Are there any admins that can help me get a page published? I feel like my page is intentionally being stone walled simply due to the content in it. More then enough news coverage citations. He is also an author/ been in documentaries/ involved in politics and so forth.
It the subject matter that I believe they don't like. But it's what has been making this person well known around the world.
I made changes to Wikipedia but my changes are pending review. Any way I can request a review or get the page approved faster?
Seriously! This guy can go fuck himself! All that bastard does is abuse his power and never gives me a chance! Every time I make constructive edits, the hardass reverts them simply because I'm a sock.
As part of Masters(in Interaction Design)project, we are teaming up with Wikimedia Foundation. My team wanted to interview some editors to understand what is the process like, how do they check reliability, how do they localise the content, what are the challenges, etc. Can anybody here help me with that??
It involves approving certain edits - if so let me know in the comments/DM
If such a system is deployed on Wikipedia, in my opinion it will result in negative privacy implications. For instance it will be used as a privacy-violating tool to harass users in the midst of edit wars or admin powertrippings, not to mention potential of adaptation by oppressive governments to track down dissenters.
Worryingly, in the research paper there are talks of extending it to Facebook and Twitter. The system can theoretically be cheated through imitating or using different writing styles with the help of AI GPT tools though.
This one is full of SPAs, Ohnoitsjamie, and other Wikipedia nonsense to defend Henry T. Nicholas III of Broadcom.
A place for members of to chat with each other
