Microsoft has a problem: nobody wants to buy or use its shoddy AI products — as Google's AI growth begins to outpace Copilot products

Microsoft Chief Executicve (CEO) Satya Nadella takes part in the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Event during the G7 Summit at the Borgo Egnazia resort in Savelletri, Italy, on June 13, 2024.
Satya Nadella is burning decades of customer good will chasing the latest tech fad. (Image credit: Getty Images | MANDEL NGAN)
Disclaimer

Enjoy our content? Make sure to set Windows Central as a preferred source in Google Search, and find out why you should so that you can stay up-to-date on the latest news, reviews, features, and more.

If there's one thing that typifies Microsoft under CEO Satya Nadella's tenure: it's a general inability to connect with customers.

A recent report from The Information detailed how Microsoft's internal AI efforts are going awry, with cut forecasts and sales goals for its Azure AI products across the board. The Information said that Microsoft's sales people are "struggling" to meet goals, owing to a complete lack of demand. Microsoft denied the reports, but it can't deny market share growth trends — all of which point to Google Gemini surging ahead.

Last week we wrote about how Microsoft Copilot's backend partner OpenAI issued a "code red" situation. ChatGPT has fallen behind Google Gemini in problem solving, and Nano Banana image generation has outpaced OpenAI's own DALLE by leaps and bounds.

With OpenAI's business model under constant scrutiny and racking up genuinely dangerous levels of debt, it's become a cascading problem for Microsoft to have tied up layer upon layer of its business in what might end up being something of a lame duck.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
FirstPageSage AI Chatbot Usage Chart (December 3, 2025)

#

Generative AI Chatbot

AI Search Market Share

Estimated Quarterly User Growth

1

ChatGPT (excluding Copilot)

61.30%

7% ▲

2

Microsoft Copilot

14.10%

2% ▲

3

Google Gemini

13.40%

12% ▲

4

Perplexity

6.40%

4% ▲

5

Claude AI

3.80%

14% ▲

6

Grok

0.60%

6% ▲

7

Deepseek

0.20%

10% ▲

There are reams of research that suggest agentic AI tools require human intervention at a frequency ratio that makes them cost ineffective, but Microsoft seems unbothered that its tools are poorly conceived.

In any case, OpenAI is supposedly going to launch future models of ChatGPT early in attempts to combat the rise of Google Gemini. I suspect the issues are deeper for Microsoft, who have worked tirelessly under Satya Nadella to create doubt around its products.

SEO and analytics firm FirstPageSage has released its AI market share report for the start of December, and it shows Google Gemini actively poised to supplant Microsoft Copilot. Based on reports that Google Gemini is now actively beating ChatGPT's best models, FirstPageSage has Google Gemini sprinting past Microsoft Copilot quarter over quarter, although ChatGPT itself will remain the front runner.

Google's AI advantages are accumulating, as Microsoft's disadvantages snowball

Cloud servers

Microsoft's destiny under Satya Nadella seems to increasingly point towards being a server broker for NVIDIA, rather than tech leader and innovator. (Image credit: Microsoft)

Whether it's Google's Tensor server tech or dominating position with Google Play-bound Android, Microsoft's lack of forethought and attention paid to their actual customers is starting to catch up with the firm. Nadella has sought to blame the company's unwieldy size for the lack of innovation, but it reads like an excuse to me. It's all about priorities — and Nadella has chased shareholder sentiment over delivering for its customers or employees, and that short-termism is going to put Microsoft on the backfoot if AI actually does deliver another computing paradigm shift.

Microsoft depends almost entirely on pricy NVIDIA technology for its data centers, whereas Google is actively investing to own the entire stack. Microsoft has also worked incredibly hard to cram half-baked AI features into its products, whereas Google has arguably been a lot more thoughtful in its approach despite some early mis-steps with Google Search summaries. Microsoft sprinted out of the gate like a bull in a China shop, and investors rewarded them for it — but fast forward to 2025, and Google's AI products simply work better, and are more in-tune with how people might actually use them.

I am someone who is actively using the AI features across Google Android and Microsoft Windows on a day to day basis, and the delta between the two companies is growing ever wider. Basic stuff like the photo editing features on Google Pixel phones are lightyears beyond the abysmal tools found in the Microsoft Photos app on Windows. Google Gemini in Google Apps is also far smarter and far more intuitive than Copilot on Microsoft 365, as someone actively using both across the two businesses I work in.

Microsoft's "ship it now fix it later" attitude risks giving its AI products an Internet Explorer-like reputation for poor quality.

Dare I say it, Gemini is actually helpful, and can usually execute tasks you might actually need in a day to day job. "Find me a meeting slot on this date to accommodate these timezones" — Gemini will actually do it. Copilot 365 doesn't even have the capability to schedule a calendar event with natural language in the Outlook mobile app, or even provide something as basic as clickable links in some cases. At least Xbox's Gaming Copilot has a beta tag to explain why it fails half of the time. It's truly absurd how half-baked a lot of these features are, and it's odd that Microsoft sought to ship them in this state. And Microsoft wants to make Windows 12 AI first? Please.

Microsoft's "ship it now fix it later" attitude risks giving its AI products an Internet Explorer-like reputation for poor quality, sacrificing the future to more patient, thoughtful companies who spend a little more time polishing first. Microsoft's strategy for AI seems to revolve around offering cheaper, lower quality products at lower costs (Microsoft Teams, hi), over more expensive higher-quality options its competitors are offering. Whether or not that strategy will work for artificial intelligence, which is exorbitantly expensive to run, remains to be seen.

