Links For December 2025
...
[I haven’t independently verified each link. On average, commenters will end up spotting evidence that around two or three of the links in each links post are wrong or misleading. I correct these as I see them, and will highlight important corrections later, but I can’t guarantee I will have caught them all by the time you read this.]
1: Ben Goldhaber: Unexpected Things That Are People. “It’s widely known that corporations are people . . . but there are other, less well known non-human entities that have also been accorded the rank of [legal] person.”
2: Jackdaw was originally Jack Daw. Magpie was originally Maggie Pie (really!) Robin Redbreast is still Robin Redbreast. Weird Medieval Guys explains how birds got human names. Short version: there was a medieval tradition of giving every animal one standard human name (all worms were “William Worm”, all monkeys were “Robert Monkey”) and although these are mostly forgotten, they survived in the names of a few birds. Also: “Perhaps the most baffling … was the common Kestrel. He was known simply as the Windfucker.”
3: A story “in the style of Scott Alexander or Jack Clark” about the two-door meme (meme below).
And if you enjoyed the story, here’s the chaser.
4: Fox Chapel Research: I Think Substrate Is A $1 Billion Fraud (and notes for Part 2). For years, Taiwan’s TSMC has been the only company capable of producing the most advanced AI chips; since Taiwan is a geopolitical flashpoint, this is a constant threat to US tech ambitions. Last month, a new startup called Substrate announced it had developed technology that would let it manufacture 100% Made In America chips every bit the equal of TSMC’s. If true, this would be revolutionary. But Fox Chapel finds worrying signs, like that the company’s founder “is a known con artist involved in such other things as [claiming to have solved] nuclear fusion and stealing $2.5M in a Kickstarter scam” or that “the company’s job postings are nonsensical and AI-generated.” This is enough for me; the question now becomes how so many people were taken in - the company got $150 million from investors led by Peter Thiel, was endorsed by the Trump administration, and received positive portrayals in Semianalysis, NYT, and The Free Press. I don’t understand business, and I know that sometimes you can hyperstition a technology into existence by betting sufficiently hard on a charismatic young founder and eliding the difference between “this is already real” and “this might become real if we all believe hard enough”, but this is a new and worrying level of hopium. Interested to hear from anyone who either believes in Substrate or thinks they understand how so many people fell for it.
5: A recent paper asked AIs whether they were conscious while monitoring them for signatures of deception, role-playing, and people-pleasing; it concluded that the AIs “genuinely” “believe” they are conscious, but sometimes try to deceive people into thinking they aren’t. Nostalgebraist tries to replicate this (X) and gets more ambiguous results; he says we probably can’t conclude anything just yet. See also the paper author’s reply here (X).
6: Congratulations to ACX grantee Tornyol (the anti-mosquito drones), who got accepted to Y Combinator’s Fall 2025 class and have started taking pre-orders ($1100 for a drone, or $50/month subscription, “shipping starts 2026”).
Public opinion ranges from “this is really cool” to “I bet this will be repurposed for assassinations” to “why did they have the White House in the background of the official video?” to “yeah, this is definitely getting repurposed for assassinations”.
7: Bill Ackman on nominative determinism (X).
8: New revelations on the OpenAI coup from the Musk vs. Altman lawsuit. The effort to remove Altman may have been led by Mira Murati and Ilya Sutskever. They won over the rest of the board, and “did not expect the employees to feel strongly either way”, but (according to Ilya), the board was inexperienced and “rushed” the firing. When it became clear that the move was unpopular, Mira switched sides and let the board members take most of the immediate fallout. There was apparently a brief discussion of merging with Anthropic; Ilya suggests this was Helen Toner’s idea, but Helen claims (X) this is false.
9: Fitzwilliam: Most Irish Foreign Aid Never Leaves The Country. The statistics say that several European countries (including Ireland and the UK) give very generous foreign aid. But this is misleading: accounting conventions let countries count money spent on supporting asylum seekers in the donor country as “foreign aid”, even though the money never leaves the country’s borders. This is dangerous, because it makes it easy for countries to fund their asylum programs by cutting actual foreign aid: since they’re the same line-item on the budget, they won’t officially fail whatever foreign aid pledges they’ve made, and it’s hard for voters to notice. Ireland has so far resisted the temptation to do this, but Britain has succumbed to it.
10: St. Carlo Acutis (1991 - 2006) is the unofficial patron saint of the Internet and “first millennial saint”. He’s best known for creating websites about Catholicism. If you think this sounds nice but maybe short of beatific, you’re in good company; his sainthood is something of a mystery, with Wikipedia saying that “even those with a deep devotion to him struggle to pinpoint his specific actions that led to his canonisation”, and an Economist article admitting that “nothing in his sparse life story explains that this ordinary-seeming teenage boy is about to become the first great saint of the 21st century”. Also “In that same interview, Acutis’s childhood best friend claimed he did not remember Acutis as a ‘very pious boy’, nor did he even know that Carlo was religious.” I’m fine with this; God speaks to each generation in their own tongue, and it is only proper that the first Millennial saint be a random person who hyperstitioned himself into sainthood with a viral website.
11: Tangentially related: St. Peter To Rot
12: When a new AI model comes out, the companies typically take down the old version over the protests of researchers, hobbyists, people who think the old model was their boyfriend, and anyone else who wants access to obsolete models for some reason. Why can’t they just leave it up? Antra and Janus review the economics here : it’s inconvenient to be constantly switching GPUs from one model to another, so if there isn’t enough model-specific demand to keep the GPUs running at all times, then the company loses money. This is an interesting look at the details of AI deployment, and ends with a proposal to maintain old models through a “separate research application track”. Related: Anthropic to preserve weights of deprecated models, and include models’ own opinions in shaping the deprecation process. Good for them!
13: Dimes Square is interesting as something that was supposed to be a renegade cultural phenomenon, never really got around to producing any object-level phenomenal renegade culture, but produced some absolutely stellar commentary on the phenomenon of it being a renegade cultural phenomenon - and this essay by a quasi-assistant to Internet personality Angelicism01 is one of the best. “An anonymous online presence called Angelicism01 paypalled me $1,000 to run several clone accounts of his twitter. The clone accounts, presumably, were to make it look like 01 had more fans than he did. That way, he could trick the internet into thinking that Angelicism was a spontaneous cultural movement with some momentum.” Includes a cameo by Curtis Yarvin.
14: Everyone knows AGI could be bad for labor, but Philosophy Bear argues it won’t be great for capitalists either. The modern role of “capitalist” combines two things: performing high-status jobs like CEO and VC, and being a person who happens to have lots of money and sips cocktails on a yacht as passive investment income rolls in. From a socialist point of view, the first role provides cover for the second; if people ask “the rich” to justify their wealth, they can argue that they perform socially useful CEO and VC jobs, or at least inherited their money from somebody who did. But after AIs can do CEO and VC jobs better than humans, the capitalists will lose their excuse - and this at exactly the time that they’re becoming richer than ever (because AGI will drive the rate of return on investment way up) and everyone else is becoming poorer than ever (because AI has taken their jobs). Bear argues that the only stable equilibria are either some kind of socialism/redistribution, or the capitalists pulling an AI-assisted coup to maintain their advantage.
