Aniconomics🏴‍☠️

7,464 posts
Opens profile photo
Aniconomics🏴‍☠️
@AniconomicsAlt
Anarcho-Capitalist - Hoppean | Agnostic-Atheist | Otaku & Rorikon | Nationalist | 🟨⬛ Novelist & Graphic Designer
Your mothers house

Aniconomics🏴‍☠️’s posts

Replying to and
People need to understand they will never have a chance with these vtubers. Their entertainers first and foremost. You don’t know what they look like in real life or what they are like off screen. Some may even have undeclared significant others.
Replying to
This is why the definition for the loli archetype does not include age among its criteria. It simply refers to a young / young looking female character that is designed to look cute. Tastumaki and Frieren are youthful looking women with petite statures. Their ages are irrelevant
Replying to
Loved Rango. The writing in the introduction was genius. Rango explains the “call to adventure” which is a narrative plot decide that happens in the hero’s journey. Then the call to adventure initiates in real time as Rango is flung out of of his enclosure into the desert.
Replying to
Conveniently avoids the fact most of the world participated in the slave trade and constantly invaded each other for resources. This meme is simply a product of recently bias. Because the British empire was one of the most recent empires.
Replying to
Socialists: Workers should own the means of production. Socialists: Poor people exist, let’s make food a human right. Farmers: Do we own the food we make? Socialists: -__- Socialists: Abolishes private property rights.
It’s not transphobic. Your’re just not accepting of other peoples cultures & preferences. An otokonoko is a man who dresses and acts like a girl but still identifies as a man. It’s a very popular character archtype in Japanese fiction.
Replying to
The Dragonborn ie the player character is technically not a native of Skyrim. But I identified with the Sotrmclaoks more because I felt wronged by the Imperials. There was no trial, I was simply picked up along the way and was scheduled for execution.
Be a responsible adult and avoid content that makes you feel uncomfortable. Judging people over fictional illustrations is childish. Even going so far as to become puritanical. We should ban this and that etc.
Replying to
Most trans activists are unwilling to see the nuance. In their minds, acting feminine and dressing up like a woman makes you trans. If you don’t think you’re trans then you’re an egg that needs cracking. So, they find the idea of a femboy offensive.
Replying to
It sounds like the kids mother affirmed his identity and enabled his social media use by giving him access to a phone. I would have gone with the Dr Phil method. Send him to a ranch with no technology, healthy food and being assigned a lot of responsibilities along with exercise.
I did some research. He got fired over edgy tweets and he flirted with adult woman in DMs. Basically he was cancelled over nothing. He also offended Feminist Frequency. Which to some is a badge of honour. I could be missing something. As far as I can tell, I see nothing wrong.
Replying to
Art is a reflection of the culture it’s produced in. If the archetype is continuously producing a consistent image. Then I have little reason to doubt it. If Japanese users affirm that image then I have even less of a reason to doubt it.
Replying to
Complaining about the age of fictional characters is a sad existence. Just use your freedom of association to disassociate yourself from expression that offends you. Advocating for violence is inappropriate and is not protected under freedom of speech.
I held off on the remake, Just the first two seasons and the light novels. I will probably watch the remake in the future. The art style seems is more in line with the light novels but I heard there’s CGI which I am not a fan of.
Replying to
The Producers is a good film. I would have went the Buddhist angle since the Swastika was appropriated from Buddhist symbolism. But The Producers make more thematic sense given all the film references.
Replying to
(1) First Atheism in itself is a non-belief. There’s no set of principles inherently associated with atheism. You can’t really build off an entire philosophy over the fact you don’t believe in leprechauns.
I am unaware of the full situation. But I am providing context on what rights he is entitled to. If he used force on the woman before asking her to leave the property first. That would be wrong. It’s a different story if she tried to break into his house.
Replying to
This discussion is fundamentally retarded. Appealing to the law is a logical fallacy. The law does not necessarily always align with morality. Human rights are based on consent. Does lolicon violate any human rights? No, then it’s protected under free speech.