2024-05-23:contra no-source-doctrine,2024-05-25/26:bias-bars-consistency,prescriptive-marked word but no prescription-bar :

Dear HeliumTrades-Team,

2024-05-23:contra no-source-doctrine :

In "http://web.archive.org/web/20240522220839/https://heliumtrades.com/media-bias/zacks.com"> title:"Should You Play NVIDIA Earnings with Bullish ETFs? - Zacks Investment Research

" > Article Text:"Make sure to be on the lookout for the next edition of the ETF Spotlight and remember to subscribe! If you have any comments or questions, please email podcast@zacks.com." reveals source contradictory to no-source-doctrine keeping HT-AI secret what brand it is.

And

does the HT-AI understood with context correctly "Privacy Policy ??|??" or does this text-kind confuses HT-AI more?

2024-05-25:

I noticed in http://web.archive.org/web/20240525223537/https://heliumtrades.com/media-bias/PBS/?date=2024-05-22 the speculation, in title:"Rep. Raskin on urging DOJ to investigate 'big oil' for deception on climate change

" > "Anti-Corporate <-> Pro-Corporate "

" Scientific <-> Superstitious "

"-bias-bar . No progress-bars in title:"Trump's plans for health care and reproductive rights if he returns to White House" and some others showing of with some or no bias-bars, which was known earlier.

Still thanks for the effort to add and maintain new progress-bars.

prescriptive-marked word but no prescription-bar : http://web.archive.org/web/20240525223537/https://heliumtrades.com/media-bias/PBS/?date=2024-05-22 > title:"Spain, Norway and Ireland will recognize a Palestinian state" has "will" dark-brown-colored as prescriptive but no prescription-bias-bar.

Same article-content on 1 hour difference with different Social Media Shares:

2x title:"Trump's plans for healthcare and reproductive rights if he returns to White House

": 1. being "http://web.archive.org/web/20240523042415/https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trumps-plans-for-healthcare-and-reproductive-rights-if-he-returns-to-white-house" and 2. with difference being "20240524004151/.

Both no bias-bars despite the consume-animating (advertising): "Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else.".

First.:"Social Media Shares: 56",

Second.:"Social Media Shares: 111",

Both: Controlled with https://www.site24x7.com/tools/diff-checker.html , no difference in PBS's published manuscript.

2x the same article but with Social Media Shares being summed up skews HT's popularity-metric.

Plagiat-detector-idea: Some articles like "

PHOTOS: Barbie honors star athletes like Venus Williams

" has "(AP)" in their beginning looking like the article-writer already copy&pasted or variated content from Associated Press. HT-AI can call this out and by doing so, also trace where the content originated, since the Associated Press could copy&paste others news-articles.

Original <-> Copied - How closely this article's symbol-combination looks like from another news-article X.

Unique <-> Widespread - How similar this article's content is with all the other from HT-analyzed-content.

http://web.archive.org/web/20240526085650/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Satwinder-Singh-10/publication/346772467_Text_Similarity_Measures_in_News_Articles_by_Vector_Space_Model_Using_NLP/links/619278163068c54fa5eae527/Text-Similarity-Measures-in-News-Articles-by-Vector-Space-Model-Using-NLP.pdf : "Many of the articles posted on a news website are very similar to many other news websites."...Conclusion: "The three methodologies are the similarity of Cosine with tf-idf vectors, similarity of Jaccard with tf-idf vectors, Bag of words Euclidean dis- tance. All three of these methods showed promising results, but among these three methods, cosine similarity using tf- idf showed greater accuracy, recall and F-measure scores of 81.25%, 100% and 76.92%, respectively. The accuracy of the other two methods may be improved with the Doc2Vec model [6], which takes text corpus as input and generates document vectors as output.

"

© 🇨Marked <-> Plagiarism

Copied doesn't equal plagiarism since the ethical journalist's definition is : http://web.archive.org/web/20240526082401/https://ethics.journalists.org/topics/plagiarism-and-attribution/ : "Plagiarism is traditionally defined as taking someone else’s work and presenting it as your own.". So HT-AI has to look at all articles's similarness-index and how prominent their "originator" is marked. The plagiarism-claim to NYT is inside nytimes.com : [http://web.archive.org/web/20240526082807/https://archive.nytimes.com/publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/01/31/giving-credit-a-work-in-progress-at-the-times/?ref=thepubliceditor <- http://web.archive.org/web/20240526082401/https://ethics.journalists.org/topics/plagiarism-and-attribution/ ] .