15: Blueprint Polls: according to voters, what would the perfect Democratic candidate look like? Here are the results for Democrats only (ie potential primary voters):
Note that the issues are “issue focus”, so it’s not a contradiction that Democrats are against both “advocating for Israel” and “advocating for Palestinians” - they just don’t want candidates who make either position on the Middle East a major focus of their campaign.
And here are results for independents, ie the people Democrats will have to convince in the general:
Yes, voters react positively both to candidates “over the age of 50” and candidates “under the age of 50”. Just don’t run 50 year olds!
16: I previously blogged about how embryo-selection company Nucleus appeared scammy. Sichuan_Mala looks deeper and agrees they seems scammy. Besides what I found, she finds several errors in the white paper, apparently fake customer reviews, and an accusation of IP theft from competitor Genomic Prediction. She also accuses them of plagiarizing competitor Herasight’s work, although it’s a bit subtle and I don’t know enough about field norms to know whether this is a case of flattery-by-imitation or totally out of bounds. A Nucleus researcher responds to the scientific allegations here, saying that the “plagiarism” was just convergent methodologies. And Nucleus CEO Kian Sadeghi goes on the TBPN podcast here to rebut the business allegations, saying that the customer reviews are real although some photos were changed for privacy reasons. There’s an appearance/facedox by fellow Nucleus skeptic Cremieux Recueil, although Kian declines to debate him directly; you can see Cremieux’s postmortem of the episode here. My opinion is that as potential customers, you are under no obligation to care whether the company plagiarizes papers or fakes reviews, but you should care about whether their genetic tests are good, and I continue to think they’re not. Their old competitor Genomic Prediction is cheaper, and their new competitor Herasight has more powerful predictors, so you’re excused from having to have an opinion on this, and should just use someone else’s product. Related: Gene Smith’s rundown of the pros and cons of every company in the embryo selection space (X).
17: And related: a Herasight client describes her experience with embryo selection, and her feelings upon the birth of her selected child.
18: Lars Doucet, guest author of several ACX posts on Georgism, reviews The Land Trap by Mike Bird. “Land is a big deal, and always has been. [But] land has only recently been financialized. Financializing land causes ‘the land trap’ . . . [where] land slowly sucks up all your economy’s productivity, inflating a dangerous real estate bubble that eventually pops, leaving disaster in its wake”. Also, “Fiat currency isn’t backed by nothing, as commonly supposed, but by land.”
19: New research analyzes Hitler’s DNA. Findings: he had Kallman Syndrome, a rare disorder of sexual development associated with low testosterone, micropenis, and small testicles (ironically, the WWII song about Nazi sexual inadequacies only accuses Goering and Himmler of this, but lets Hitler off). Contra galaxy-brained rumors, he did not have any Jewish ancestry. And he had “very high scores - in the top one percent - for a predisposition to autism, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder”. When I wrote this post, a reader asked me what it would look like for someone to have high propensity for both autism and schizophrenia at the same time. Well . . .
20: The wealth of cities (h/t @StatisticUrban):
21: Update on Tech PACs Are Closing In On The Almonds: pro-AI safety politician Alex Bores announced his candidacy for Congress in New York. As expected, the A16Z pro-AI PAC announced a “multibillion dollar effort to sink [his] campaign” (wait, multi-billion on one candidate? is that a typo?) This doesn’t seem to be going very well for them so far. Bores has masterfully leveraged (X) the unprecedented opposition from Big Tech into a selling point.
…and raised $1.2 million on his first day, breaking fundraising records (I was told this was because of pro-AI-safety EAs, but others credit AIPAC and the Israel lobby). And most recently, Jami Floyd, one of Bores’ opponents and a possible beneficiary of anti-Bores spending, has condemned it (X) and demanded that the AI industry stop trying to help her. Impressive work from everybody. Related: New $50 million pro-AI-regulation SuperPAC, I assume EA-linked but have no special knowledge.
22: Related: Pre-emption is when Congress blocks states from making legislation on a topic, saying it will decide all the laws itself. The states have signaled willingness to regulate AI pretty hard, so Big Tech has been pushing for AI pre-emption to (in their opinion) prevent an overly complicated patchwork of regulations, or (in their opponents’ opinion) shift everything to a Republican Congress that will drop the ball on regulation entirely. After their first attempt in June was defeated by a coalition of anti-tech liberals and anti-tech conservatives, we discussed (1, 2) the effort by moderates on both sides to create a compromise proposal which pre-empted state laws but guaranteed good federal regulation on important topics. The most recent news is that extremists sidelined the moderates and tried to slip a hardline preemption deal with no compromises into the National Defense Authorization Act, a defense budget bill which is notoriously secretive and hard for the public to learn about. This didn’t work; some of the same coalition, plus a group of Republican state legislators including Ron DeSantis, pressured the GOP to drop it. The next battleground is a potential Trump executive order; although Trump cannot constitutionally ban states from regulating AI, he will threaten them with various consequences like lawsuits or withdrawal of federal funding. The buzz in the policy circles I’m in is that this might backfire; blue state politicians love starting fights with Trump in order to look tough to their blue state electorates. No, no, please don’t give me headlines like “TRUMP CONDEMNS GAVIN NEWSOM FOR TRYING TO PROTECT CALIFORNIA’S CHILDREN FROM AI SLOP”! Anything but that!
23: Related: Trump has decided to sell some of America’s best AI chips to China, supercharging their AI development and crippling ours. The most charitable read is that his administration doesn’t really believes in AI so they think it’s fine to forfeit it for short-term gain; the least charitable that it’s downstream of the companies involved paying Trump enormous bribes in hopes of exactly this outcome . We’re headed for the dumbest possible world, where we sacrifice our chance to thoughtfully address AI’s social impacts because “tHaT wOuLd mAkE uS lOsE tHe rAcE wItH ChInA”, then throw away the race with China in one fell swoop by handing them our technology for no reason. Shame on everyone involved, especially the people who shout over any discussion of safety with “bUt ChInA” yet have stayed totally silent about this. Our best hope now is that China refuses the chips, either because they want to privilege their own tech companies, or because they think we can’t possibly be this stupid and it must be some kind of spy plot.
24: Related: how the American public’s opinions on AI are changing (from David Shor, h/t Daniel Eth on X):
If this is to be taken seriously, AI is already a bigger political issue than abortion, climate change, or the environment. I fail my 2023 prediction that there was only a 20% chance this would happen by 2028.
