Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 169))

  • 319 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Adopting or rejecting scientific realism may make a big difference to one’s world-view, and so may adopting or rejecting common-sense realism; it therefore becomes an important question whether these two kinds of realism are mutually exclusive, as has often been supposed, so that one cannot adopt them both.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Berkeley, George (1713). ‘Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous’, in A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop (eds.), The Works of George Berkeley, 9 vols, 1948–57, Nelson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briskman, Larry (1980). ‘Creative Product and Creative Process in Science and Art’, Inquiry 23, pp. 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf (1963). ‘Intellectual Autobiography’, in Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (The Library of Living Philosophers), Open Court, La Salle, pp. 3–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection to Sex, Murray, London, first ed. 1871, second ed. 1874.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles (1872). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, 1872; reprinted University Press, Chicago, 1965.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1967). The Biology of Ultimate Concern, New American Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, Ernst (1899). The Riddle of the Universe, trans. by Joseph McCabe, Watts, London, 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (1790). Critique of Judgement, first ed.; trans. by J. C. Meredith, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, Grover (1968). ‘Scientific Methodology and the Causal Theory of Perception’, in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.), Problems in the Philosophy of Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 148–160.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto (1973). Otto Neurath: Empiricism and Sociology, Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath (eds.), Vienna Circle Collection, vol. 1, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. (1972). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, Patrick (1984). Probabilistic Metaphysics, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, John Archibald (1977). ‘Genesis and Observership’, in Butts, Robert E. and Hintikka, Jaakko (eds.), Foundational Problems in the Special Sciences, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 3–33.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Sewall (1964). ‘Biology and the Philosophy of Science’, The Monist 48, pp. 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Watkins, J. (1996). Scientific Realism versus Common-Sense Realism?. In: Cohen, R.S., Hilpinen, R., Renzong, Q. (eds) Realism and Anti-Realism in the Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 169. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8638-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8638-2_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4493-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8638-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Publish with us

Policies and ethics