Skip to main content
Advertisement
Advertisement

Business

Exclusive-How Netflix won Hollywood's biggest prize, Warner Bros Discovery

Exclusive-How Netflix won Hollywood's biggest prize, Warner Bros Discovery

FILE PHOTO: A Netflix logo is displayed at the Lucca Comics & Games 2025 event in Lucca, Italy, October 31, 2025. REUTERS/Claudia Greco/File Photo

LOS ANGELES/NEW YORK, Dec 5 : What started as a fact-finding mission for Netflix culminated in one of the biggest media deals in the last decade and one that stands to reshape the global entertainment business landscape, people with direct knowledge of the deal told Reuters.

Netflix announced on Friday it had reached a deal to buy Warner Bros Discovery's TV, film studios and streaming division for $72 billion. 

Although Netflix had publicly downplayed speculation about buying a major Hollywood studio as recently as October, the streaming pioneer threw its hat in the ring when Warner Bros Discovery kicked off an auction on October 21, after rejecting a trio of unsolicited offers from Paramount Skydance.

Details of Netflix's plan and the Warner Bros board's deliberations, based on interviews with seven advisers and executives, are reported here for the first time.

Initially motivated by curiosity about its business, Netflix executives quickly recognized the opportunity presented by Warner Bros, beyond the ability to offer the century-old studio's deep catalog of movies and television shows to Netflix subscribers. Library titles are valuable to streaming services as these movies and shows can account for 80 per cent of viewing, according to one person familiar with the business. 

Warner Bros' business units - particularly its theatrical distribution and promotion unit and its studio - were complementary to Netflix. The HBO Max streaming service also would benefit from insights learned years ago by streaming leader Netflix that would accelerate HBO's growth, according to one person familiar with the situation.

Netflix began flirting with the idea of acquiring the studio and streaming assets, another source familiar with the process told Reuters, after WBD announced plans in June to split into two publicly traded companies, separating its fading but cash-generating cable television networks from the legendary Warner Bros studios, HBO and the HBO Max streaming service. 

Netflix and Warner Bros did not reply to requests for comment.

The work intensified this autumn, as Netflix began vying for the assets against Paramount and NBCUniversal's parent company, Comcast.

'STRATEGIC FLEXIBILITY'

Warner Bros kicked off the public auction in October, after Paramount submitted the first of three escalating offers for the media company in September. Sources familiar with the offer said Paramount aimed to pre-empt the planned separation because the split would undercut its ability to combine the traditional television networks businesses and increase the risk of being outbid for the studio by the likes of Netflix.

Around that time, banker JPMorgan Chase & Co   was advising Warner Bros Discovery CEO David Zaslav to consider reversing the order of the planned spin, shedding the Discovery Global unit comprising the company's cable television assets first. This would give the company more flexibility, including the option to sell the studio, streaming and content assets, which advisers believed would draw strong interest, according to sources familiar with the matter.

Executives for the streaming service and its advisory team, which included the investment banks Moelis & Company, Wells Fargo and the law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, had been holding daily morning calls for the past two months, sources said. The group worked throughout Thanksgiving week - including multiple calls on Thanksgiving Day - to prepare a bid by the December 1 deadline.

Warner Bros' board similarly convened every day for the last eight days leading up to the decision on Thursday, when Netflix presented the final offer that sources described as the only offer they considered binding and complete, sources familiar with the deliberations said.  

The board favored Netflix's deal, which would yield more immediate benefits over one by Comcast. The NBCUniversal parent proposed merging its entertainment division with Warner Bros Discovery, creating a much larger unit that would rival Walt Disney.  But it would have taken years to execute, the sources said.

Comcast declined to comment.

Although Paramount raised its offer to $30 per share on Thursday for the entire company, for an equity value of $78 billion, according to sources familiar with the deal, the Warner Bros board had concerns about the financing, other sources said. 

Paramount declined comment.

To reassure the seller over what is expected to be a significant regulatory review, Netflix put forward one of the largest breakup fees in M&A history of $5.8 billion, a sign of its belief it would win regulatory approval, the sources said. “No one lights $6 billion on fire without that conviction," one of the sources said.

Until the moment late on Thursday night when Netflix learned its offer had been accepted - news that was greeted by clapping and cheering on a group call - one Netflix executive confided that they thought they had only a 50-50 chance.