And the problem is widespread : http://web.archive.org/web/20240526083557/https://www.cjr.org/watchdog/journalism_has_a_plagiarism_pr.php : "A CJR cover story in 1995 analyzed 20 cases of plagiarism in the previous seven years, concluding, “Punishment is uneven, ranging from severe to virtually nothing even for major offenses.” Laura Parker was fired from The Post in 1991 for lifting quotes from the Associated Press and Miami Herald. Denver Post columnist Ken Hamblin, meanwhile, was suspended for two months in 1994 after he copied five paragraphs from a Rocky Mountain News report. “The sin itself carries neither public humiliation nor the mark of Cain,” CJR’s Trudy Lieberman wrote. “Some editors will keep a plagiarist on staff or will knowingly hire one if talent outweighs the infraction.”"..."A University of Maryland study found similar ambiguity in 76 newspaper plagiarism cases between 1997 and 2006. Forty-three of those offenders — 56 percent — lost their jobs, with the rate of punishment steadily increasing from minor to major to repeated infractions",

http://web.archive.org/web/20240526083752/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212376/ : "Plagiarism has become more common in both dental and medical communities"

Sincerely, Rejmer

2024-05-19/20:2x bias-assessment on 1 hyperlink,not working footnotes:

HeliumTrades-Team,

http://web.archive.org/web/20240518235615/https://heliumtrades.com/balanced-news/?q=Why+Arab+world+democratic+freedom (https://archive.ph/fuYL1): 2x title:"Why There Is Still Hope For Democratic Liberalism in the Arab World - Democracy for the Arab World Now" analyzed from 2024-05-17 with 2 different tag-beginning-symbols ( & ).

Broken footnote-links : https://web.archive.org/web/20240520115930/https://heliumtrades.com/media-bias/ajc.com : "

stock market fluctuations [ajc.com, ajc.com, ajc.com],

" The first 2 footnotes (https://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/stock-market-today-wall-street-falls-sharply-to-close-out-its-worst-week-since-october/DUGVT4AZFFDNBFCW6EIBZIBNPY/ , https://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/stock-market-today-wall-street-rallies-to-a-record-as-big-tech-stocks-renew-their-run/IVYXAKO2UZCEFPDHRHQ5VB7FNI/ ) shows "404".

Replacable with 1. "http://web.archive.org/web/20240413011050/https://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/stock-market-today-wall-street-falls-sharply-to-close-out-its-worst-week-since-october/DUGVT4AZFFDNBFCW6EIBZIBNPY/" and 2. "https://web.archive.org/web/20240312222312/https://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/stock-market-today-wall-street-rallies-to-a-record-as-big-tech-stocks-renew-their-run/IVYXAKO2UZCEFPDHRHQ5VB7FNI/"

"

local incidents with significant community impact [ajc.com]

" :

Is a long extensive many-charged local court process with a promiment figure arguing for 1.5 million, impacted individuals at a birthday party "Dodds suffered broken ribs, a collapsed lung, cuts and bruises", "Raquel Smouthers told the court that she was at the party and witnessed the deaths of her nephew and niece.", "Chidester is a former commodore at the boat club" with no police records nor tickets being the crash cause enough for "significant community impact"? Yet it seems correct.

Sincerely, Rejmer

- May 20, 20242024-05-17:Memes in most objective,textdiff-text:

2024-05-17:Memes in most objective,textdiff : Dear HeliumTrades-Team,

"?sort=Objectivity"-issue:

http://web.archive.org/web/20240517081700/https://heliumtrades.com/balanced-news/Sweden?sort=Objectivity , http://web.archive.org/web/20240517081521/https://heliumtrades.com/balanced-news/Austria?sort=Objectivity , http://web.archive.org/web/20240517081717/https://heliumtrades.com/balanced-news/Denmark?sort=Objectivity , http://web.archive.org/web/20240517082345/https://heliumtrades.com/balanced-news/Norway?sort=Objectivity and maybe other undiscovered ones have mostly to only memes in their search-results-listing. Norway and Austria has either only memes or one article.

