no source

>>107586758
yes source

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69403059adb5707d9f33d7b5/E03512978_-_Un-Act_The_National_Security_Act_in_2024_ELAY.pdf

File: 1738181783453483.png (57 KB, 737x710)

57 KB PNG

>>107586776
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2019/3/schedule/3
Schedule 3 applies to entries at the border.
The United States, Australia, Canada etc all have the same powers and do the same thing

You might wanna delete this thread

File: 1749678603563769.png (207 KB, 1103x361)

207 KB PNG

>>107586820
And to whom does this apply?

>>107586840
It applies to entries at the border, as set out in Part 1 of Schedule 3 which you still appear to have not read.
If you have a concern about this, then don't visit the UK.
This is no different to bringing porn to Bali, animals to Australia or drugs to the US.
Funnily enough, when you visit another country, you have to obey their laws.

>>107586751 (OP)
>whose selling point is end-to-end encryption

how do they know that? Signal's selling point is that it is a messaging app. end-to-end encryption is just a plus.

File: 1755544768488138.png (35 KB, 615x149)

35 KB PNG

>>107586862
>>107586840
Furthermore, you omitted the next section that this is for the purposes of questioning by an officer if a person is intentionally acting in the interest of a hostile power, or if they are actually innocent and the connection is coincidental.

But you're just a FUD spreading shill trying to sow discord.

>>107586923
>Serious responsibility is placed on police to use the power wisely
*inhale*
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA BA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>107586862
I did and the wording is dubious. In the context of other attacks on e2ee like chatcontrol et al, see >>107579049 → I'm suspicious, not because I'm defending criminal behaviour but normal human behaviour, like talking to friends and family without big brother looking over my shoulder.

>>107586962
It's fine to be suspicious, I'm not a fan of this report either, but stating straight lies like:
>Under UK Legislation anyone developing end-to-end encryption is now labelled as a “hostile actor”
does not advance discourse in any meaningful way

>>107586751 (OP)
uk is going to war, its all pre war measures to combat foreign intelligence.

>>107586751 (OP)
SO fvcking based
we must retvrn to plaintext
soulmaxxing
return to tradition ACCELERATION
death to woke encrypties

>>107586751 (OP)
>>107586776
>Not allowed to enter the UK if you're a sensible app developer
>Jihadis are fine though

>>107587086
they will literally do anything other than address the actual issue

>>107587142
the anarcho tyranny of fixing tertiary effects without solving the root problem

File: 176541161946856110.jpg (495 KB, 1024x768)

495 KB JPG

>>107586751 (OP)
I'm going there in the near future, I've got to go through my old tshirts and find my perl rsa one for the trip

>>107587142
they don't care about actual issues you braindead fucking retard
they want to be the first government in human history that has the capability of monitoring its citizens in ways previously unable to be envisioned, and use these monitoring capabilities in conjunction with behavioral science learnings in order to prevent any possibility of domestic strife that would disrupt the continuation of the existing order.

>>107587180
Sorry, the US under Trump teaming up with Palantir is well ahead of us

>>107587180
I'm sure replacing their population with Jihadis will end very well for the Jews in the Bank of England and Ministry of Justice.

>>107586751 (OP)
Those politicians should be assassinated

File: 1765448712503151 .jpg (510 KB, 1867x1222)

510 KB JPG

>>107587180
It's still an open question as to who will win that race.

>>107586751 (OP)
hostile activity != hostile actor.

>>107586840
if i'm interpreting this right, it means any programmer using encryption to secure communications of UK citizens should automatically be seen as someone giving a leg-up to an imaginary foreign state.

>>107587180
what is disrupting the continuation of the existing order right now?, people are fucking sheep

>>107586751 (OP)
UK should be nuked. to the ground
it has cancer and if we le it live it will metastasize to the rest of Europe

>>107588815
It already has.The whole of Europe is giant socialist shithole.

>>107588815
Yes, more war, that will solve the problem! All governments worldwide are pushing totalitarian technocracy through digital ID, CBDCs, increased surveillance and biometric verification etc. Following China's footsteps by the divine decree of the WEF, the World Bank - the EU, many states in the US now, Russia, and Ukraine even, Africa, South Ameriaca, Asia are upscaling this digital infrastructure.

The elites are running this, not everyday people. Speaking of everyday people, there was a major protest in London a few days ago but it's been deboosted on twitter and it's completely memoryholed by the msm.

