Talk:Soyjak.party

	hideThis article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
showArticles for creation showWebsites: Computing showInternet showSoftware: Computing showTechnology showInternet culture

Users of the site have a history of raiding Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia. It seems likely this article will also be subject to vandalism. While WP:NO-PREEMPT says articles can't be protected pre-emptively, I think this measure will soon show itself necessary. A comment by a user of the site was already posted on this talk page. ~2025-37440-32 (talk) 09:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the history, there was already a non-constructive edit by a user of the site (based on the lingo) ~2025-37440-32 (talk) 10:00, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All of the information I added is true, but where am I supposed to find references if Soyjak Wiki is blacklisted? Most articles documenting Soyjak.party are about the 4chan hack. Soynorth (talk) 15:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, I can't link to the site itself due to it being blacklisted. Soynorth (talk) 17:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Last thing: can you add information without citations as long as you put Citation needed? I have a lot to write about the site culture but I can't add it in. Soynorth (talk) 17:52, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, you cannot.

Hope that helps. Augmented Seventh (talk) 20:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So where do I get my sources from? There aren't many websites documenting the culture of the site online. Soynorth (talk) 20:46, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We can only include information sourced from reliable, secondary sources. If those don't exist for a given piece of information, then the information probably doesn't belong here. Which is OK -- not everything about a given subject needs to be in its article. I'm assuming that "Soyjack Wiki" is user-generated, which means it wouldn't be an acceptable source regardless. --tony 20:48, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's an article from the site "Hacker News" about the 4chan hack but it doesn't go into much detail. ~2025-39010-44 (talk) 22:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The logo has a transgender individual being hanged, and that can trigger people try censoring it. ~2025-38957-09 (talk) 08:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather not censor Wikipedia. Soynorth (talk) 10:44, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this, so much this Itzcrazycremeens (talk) 11:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]