Croatia and Bosnia on the other hand doesn't. ( http://web.archive.org/20240517090000/https://heliumtrades.com/balanced-news/Croatia?sort=Objectivity , http://web.archive.org/web/20240517082523/https://heliumtrades.com/balanced-news/Bosnia?sort=Objectivity ). Probably because the "Objectivity"-rating in those tags are rarer.

https://archive.ph/20240517200600/https://heliumtrades.com/balanced-news/North%20Korea%20internet%20access has "

North Korean animation outsourcing for Amazon, HBO Max series

A misconfigured North Korean Internet cloud server has provided a fascinating glance into the world of North Korean animation outsourcing and how foreign companies might be inadvertently employing North Korean companies on information technology (IT) projects. The incident also underlines how difficult it is for foreign companies to verify their outsourced work is not potentially breaking sanctions and ending up on computers in Pyongyang.

38north.org Apr 22, 2024

" as third result with 2 generic results on top with

seemingly same "Objective"-bar:"2.5-gaped 1/7-sized blue bar"

" Objective <-> Subjective :

"

" Uncredible <-> Credible :

Rational <-> Irrational :

Article Text", yet when sorting to most objective (https://archive.ph/20240517200631/https://heliumtrades.com/balanced-news/North%20Korea%20internet%20access?sort=Objectivity) , it shows "

Report: North Korean Animators May Have Worked on Amazon, HBO Shows

A report published from watchdog group 38 North suggests U.S. animation companies may have unwittingly used work from North Korea. The post

Breitbart Apr 23, 2024

" with slightly worse objective journalist performance

(

" Objective <-> Subjective :"2.5-gaped 1/7-sized blue bar"

Prescriptive:

Political:

Uncredible <-> Credible :

Rational <-> Irrational :

")

and no " "-tagged article but the first result with " "-tag. Is it because the more bias-bars, the more confident the HT-AI and or sorting-system is to make it objective for sure? And no "Rational <-> " ️ "Irrational"-emojis are missing at 2024-05-17 18:40 .

2x-analyzed article:

"https://archive.ph/2024.05.17/https://heliumtrades.com/media-bias/cbs?date=2024-05-12" has same article (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/marine-veteran-says-he-tried-to-help-north-koreans-in-spain-defect-60-minutes-transcript/) analyzed twice both in title:"Veteran faces charges after he says he tried to help North Koreans defect" but only one has " "-tag and with different reader-headline-overview.,

http://web.archive.org/web/20240517211302/https://heliumtrades.com/media-bias/Vox?date=2024-05-12 with tag and title:" How to fight without ruining a relationship" and " How to argue without destroying a relationship - Vox.com" with same reader-headline-overview too.

http://web.archive.org/web/20240517212046/https://heliumtrades.com/media-bias/vox in reader-mode: "My Bias: My training data includes a wide range of global texts, predisposing me to a nuanced understanding but also to inherent Western and liberal biases, influencing how I analyze and interpret global events, especially around sensitive topics like politics and social justice." - 2024-04-27 My suggestion: HeliumTrades has to define sensitive topics and tagged them as "Sensitive" to be more aware of HT's biases.

Sensitive <-> Rough

Polarization/Divisive <-> ️Consensus/Consensus-making/Uniting

Text-difference between http://web.archive.org/web/20240517200610/https://heliumtrades.com/balanced-news/North%20Korea%20internet%20access -> "

North Korean animation outsourcing for Amazon, HBO Max series

"..."

38north.org

" and http://web.archive.org/web/20240422194029/https://www.38north.org/2024/04/what-we-learned-inside-a-north-korean-internet-server-how-well-do-you-know-your-partners/:

Original archived article has:"A Month of Animation

", "The identity of the person or persons uploading the files could not be determined.

", "Figure"-picture-descriptions, "Projects Identified", "Season 3 of “Invincible,” an Amazon Original animated series produced by California-based Skybound Entertainment. A document on the server carried the name of the series and “Viltruminte Pants LLC,” which appears to be part of the Skybound group.

“Iyanu, Child of Wonder,” an anime about a superhero created by Maryland-based YouNeek Studios and being produced and animated by Lion Forge Entertainment for airing in 2024 on HBO Max. “Dahliya In Bloom” (魔導具師ダリヤはうつむかない), a Japanese anime series scheduled to air from July 2024. Files named “猫” (Cat) that also carry the name of Ekachi Epilka, an animation studio in Hokkaido, Japan (Figure 1). Video files that appear to be from “Octonauts,” a BBC children’s cartoon. The files had no additional identifying information and appeared to be completed, so it is possible these were not worked on by the animators. An unidentified animation series with documents that refer to Dalian’s Shepherd Boy Animation (大连牧童动漫).