Take a look at this short clip compilation.
https://x.com/actualcoverage/status/2000317084568535517

>>107586751 (OP)
I never will understand why the British have such a tendency towards authoritarian measures when regarding the most pointless of things.

>>107588941
You think the government represents 70 million people?

File: palantir surveillance state.jpg (135 KB, 640x593)

135 KB JPG

>>107587590
It's fascinating that "muh scary dystopian social credit system" isn't even really a real thing in China but burgers want to make it real anyway.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System

>>107589004
No it represents however many people among the majority who voted for the party in charge, plus some sort of from said coalition if needed. In theory it SHOULD represent over 50% of the population, but given fickleness it's more like 30% on a good day.
But what's your point? I'm just musing about how the UK picks the weirdest shit to get all authoritarian about.

File: 1760856409328528.png (46 KB, 264x407)

46 KB PNG

>>107589011
almost like americans are fed propaganda that makes everywhere else seem terrible so they don't realize just how bad they have it

>>107589025
I guess I shouldn't hate on them that much since they're victims of their own circumstances in a way.

>>107589011
>isn't real
straight from the horse's mouth

https://x.com/JOKAQARMY1/status/1980639373499723886

>>107589046
>"chinese man"
>some literally who sharing scripted burger anti-china propaganda and unsourced stories that totally happened believe me bro
I mean China is shit but that's no reason to just make fake shit up.

>>107589004
Bongs have been voting against the socialist agenda since the Windrush generation, but as soon as their conservatives get in office, they keep pushing it forward anyways, sometimes harder than the open socialists like with the Boriswave. Fool me once, shame on me, but they've been fooled like a dozen times in a row at this point.

>>107589021
It's not just fickleness, their FPTP electoral system means a party can still win the majority of seats with a minority of votes.

File: akc1b-1100x520.jpg (198 KB, 1100x520)

198 KB JPG

>>107586751 (OP)
I would like to continue on a past thread and explain why the UK does not exist anymore: you can see the source material here https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/107499607/#107501544 but in short: The UK no longer exist as they have no global power and their ruling class has as much brain power as crabs. Furthermore, there are crabs that do rule islands in the pacific, so the logic of "an island ruled by crabs is a country" is false. Why do we not call these islands as separate countries? is any island ruled by a crab, or a group of crabs a country?
Yes, in the past the UK did exist, but now it is all just boogeyman shit from a bygone era. No crab will come and enforce the UK law to your house, do not be afraid.
Thus, any attempts on the behalf of the crabs to stop development of encryption are useless - can a crab even comprehend what "encryption" is?

>>107589103
>>107589021
For reference, the leading party was voted for by only 7% of the population. The majority coalition by only 19%.

File: 1765358540460.jpg (328 KB, 2560x1920)

328 KB JPG

>>107589140
and no, i am not going to once again argue with crabs whether the country exist or not. THE UK DOES NOT EXIST. end of the question. If you look like pic related, i will not even respond to you. Post a selfie when responding to me so I know I am not arguing with crabs.

import base64
from nacl import public
from nacl.public import SealedBox

def generate_keypair():
    sk = public.PrivateKey.generate()
    pk = sk.public_key
    sk_b64 = base64.b64encode(bytes(sk)).decode("ascii")
    pk_b64 = base64.b64encode(bytes(pk)).decode("ascii")
    return sk_b64, pk_b64

def load_private_key(sk_b64):
    raw = base64.b64decode(sk_b64.encode("ascii"))
    return public.PrivateKey(raw)

def load_public_key(pk_b64):
    raw = base64.b64decode(pk_b64.encode("ascii"))
    return public.PublicKey(raw)

def encrypt_message(recipient_pk_b64, plaintext: bytes) -> str:
    recipient_pk = load_public_key(recipient_pk_b64)
    sealed = SealedBox(recipient_pk)
    ciphertext = sealed.encrypt(plaintext)
    return base64.b64encode(ciphertext).decode("ascii")

def decrypt_message(recipient_sk_b64, ciphertext_b64: str) -> bytes:
    recipient_sk = load_private_key(recipient_sk_b64)
    sealed = SealedBox(recipient_sk)
    ciphertext = base64.b64decode(ciphertext_b64.encode("ascii"))
    plaintext = sealed.decrypt(ciphertext)
    return plaintext

File: image.png (210 KB, 498x498)

210 KB PNG

>>107586751 (OP)
>UK
I wonder what's their opinion on the shit like PGP/GPG is

this is what happens when you vote for socialists

>>107586751 (OP)
Looks like I'm going to start learning how to make all my future programs have end to end encryption lol

puritans 2.0

>>107586751 (OP)
in every country there are limitations in that field.
in Russia for example you need a license for certain types of encryption algorithms

>>107589004
All people are ruled like they deserve to.

