Skip to Content

Chicago Justice Season 1 Episode 2 Review: Uncertainty Principle

Critic's Rating: 4.8 / 5.0

It usually takes me a little while to get into a new show, but Chicago Justice has already won me over.

Chicago Justice Season 1 Episode 2 had everything I love most.

Characters I already know and love working alongside ones that I can't wait to get to know better, a compelling story, courtroom drama, and controversial social issues that the writers aren't afraid to dive into deeply.

Paul Robinette - Chicago Justice
(Elizabeth Morris/NBC)

From the moment Antonio joined the State Attorney's office, a conflict between his old job and his new one was inevitable, and there couldn't have been one more perfect.

Antonio's loyalties were divided not only because the SA's office was going up against Voight's unit but because Atwater is probably one of the best cops in that unit. While Voight tends to encourage the use of violence as a means to an end, Atwater is pretty much a straight shooter.

For that reason, Antonio wasn't the only one conflicted. I was rooting for Atwater even though I wanted to get to the bottom of what happened and get justice for the Wilkes family.

Stone: It’s Voight’s unit. They aren’t exactly shrinking violets.

Antonio: That’s bull.

Stone: I get no pleasure out of going after a cop, especially Kevin Atwater.

Antonio: Then drop it.

Stone: My obligation is to the victim and their family. I can’t just drop him.

🔗 permalink: My obligation is to the victim and their family. I can’t just drop him.

Stone and Antonio clearly have opposite priorities, and that's not likely to change anytime soon. Antonio's first loyalty is always going to be Voight and the rest of his old unit, and it'll be interesting to see how that plays out.

It didn't help that Voight's unit has a reputation for violence and Voight's contribution to the investigation was to opine that if Atwater killed Wilkes, Wilkes deserved it.

Both Stone and Antonio were right and wrong.

Stone was under a lot of pressure from Jeffries to avoid the appearance of favoritism or shielding cops from the consequences of bad behavior, and he was just as overzealous in the pursuit of that goal as Antonio was in his efforts to protect Atwater.

Atwater: You want me to say it’s okay, you tried your best, Antonio? Nothing makes this okay. I got a badge, I’m guilty. Simple as that.

Antonio: You don’t know that.

Atwater: I saw a black woman get up and testify against me today, looking at me like I turned my back on my people. My people whose history includes fire hoses being turned against them, being shut out of restaurants and schools, being lynched. This isn’t what I became a cop for.

🔗 permalink: I saw a black woman get up and testify against me today, looking at me like I turned my back…

Antonio and Atwater's friendship took a huge hit as a result of this whole mess, and it remains to be seen if it can ever really be fixed.

Atwater's arrest scene was a powerful reminder of just what was at stake. Antonio showed up to wordlessly arrest Atwater, and Trudy gave him a disapproving look as they passed her on the way out of the building.

The lack of dialogue said much more than any words ever could.

Robinette: Have you ever been arrested?

Stone: Objection. Relevance.

Robinette: Goes to credibility, your Honor.

Judge: I’ll allow it.

Witness: No, I have never been arrested.

Robinette: Has anyone in your family ever been arrested?

Stone: Objection!

Judge: Overruled.

Witness: Yes. My brother James. He was on the El.

Robinette: What was your brother James doing on the El?

Witness: They said he was disturbing the peace. His teacher had given him a ticket to United to see the Bulls. I guess a black man sitting on the El disturbed some people.

🔗 permalink: They said he was disturbing the peace. His teacher had given him a ticket to United to see…

Throughout the hour, Chicago Justice took the opportunity to explore issues of racism in policing without being heavy handed or preachy.

The choice of Atwater, an African American cop, as the cop on trial for excessive force was an interesting one.

Most crime dramas tackle the issue of white cops shooting unarmed black suspects, but "Uncertainty Principle" went in a more interesting direction.

For one thing, Atwater's problem was far more realistic.

There was no dramatic shootout or question of whether an unarmed suspect drew a gun or not. Instead, Atwater did what he thought he had to in order to subdue a resistant suspect and was left questioning whether he went too far.

This felt to me like something that happens far more often to real cops, and its relative uniqueness on television made it more interesting.

In addition, the pressures and difficulties black cops face are different than those white cops face, especially when it comes to conflicts with black suspects.

Atwater: You want me to say it’s okay, you tried your best, Antonio? Nothing makes this okay. I got a badge, I’m guilty. Simple as that.