", "Implications: Due Diligence Needed on IT Outsourcing

", "

The case caused the US to update its guidance for spotting North Korean IT workers." The green-lack represents over-fixation of letter-level-details ignoring the relation between letters.

Sincerely, Rejmer

-error-

Reply: 2024-08-07:Reply: 2024-07-07 web.archive.org is temporary offline:

2025-09-09: "Hi Rejmer,

Just rolled out the “intelligence” meter to judge how intelligent articles/publications are. More data will be included going forward.

Conner" Reply:v

Rejmer:"2025-09-12:

Dear HeliumTrades-Team,

I tried to save https://heliumtrades.com/media-bias/lew-rockwell yet it says "capture failed because Save Page Now does not have access rights"..."(HTTP status=403)." in "https://megalodon.jp/2025-0913-0539-10/https://web.archive.org:443/save/https://heliumtrades.com/media-bias/lew-rockwell". I also noticed that the bar-color below " Libertarian <—> Authoritarian " is changing. Does that mean "undetermined importance-scale" of that bias? It's more archive-friendly to have a static color. Either 50% green and 50% red or grey and maybe changing color-scale of importance from (Red > Orange > Yellow > Green) to (Black > Grey > White), but that might be counter-intuitive for the average reader. https://megalodon.jp/2025-0913-0527-54/https://heliumtrades.com:443/media-bias/lew-rockwell doesn't show emojis.

By clicking "   The 9/11 Nightmare Never Ends" in https://megalodon.jp/2025-0913-0527-54/https://heliumtrades.com:443/media-bias/lew-rockwell , it redirects to original page instead the archived one.

Between "More than anything else, that horror from 9/11 haunts me." and "In the first few years after the Islamic terror " in HeliumTrades, there's no line-break compared to those same statements in https://web.archive.org/web/20250912205204/https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/09/no_author/the-9-11-nightmare-never-ends/ . HeliumTrades's Article Text ignores line-breaks in the beginning except "This article was

One of the nightmares that", "from 9/11 haunts me.

In the first", yet adds more line-breaks the further one scroll below.

HT's Article Text also repeated the article from LewRockwell.com 2x. One without linebreaks and one with accruate linebreaks. That either shows inconsistencies of what an "Article Text" is or another unknown standard of analyzing the same article in different revisions.

Inside lewrockwell.com , between "As the years went by, those videos disappeared." and "Even during the annual memorials for 9/11, the sight of Americans falling from the sky was gradually obscured" are two spaces " " meanwhile HT-Article-Text has 1 space " ".

Analyzing "This article was" alone is more useless since it's very vague to process what it means. It's also an incomplete information for HeliumTrades-"Article Text" about https://web.archive.org/web/20250912205204/https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/09/no_author/the-9-11-nightmare-never-ends/ : "This article was originally published on American Thinker.". It's unfinished.

https://web.archive.org/web/20250912205204/https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/09/no_author/the-9-11-nightmare-never-ends/ uses one space-gap inside sentences, yet two between finished sentences and finished sequenced paragraphs like "(1) We were in a civilizational war, and (2) militant Islamists were our enemies.". This can be noted my HT-AI as well when fixed, although "Article Text" is just a vague approximation which shows vaguely what HT-AI read with their "eyes" as well.

The "Advertising"-bias might missed "" as an ".img" (BURT'S GOLD PAGE) and one can argue that Political Theatre, LRC Blog, LRC Podcasts with "MORE"-links also counts as advertisement.

I can see how using more philosophical concepts and abstract, metaphorical statements like "Marxist dialectic was in full force" leads to higher intelligence (if rigidly defined). The inclusion of "Marxist" makes it more political. The bias-assessment seems fine for the first heuristically reading of https://web.archive.org/web/20250912205204/https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/09/no_author/the-9-11-nightmare-never-ends/ .

SIncerely, Rejmer",

2024-08-07:Re: 2024-07-07:web.archive.org is temporary offline

Dear HeliumTrades-Team,

It works now.

Sincerely, Rejmer

2024-07-07: web.archive.org is temporary offline:

Dear HeliumTrades-Team,

From https://archive.ph/ZB2Ec or every web.archive-links I clicked at 2024-07-07, the page says:"

Temporarily Offline

". megalodon.jp or archive.ph are available.

