We're tired of all the misinformation

If you're here, you probably are too. Most people just re-share whatever they see without checking. Factually exists for people who want a calm, non-partisan place to verify things. Support it to keep it independent — no ads, no political money.

D
Dee$53h ago

I appreciate being able to check information for validity.

M
Mark$98h ago

Yep, that info helped.

R
Religion Is Fiction$1/mo1d ago

Good to know there's a place where facts live

D
Dawn$52d ago

Great, in depth information.

S
Someone In Az Usa$502d ago

I love the approach, the layout, the links to sources--and that you're not based in the US. I really, really hope this continues and (cynicism poking through) that you're not an AI bot yourself.....

A
A.b. $22d ago

Thank you for making fact finding easier.

M
Mikal$53d ago

In this day and age, we are desperately in need of unbiased fact checking. The answers we seek might not always be clear or unequivocal but at a minimum they should at least be honest.

D
David Denman$54d ago

Appreciate reliable information.

A
Alan E. Kiviat$5/mo5d ago

You appear strongly to follow one of my favorite slogans: "We have to earn our wings every day." Like a friendly breeze under a bird's wings---tho I'm no gull (ie no gullible type, well, 99.9% of the time, min)--you've buoyed my hopes. For raising---with lotsa' help needed elsewhere---the reason/maelstrom ratio in at least American discourse re. public affairs. And re. scientific, commercial and bunk claims. Not at all always 3 mutually exclusive categories, either. Here's some monthly dough.

C
Concerned American$51w ago

Not sure how you substantiate everything and how large of an organization factually is, but if you are what you say you are and report everything through unbiased eyes or opinions, you're to be commended. BTW, how do you fact check factually?

J
Jayne Genter$51w ago

Thank you

S
Someone$351w ago

The news media in the US has shown a weakness I have never seen. I believe nothing I see or hear from the major 3 networks. I really turned to CNN and MSNBC years ago but have since lost it with them. I want to believe in Factually and its policy and will hopefully become a permanent member. Keep up the great work!

S
Someone$11w ago

I would like to belive in your FACTUALLY, im donating a one dollar monthly if im confenced my you reports i will sending larger donatacions. What i see in most of the media now is mostly un true, What a World we live in now.

@
@paloma_phoenix_dance$5/mo1w ago

I like the step by step look and the highlighting of sources.

@
@specialfx35$101w ago

Truly appreciate independent fact checking. Can't trust the media bias anymore.

K
Kmherm$5/mo1w ago

Facts are far more useful than opinions.

P
Petra$251w ago

There is so much distorted information depending on a person's bias that it clouds the truth. To make my own assessment/opinion I need cold hard facts

B
Beth Sinclair$5/mo1w ago

Good to have some independent fact checks.

E
Elisabeth$251w ago

Thank you for this great way to quickly look up facts about laws that have passed and government statistics.

M
Margaret Sivis$251w ago

Like the detailed info you provide

D
Dee$53h ago

I appreciate being able to check information for validity.

M
Mark$98h ago

Yep, that info helped.

R
Religion Is Fiction$1/mo1d ago

Good to know there's a place where facts live

D
Dawn$52d ago

Great, in depth information.

S
Someone In Az Usa$502d ago

I love the approach, the layout, the links to sources--and that you're not based in the US. I really, really hope this continues and (cynicism poking through) that you're not an AI bot yourself.....

A
A.b. $22d ago

Thank you for making fact finding easier.

M
Mikal$53d ago

In this day and age, we are desperately in need of unbiased fact checking. The answers we seek might not always be clear or unequivocal but at a minimum they should at least be honest.

D
David Denman$54d ago

Appreciate reliable information.

A
Alan E. Kiviat$5/mo5d ago

You appear strongly to follow one of my favorite slogans: "We have to earn our wings every day." Like a friendly breeze under a bird's wings---tho I'm no gull (ie no gullible type, well, 99.9% of the time, min)--you've buoyed my hopes. For raising---with lotsa' help needed elsewhere---the reason/maelstrom ratio in at least American discourse re. public affairs. And re. scientific, commercial and bunk claims. Not at all always 3 mutually exclusive categories, either. Here's some monthly dough.

C
Concerned American$51w ago

Not sure how you substantiate everything and how large of an organization factually is, but if you are what you say you are and report everything through unbiased eyes or opinions, you're to be commended. BTW, how do you fact check factually?

J
Jayne Genter$51w ago

Thank you

S
Someone$351w ago

The news media in the US has shown a weakness I have never seen. I believe nothing I see or hear from the major 3 networks. I really turned to CNN and MSNBC years ago but have since lost it with them. I want to believe in Factually and its policy and will hopefully become a permanent member. Keep up the great work!

S
Someone$11w ago

I would like to belive in your FACTUALLY, im donating a one dollar monthly if im confenced my you reports i will sending larger donatacions. What i see in most of the media now is mostly un true, What a World we live in now.