Antonio: You don’t know that.

Atwater: I saw a black woman get up and testify against me today, looking at me like I turned my back on my people. My people whose history includes fire hoses being turned against them, being shut out of restaurants and schools, being lynched. This isn’t what I became a cop for.

🔗 permalink: I saw a black woman get up and testify against me today, looking at me like I turned my back…

Atwater's description of how he felt as if he were being seen as a traitor to his community and was now the oppressor rather than the oppressed was one of the best moments in "Uncertainty Principle."

It was realistic and raw and was done in the context of a basketball game between two members of the justice system who suddenly found themselves on opposite sides.

When Atwater decided to take a plea soon afterwards, I wondered whether Wilkes' mother would have been equally satisfied with his attempt to take responsibility for his actions if he had been a white cop who had killed her son.

It also reminded me of how many people, many of them poor and/or black, plead out even if they are not guilty because they just can't continue to fight for one reason or another.

Antonio: He’s just a guy, you know? Worse than some, better than most. So tell me, what kind of prick goes out of his way to ruin a good person’s life like that?

🔗 permalink: He’s just a guy, you know? Worse than some, better than most. So tell me, what kind of prick…

I had mixed feelings about the 11th hour discovery that Atwater couldn't have been guilty for this reason.

I didn't want Atwater to go to jail for something he might not have done, and I felt vindicated by his exoneration, but it felt somewhat convenient. 

Sure, questions had come up before about whether Wilkes was drunk but for Antonio to discover new evidence that suggested Atwater was innocent right after he'd been sentenced was a little bit too easy.

Plus, in real life wrongly convicted persons rarely get justice 30 seconds after they were sentenced, and victims' families might object strenuously to a conviction being vacated.

Stone's apology was a nice touch that I wished occurred more often in the real world, too.

Laura: You know what would be nice? If my partner and I were on the same page.

Antonio: I worked with Kevin Atwater. He was my partner.

Laura: I’m your partner now.

🔗 permalink: I’m your partner now.

Obviously, Antonio's divided loyalties aren't going to resolve themselves in an hour, but I was glad to see him settling into his partnership with Laura.

Laura, for her part, was able to be empathetic once Atwater pled out rather than focusing solely on justice being served. This bodes well for their future relationship, and I'm very interested in how it will evolve.

Meanwhile, I'd also like to see more of Robinette and Stone's relationship. I love it when there are some personal stories mixed in with all the legal drama, and this was no exception.

I want to see exactly what the story is with Stone's father, and I was wondering if Stone and Robinette somehow shared a father. I could be way off base, but that's just a vibe I got. 

In any case, Stone calling his father at the end of the hour means that there's more of his backstory to come, hopefully soon.

What did you think of  "Uncertainty Principle"? Do you think Atwater and Antonio's friendship can ever heal? Will Antonio's loyalties ever shift, and should they?

Weigh in below, and don't forget if you missed anything you can always watch Chicago Justice online.

The Big Audition - Riverdale Season 1 Episode 6

Comments

Most Commented

Canceled Chicago Fire Spinoff Never Got a Fair Chance to Succeed

One Chicago seems untouchable, but one canceled Chicago Fire spinoff from 2017 tells another story.

I’m talking about Chicago Justice — the Law & Order of Chicagoland, which only had 13 episodes before NBC canned it.

I loved this show and still miss it. NBC had its reasons, but I think the network made a mistake by axing this legal drama without giving it a chance to shine.

Obesessed With Justice - Chicago Justice
(Elizabeth Morris/NBC)

I Loved Chicago Justice’s Connection To The Law & Order Universe, But NBC Saw It As A Weakness

Chicago Justice was the most connected of all the One Chicago shows to the Law & Order franchise.

One of its biggest selling points was ADA Peter Stone — the son of Michael Moriarty’s Benjamin Stone, the ADA who tried cases during the first five seasons of Law & Order.

Stone had a compelling backstory. He felt he was a huge disappointment to his legendary father, from whom he was now estranged, and thus eager to prove himself in the courtroom.

He also tended to see legal issues in black and white terms — sometimes literally, as he didn’t understand the role racism played in many crimes in the Chicago area.

It seems like a perfect premise that would appeal to Law & Order fans, right? It certainly appealed to me. Sadly, however, that was one of the reasons NBC decided to axe Chicago Justice after only one season.