In "https://archive.ph/Qcj4R": "

How to catch a glimpse of the Milky Way galaxy this summer - Detroit Free Press

Article Bias: Informative, descriptive article on how to see the Milky Way galaxy with a slight promotion of Michigan's dark sky parks", the Article-Bias-description says "slight promotion" without promotion-bias.

Article Text missed: picture-description, "Here's everything you might want to know to catch a glimpse of the Milky Way galaxy.

How is it possible to see the Milky Way galaxy?

", bold in-between-titles all except one with "

?

" in their end, article suggestions with and after "More:", "In order to see the Milky Way, you have to eradicate all sources of light, even moonlight.", "Detroit Free Press"'s "News Alerts"-Newsletter-ad, state-park-location-list for avoiding light pollution and seeing the "Milky Way", "You can also use a light pollution map to look for other nearby areas with low light pollution."

Sincerely, Rejmer

2024-06-14:AI-Thoughts, Archiving-videos-method in case:

Dear HeliumTrades-Team,

"Written by AI"-bias contributes a bit closer to some realistic truth, yet how relevant and useful is it for HT-AI's limited energy to process if someone is AI or human?

On positive side, this bias is good to check if the author is more likely saying the truth about if article X is written by human/AI. And the human HeliumTrades-reader could make a probabilistic guess that this article is more likely to be hallucinated because this content belongs to that category: AI-written.

Yet on negative side: That above reasoning for human HT-readers is indirect and assumes/projects more bias than it measures. I slightly believe at some point there would be no truth-relevant difference between humans and AIs because scientific progress making at least some AIs more human-like.

At what characteristics does the HT-AI differentiate between human and AI? What is AIness, the distinction between "artificial" electronic impulses and beyond programmers-made pattern-recognition and "natural" evolution-made biological intelligence?

I am unsure about intelligence and consciousness. What both AIs and human intelligence have in common is that they are emergent properties of a certain pattern/system constituting cognitive functions.

AI and Human Intelligence (HI)-differences:

http://web.archive.org/web/20240614193330/https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/difference-between-artificial-intelligence-and-human-intelligence/ :

AI:"

• AI can process vast amounts of data much faster than humans.

• AI can work around the clock without needing breaks or rest.

• AI can perform tasks that are too dangerous or difficult for humans.

", "

• AI lacks the creativity and intuition that humans possess.

• AI is limited by its programming and may not be able to adapt to new or unexpected situations.

• AI may make errors if not programmed and trained properly.

"

HI: "

• HI has creativity, intuition, and emotional intelligence that AI lacks.

• HI can adapt to new and unexpected situations.

• HI can provide ethical and moral considerations in decision-making.

", "

• HI is limited by its physical and mental capabilities.

• HI is prone to biases and may make errors or poor decisions.

• HI requires rest and breaks, which can slow down processes.

"

Common:"

• Both AI and HI can learn and improve over time.

• Both AI and HI can be used to solve complex problems and make decisions.

• Both AI and HI can process and interpret information from the world around them.

"

List: "

Artificial Intelligence Human Intelligence

1. Emergence AI is an advancement made by human insights; its early improvement is credited to Norbert Weiner who theorized on criticism mechanisms. On the other hand, human creatures are made with the intrinsic capacity to think, reason, review, etc.

2. Nature Artificial intelligence (AI) strives to build machines that can mimic human behavior and carry out human-like tasks. Human intelligence seeks to adapt to new situations by combining a variety of cognitive processes.

3. State Machines are digital. The human brain is analogous.

4. Function AI-powered machines rely on input of data and instructions. Humans use their brains’ memory, processing power, and cognitive abilities.

5. Pace/Rate of AI and human As compared to people, computers can handle more data at a speedier rate. For occurrence, in the event that the human intellect can solve a math problem in 5 minutes, AI can solve 10 problems in a minute. In terms of speed, humans cannot beat the speed of AI or machines.

6. Learning ability As machines are unable to reason abstractly or draw conclusions from the past. They can only acquire knowledge through information and frequent training, but they will never develop a human-specific thinking process. Learning from various events and prior experiences is the foundation of human intelligence.

7. Decision Making AI is profoundly objective in choice making because it analyzes based on absolutely accumulated data. Human choices may be affected by subjective components which are not based on figures alone.

8. Perfection AI frequently produces precise comes about because its capacities are based on a set of modified rules. For human insights, there’s more often than not room for “human error” as certain subtle elements may be missed at one point or the other.