Microsoft's savvy early investment in OpenAI gave it an incredibly strong position early on, but as we get deeper into the cycle, some cracks are starting to show. Many of Microsoft's AI products to date simply scream of a total lack of direction and utter chaos, but it's not all hopeless. Some of Microsoft's enterprise solutions for AI are seeing strong growth. Github Copilot has been something of a success story for Redmond, and Microsoft is exploring its own Maia and Cobalt chips and even language models, in attempts to decouple itself from NVIDIA and OpenAI respectively. But Satya Nadella's Microsoft has an uncanny knack for failing to deliver on promising initiatives like those.

Without a stronger emphasis on quality, Microsoft's future in AI could simply end up revolving around re-selling NVIDIA server tech and jacking up local electricity prices, rather than providing any real home-grown innovation in the space. Shareholders will be more than happy for Microsoft to simply be a server reseller, but it would be a ignoble legacy for what was previously one of tech's most innovative companies.


Click to follow Windows Central on Google News

Follow Windows Central on Google News to keep our latest news, insights, and features at the top of your feeds!


 
Jez Corden
Executive Editor

Jez Corden is the Executive Editor at Windows Central, focusing primarily on all things Xbox and gaming. Jez is known for breaking exclusive news and analysis as relates to the Microsoft ecosystem while being powered by tea. Follow on Twitter (X) and tune in to the XB2 Podcast, all about, you guessed it, Xbox!

Conversation

|

Please follow our community guidelines.

All Comments

    1. Comment by freonscl.

      this happens when microsoft quits phone market

      • Comment by pbilk.

        Thanks for writing this. I wish Copilot could match Gemini’s capabilities, but I’m satisfied with Copilot since it’s useful for my tasks. I won’t use Gemini because I don’t like Google as a company or their dominance in so many areas. As for Nadella, he either needs to improve his leadership and direction or step down. His decisions have hurt Microsoft’s products (the Surface line) and software, leading to the loss of one of their top product guys. Instead of gradually and thoughtfully improving hardware, software, and their integration, he made a sharp turn straight into AI without a second thought, or so it seems.

        • Comment by Pepe Vera.

          I use copilot at work, inside teams. I cannot tell how much time I've saved by using it. It's not as great as chatgpt but it's quite good at work. For some tasks I'm like 10 to 50 times faster, and better too.

          • Reply by Jeff Norton.

            Agreed. This article must be writing by a casual AI user. Copilot is revolutionary to productivity at work with their llm’s trained on SharePoint and Teams sites. Very odd article.

        • Comment by caderik.

          Great article, although I am not sure any of the current models has a defining edge. Also to be clear, nobody is competing with Nvidia enterprise GPUs - these have a density of cores and memory that nobody can match making every other GPU almost unusable for any real AI use case. Microsoft is supposed to unveil their own GPUs next year but as all other GPUs, these will be toys compared to Nvidia.

          But AI integration in Microsoft products is the worst, no questions asked. We need to see the major next version of Office before we can judge that they do not innovate but the copilot integration is a monstrosity today.

          • Comment by Alex Nuggz.

            This is a short sighted view, Microsoft has dominance in the business space and Copilot is providing real value in this area being heavily integrated into the Microsoft tech stack, we're using it across our law firm now and its becoming a game changer. The fact is that the majority of businesses and enterprises are already invested in the Microsoft Ecosystem, Microsoft 365, so like us they want an AI tool that is available across their whole suite of tools. Copilot is the only one that really offers this. They key for many businesses is the data is stored within the Microsoft tenant, so it lives where there email, Sharepoint, OneDrive etc live. This means from a compliance perspective its already a winner in the AI for business space. You also have plenty of control via Microsoft Purview.

            In the consumer space sure they aren't doing so well, the competition is fierce and models are racing to constantly one up each other, but the consumer space doesn't make them much money in comparison to the business/enterprise space.

            • Comment by Will.

              Look at ANY Microsoft product and you will see the same thing. Launch something with a big show, promise new stuff, maybe deliver something months or a year later in small bits, and in a few years repeat the process. This is Microsoft. Copilot is going to turn into the Bing of AI, something someone would use because it is the default in Office/Windows and that is it. Business use it because of the AI controls built into admin management but its results and output are poor compared to anything else.

              • Comment by Daniele.

                How long is this Nadella dinasty? Does it ever end? I see him a better fit for the cloud services department. Really, MS needs a shock.

                • Comment by pjmlp.

                  We want a proper engineered Windows, without web widgets and loading processes in background to work around sloppy programming practices and lack of employees with good Windows programming skills. We don't need to throw away perfectly working computers only to make shareholders and Microsoft partners happy with new Windows licenses. Then maybe AI might become interesting.

                  • Comment by Jan Bar.

                    Their problem is that they try to add AI to products that have been on the market for years. I've been using Visual Studio 2026 and I've been using Cursor, and you can see that one has been built with AI in mind, while in the other it's just slapped on top and it isn't that functional.

                    • Comment by WineWeasel.

                      Part of Microsofts problem is choice they force you to have stuff you don't want then when something new comes along people do everything they can to avoid it and the other installs that usually come with it. If they were sensible they would put it on the pro version of Windows and have it as an optional download that way those without pro would have FOMO and probably download it. Same with Edge it forces it way in and you can't get rid of it if I wanted it I'd download it the few times it has managed to pop itself open drives me mad so I find more ways of blocking it