Skip to main content
You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
For Subscribers Investigations

I asked AI to scan thousands of Barry and Honey Sherman murder case documents. Here’s what it told me I missed

I was skeptical, but curious if AI could tell me something that I had not already learned from endless days and nights perusing documents. Here’s what I found.

Updated
7 min read
BarryHoneygrandchild.JPG

Barry and Honey Sherman shortly before they died, pictured with a newborn grandchild.


New for subscribers! Gift this article to friends and family for free.
Got it!
Kevin Donovan

Kevin Donovan is the Star’s chief investigative reporter based in Toronto. He can be reached at 416-312-3503 or via email: kdonovan@thestar.ca.

More from The Star & partners

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

To join the conversation set a first and last name in your user profile.

Conversations are opinions of our readers and are subject to the Community Guidelines. Toronto Star does not endorse these opinions.

Conversation

|

Top Comments

    1. Comment by William.

      Guided and interpreted properly AI is a very useful tool in many areas. It's just one more investigative tool like fingerprints, DNA, ballistics analysis, and so on. To Donovan's key point it needs the review of a human.

      What strikes me most about this case is that except for Donovan, it appears that it's a case nobody really wants resolved. If the family, and anyone else with a key legitimate interest, wanted this solved the Chief of Police wouldn't have a quiet moment in his day until it was resolved.

    2. Comment by Diane.

      What is frustrating about AI for writing, is while it often it does a great job, based on the command, and the profile set up, once in awhile it is well below par, and further prompts don't improve it. For a recent task, part 1 and 2 were great, then part 3, it used a different format and the content was longer and in a different style. A prompt asking it to use the same format did not work. It is still a valuable tool for some tasks, but in needs good review to ensure accuracy.

    3. Comment by ROBERT.

      Interesting. Thanks Kevin.

      What I have a problem with is that Det. Const. Dennis Yim of the homicide unit said in court that he and Price are up to the task of solving the Sherman murders. And to boot, he didn't think it was time to get help from Det. Sgt. Steve Smith of the Cold Case Unit (who reportedly has had numerous successes in solving old cases)? At this rate they could all be retired from the force and the case will continue to remain unsolved.

    4. Comment by Darcy.

      Funny, when I read of Rob Reiner and his wife's suspected murders this morning, I immediately thought about the Sherman cold case. And thought about it again when it was revealed that a close family member of Reiner was already in custody.

      I have no insight into the circumstances of the Sherman deaths but the statistics certainly suggest that the motives behind the killings have a direct correlation to family circumstances. The cautionary reminder is the deaths of Gene Hackman and his wife who with good police and laboratory work led to human frailties instead of the sinister notions that immediately came to mind.

    5. Comment by Aaron.

      I enjoy the author’s work and appreciate the dedication to this case, but this is an article about “I don’t know how to use a computer.” If you used the Gemini app, you likely exceeded its capacity by 125x, which means all it will do is make stuff up. If you used Gemini in aistudio then you still exceeded capacity by 4x - still the wrong tool. The closest thing to what you wanted as a consumer tool is notebookLM, which wouldn’t have had the problems you wrote your whole article on. Instead you described how hammers are not good at cutting wood, then drew broad conclusions about hammer in general. I would recommend choosing the right tools next time, because they would be invaluable in your line of work.

    Send us your Feedback