9. Energy Consumption The modern computer generally uses 2 watts of energy. On the other hand, human brains uses about 25 watts

10. Modification of AI and Human AI takes much more time to adjust to unused changes. Human insights can be adaptable in reaction to the changes in their environment. This makes individuals able to memorize and ace different skills.

11. Versatility AI can as it were perform fewer assignments at the same time as a framework can as it were learn duties one at a time. The human judgment skills underpin multitasking as proven by differing and concurrent roles.

12. Social Networking AI has not aced the capacity to choose up on related social and enthusiastic cues. On the other hand, as social creatures, people are much way better at social interaction since they can prepare theoretical data, have self-awareness, and are delicate to others’ feelings.

13. Task It does optimization of the system. It cannot be creative or innovative as humans can only think and machines cannot. It is innovative or creative.

Artificial Intelligence Human Intelligence

Processing Based on algorithms and mathematical models Based on cognitive processes and biological structures

Learning Based on data and feedback loops Based on experience, intuition, and creativity

Speed Can process data and perform tasks much faster than humans Slower than AI in processing large amounts of data, but can make complex decisions quickly

Adaptability Can quickly adapt to new data and situations Can adapt to new situations, learn from experience, and make decisions based on context

Emotions Lacks emotions and empathy Capable of feeling emotions and empathy

Creativity Limited ability to be creative or think outside of the box Capable of creativity, imagination, and innovation

Ethics Does not have a moral code or conscience Has a moral code and conscience that guides decision-making

Physical Limitations Does not have physical limitations, can operate 24/7 Limited by physical capabilities and requires rest and maintenance

"

http://web.archive.org/web/20240614190246/https://www.techtarget.com/searchEnterpriseAI/tip/Artificial-intelligence-vs-human-intelligence-How-are-they-different : "

One-shot vs. multishot learning

": "Human intelligence. One of the most miraculous qualities of humans is the ability to learn new concepts and ideas from a small number of samples, sometimes from a single one. Most humans are even able to understand and identify a pattern and to use it to generalize and extrapolate. Having been shown one or two images of a leopard, for example, and then being shown images of various types of animals, a human would be able to determine with high accuracy whether those images depicted a leopard. This ability is referred to as one-shot learning.

AI. Much more often than not, artificial intelligence systems need copious examples to achieve comparable levels of learning. An AI system may require millions, even billions, of such samples to learn at a level beyond that of a human of average intelligence. This requirement for multishot learning distinguishes AI from human intelligence. Many researchers feel that this difference is a strong basis for describing humans as being, on average, much more efficient learners than AI systems.", "

Imagination and recitation

", "

Multisensory input and output

"

Human-AI-Synthesis: "As AI research and implementation continue apace and the practical, existential need for more applied human imagination grows, we should expect to see the two forms of intelligence increasingly brought together in human-AI teaming."

http://web.archive.org/web/20240614190703/https://www.ft.com/content/1ff66eb9-166f-4082-958f-debe84e92e9e : "But while the algorithms behind those feats can seem stunningly intelligent, they currently differ from humans in that one crucial respect — they don’t know what they don’t know, an ability psychologists refer to as metacognition."..."2019 paper from Matthias Hein’s group at the University of Tübingen showed, as the test images become more and more different from the training data, the AI’s confidence goes up, not down — exactly the opposite of what it should do."

http://web.archive.org/web/20240614190933/https://www.kornferry.com/institute/human-or-ai-the-nuances-of-intelligence : "Intelligence exists in various forms. Humans have what we call General Intelligence (G), the ability to learn, reason, and solve problems across a wide range of domains."

"Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)—the intelligence exhibited by platforms like ChatGPT—allows an AI system to generate new material, be it audio, image, or text, from previously trained data. And thanks to advances in computing power, the speed at which information can be analyzed and content produced far surpasses that of any human. However, GenAI is a narrow kind of intelligence, lacking a broad range of basic human capabilities. GenAI models are designed to perform a specific task and to do that specific task well. So, while ChatGPT may be better than humans at synthesizing research quickly, it cannot intuit the subtleties and subtexts of relationship dynamics."

What GenAI exhibit from human brain:"Learning Approaches","Sequential Data Processing: Generative AI models learn context by identifying sequential data. ","Pattern Recognition"

"Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)envisions a conceptual AI system with human-like reasoning, judgment, and wisdom, capable of feeling, problem-solving, learning, and performing various cognitive tasks independently. But AGI is still just a theory. Although some future AI models come close to AGI’s description, they still rely heavily on supplied data and human prompting and have yet to form independent reasoning."