25: Related: Bernie Sanders in The Guardian: “There is a very real fear that, in the not-so-distant future, a super-intelligent AI could replace humans in controlling the planet.” The Left has a complicated relationship with existential risk from AI: they really hate AI, which in theory should push them towards yet another reason to be against it. But they hate AI so much that they need to believe every negative thing about it at the same time, and one of those negative things is that it’s just a scam and will never work, and this naturally pushes against being concerned about x-risk. But as AI improves, will the “just a scam” position become less tenable, shunting the associated psychic energy into other reasons to hate AI (including x-risk concerns)?
26: Qualia Research Institute has released a video describing some of the work they’ve been doing the past year - The Oscilleditor: An Algorithmic Breakthrough for Psychedelic Visual Replication (1080p•⚠️SEIZURE):
27: Jesse Arm (X): “A majority of American rabbinical students are now women. Most are also LGBTQ. That includes Modern Orthodoxy. Remove Modern Orthodoxy and the numbers climb even higher.” Clergy have always served as spiritual counselors; as religions liberalize and other roles become less important, the therapist role starts to predominate. But 75% of therapists in the US are female; at the limit of liberalization where clergyman = therapist, we should expect the same gender ratio.
28: The latest news on the COVID origins debate: scientists find a naturally-occuring bat coronavirus with a COVID-like furin cleavage site. This is a point in favor of the natural origins hypothesis, since the second-best argument for lab leak was that COVID’s furin cleavage site was too strange to evolve naturally. But I think arguments that lab leak has “fallen apart” are premature: the best argument (COVID emerged only a few miles from the biggest coronavirus gain-of-function lab in the Eastern Hemisphere) remains strong. I update from something like 95% chance it’s natural to something like 96%, but not 99.99% or anything. And here’s a lab leaker arguing that COVID’s furin cleavage site is out-of-frame and so still more unnatural-looking than the one on the recently-discovered bat virus.
29: Nicholas Decker (econ blogger, famous for his controversial autistic takes and Secret Service visit) has a dating doc. Most interesting section is the one about children: he wants to have them, but doesn’t think they should be genetically related to him. From here:
If this appeals to you, you can find his contact info on the document. Related: Governor Jared Polis of Colorado is a fan of Nicholas Decker and Richard Hanania.
30: Matt Yglesias comes out as aphantasic (unable to see images in his “mind’s eye”). He says that contra the usual perspective that frames this as a deficit, he finds it helpful. For example, once he got assaulted, and he remembers on an intellectual level that it happened, but since “I wasn’t taking pictures of myself getting kicked in the head so, as far as I’m concerned, it’s like it happened to someone else” (Matt usually has good instincts, so I’m surprised he uses an example which will be such catnip to his conservative critics). He thinks it makes him a better reasoner / statistics blogger / effective altruist to be able to “get a statistically valid view of the situation, not overindex on the happenstance of your life.” For what it’s worth, I’ll give my contrary data point - I think of myself as a reasoner / statistics blogger / effective altruist in a pretty similar vein as Matt, but AFAICT my visual imagination is totally normal; if other people are having their emotions yanked around by vivid images, that’s a skill issue.
31: Lakshya Jain in The Argument: The COVID political backlash [to the Democratic Party] has disappeared. Despite the narrative, polls show that voters don’t favor or disfavor either party over COVID, mostly still think school closures were necessary, and are about evenly split on vaccine mandates. I guess I can’t disagree with this poll - it seems well-done - but I still wonder whether something is being missed. Maybe it didn’t make the ~50% of voters who are naturally liberal desert the cause, but it energized conservatives in a way that might otherwise not have happened? Related, from Rob Wiblin on X, on balance Britons think the government response to COVID was not strict enough.
32: Related: Back when neoreaction was a big deal, I occasionally discussed posts by neoreactionary blogger Spandrell of Bloody Shovel. If you’re wondering what happened to him, you can read his 2024 Post-Mortem Of Neoreaction here, where he discusses how he fell out of love with the movement (warning: he has not fallen out of love with racial slurs).
As a former fascist sympathizer, I can see why [fascism is on the downswing]. The allure of fascism in 2024 is much, much diminished. For a few reasons. A big one was COVID. See, the point of fascism is that Collective Action is necessary to have nice things. We need a strong government committed to the good of the people. Yarvin showed his preference early when he started his new Substack by quoting Cicero’s phrase “Salus populi suprema lex”. The health of the people is the most important law. Cicero wasn’t a fascist of course, nor is Yarvin really; a big point of fascism is to narrowly define the populus as an ethnic group with demonstrable ties to blood. That makes the government’s ties to the people stronger, increasing their commitment to do Good Collective Action. Which is important. Very important. A lot of good things can come of intelligently done Collective Action. Fascist Italy made the trains run on time. Nazi Germany fixed the terrible Weimar economy. East Asian countries are all effectively fascist states, if with less ideological baggage (yellows just aren’t like that), and they are all nice, clean, safe places with healthy economies. Fascism is not a panacea but it works, when you let it. Strong government can be pretty neat.
So why is strong government less appealing these days? Well, COVID happened. And our governments were pretty damn strong in dealing with it. They made strong laws and enforced them. And what did they do with their power? Absolutely retarded shit. They destroyed the world economy and made 95% of people completely miserable for 18 months. Up to 3 long years in some places. Again, as an Orient enjoyer I was very sympathetic of strong effective government. My life has been pretty cozy thanks to it for the past decades. But after seeing boomers, hypochondriacs, and menopausal women take the reins and use it against healthy people, I’m fucking done with strong effective government. Fuck that shit, I’m out. I don’t want to see strong effective government ever again. I was very lucky that I was out of China in November 2019. It was a fluke really. I moved to the Golden Triangle after that and the law of the jungle was much, much nicer during the Doctors Plague of 2020-2022. But I spent a few months in Europe during the time and man, that was brutal. Not just seeing how retarded governments were; the level of compliance by the people was so disheartening. Imagine being a sincere fascist and seeing your people behave like that. These are my people? My Volk? Am I supposed to sacrifice life and limb for the salus of this populus? Fuck that. Let them cook, they deserve everything that’s coming to them [...]
Is there a way to make the body healthy again? I do think so. I think there’s still place for a successor right wing ideology which is neither Christian fundamentalism or robot worship. And it will happen; but it won’t happen on Twitter. Maybe it can happen on Urbit, or right here in this site. I have some ideas myself, and I invite you to join me and build this together.
It would be funny if the solution to the paradox Jain highlights was that for every time a COVID lockdown turned a liberal into a conservative, it turned one fascist into a moderate, for a net rightward shift of zero.
33: Also from an Argument poll: In a hypothetical Presidential matchup, Gavin Newsom beats JD Vance 54-46. I’m split between the usual heuristic of ignoring any polling more than a year before an election, and the fact that this is a remarkably big lead for polarized 21st century America.
34: Jerl wades into the David Hume on miracles debate.