Source: Reuters

Sign up for our newsletters

Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox

Subscribe here
Inbox
Advertisement

Business

Hollywood unions alarmed by Netflix's $72 billion Warner Bros deal

Dec 5 : Hollywood unions and theater owners on Friday sounded the alarm over Netflix's proposed $72 billion takeover of Warner Bros Discovery, warning the deal would cut jobs, concentrate power and reduce theatrical movie releases if the deal passes regulatory review.

The deal would place the streaming giant's HBO brands under the Netflix umbrella and also hand control of the historic Warner Bros studio over to Netflix, which has already upended Hollywood by hastening the shift from movie releases in cinemas to home streaming.

Netflix, the force behind "Stranger Things" and "Squid Game," could gain control of marquee Warner Bros titles such as "Batman" and "Casablanca." 

"This merger must be blocked," the Writers Guild of America East and West said in a statement. "The world’s largest streaming company swallowing one of its biggest competitors is what antitrust laws were designed to prevent."

The deal faces antitrust reviews in the United States and Europe, and American politicians have already expressed skepticism.

The Writers Guild, which represents writers in motion pictures, television, cable, broadcast news, podcasts and online media, raised concerns over job cuts, wage reductions, higher prices for consumers and worsening conditions for entertainment workers. Netflix said it expects to generate at least $2 billion to $3 billion in annual cost savings by the third year after the deal closes.

The Netflix-Warner Bros deal risks eliminating 25 per cent of the annual domestic box office, said Cinema United, the trade group representing 30,000 movie screens in the United States and 26,000 internationally.

Netflix does release some films in theaters before making them available to subscribers, and the company said it would maintain theatrical releases for Warner Bros films and support Hollywood creative professionals. 

Netflix said the deal would give subscribers more shows and films, boost its U.S. production and long-term spending on original content and create more jobs and opportunities for creative talent. Warner Bros Discovery did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment on the opponents' concerns.

But Cinema United President Michael O'Leary called the merger "an unprecedented threat" and questioned whether Netflix would maintain the current level of distribution. "Sporadic and truncated theatrical releases to meet awards criteria in a handful of theaters is not a commitment to exhibition," O'Leary said.

The Hollywood Teamsters, who represent drivers, casting professionals, mechanics and other workers in the entertainment industry, also opposed the deal, calling for "opposition across all levels of government" while urging antitrust enforcers to reject the deal.

"Teamsters have been clear on our position that greed-fueled consolidation of corporate power, no matter what industry, is a direct threat to good union jobs, the livelihood of our members and the very existence of our industry," the union said in a statement.

The Directors Guild of America, however, was more reserved, saying it had significant concerns to discuss with Netflix.

"We will be meeting with Netflix to outline our concerns and better understand their vision for the future of the company. While we undertake this due diligence, we will not be commenting further," the DGA said in a statement.

The screen actors union SAG-AFTRA said the merger "raises many serious questions" and it would comment further on the impact on its members after analyzing the deal.

Source: Reuters

Sign up for our newsletters

Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox

Subscribe here
Inbox
Advertisement

Commentary

Commentary: The US may be running the wrong AI race

China’s favouring of small and cheap models such as DeepSeek could prove to be the better bet, says John Thornhill for Financial Times.

Commentary: The US may be running the wrong AI race

Qwen and Alibaba logos are seen in this illustration taken Jan 29, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

LONDON: Surrounded by kick-boxing, piano-playing humanoid robots at a high-tech fair in Shenzhen last month, some tech influencers were asking: Can the West catch up with China?

That question would have sounded absurd two decades ago, but it is anything but today. This week, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute published its latest critical technology tracker, covering high-impact global research in 74 areas. It found that China now leads in 66 of those technologies, in fields as varied as computer vision, quantum sensors and nuclear energy, with the US ahead in the other eight. 

ASPI’s researchers highlighted a familiar story across many technologies. An early and overwhelming US lead in research output in the first decade of this century has been surpassed by China’s persistent long-term investment in fundamental research.

In 2005, China accounted for just 6 per cent of the world’s most highly cited research papers but that share had risen to 48 per cent this year. The comparable proportion of US publications fell from 43 per cent to 9 per cent. At a time when the US is defunding many federal science programmes, China is doing the opposite by “building the whole technology ecosystem”, says Jenny Wong-Leung, one of the report’s authors. 

