(...)

also: post your fav episode!

>>338

>18-years-old
lol nope!

>>>341

>>>342

>>>343

>>340

How far earlier?

>>>344

>>340

ID issues?

>>>344

>>340

can you provide proof of this statement? I’ve gotten my rocks off to this chick a stupid amount of times. You giving a solid case to what you just said will make that jerk count skyrocket.

>>>344

>>341

>>342

>>343

there's already been a few of them that were shown to have been 15/16 when they did their scenes, that people showed on that other but now nuked thread, and they say this to all of them and I am beginning and already have begun to doubt that, really many of they were actually 18 at this stage, so yes I really do think that she's another one with ID issues and feel like someone will eventually do some digging and find that out.

oh yeah, here's a pic of one example of a couple who were - at the time of doing their scenes E179 was 16 at the time and E172 was the one who was 15 at the time, was stated that she had just turned 15, barely, when she did her scene.

there are more of these ID issue examples photos but was the only one I've got

>>>346

>>>637

>>345

Can you show example of issue?

>>>347

>>346

that is the example...

>>>349

This girl was 18 when filming as was the vast majority of girls they had on, but they snuck in a few that weren't every now and then.
Some of which never ended up on the website and they got put in jail for it. So if 375 is your favorite don't worry

>>>357

>>347

That’s not an example, that is speculation

>>>352

Need help Identifying set number

>>>354

>>>359

>>349

it has been proven to be true, stop being stupid.
the people behind the studio got arrested for having - girls in their videos, and that is one of them.

>>350

bump GDP number

>>>356

>>>359

>>354

GDP E154

>>>359

>>348

no there were more than just one who was - that's one of the things he got convicted for was the sex trafficking of Minors, not a Minor, there were a lot more, just so far only know of a few who had ID Issues

>>350

>>354

>>356

It's 190. Rachel

>>353
he was charged with murder because of a dispute over money for a gay porn shoot. They didn't find enough to convict him. He was scapegoated and fired from the RK Inc for shooting with the girl. That UA girl from those scenes and a few other unreleased was dating him. They continued to date and he was charged with a DV a few years ago. She still models and has an OF. She used a fake ID and lied about everything. FL laws don't guard against fake IDs.

Does anyone have full gdp and gdt collection the could share?

>>>368

>>365

>>>373

>>368

not what he asked.

>>>376

is there a proper meg a. nz archive of gdp?

what about the wiki info on the models?

>>373

well the lazy fuck can go look for them himself now

>>>377

>>376

damn you triggered manFORBIDDEN, you link a pic with the adress censored and you get mad when called out. Get over yourself.

>>345

I've seen proof on 179. But do you have any proof on 172