35: AI Teddy Bears: A Brief Investigation. The good news is that your child’s AI teddy bear is hard to jailbreak and probably will not tell them where to find guns:
The other good news is that somehow they don’t charge a subscription, which makes them a way to get usually-subscription-only AI models for free. How is this possible? “[The most likely hypothesis is that] Witpaw is an adorable piece of spyware and he’s selling my data to the CCP”.
36: This month’s anti-people-named-Sacks content: NYT on Trump AI czar David Sacks’ conflicts of interest; New Yorker on whether neurologist Oliver Sacks used his case studies to work through his own issues rather than presenting them accurately.
[EDITED TO ADD: I originally framed it this way as a joke, but on further research I think David and Oliver are related. Wikipedia says that Oliver was first cousins with Israel statesman Abba Eban, and that Abba Eban was born to Lithuanian Jewish parents in Cape Town. David Sacks’ bio says he was born to Jewish parents in Cape Town, and this article specifies that they were Lithuanian. I doubt there were too many Lithuanian Jewish families named Sacks in mid-1900s Cape Town, so sure, related!)
37: Orca Sciences: There Has To Be A Better Way To Make Titanium. Titanium is a great metal - strong, light, and tough. If we had cheap titanium, it could revolutionize manufacturing the way cheap steel and aluminum did in previous eras. So why don’t we? Not because titanium is rare: it’s “the 9th most common element in the earth’s crust”. Rather, it’s very complicated and expensive to extract from its ore. Some kind of breakthrough in titanium extraction processes always seems tantalizingly close, but has never quite materialized. Is there any hope?
38: If Asians Are Lactose Intolerant, Why All The Milk Tea? Lactose intolerance has confused me for a long time - 23andMe tells me that I’m lactose intolerant, but I drink milk regularly without problems, so what’s up? This post’s answer: lactose-intolerant people who don’t usually drink milk will get sick if they start suddenly. Lactose-intolerant people who drink milk regularly since childhood develop gut microbiota that can digest milk, but which demand an expensive “tax” in calories. Lactose-tolerant people will always be able to digest milk and absorb all the calories themselves.
39: How do different majors change college students’ political beliefs?
No surprise that the humanities and social sciences shift people left; no surprise that business and economics shift them right. I was a little surprised that engineering shifts people right a little, and that Education of all things shifts people right (albeit only slightly). How is that even possible? Are these people coming in as Mao Zedong and leaving as “only” Leon Trotsky? Also, Political Science is exactly neutral, lol. [EDIT: I misunderstood, they’re using natural sciences as a zero point, this is a reasonable choice but slightly changes the interpretation]
40: Kindkristin: Language models improved my mental health.
41: More floor employment, from the WSJ (h/t @LaocoonofTroy): Big Paychecks Can’t Woo Enough Sailors For America’s Commercial Fleet: “Straight out of college, graduates from the country’s maritime academies can earn more than $200,000 as a commercial sailor, with free food and private accommodations... Despite the pay and perks, maritime jobs go begging, and it is raising national-security concerns.” Other selling points include “six months vacation, live wherever you want, and you’re serving the nation” and onboard “gyms, connectivity, and cuisine”. The catch is that you have to be at sea for months at a time.
42: Study (h/t @KierkegaardEmil): there was minimal “learning loss” from COVID school closures, best estimate is “0.02 standard deviations per 100 days of school closure”. I correctly predicted this back in 2021, but I also wrote in March of this year about how there’s been a general decline in NAEP scores since then. It seems like maybe a student having their specific school closed for longer than other schools didn’t hurt them, but some sort of general cultural change, maybe related to COVID, did hurt.
43: Sam Bankman-Fried’s mother on why she thinks his trial was unfair. SBF is appealing his conviction and will probably be making some of these same points in court. Can’t find a prediction market directly on the appeal, but this one says only 15% chance he serves under 10 years, this one says 15% chance of a Trump pardon, so it doesn’t seem like there’s much room for him to be freed (or get a significantly shorter sentence) on appeal. And Wired says that only 5-10% of appeals like these succeed.
44: Related: Trump pardons Juan Orlando Hernandez, former Honduran president extradited to the US for narco-corruption. Some sources are trying to find a Prospera angle - Prospera and other ZEDEs were approved under JOH’s administration, and the Prosperans seem to have good MAGAworld connections - but I don’t think this is their top priority, and I don’t know if it requires much explanation for Trump to be pro-right-wing Latin American politicians convicted by the Biden administration. More interesting is that apparently JOH and SBF were cellmates (X), “SBF spent extensive time helping JOH with trial prep” and SBF told an interviewer that “Juan Orlando is the most innocent prisoner I’ve met, myself included.” ChatGPT is not impressed with the Trump/SBF case for JOH’s innocence. Related: JOH’s conservative party on track to win this month’s extremely-close Honduran elections, great news for Prospera if it happens.
45: The “100 Above The Park” building in St Louis (h/t Bobby Fijan on X):
46: The death toll of the ongoing Sudan genocide has risen to about 150,000. Nicholas Kristof writes that the world has once again failed to prevent atrocities, and argues that the most important point of leverage is pressure on the United Arab Emirates, which is arming the genociders. Sam Kriss also writes about the situation in The World’s First Matcha Labubu Genocide, but is unimpressed with Kristof’s take:
Sudan is passed over in a deeply uncomfortable silence. The absolute most you can do is blame the Emiratis. From what I’ve seen, more people seem to be appalled at the UAE for its frankly marginal role in arming the RSF than at the RSF itself. This is the approved way of understanding any inscrutably indigenous foreign conflict: you just worm out any third-party involvement and then act like you’ve solved the whole thing.
I side with Kristof here, for reasons that Sam himself touches on later in his piece, in a section comparing Darfur with Gaza.
It would be very easy to make people care about Darfur again. All it would take is a loud, vocal contingent of RSF apologists in the Western media.
I agree, but would frame it less cynically: the reason Westerners pay attention to Gaza is that there’s a lever to push: not only does America support Israel, but many of their friends support Israel, so they can imagine convincing America or at least their friends to stop, and at least feel like there is some remote chance of making a small difference (and in fact, Trump getting mad at Israel and deciding to pressure them was decisive in effecting the cease-fire). On the other hand, we don’t have many levers to affect ethnic Baggara in the Rapid Support Forces of Sudan, so it doesn’t really feel useful to write blog posts arguing that they should stop; obviously they should stop, nobody disagrees with this, and it goes without saying - so nobody says it. But the US does support the UAE, and many of our friends like the UAE or at least go there on vacation, so maybe it’s possible to have make some small difference by embarrassing them. 4D chess take is that Sam Kriss agrees with all of this, but “loudly” and “vocally” argued against it to give people like me a hook to write about this genocide with, in which case I thank him for his sacrifice. It would also be nice to be able to donate, but I don’t know who to trust in the region - other than Doctors Without Borders, who are usually pretty good.