The network concluded it didn’t want to be overrun with One Chicago shows, already had three, and that Chicago Justice was redundant because of its similarity to Law & Order.

The Murder Suspect - Chicago Justice
(Parrish Lewis/NBC)

NBC Was Wrong About This Canceled Chicago Fire Spinoff

It burns me up (no pun intended) that NBC canceled Chicago Justice because its similarity to Law & Order made it more expendable than the other Chicago Fire spinoffs.

First of all, this was 2017 — the original Law & Order was long gone and wouldn’t return until 2021.

So what was NBC saying here? That people who like Law & Order didn’t deserve a show they enjoy?

Let’s be real, too — Chicago Justice was buried on Sunday nights. Yes, it had lower ratings than the other One Chicago shows, but did it really stand a chance during that timeslot?

The Good Wife had just ended, so NBC might have hoped to get an edge over CBS by offering a replacement legal drama in that time slot.

A Link To Other Murders - Chicago Justice
(Elizabeth Morris/NBC)

Still, Chicago Justice was competing with Madam Secretary, which meant there were two intelligent shows about complicated legal and political issues going head to head.

If NBC wanted to improve Chicago Justice’s ratings, it should have moved it to another night instead of giving up on it. Since it was similar to Law & Order, airing it and Law & Order: SVU back-to-back should have been a no-brainer.

The three other Chicago shows aired on Tuesday through Thursday, but it would have made more sense to pair Chicago Justice with Law & Order: SVU, which was the lead-in to Chicago P.D. in those days.

In any case, the ratings aren’t the real story here any more than they were for Blue Bloods.

Chicago Justice was lower rated than the other One Chicago shows, but it still had a total viewership of between 5 and 6 million viewers per week — something other shows that were renewed struggled with a bit.

Sharing a Drink - Chicago Justice
(Parrish Lewis/NBC)

The TV Landscape Was Different in 2017, But NBC Made a Mistake CBS Is Repeating Today

The biggest reason for canceling Chicago Justice was that NBC feared having too many One Chicago shows.

That was more forgivable in 2017 than it would be today. It was the pre-streaming era, where networks were limited to whatever slots they had available in primetime.

It also was before TV was oversaturated with reboots and spinoffs. There was no such thing as monopolizing the schedule with three episodes of the same franchise.

So NBC decided one of these spinoffs had to go, and Chicago Justice was the easiest to axe.

A Second Murder - Chicago Justice
(Parrish Lewis/NBC)

Of course, NBC knew this would be the fourth One Chicago show when the network greenlit it, confusing its decision.

Plus, it sent Stone to Law & Order: SVU for a season, demonstrating the premise was worthwhile even though the show didn’t make it.

Eight years later, here we are again, only it’s a different network making a ridiculous decision about a Dick Wolf franchise.

FBI: International and FBI: Most Wanted‘s cancellations aren’t about ratings either. They’re partially about expense, and partially to make room for a fourth FBI spinoff.

CBS’ decision is less forgivable because the TV landscape has changed. Today, we have streaming services that can handle the overflow.

NBC has experimented with this, successfully transitioning Days of Our Lives to Peacock only and experimenting this season with Law & Order: Organized Crime going there too.

Jefferies Oversees The Case - Chicago Justice Season 1 Episode 1
(Parrish Lewis/NBC)

So if Chicago Justice were airing today, maybe NBC would put it on Peacock instead of panicking about how many One Chicago shows were eating up time on its schedule.

Yet CBS canceled two popular shows outright to make room for another member of the same franchise, and we’re no less overrun with police procedurals than we were before the network made that decision.

What do you think, One Chicago fanatics?

Is CBS making the same mistake that NBC did with its canceled Chicago Fire spinoff?

Vote in our poll about whether you would watch a rebooted Chicago Justice (theoretically — there are no such plans as far as I know!) and then hit the comments with your thoughts.

Would You Watch Chicago Justice If It Were Rebooted Today?

All 13 episodes of Chicago Justice are available on Apple TV+.

Watch Chicago Justice Online


TV Fanatic is searching for passionate writers to share their voices across various article types. Think you have what it takes to be a TV Fanatic? Click here for more information and next steps.

Comments

Michael

Wednesday 2nd of April 2025

I own the only season on DVD. Did it deserve better? Possibly.

Sharing is Caring

Help spread the word. You're awesome for doing it!