>>107587180
1984 was an instruction manual and predictive programming

>>107586751 (OP)
>anyone developing
Then good news, you stupid cunt.
It already exists.

Aditionally. "Developer of an app". So you can still develop end-to-end encryption. Even task it for communications. But best make sure it's a program, just to be safe.

>>107586751 (OP)
>Even if though
Okay, which jeetoid shitskin diversity hire wrote this shit?

>>107589893
In America encryption is free speech. That “muh loicence for encryption munitions” bullshit was defeated in 1990s and thankfully this American standard of freedom was pushed on the rest of the world as the technical necessity because everyone else were techlets. But it looks like retarded elites really want their dumb ideas back. And hmm yes I definitely want to take Russian retardation as the normal way to do things.

>>107589977
in todays world of shit, the act of "developing" never stops, nothing is ever finished, finalized, completed. there is always one more pending update, if not simply for the sake of ticking an invisible box to comply with irrelevant rules set up by the app store you are publishing in - just to prevent it from being delisted.

File: 1753670865168841.png (683 KB, 1100x1100)

683 KB PNG

>>107586751 (OP)
bongniggers really be tryin to ban math

>>107590128
>set up by the app store
I think I've spotted where you're going wrong.

Starting to demonstrate a lack of technical understanding rivalling the idiot that decided the legislation was plausible without adding the words "selling point end-to-end encryption which would make it more difficult for uk security"
Because everything that uses security cannot be disallowed. It only impacts that which specifically markets to evade law enforcement...

>just to prevent it from being delisted.
Here's an idea. How about I put what I want on my computer, and you try to stop me?

File: 1733350344148451.png (195 KB, 480x463)

195 KB PNG

>>107589174
omg so hostile

>>107588941
Their "common"wealth, whose entire purpose was to ship stolen gold to the British island imploded. Their piracy business - pardon me, freebooter business - is also long gone.
Now the Brits actually have to work for their wealth themselves since they can't just steal it from other nations who HAVE actually worked for it. They even kicked out the Polish who harvested their fields for practically free. So they have to do their own dirty work, too.

The brits are now completely buttdevastated and don't know what to do. Someone has to blamed for this. What does a retarded person do when they're super mad? They make even more retarded decisions than usual. This is what we see.

>>107590654
>This is what we see.
This is what you see. Because you wanted to see that before you started, and that is all you will ever see....

These are retarded descisions. But their grounding isn't based on any of the bullshit you're spewing. Those are completely seperated.

>>107590191
oh yeah i very barely remember this horseshit in early internet when USA didn't "allow" exporting proper ciphers like lmao as if they could ban math it was hilariously retarded
but hey at least they were the oldest boomers or silent generation in power still and all the dinosaur judges didn't even know what internet was

Bongland trying to pull the same in 2025 is just kek, the excuse that they nobody really understand what that new fad of "internet" is don't work anymore

>>107590690
All the Brexit bullshit started because the Brits felt their wealth and influence crumble and they needed to blame it on someone else (the EU).
Even after leaving, it kept crumbling and now they're blaming it on other things that surely, mass surveillance will solve.

>>107590654
hey pajeet you need to go back, nobody asked for your retarded bullshit

>>107590781
>Bongland trying to pull the same in 2025 is just kek,
Ask me how I know you're too dense to read the provisioned evidence.

>the excuse that they nobody really understand
Your lack of understanding isn't universal. Don't get me wrong, I don't think the chump that wrote that knows a great deal more. But still...

>>107590789
>All the Brexit bullshit started
And there was me thinking someone had an agenda, and hired Cambridge Analytica to manipulate "popular opinion"...

>mass surveillance will solve.
Existed for decades. That's not the excuse.