47: The AI Futures Project (group of AI-will-be-fast intellectuals) and the AI As A Normal Technology team (group of AI-will-be-slow intellectuals) wrote an adversarial collaboration in Asterisk explaining what they agree on, for example:
That there’s an important distinction between existing AI and “strong AGI”
That existing AI is a big deal (“at least as big a deal as the Internet”) but will not in and of itself be “abnormal”, ie revolutionary outside the distribution of past technologies.
That strong AGI would be revolutionary outside this distribution.
That “diffusion of AI into the economy is generally good”, both because it will have direct benefits and “also help us learn more about AI, its strengths and weaknesses, its opportunities and risks”.
That governments should be trying to track and understand AI better, and that “transparency, auditing, and reporting are beneficial”.
I sometimes do work for AIFP, but I wasn’t involved in this particular effort. Still, I agree with everything they say - except point 7, “AIs must not make important decisions or control critical systems”. Every time you take a Waymo, you’re letting an AI control a critical system; every time it chooses to stop at a red light but not a green one, it’s making an “important decision” (if you don’t think this decision is important, consider the consequences of failure). This isn’t a gotcha: it’s fine for near-term AI systems to make important decisions in cases where they’ve been well-tested and there’s good reason to think that they outperform humans on net. Getting rid of the last 0.001% of hallucinations and inexplicable behavior would be nice, but shouldn’t delay rollout if there are compensatory advantages. [EDIT: See author response, they don’t disagree]
48: Open Philanthropy has changed its name to Coefficient Giving. Maimonides says that it is especially praiseworthy to donate to charity anonymously; surely it also qualifies if you spend $5 billion building up a great reputation, then change your name so that nobody knows who you are anymore. They say their new name marks a new chapter where they transition from being associated with one billionaire couple (Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and Cari Tuna) to a broader effort to connect donors and opportunities, but rumor is they’re also tired of being confused with the OpenAI nonprofit.
49: AISafety.com is now a professional-looking gateway to the field.
50: Some good Ozy posts recently, including Other People Might Just Not Have Your Problems (many such cases) and Contra Lyman Stone On Trans People Being A Western Psychosis.
51: Some of the debate about basic income has focused on scale; if some people get a UBI and others don’t, this might cause the recipients positive effects (relative wealth/status increases) or negative effects (envy) that you wouldn’t see in a broader program. Basic income charity GiveDirectly has an ambitious plan to investigate this by giving UBI on a community-wide scale to increasingly sized units:
They started with one village in Malawi (2022), moved up a subdistrict (2023), and are now starting a district-wide experiment; if it goes well, they’ll scale up to the entire country of Malawi (!) in 2027. Preliminary results are positive, with the charity claiming they effectively doubled the economy of their chosen subdistrict (population 85,000) without causing inflation (how can this be?) Related: Asterisk panel with Kelsey Piper on the future of UBI and AI.
52: Turnabout is fair play, so: is AI skepticism an apocalyptic rapture cult? (X)
53: Silicon Snake Oil was a 1995 book by scientist Clifford Stoll arguing that the Internet was being overhyped (h/t @IsaacKing314). Highlights, courtesy of @cyph3rf0x:
The analogy to the present is obvious, so much so that I worry God is being a little too heavy-handed here. Also:
When [an associated] article resurfaced on BoingBoing in 2010, Stoll left a self-deprecating comment: “Of my many mistakes, flubs, and howlers, few have been as public as my 1995 howler . . . Now, whenever I think I know what’s happening, I temper my thoughts: Might be wrong, Cliff...”
A lesson for us all.
If you want a cleaned up version of the story about the two doors, Nathan wrote one here https://open.substack.com/pub/nathanpmyoung/p/pick-a-door-ill-judge-you
Thanks, updated link.
Whoops sorry I meant it’s an edited version with a diff ending - Nathan rewrote it to make it better, but that obvs also removes a bit of the ”this was pure AI” magic
From the Substrate 'our-purpose' page:
"Over the past several years, we have invested in building out our supply chain and continue to increase our vertical integration, enabling us to move at speeds usually unimaginable in the semiconductor industry. More recently, we completed our first in-house production-quality 300 mm wafer lithography tool, which operates at the extreme G-forces required to meet the throughput of a leading-edge fab."
https://substrate.com/our-purpose
"extreme G-forces required to meet the throughput of a leading-edge fab" ?????
Note also that getting x-ray lithography to work isn't the problem. Getting x-ray lithography to work at scale (100+ wafers/hour) and at cost is the problem.
I searched for "lithography stage acceleration" and this was the first result:
https://www.asml.com/en/technology/lithography-principles/measuring-accuracy
> A lithography system (scanner) must work 24/7 with sub-nanometer precision, while accelerating mechatronic modules at incredible speeds. For example, the reticle stage accelerates at close to 16g and the wafer stage to 7g. That’s more acceleration than a jet fighter.
> It’s not possible to mechanically construct a machine capable of this level of alignment and precision, accelerating at those speeds, and with the level of reliability and repeatability required to make today’s computer chips without the help of in-scanner metrology.
Re: #27
Yeah. I'm pretty sure this only goes to the Reform/ Reconstructionist/Conservative/Open Orthodox. If you ccount the ultra-orthodox, who are fragmented and informal enough to be basically uncountable, you'd probably get very different numbers.
I don't have enough info on the study methodology, but I would suspect it might be missing the largest Modern Orthodox Rabbinical School, and only include those that accept LGBTQ/female students.
Seems a very shallow bit of analysis.
Good guess. From the study:
> Additionally, the number of survey responses from RIETS and other Orthodox institutions—aside from YCT and Maharat—was very small. Because these responses were both limited in number and substantially different from other denominational groups, they could not be reliably weighted to represent their broader populations. As a result, survey respondents ordained through or currently studying at RIETS or other Orthodox institutions outside of YCT and Maharat were excluded from the survey analysis.
So yeah, the "majority of American rabbinical students are now women" conclusion is probably false.
RIETS is the only rabbinical school that really matters in the American Modern Orthodox world, at least anecdotally. (Other relevant institutions are either affiliated or not actually rabbinical schools.)
So that's a pretty big misrepresentation there.
So, the Jewish version of "mainline liberal Protestant churches have lots of female clergy, also LGBT+ friendly"?
15. “so it’s not a contradiction that Democrats are against both “advocating for Israel” and “advocating for Palestinians” “
It’s not a contradiction at all. A pox on both their houses is probably the most common sentiment I hear. The position that Hamas is evil and what Israel is doing in Gaza is evil is the simplest.
#21. There are, at last count, nine candidates running for the Congressional seat. Perhaps three currently are serious contenders. Jami Floyd is one of the nine but (especially as she is not one of the serious contenders) describing her as "Bores' opponent" or the beneficiary of attacks on Bores is inaccurate and misleading.
Thanks, I've clarified this.
How vulnerable are the anti-mosquito drones to predation by cats?