ASPI’s findings accord with Nature’s latest ranking of research institutions, tracking articles across 145 science journals. In terms of research output, nine of the world’s top 10 research institutions are Chinese with only Harvard University in the top tier. China is now mass manufacturing research; it truly has become a scientific superpower.

A person receives a can of soda from a humanoid robot at an Agibot booth during the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai, China, Jul 26, 2025. REUTERS/Go Nakamura

THE AI RACE

Published research, though, does not automatically translate into technological capability. Moreover, the location of research expertise does not always map with successful commercialisation of technology – as a long line of frustrated British scientists can attest. 

However, a separate report from the Special Competitive Studies Project in the US earlier this year also highlighted the striking progress that China has made in adopting many frontier technologies.

According to the SCSP’s staff assessment, the US is still leading in semiconductors, synthetic biology and quantum computing while China dominates in advanced batteries, 5G and commercial drones. But the most contested, and arguably most consequential, area is artificial intelligence.

President Donald Trump has said that the US will do “whatever it takes” to lead the world in AI. And the big US tech companies, including OpenAI, Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta and Amazon, are making colossal investments to fulfil that ambition. OpenAI alone is planning to invest US$400 billion over the next few years to build out its Stargate data centres across the US.

Last month, the Trump administration launched the Genesis Mission to boost the private AI sector by sharing the public data sets and computing resources of the country’s 17 national laboratories.

“We’re essentially pitting our private capitalists against this nation state of China. The stakeholders here have two very different sets of resources, attributes, strengths and weaknesses,” says David Lin, a senior adviser to the SCSP.

DIFFERENT AI MODELS

But the US and China are also adopting very different approaches to adopting AI. The big US companies mostly favour massive, proprietary, “closed-weights” models, such as ChatGPT and Gemini, which may be best suited to achieving generalisable intelligence.

By contrast, Chinese AI companies favour smaller, cheaper (and arguably less safe) “open-weights” models, such as DeepSeek and Alibaba’s Qwen, that can be more readily adapted by developers.

In part, China is making a virtue of necessity because US export restrictions have denied it access to the state-of-the-art silicon chips needed to build the most powerful foundation models. But it also reflects China’s priority in rapidly diffusing the technology.

Michael Power, the former global strategist of the investment firm Ninety One, reckons the US is making a “catastrophic strategic error” in betting so heavily on giant closed AI models.

“China’s model is turning out to be far more effective in terms of usable compute in the real world,” Power tells me, especially considering the country’s lower energy costs. Even Sam Altman, OpenAI’s chief executive, has expressed his personal concern that “we have been on the wrong side of history here”.

A recent study by MIT and Hugging Face found that Chinese open models have now overtaken comparable US models in terms of global adoption. Many US companies, including Airbnb, have become fans of the “fast and cheap” Qwen. In this critical area too the question arises: Can the West catch up with China?

Source: Financial Times/el

Sign up for our newsletters

Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox

Subscribe here
Inbox
Advertisement

Business

US lawmakers press Google, Apple to remove apps tracking immigration agents

Dec 5 : The House Committee on Homeland Security has asked Google and Apple to detail what steps they are taking to remove mobile applications that allow users to track federal immigration officers.

In letters sent on Friday to Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Apple head Tim Cook, committee leaders singled out ICEBlock, an app previously used to monitor U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, saying apps hosted on their app stores risk "jeopardizing the safety of DHS personnel." Lawmakers requested a briefing by December 12.

The letters urged Google and Apple to ensure these apps cannot be used to target officers or obstruct lawful immigration enforcement.

The committee noted that while free speech is protected, it does not extend to advocacy that incites imminent lawless action, referencing a landmark Supreme Court ruling.

Google and Apple did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment.

The letters follow concerns that these tools allow users to anonymously report and track the movements of federal agents, including those from ICE and Customs and Border Protection.

In October, Google said that ICEBlock was never available on Google's Play Store and added it had removed similar apps due to policy violations.

Apple also removed ICEBlock and other tracking apps from its App Store at the time.

Attorney General Pam Bondi said the apps "put ICE agents at risk just for doing their jobs," while Apple cited violations of its policies against content that could harm individuals or groups. The removals followed a surge in downloads of ICEBlock, which had more than a million users before being pulled.

Source: Reuters

Sign up for our newsletters

Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox

Subscribe here
Inbox