@
@paloma_phoenix_dance$5/mo1w ago

I like the step by step look and the highlighting of sources.

@
@specialfx35$101w ago

Truly appreciate independent fact checking. Can't trust the media bias anymore.

K
Kmherm$5/mo1w ago

Facts are far more useful than opinions.

P
Petra$251w ago

There is so much distorted information depending on a person's bias that it clouds the truth. To make my own assessment/opinion I need cold hard facts

B
Beth Sinclair$5/mo1w ago

Good to have some independent fact checks.

E
Elisabeth$251w ago

Thank you for this great way to quickly look up facts about laws that have passed and government statistics.

M
Margaret Sivis$251w ago

Like the detailed info you provide

322 supportersGoal: 1,000
32%
Join Dee, Mark, Religion Is Fiction and 319 others who check for themselves

How many criminal cases has Donald Trump been convicted in and what were the charges?

Checked on December 9, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Donald Trump has been convicted in one criminal case: a New York jury found him guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records tied to hush‑money payments; he was sentenced to an unconditional discharge on January 10, 2025 (no jail or fine) and is appealing the conviction [1] [2]. Other major criminal cases — federal prosecutions and Fulton County, Georgia — were either dismissed, paused, disqualified, or remain subject to procedural appeals in the reporting provided [3] [2] [1].

1. The one conviction: New York “hush‑money” falsifying business records

A Manhattan jury convicted Trump on 34 counts of falsifying business records, tied to payments made during the 2016 campaign to conceal damaging information, commonly called the “hush‑money” case; the jury verdict came May 30, 2024 [1] [3]. Judge Juan M. Merchan sentenced him to an unconditional discharge — leaving the convictions on the record but imposing no custody or fine — on January 10, 2025 [1] [2].

2. What the New York conviction legally means and what’s next

The conviction is criminal and felony‑level under New York law for falsifying business records in the first degree; Merchan upheld the conviction in post‑trial rulings and Trump has filed an appeal [4] [1]. The unconditional discharge spares Trump immediate punishment but leaves a criminal record and ongoing appellate litigation; news outlets report the Supreme Court and other courts were involved at points in post‑trial procedural filings [5] [4].

3. Other major criminal matters: convictions? No — procedural outcomes, dismissals, pauses

Reporting shows Trump faced multiple additional criminal indictments — federal cases (classified documents in Florida and election‑related charges in D.C.) and a Fulton County, Georgia, indictment — but those matters in the sources provided were dismissed, paused, or involved prosecutorial disqualification rather than resulting in convictions in the cited accounts [3] [1] [2]. For example, Fulton County’s prosecution was paused while courts considered disqualifying Fulton prosecutor Fani Willis and that disqualification was reported as granted by an appeals court in December [3].

4. Totals and counts in context: charged vs. convicted

Across the four indictments cited in the reporting, Trump was charged with a large number of counts (reported as 88 total charges across indictments), but as of the reporting dates in these sources he had been convicted on 34 counts and many other charges were dismissed or remain unresolved on appeal [5] [3]. Available sources do not mention any additional criminal convictions beyond the 34 falsifying‑records counts [1] [2].

5. Competing narratives and political implications

News outlets and legal commentators treat the New York conviction as a historic first — the first felony conviction of a former U.S. president — while also emphasizing that sentencing spared incarceration and that appeals are ongoing [2] [1]. Supporters of Trump have characterized post‑trial developments and court actions (discharges, dismissals, disqualifications) as vindications; prosecutors and critics point to the guilty verdict and the underlying findings as establishing criminal liability. The sources note both the conviction itself and the complex, ongoing procedural fights that shape its ultimate legal effect [1] [3].

6. Limitations in the record and what reporting does not say

The provided sources document the New York conviction and post‑trial order of unconditional discharge, and they report dismissals/pauses in the other major cases, but they do not provide final appellate outcomes for every charge nor do they include potential later developments beyond the dates in these sources [5] [3]. For claims about pardons, later reversals, or additional convictions, available sources do not mention those outcomes in the material you provided [3] [2].

7. Bottom line for readers

Factually, based on the reporting cited here, Donald Trump has one criminal conviction: 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the New York hush‑money case, with an unconditional discharge issued on January 10, 2025 and appeals pending [1] [2]. Other high‑profile criminal prosecutions cited in these sources were dismissed, paused, or subject to prosecutorial disqualification and are not reflected as convictions in the material provided [3] [1].

Want to dive deeper?
How many criminal convictions does Donald Trump currently have as of December 2025?
What were the specific charges and outcomes in each of Donald Trump’s criminal convictions?
Which courts handled Donald Trump’s convictions and what sentences or penalties were imposed?
How do Trump’s criminal convictions affect his eligibility to hold or run for public office?
What appeals or post-conviction legal actions have been filed in each of Trump’s criminal cases?

For the curious ones

Weekly roundup of the top fact-checks like this one

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.