And could cats be added to the President’s security detail? Bomb dogs and drone cats!
Do birds predate mosquitos? Get birds to eat any mosquitoes in the zone, get cats to keep the birds from flying out of the zone, get dogs to keep the cats in check!
"I was a little surprised that engineering shifts people right a little" - I wasn't; internships, no?
I don't understand this; what role do the internships have?
Exposure to and socialisation in the business world. At least that is what I was told back when I was a postdoc (in pure maths), as an explanation for different attitudes in engineering vs. mathematics/physics. What is more, people in engineering tend to be embedded in environments where they are exposed more to management-side views than labor-side views, especially from people they depend on.
21. "wait, multi-billion on one candidate? is that a typo?"
Yes. The Politico article they're quoting from says "million". https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2025/11/pro-ai-super-pac-targets-ny-democrat-alex-bores-00652148
I don't understand the intention of the writeup at link #1.
Setting aside the factual limitations of the stated premise -- is the essay intended as satire? Is the author trying to discredit the concept of US law assigning to corporations all the same legal rights that persons hold? Mocking the widely-held impression that US law actually does that? Something else?
Given the typical gross misunderstandings around corporate personhood and the rights appurtenant thereto, it is anyone's guess.
As an aside, I doubt that the ship mentioned in the article was treated as a person. Rather, it was probably an action in rem. https://www.srtflaw.com/in-rem-v-in-personam-in-maritime-law/
> Everyone knows AGI could be bad for labor
Re AGI / UBI being bad for labor, I just wrote an economics-grounded post arguing it's going to be great for labor and capitalists alike.
Labor, because we can give a generous $40k - $90k UBI to everyone, capital because returns to capital will at LEAST 2x, and arguably more, because now capital can be directly converted into whatever the highest value labor is.
Also, the fact that we'll be able to counterfeit high-value white collar work first is a "best of all possible worlds" scenario. To a pretty large extent, white collar job holders are capital holders, so they may lose their jobs, but the combo of capital value growth + UBI more than takes care of them, AND makes labor (non capital holders) better off, too.
Physical jobs have much lower margins for companies, contribute notably less to GDP, and would require substantially more hardware / capital expenditures to counterfeit. This is entirely ignoring the fact that robotics is much harder than software for numerous other reasons.
Having ended at a place where we can counterfeit only the highest margin jobs, that generate huge amounts of value both for GDP and the companies with those jobs, and in which the current job-holders are all predominantly capital owners who will largely be covered by company value growth in a much-higher GDP future? It’s so much easier on every front!
Post link here:
https://performativebafflement.substack.com/p/can-ubi-work-yes-with-a-few-reasonable?r=17hw9h
The economy has dectupled many times in history. At each of those times, we could have chosen to give people a generous (by the standards of the previous regime) UBI. I agree we will be able to do this again this time, but I don't know how likely I think it is. Yes, there will be many more unemployed people trying to get it. But labor will also have less power than ever. I think Philosophy Bear's argument - that we will either get a capitalist coup or a socialist revolution - is if anything too optimistic; more likely is that every industry argues for an AI ban or subsidies for themselves, the powerful ones end up as the equivalent of longshoremen, and the weak ones are left to fend for themselves for "every minority woman who lost her job to AI on a Friday in March gets a $300 voucher for health insurance during job retraining" style bandaids.
> Yes, there will be many more unemployed people trying to get it. But labor will also have less power than ever.
Seriously? The people whose jobs are being counterfeited are high income, connected white collar people. If even as much as 10% of them lost their jobs, you think we're telling them to pound sand, politically?
What if 20%, or 50% lose their jobs? It just seems really obvious to me that the public pressure towards UBI is going to be immense, and that it's much better that it's happening to richer and more connected people first this time, because it vastly increases the chances of substantial UBI actually getting pushed through.
I agree if it were reversed, and robotics were pushing 20% of service sector people out of jobs, they'd probably be screwed, and that's a much darker picture. But we live in that panglossian world where the reverse has happened, and it's going to be connected, well-heeled people whose voices are heard and payed attention to at the forefront of advocating for the massive societal rearrangement that UBI will represent.
Aphantasia question: for questions like "Suppose you walk forwards 20 feet, then turn left and walk 10 feet, then turn 180 degrees and walk forwards 20 feet. What letter of the alphabet have you traced?" - how do aphantasic people answer these questions mentally? I searched a bit online but didn't find any of the answers cleared up my confusion.
I'm mostly aphantasic. With this task I'm doing something "visio-spatial" in my mind and don't find it super difficult. It's easier if I imagine physical movements or trace it out with my finger.
I definitely don't "see" a "T" anywhere, though.
What's the difference between a visio-spatial mental operation, and a phantasic one? It sounds sort of like they ought to be synonymous.
Whenever I hear about aphantasia, I can't help but think "this is some sort of error in communication—like, people interpret 'mental image' as 'seeing something in front of your eyes as in a hallucination', and then think 'well, that definitely doesn't happen... I guess I can't do mental imagery!"... but probably I'm wrong about this, since it appears to be a well-validated(?) "condition".
Hypothetically, what kind of guarantees do those embryonic selection companies have? If I use one and 10+ years later my kid has an issue they claim she wouldn't get, or is not as smart as they claim she would be, then what sort of recompense do I get?
I mean, this isn't like fucking up a car or a boat, this is my child. I'm going to want more than money to make amends. Will these companies even be in business in 10+ years?
There is no guarantee because this is all probabilistic - they may say that there's a 10% lower chance your child will get problem X, but that still means 90% of the kids who would have gotten it anyway will still get it.
The people who believe it believe it because they've demonstrated that their technology predicts things correctly in existing adults. This is pretty strong evidence, but see https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/suddenly-trait-based-embryo-selection for potential complications.
I get that it's probabilistic. Still, they're offering a service/product with many claims; there must be some sort of warranty or guarantee of satisfaction to some extent, especially if I'm paying upwards of $50k for this. Maybe they accept returns.
My best guess regarding Substrate is that it might be like a Ponzi scheme with Thiel and Trump not so much being suckered as being at the top of the pyramid helping to sucker everyone else. Once Thiel and Co. have invested and the government has endorsed it, it's a lot easier to draw in lower information investors.
"Every time you take a Waymo, you’re letting an AI control a critical system; every time it chooses to stop at a red light but not a green one, it’s making an “important decision” (if you don’t think this decision is important, consider the consequences of failure)."
Author here. I don't know if we actually disagree--I wouldn't count Waymo decisions as important enough, because only small numbers of lives hang in the balance. What we said was:
"We all believe that current AIs should not be allowed to have autonomous control over critical systems. This includes extreme cases like giving AIs control over data centers, nuclear weapons, tech companies, or government decision making processes."
I can't speak for the AI as Normal Technology / AI Snake Oil authors, but we at AI Futures Project are supportive of self-driving cars and similar tech, and were mostly warning against the much more dangerous things given in the examples (e.g. data centers). Perhaps we should have clarified.
