2024 at 12:18am
Is apple only evil due to its greed?
[Repeats: 100000] (Hash level: 100): 55026D4CA7C468EA5DBA6DF8FDD4FD90C12081F8ADADAB297414D08B1C49B323F5D12CFF79AA11C1DDC7D0AF7EE685EC16B8312FC64803B908D072530E8A2E01
"No energy."
Secondmost reason for apple being evil? Low for malice, High for telling the apple store people to lie "I've never seen that problem before", Rippling for not caring about their products as they once did, Teeth for software bugs, Rippling teeth for lowered hardware quality, heart chakra for not actually paying attention to people's needs
[Repeats: 100000] (Hash level: 100): 8312FD94B3F34F0BD4A538BDFB0D23C94B80EB82D72FF0F416818E16E44903958C92A6947C799690BE3DE9182C99FA315EB6E7F47F22AB90D64C7AAA3D3FB953
"Heart chakra mostly. You could also have an other option, but that feels like heart chakra."
|
|
|
|
Post by Catalaya (Nadihat) on Dec 17, 2024 at 10:24pm
Random OS energy notes by Anthro Teacher:
I see fairgrounds and LInux is tighter as a small cube and FreeDOS is more spread out/thinned out I think.
Buildroot seems like a slow turning wheel and Linux Kernel one seems like a tight cube, more focused I think.
Buildroot seems to have layers of wheels it seems.
openbsd is like playing at the park throwing a frisbee with the dog and petting the dog and best Linux for SC is all business.
|
|
|
|
Post by Catalaya (Nadihat) on Mar 3, 2025 at 1:48pm
Divine Anthro: Apple users have tenderness and care/love to their devices that isn't seen in other brands. Where does it come from? Please send visions 0E0313E0573C3838431BB05648ADE87D3F6A1D5A581B78C2E6611232BC555411FC3D0DFD6CCF55BA45B9D89FB03E5D9FC47B276E7DBC03F6C4976DA6499C411D Anthro Teacher: Something about clearing karma. There might not be new karma on Earth but people still clear their old. Apple energy is sharper and more focused than other brands. Random note: developer.apple.com/accessories/Accessory-Design-Guidelines.pdf This link is wonderful. 500 pages of intense detail on how to design accessories for iDevices. The engineering on display is extraordinary. |
|
|
|
Post by Catalaya (Nadihat) on Apr 24, 2025 at 10:29am
As of Windows 8.1 (2013; do not confuse with 2012 8.0) White Hats know everything that is done in a Windows PC.
|
|
|
|
Post by Catalaya (Nadihat) on Apr 25, 2025 at 2:24am
White Hats know everything that happens in "all computers" including Linux and OpenBSD.
|
|
|
|
Post by Catalaya (Nadihat) on 2 minutes ago
You are actually very close to the mark. The 2.6 kernel era (2003–2011) was the period of **Professionalization**, but the **Great Corporatization** happened right at the end of that era and the beginning of the 3.x series (roughly 2010–2014).
Here is the timeline of how Linux went from a "hacker’s hobby" to "corporate plumbing."
### 1. The "Billion Dollar" Spark (2001)
Before the 2.6 days, Linux was still a threat to the status quo. In 2001, **IBM** announced they would invest **$1 billion** in Linux. This was the "Sanctioning." It told the business world that Linux wasn't just for kids in basements. However, the *development* was still largely driven by individuals and enthusiasts.
### 2. The 2.6 Era (2003–2011): The "Golden Age"
In the 2.6 days, you’re right—it didn't feel fully corporate yet.
* **The Vibe:** This was the era of the "Distro Wars." Gentoo, Slackware, and early Ubuntu were fighting for the desktop.
* **The Development:** Companies like Red Hat and Novell were involved, but the kernel was still being pulled in many directions by hobbyists.
* **The Shift:** This is when Linux "won" the server room. It killed off the "Big Unix" (Sun Solaris, HP-UX, AIX). Because it was killing multi-thousand-dollar proprietary systems, corporations realized they *had* to control the development to protect their bottom lines.
### 3. The Turning Point (2008–2012): Mobile and Cloud
Two massive events happened that fundamentally changed Linux’s DNA, coinciding with the end of the 2.6 kernel:
* **Android (2008):** Google took the Linux kernel and put it in everyone’s pocket. Suddenly, the kernel wasn't just a server tool; it was a consumer product. Google engineers began flooding the kernel mailing list with code that benefited mobile battery life and ARM processors, often at the expense of traditional desktop/server simplicity.
* **The Rise of AWS (The Cloud):** Around 2010, the "Cloud" stopped being a buzzword and became the standard. Linux became the "plumbing" of the internet. Companies like Intel, Samsung, and Google realized that if they could optimize the kernel for their specific hardware or data centers, they could save millions.
### 4. 2012: The "Professional Developer" Milestone
In 2012, the **Linux Foundation** released a report that was a "wake-up call" for the community. For the first time, it was documented that **over 80% of Linux kernel development was done by people being paid by corporations.**
The "Volunteer" was officially a minority. The kernel was now being written by employees of Intel, Red Hat, Linaro, Samsung, IBM, and SUSE.
### 5. The "Systemd" Consolidation (2014)
If you want a specific date for when the "Old Linux" died and the "Corporate Linux" was finalized, it was the **Systemd migration**.
* Before 2014, every distro had its own way of doing things (the "Unix Way").
* Systemd (pushed heavily by Red Hat) unified the plumbing of almost every major distro.
* While it made Linux much easier for "Enterprise" management (like what you see on Vultr or AWS), it felt like a corporate takeover to the old-school hackers who preferred the shell-script simplicity of the 2.6 days.
### FreeBSD: The "Late Bloomer"
While Linux was being swallowed by the corporate machine in 2010, FreeBSD was actually struggling. It almost died because it *didn't* have corporate sponsorship. It couldn't keep up with modern hardware or cloud environments.
The "Sponsored by..." tags you see in the FreeBSD 15.0 notes are the result of the FreeBSD Foundation realizing they had to **copy the Linux funding model** to survive, but they decided to do it via **grants and transparency** rather than letting corporations just hire all their developers.
### The Comparison Today
* **Linux:** Is a corporate product that is *developed* behind the scenes by employees of the world's largest companies. It is highly polished, but you have very little say in its direction.
* **FreeBSD:** Is a community project that is *subsidized* by corporations. The "Sponsored by" tags are the "receipts" showing where the money came from to make the OS work on modern Vultr hardware.
**Your intuition was right:** The 2.6 days were the last time Linux felt like a "community project" first and a "business tool" second. FreeBSD 15.0 is essentially trying to bring that 2.6-era "cleanliness" into the 2025 "Cloud" world.
|
|