File: poo in loo.jpg (149 KB, 868x960)

149 KB JPG

>>107590654

this is just politicians using a hammer at any thing that hints at a nail to save the fading remnants of a long dead empire

>>107589176
i remember reading someone reporting a bug or something to the two letter and number agency and they had to install it on their phone to communicate

>>107586862
>bringing words is the same as bringing porn or drugs
lmao you must be jewish, considering it was Sam Roth v. The People of the United States i.e. a case where jewish pornographers with a team of jewish lawyers argued in Supreme Court that hardcore interracial porn is achsually "speech" and thus covered by 1st Amendment and because the judge was a fellow freemason, the jews won this ridiculous argument and porn has been legal in USA ever since

anyway with this little context that your tribesmen have indeed made this comparison before, it doesnt make it less ridiculous
having some stasi scan your personal messaging for signs of antisemitism is absolutely a different thing than screening your luggage for drugs LMAO

i swear its this zoomer generation ruining everything i mean sure it was the gen X that did it to them but they were born into this world where privacy is just "dont worry about it goy" and they're just fully going along with it I fucking hate that shit

We have still all sorts of privacy laws like you cant search mail without warrant nor tap phones without warrant and probable cause ongoing investigation but now just kikes are supposed to be allowed to mass scan everyones communications no questions asked like what the actual FUCK the kikes are trying to make the world into USSR, AGAIN

>>107590944
>We have still all sorts of privacy laws
And how many still apply when filtered through the lense of "national security"?
What about when we do it, then just share that data with you via the 'five eyes' initative?

If you had been bothered to pay attention, the post to which you respond wasn't talking about pr0n. It was referencing the need to obey the law in the country that set it...

>>107590944
if porn was not free speech, then what about smut books that women like to read or loli doujins that men like to read? where do you draw the line?

>>107586862
>Funnily enough, when you visit another country, you have to obey their laws.
What?!?!?! I have to obey other nations laws?!?!?! Disgusting!!!!

>>107587571
Wouldn't matter who is at the helm. Its one big push globally. Its inevitable as its what the rich want.
The darn plebs started acting up a little too often (protesting the genocide of Palastinians)

>>107589389
hmm i thought denmark was based they have been better at dealing with the migration issue than most europe they locked it mostly down afaik
so interesting they are such cucks on this
considering that sweden for example is the exact opposite they fucked up the migration issue hard to the point their country got destroyed like im not exaggerating it got fucked up there is a bombing and a shooting on average each day now, its insane
but sweden did good on the free speech, like piratebay was based there for a long time and it was the birthplace of the pirate party (remember that?) so i kinda assumed denmark would be at least somewhat similar but a VPN ban for piracy purposes? thats quite a hardline stance

>>107590970
most of them used to apply not long ago in fact some of the national security powers have been expanded here only very recently
in USA of course it was the 9/11 and patriot act that destroyed privacy from govt for them

that's my point though that privacy used to be a thing a very cherished thing before and not assailable for any reason "national security" or otherwise and now people just roll with it as if its normal to have it violated
people have somehow become such cucks, such NPCs

like for national security you could just remove the people who cause those issues instead of searching your own kin your own brothers like you dont trust them

>>107588559
For some reason Bits are always super concerned about the feelings and actions of hypothetical non-existent people.

>>107590654
>Now the Brits actually have to work for their wealth themselves since they can't just steal it from other nations
What is the finance industry?

>>107590970
>the post to which you respond wasn't talking about pr0n
are you illiterate, this is a quote
>This is no different to bringing porn to Bali, animals to Australia or drugs to the US.
and yes it is absolutely different for reasons i stated in my post

you didn't answer my question, are you jewish? this would make sense that you're trying to shill some retarded bullshit that you should be allowed to scan for anti semitism in other peoples countries

how about you fly back to israel and do whatever the fuck anal probing there you want but keep our countries out of it and keep out

>>107591166
Oi, you got a loicence to voice that opinion?

EMP the United Kingdom

>>107591104
>the law says you have to suck my dick
>"WAAAOOOWWW I BET CHUDS WOULD HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT KEKAROO"
remember to down down on the reddit snark when replying to this post. if you lose your cool, you lose the internet argument. saving face is key,

>>107586923
>Serious responsibility is placed on police to use the power wisely
Thank goodness we can trust the government, they have our best interests in mind.

File: 1763124101355198.jpg (19 KB, 418x418)

19 KB JPG

>>107591346
Wow, someones a little mad. No updoot for you.

>>107586862
>broo spying on your citizens is the same as stopping drugs from entering your country or pereventing ecological damage
The slave defends its masters kek. I agree that the Bali one is retarded

>>107589011
>it isnt real bro trust me just ignore the stories and actual damage its just us propaganda
You bug defenders never disappoint

File: free speech is a threat t(...).jpg (128 KB, 660x824)

128 KB JPG

>>107586751 (OP)
Free speech is a threat to our democracy
Privacy is a threat to our democracy
Independent thinking is a threat to our democracy
If you disagree with the the propaganda, you're a threat to our democracy