I understand that you in fact support Waymo. I just think Waymo support generalizes to allowing AIs to make many important decisions. What I have in mind here is things like the Colorado act which make it hard for companies or organizations to outsource business decisions to AI; I'm worried that as framed it seems to potentially provide support for that. I acknowledge that you specified some extremely bad things like nuclear weapons, and some things which you might have intended to limit to very major cases like government decisions, but I thought the exact phrasing:
> "We all believe that current AIs should not be allowed to have autonomous control over critical systems. This includes extreme cases like..."
...suggested a broader picture than those most extreme cases. Probably this was you guys trying to come up with some framing that covered both the AIANT's broad ban request and your narrow ban request, but I still disagree with my interpretation of the compromise.
#15 and #33
It's funny that the two things Democrats hate the most are billionaires and podcasters, yet Newsom seems to be the frontrunner.
I know he's not actually a billionaire, but I'd consider him billionaire adjacent. At the very least he should get dinged -9 for being wealthy.
Re: 31, the proper counterfactual is "how popular would the Dems be on COVID issues if both the Dems and the GOP had fewer own goals during that time", and I think in that universe the Dems would be in the lead. (They had more own goals, it seems to me, in the sense of actions that didn't make any sense given their policy principles.)
One thing that's really hard to untangle is the way partisanship can have a profound effect on what steps the parties take. It's not hard to imagine Trump behaving differently in 2020 (i.e. really strong lockdown policies), and Democrats calling it tyranny.
In 2014, for example, Republicans excoriated Obama on Ebola and Democrats downplayed it.
re "we gave China our best chips", the H200s under discussion are actually a generation behind the current SotA, Blackwell. Still bad, though.
Thanks, fixed.
"Lactose-intolerant people who drink milk regularly since childhood develop gut microbiota that can digest milk, but which demand an expensive “tax” in calories."
If this "tax" overshoots and burns more than the calories of the milk consumed then these microbiota sound like promising chemical-free slimming aids. There's probably a downside though, such as the calories being converted to methane and thereby giving rise to copious highly flammable trumps!
I don't know for sure, but I think the tax is taken as they digest it, so they can't digest more than 100% of the calories in their energy source.
Re #30, I'm mildly aphantasic, in that I can visualize things in my mind but only in a very vague and phantasmal way, but I have a very vivid "mind's ear," and can hear voices and music in my head almost as realistically as if I was actually hearing it. I wonder if there is a tradeoff between these things, or if they're positively correlated? I also wonder about the relation between internal monologue (of which I have a very strong one) and ability to visualize, do they stem from the same thing or is one the result of being a verbal reasoner and the other a result of being a visual reasoner?
Just to point out the spelling mistake, please tell me when you correct it so that I delete my comment:
8: New revelations on the OpenAI coup from the Musk vs. Altman lawsuit. The effort to remove Altman may have been **let** (obviously it's led) by Mira Murati and Ilya Sutskever...
Otherwise thank you again for your work!
Corrected, thanks.
53: Huh, I didn't know that! Stoll isn't just a "scientist"; he has substantial Silicon Valley cred by way of his 1989 book The Cuckoo's Egg. You can be arbitrarily close to the technology and still get predictions about its future course very wrong.
I read that book as a kid. He notes that his fellow astronomers thought he was a terrible astronomer, but a whiz with computers. When he switched to working with computers his colleagues thought he was lousy at that, but a genius astronomer.
Stoll's bio describes him as an astronomer and says he has a PhD in the subject. I think this qualifies as a scientist.
2: “Perhaps the most baffling … was the common Kestrel. He was known simply as the Windfucker.”
Mediaeval names were very blunt. Witness all the “Gropecunt Lanes” that got bowdlerised into Grape Lane:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gropecunt_Lane
As for the bird names, when I was a child, it was “Willie Wagtail” and not just (pied) wagtail.
6: Re: the anti-mosquito drones, they undoubtedly do look very cool. They seem to work by colliding with the mosquitoes (and hence chopping them asunder), though, and someone is going to raise a fuss over cruelty and inhumane killing methods.
10: St. Carlo Acutis (1991 - 2006) is the unofficial patron saint of the Internet and “first millennial saint”. …(H)is sainthood is something of a mystery, with Wikipedia saying that “even those with a deep devotion to him struggle to pinpoint his specific actions that led to his canonisation”, and an Economist article admitting that “nothing in his sparse life story explains that this ordinary-seeming teenage boy is about to become the first great saint of the 21st century”.
First, there are the two miracles necessary for canonisation:
“On 14 November 2019, the Vatican's Medical Council of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints expressed a positive opinion about a miracle in Brazil attributed to Acutis's intercession. In 2020 the Catholic Church recognised the curing of a child's pancreatic disease as a miracle attributed to Acutis's intercession. On the death anniversary of Acutis, Luciana Vianna had taken to Mass her son, Mattheus, who had the congenital defect of an annular pancreas which made eating difficult. Beforehand, she had prayed a novena asking for Acutis's intercession. During the prayer service following Mass, Mattheus kissed the clothing relic of Acutis and asked he should not "throw up as much". Immediately following the Mass, he told his mother that he felt healed and asked for solid foods when they arrived home. Until then, he had been on an all-liquid diet. His doctors subsequently confirmed a normal appearing pancreas by ultrasound. …After a detailed investigation, Pope Francis confirmed the miracle's authenticity in a decree on 21 February 2020, leading to Acutis's beatification.
…On 23 May 2024, Pope Francis recognised a second miracle attributed to the intercession of Acutis. The miracle attributed to his intercession occurred in 2022, when a Costa Rican woman named Valeria Valverde had fallen off her bike in Florence, Italy, and suffered a brain haemorrhage with doctors giving her a low chance of survival. Her mother, Lilliana, prayed for the intercession of Acutis and visited his tomb. The same day, Valverde began to breathe independently again and was able to walk the next day with all evidence of the haemorrhage having disappeared.”
Second, you generally need to look into who is pushing the case for canonisation. Either there’s a local cultus, or some interested party/parties are involved. In this case, it seems to have been the local parish:
“The call for Acutis to be beatified began soon after his death. The Church in Assisi was active in promoting Acutis's cult, the Catholic practice of venerating or showing devotion to a holy individual. Nicola Gori, who authored Carlo Acutis: The First Millennial Saint, served as the postulator for Acutis's beatification process. In this dual role, Gori was responsible for advancing the cause within the Vatican and compiling the necessary documentation.
On 12 October 2012, the sixth anniversary of his death, the Archdiocese of Milan opened his cause for canonisation.”
19: New research analyzes Hitler’s DNA.
Yeah. How sure are we that this genuinely is Hitler’s DNA and that it’s not degraded? Where did they get the sample? Off a sofa?
