It is too realistic. Actually it’s realistic enough to be compared to this *real* child If you’re going to call me a moral 🚬 for calling that out and if I am somehow the bad guy here then then I rather stay the bad guy
"But it's too realistic" If you wanna police people over being attracted to fiction, you aren't a lolicon. Either all of it's okay or none of it's okay. No room for moralfagging, sorry.
38
22
311
19,246
The one on the left literally looks like a doll and is a robot in the context of their own story. They dont look like an actual child because they're still stylized in the same way Marie Rose from DOA is. Also Diana literally has an adult voice actress too 🤣
11
3
147
3,371
They are not even close to stylized in the same way Dolls do not look like this. Please stop using this cope and just hoping people dont list out the many differences such as rosier cheeks, and distinctly more rounded features only specifically children can have
2
1
11
450
I dont see a real child here at all and its absolutely bullshit youre trying to say its true. Real kids dont have bug eyes and porcelain shiny skin (literally perfect skin). She looks stupidly stylized.
2
21
393
You are now basically arguing that if you put makeup on a child's face, she now magically isnt a child. Cus makeup can easily make a child have a smooth face. What about characters like Ellie who have all of those but are still sexualized? Also, why did you ignore the real image that looked really comparable to the character then? If they are bug eyes why are their eyes so simmilar?
2
6
336
I have no idea where you got that picture of the kid (god it feels like im talking to an anti when theyre linking real pictures of children) but they actually do look distinctly different. One looks fake and the other real. It's as simple as that.
1
8
171
How does one look fake vs the other? If graphical fidelity is your only line of argument and defense. That sounds very akin to an anti trying to blur realism and stylization. Lolicon defenses has never been souley reliant on graphical fidelity as a point alone
1
2
164
Except its not just graphical fidelity. Diana looks unrealistic on purpose. She isnt meant to look like a real kid, shes made to look like a robot. That comes across witj her design with her eyes, hair, and skin.
1
7
159
Her hair looks like normal human skin, her eyes are on the same anatomical scale as a human child's would be to the ratio of her skull, her skin once again is featurless but many kids can have that, and can even just put on makeup to accheive a simmilar effect. Source? I meet kids everyday I go to my part time job and lots of them have very smooth faces You just keep focusing on the only stylization being jts a videogame model with only so much ways to rig dynamic features vs that of loli art which has even things like a 1 dimensional skin tone.
3
3
199
I disagree. She does not look like a real child and the hair, skin, and eyes look unrealistic. And you're not the only one around real kids and people in every day life so not sure why you're bringing that up...its clear neither of us will ever agree here.
1
4
159
HOW do they not look realistic? Saying that they dont look realistic by just saying they dont doesnt substantiate your point. It once again just presumes the difference in graphical fidelity is magically enough to distinguish those points. Kids irl can have messy hair, often have slightly bigger eyes, and smoother skin. People spend their time around kids, so they can substantiate that kids look a lot closer to the imahe on the left, than they do on the right correct?
1
3
225
You're comparing her directly to an anime character instead of other videogame characters done in a similiar style that have never been accused of looking too realistic. Child Tifa, Child Aerith, Yuffie, Priscilla are examples from a modern game of underage characters.
2
4
437
Yes, I am comparing her to an ajime character CUS ANIME IS THE POINT IN WHICH WE HAVE TO DRAW A LINE. As that is the line and stylized basis in which we use as a default to seperate from pedophilia. Putting aside the fact that this whataboutism is neich cus these characters are hardly if ever brought up in lolicon circles. It still doesnt magically make their forms of realism or graphical fidelity as a separation okay. Putting aside the fact they still look DISTINCTLY older than THIS lol.
1
4
196
Ah so age matters (she doesnt have an age since shes a robot) when its something you dont like. All youre doing is proving yourself a hypocrite. Also are you seriously saying videogame characters aren't talked about in lolicon circles? Especially anime inspired ones? Wut
1
2
174
When did I note age? When did I literally ever noted age? I didnt lol Also, lolicon circles do not talk about the 3d videogame models of Capcom characters that often, they often will use cartoonized versions of their adult proportions and tone them down
2
6
192
That is not saying they are the same AGE as her 😭 Cat please. I literally said LOOK ffs. They could be older within universal context, that wasnt what I was talking about
1
107
Youre trying to make it sounds like it matter she somehow looks physically younger. Why? Why does that matter?
1
1
95
Because she straight up looks younger and more like an actual kid than any of these examples. Rounded off facial features, distinctly rosy clashing cheek color with the rest of her multidimensional skin pallet, extremely small, otherwise featurless and stubby proportions from her head to the rest of her body. These all encompass a very realistic take on a more accurate to life child character than say Illya
2
3
125
Priscilla who I shared still looks like an unrealistic videogame child...just like Diana. It doesnt matter if she looks older. Physical age doesnt matter with fictional characters.
1
1
112
It literally does when Diana looks explicitly more realistic to younger kids vs. that of Priscilla. Once again, you keep using graphics as the only stylized point of reference without being able to substantiate how her hair, eyes, or skin are magically more unrealistic in nature
1
4
121
Have you actually watched clips of Diana? Or just looking at pictures? Her hair does not act naturally in motion. Her eyes look too big and not like a real child's eyes. Her skin comes off as too shiny and not even like the other human character in the trailer.
1
1
103
Her hair dies not act naturally in motion because videogame hair rarely if ever acts accurately Her eyes no matter how much you keep trying to say this, do not look too big. These are at the anatomically right proportion, many kids have big eyes like that. And her skin once again maybe featurless and "shiny" but many kids have this or wear makeup to accheive this
1
106
We'll have to agree to disagree on these points because we obviously are both going in circles here. I believe im right and you believe you are.
1
101
Fine sure. Sure hope you know btw that I still respect you in like every other front of this topic right? 🙏
1
94
Honestly how so? Because it seems like youve basically disagreed with me on every front lol.
1
107
Every front? Every front? Really? when did I say looking at smut of Illya is pedophilic? Is that not another front from the culture war we agree onM
1
1
126
You brought up this "topic" which I thought was just about Diana. Didn't realize you were talking about lolis in general.

Jun 8, 2025 · 12:32 AM UTC

1
1
150
Well I said "fronts" You know? As in a war? You have the Japanese front, but then the German front of wwii I have discomforts with more realistic cgi characters in fiction but on the front of the culture war with lolis? Nah. We agree on pretty much everything else. And maybe you have shifted my opinion a bit here
1
1
173
Well I refollowed you since you are against what your "allies" on this topic said. And honestly i feel like everyone can have different comfort levels with fiction. Just let others do what they want if theyre not hurting real people.
1
73