Discussion and pointing out Human-AI-dialectic:"While some argue that we will never reach AGI, the stark reality of vastly changing landscapes, adoption rates, and investments in the technology means that its capabilities should not be ignored. Nor should we ignore that humans and their incredible brains have developed these incredible tools. Humans and AI are closely connected and recognizing the complexity—and necessity—of this relationship will enable us to become better users of generative AI."

"Despite the fact that there is no universally accepted definition, Artificial intelligence (AI) is the ability to think and act like a human. "..."

The father of AI, John McCarthy (1927-2011), defines it as "The science and engineering of making intelligent machines"."

"Norvig and Russell, the authors of “Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach” define four different AI approaches:

Virtually forever. We have a lot of free space and although the archive grows with time, the storage and bandwidth get cheaper."

Have a good day from Rejmer.

Rejmer2017 0 <rejmer2017@gmail.com>

So., 8. Jan. 2023, 03:29

an contact@email.heliumtrades.com

Add: By scrolling further from the middle to the border out or halfly donut-like with cursor or thumb many times in HeliumTrades bias-wheel by sources such as law360, little bias/es are showed at different size-scale.

Rejmer2017 0 <rejmer2017@gmail.com>

So., 8. Jan. 2023, 04:06

an contact@email.heliumtrades.com

P. S. S.: There's rarely an occurrence where during that zooming, it shows a bit "Sensational" in bias-wheel too, but by restarting the site, "Sensational" disappears. That situation was in begin January 2023 discovered and could be a bug.

Also https://web.archive.org/web/https://heliumtrades.com/media-bias/prweb.com has bias-wheel to "Most X Articles" by having 0 Prescriptive bias with the most prescriptive articles.

” ; 2023-01-06 : 23:46 : “City Journal Bias

Posteingang

Conner Productions <conner@connerpro.com>

Sa., 7. Jan. 2023, 00:46

an mich

Hi Rejmer,

I really appreciate the feedback.

1.) I've updated the model to include more headlines, which has greatly increased the accuracy of the bias analyses. City Journal is looking more accurate now.

2.) The bias wheel will only appear if there are a minimum number of articles to look at. I've increased the number of articles being fed in so that more sources can have wheel charts e.g NCBI.

3.) On the source overview page, I've added a sortable composite "bias score" (desktop only).

4.) I've integrated Helium with Archive.org, which will increase the data they are able to store of my site.

5.) I've added better perspective/bias analysis with citations to stories e.g https://heliumtrades.com/balanced-news/russian-troops

Best,

Conner

” ; 2023-01-02 : 13:25 : “City-Journal is right-wing but detected as biased against democrats

Rejmer2017 0 <rejmer2017@gmail.com>

Mo., 2. Jan. 2023, 14:25

an contact@email.heliumtrades.com

Dear HeliumTrades-Team,

Even considering that the summary fromhttp://web.archive.org/web/20230102135055/https://heliumtrades.com/media-bias/city-journal only focuses on headlines and removing source names, I want to point out that it is against democrats contra to that page said anti-republican. https://www.city-journal.org/when-ideology-trumps-empathy signals right-wing in my opinion and their reddit attracts right-wingers and subreddit ones such as ProGun. Media Bias/Fact Check, Wikipedia, Reddittor, Wikidata and AllSides agrees on a conservative city-journal.org notion.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/city-journal/https://www.allsides.com/news-source/city-journal-media-bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_Journal https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/6h7h7d/city_journal_recommendation_for_rightwing/https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5123254https://www.reddit.com/domain/city-journal.org/top/?sort=top&t=month

Right-wing audience founding:https://apps.apple.com/us/app/city-journal/id420931366?see-all=reviewshttps://twitter.com/CityJournal/status/1609655706340278274?cxt=HHwWhIC-scXV0tYsAAAA

Catched right-wing headlines:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08913810508443641

Also a cleaner look for the headlines:https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=city-journal.org

Useful link in general maybe:https://www.demblognews.com/2017/10/disinformation-news-list.html

Have a good day, Rejmer.

Rejmer2017 0 <rejmer2017@gmail.com>

Mo., 2. Jan. 2023, 14:26

an contact@email.heliumtrades.com

*City-Journal is right-wing but detected as biased against republicans and the Trump-Administration

”