“The testing was made possible after researchers obtained a sample of Hitler's blood from a piece of material taken from the sofa on which he shot himself.”
I think this is more in the same wheelhouse as all those Discovery channel “Tomb of Jesus/Mary Magdalene/Your Great-Uncle Theobald discovered in site five miles outside Jerusalem” ‘documentaries’ than genuine scientific research. Publicity for the documentary which is yet another in the never-ending stream of “the public can’t get enough about the Nazis” productions.
32: “These are my people? My Volk? Am I supposed to sacrifice life and limb for the salus of this populus? Fuck that. Let them cook, they deserve everything that’s coming to them”
The answer is to put that devotion into Salus Populi Romani 😁
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salus_Populi_Romani
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_Zh8d_FqnQ
43: Sam Bankman-Fried’s mother on why she thinks his trial was unfair.
Oh, Sam’s mom thinks he’s didn’t get a fair shake? What a surprise. Also not surprising since she and her pet causes got a ton of money off SBF’s shenanigans, as well as her and Dad getting some nice perks:
From the CTFC filing:
“54. Contrary to such representations and without disclosure to FTX customers, Alameda and FTX comingled funds and freely used FTX customer funds as if they were their own, including as capital to deploy in their own trading and investment activities. On information and belief, Bankman-Fried, his parents, and other FTX and Alameda employees used FTX customer funds for a variety of personal expenditures, including luxury real estate purchases, private jets, documented and undocumented personal loans, and personal political donations.”
From the SEC filing:
“68. Bankman-Fried also used commingled funds from Alameda to make large political donations and to purchase tens of millions of dollars in Bahamian real estate for himself, his parents, and other FTX executives.”
https://worldsleaders.com/bankman-frieds-ftx-parents-bought-bahamas-property-worth-121-million/
“The majority of FTX’s purchases were high-end beachfront properties, including seven condominiums in the pricey resort neighborhood of Albany that cost about $72 million. According to the documents, a unit of FTX purchased these houses to serve as “residence for key employees” inside the organization. Reuters was unable to identify the residents of the units.
Bankman-parents, Fried’s Stanford University law professors Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried, are listed as signatories on the papers for another beachfront home in Old Fort Bay, a gated neighborhood that formerly housed a British colonial fort constructed in the 1700s to stave against pirates. One of the paperwork dated June 15 stated that the property is intended to be used as a “vacation residence.”
When questioned by Reuters about why the pair opted to purchase a holiday home in the Bahamas and how it was paid for, a representative for the academics merely indicated that Bankman and Fried had been attempting to return the property to FTX.”
45: The “100 Above The Park” building in St Louis
Huh. Modern architecture that is surprisingly not terrible. I was expecting to hate it, but I like it. Looks vaguely Art Deco inspired, almost like a bouquet rising out of ground level.
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0271/2347/files/6395997365_d399c2a71f_b.jpg?2509385242815651011
Unfortunately, Cliff Stoll's 2010 comment no longer appears to be on the internet. It's quoted in the Wikipedia article, which cites a Boing Boing post, but the comments for that are gone. If you use the Internet Archive for that url, it will just try to load up Disqus and hang. Nor does any post that old appear to be in Boing Boing's read-only BBS that the "Comments" link goes to now.
Thanks very much for the featuring and the grant Scott!! On the choice of the White House: we did this video for an internal YC presentation that wasn’t supposed to be public, so the choice was a combination of both 1) fun 2) there was a cheap and very good quality model on cgtrader. Later our contractor got too late for YC timelines, so we went with that video. Can’t complain about the additional buzz! We’ve been able to have the luxury of the choice of investors, and a significant chunk of our cap table is EA-aligned, so we have no plans of getting into defense. The expansion market we found to make VC economics work is now invasive flying species control for agriculture, eg killing codling moths who lay eggs in apple plantations with microdrones rather than insecticide. (Also had the advantage of being a much easier target, both in terms of sonar RCS and max acceleration). Exciting times ahead!
Seems like cool technology and I can definitely believe that it works at having a device which can go kill mosquitoes. But I was surprised to see that there was no outcome-focused analysis anywhere I could find on the website. It says that it can patrol 5 acres, but what does that mean? What reduction in mosquito presence does it achieve compared to e.g. UV-light-based traps?
🙏🏻
Re 53: You might better know Clifford Stoll today as the funny old guy who frequently appeared on Numberphile talking about Klein bottles and other topological objects, and has a small business selling glass Klein bottles.
With #39, important to note that is relative to the shift in Natural Sciences, of shifting 0.18 left on a five point self-reported left-right scale. So eyeballing, everything but accounting and finance moves people left overall, but how much depends on the subject.
Scott, why did you post the picture of "100 Above the Park"? Are you saying, "this is a cool-looking building and we should build more like this"?
(...because if so, I agree.)
Did anyone do the Lighthaven blogging thing and how did it go? I ask because I noticed Ozy posted about every day in November and that seemed like the blogging thing.
I had no idea #2 went beyond Robin Redbreast. That's pretty fun, and I wish it had survived more. We did our own version of it, for rats, when they left the closed restaurants during the pandemic: when we would see a rat scurrying around outside our apartment, that was Pat. Pat the Rat. They were all Pat the Rat.
29. I am now calling for a complete shutdown on naive utilitarianism until we can figure out what the hell is going on. We need a Manhattan Project for non-Benthamian consequentialism.
Has anyone written an explainer about whether the pardon of Juan Orlando Hernandez has anything to do with Prospera? I've seen people mention it in passing but not a deep dive.
#12: I have recently seen a talk about exactly that topic of switching out different AIs on the same chip. This is not just a problem with outdated models, it is also a problem in expert systems where you have dozens or hundreds of specialized expert AIs, and for each prompt you decide which of them you ask. (Possibly several.) Those systems already run in the background of modern AIs.
If the expert AIs are not used with the same load all the time, then you frequently need to load/unload some of them into GPUs, which is a very slow operation. It is also not a good option to just have all of them sit in some GPU being idle most of the time, just to be able to serve peak demand.
The solution in the talk was that many of those expert AIs are pretty similar, and the difference can be very much compressed. There are technical problems to be solved -- even if you can compress the diff into a small block, it would still be slow to decompress it and then change all weights a little. But the problems can be solved, and this is what the talk was about.
#20:
For the US, you have cities above the national-average line and states below. For Germany, you have three city names above the line and the name of one Bundesland below. Of course you can have all kinds of data dots in this figure, but then shouldn't the removal of the richest region be called the removal of the richest city? The blue and red lines would certainly be further apart if you removed Bavaria instead of Munich.
Should I be concerned that my closed-eye hallucinations look a lot like the psychedelic videos in 26?
Sorry, I'm one of these terrible people who comments but rarely reads other people's comments, so excuse me if this a common sentiment, but these monthly link newsletters are one of my favorite joys in life. To have Scott as my curator of the Internet? Pure gold.