-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Collapse file tree
Files
Search this repository
/
Copy pathresearchnote.txt
More file actions
More file actions
Latest commit
69 lines (31 loc) · 6.87 KB
/
researchnote.txt
File metadata and controls
69 lines (31 loc) · 6.87 KB
You must be signed in to make or propose changes
More edit options
Edit and raw actions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
2023-10-21: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/18326/1/may-bias-in-science.pdf
https://citizentruth.org/objective-journalism-media-bias-media-history/
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt19qgf0x.7?seq=2#metadata_info_tab_contents
2023-10-21:a
Evidence-rated search engine: pedro.org.au/english/resources/links/ : tripdatabase.com; otseeker.com/Search/BasicSearch.aspx; neurorehab-
evidence.com/web/article/advanced_search_standalone/sort/rating/desc; speechbite.com/search-results/?
keyword=keyword&authors&journal&from&to&access&targetArea&intervention&clientSubgroup&ageGroup&serviceDelivery&method&pedro&advanced-search-submit=Search ; maybe
epistemonikos.org/en/search?q= ; cebm.net ; healthevidence.org/search.aspx ; search.pedro.org.au doesnt rate systematic review; kinda
crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/search/simple ; cancercareontario.ca/en/guidelines-advice/types-of-cancer/171 < cancercareontario.ca/en/guidelines-advice/types-of-
cancer/171 ; nccmt.ca/search?q= ; evidencealerts.com
GRADE-descriptive, reviewed search results: ebm.bmj.com/search/ ; bmj.com
Guide of evidence-based medicine: guides.library.ualberta.ca/c.php?g=345165&p=2324908 ; pedro.org.au/english/resources/links/ ; megalodon.jp/2025-1127-1744-
13/https://ualberta.scholaris.ca:443/bitstreams/7b06ac0f-add8-41f5-b4d4-311f1353c332/download ; https://megalodon.jp/2025-1127-1744-
18/https://hslmcmaster.libguides.com:443/friendly.php?s=ebm ; 2025.11.27/plus.mcmaster.ca/McMasterPLUSDB/
evidence-based search-engine of evidence-hierarchy-ranking:accessss.org ; crd.york.ac.uk/CRDWeb/ResultsPage.asp?
Active_Results_Tab=0&DatabaseID=0&PageNumber=1&RecordsPerPage=20&SearchSessionID=3478443&LineID=3367404&SearchFor=%28test%29&SearchXML=%26amp%3Bamp%3Blt%3Badvanced
%26amp%3Bamp%3Bgt%3B%26amp%3Bamp%3Blt%3Bsearchfor+field%3D%26amp%3Bamp%3Bgt%3B%28test%29%26amp%3Bamp%3Blt%3B%2Fsearchfor%26amp%3Bamp%3Bgt%3B%26amp%3Bamp%3Blt%3B%2F
advanced%26amp%3Bamp%3Bgt%3B&UserID=0&ShowPreviews=0&ShowPubmed=0&SearchSortField=3&SearchSortDirection=0&ShowSelected=0 ;
Search engine-note: 2025.11.24/https://websitering.neocities.org/ScrubTheWebIsGone : "some searches that Google and Bing just aren't good at; they can only find
relevant documents if they're on popular websites. Popularity!=Relevancy.", "As far as I know the last remaining 90's search engines are Aliweb (1993, no longer
crawling but returning results,) WhatUSeek (1995, at least, more of a directory today, but still has an active crawler,) NorthernLight (1997, went off line in
1999, came back around 2007, current public index only includes recent business news articles,) Thunderstone's Web Catalog (1998, crawls sites and organizes them
into a directory, but does not index individule pages,) Zerx (1999, at least, returns many dead links,) Findia.net (1999,) and Google (1996, under a subdirectory
of Stanford's domain, 1998 with their own domain.)"; 2025.12.01/https://www.reddit.com/r/degoogle/comments/1g1wkxi/search_engines_that_dont_use_google/ : https://wiby.me/ and https://www.marginalia.nu/ ;
2025.12.01/searchenginemap.com/ : Yep's crawler is independent and not connected to Google, Bing, Mojeek, Yandex.; 2025.12.01/https://seirdy.one/posts/2021/03/10/search-engines-with-own-indexes/ : Living document. "Google, Microsoft (the company behind Bing), and Yandex aren’t just search engine companies; they’re content and ad companies as well."; 2025.12.01/https://community.e.foundation/t/all-the-internet-search-engine/33403/4 : "Alltheinternet is a metasearch engine. This means they aggregate results of search queries from various sources (incl. Bing, Google, …). At the end it is compareable to spot from /e/, which is based on searx. As such the two later are very configurable and may yield the same/similar results. You can adjust which sources are used. The number of sources is growing in searx/spot. Searx has the benefit that you can decide which instances (decentralized in contrast to alltheinternet) you want to use.", "AWS, Google and MS are natural choices here. Guess there is someone more knowledgeable in this forum.
You can use trackercontrol. It appears indeed that they ping google and some others directly."..."TrackerControl (TrackerControl allows to monitor and control hidden data collection in apps.) - https://f-droid.org/packages/net.kollnig.missioncontrol.fdroid"
Search engine-note:a
claims: https://world.physio/sites/default/files/2021-02/AMC2020-Global_0.pdf : Germany and Austria denies direct access more than US.; 2025.11.27/cebm.net/covid-19/covid-cases-in-england-arent-rising-heres-why/ : 2020-08-02: "The potential for false-positives (those people without the disease who test positive) to drive the increase in community (Pillar 2) cases is substantial, particularly because the accuracy of the test and the detection of viable viruses within a community setting is unclear."; 2025.11.27/cebm.net/2020/09/should-covid-19-travel-quarantine-policy-be-based-on-apparent-new-case-rates/ : "reported case rates have a particular limitation: they are a statistic strongly influenced by testing policy."; 2025.11.27/healthevidence.org/view-article.aspx?a=efficacy-sars-cov2-vaccines-preventing-sars-cov-2-infection-systematic-review-52347 : SARS SRAS mistypo in their side.;
2025.11.27/healthevidence.org/view-article.aspx?a=effect-pre-covid-post-covid-vaccination-long-covid-systematic-review-meta-49777 : 2024 : 10/10 strength evidence that WHO's definition of Long-COVID substantially decreases life quality.; https://www.healthevidence.org/view-article.aspx?a=protect-long-term-care-facilities-pandemic-events-systematic-review-48796 : 2024 : 10/10 "Certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using GRADE.", "Although CoE of interventions was low or very low for most outcomes, the implementation of NPIs identified as potentially effective in this review often constitutes the sole viable option, particularly prior to the availability of vaccinations. Our evidence-gap map underscores the imperative for further research on several interventions. These gaps need to be addressed to prepare LTCFs for future pandemics." contradicts 2025.11.27/healthevidence.org/view-article.aspx?a=effect-pre-covid-post-covid-vaccination-long-covid-systematic-review-meta-49777 at vaccine effectiveness.;
2025.11.27/openpublichealthjournal.com/VOLUME/18/ELOCATOR/e18749445367433/ : "Non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs), also known as public health and social measures, have played a critical role in mitigating the spread of infectious diseases, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic [6, 8]. These interventions include measures such as mask-wearing, hand disinfection, physical distancing, screening and isolating infected individuals, and improving ventilation systems in buildings to reduce airborne transmission [3, 9, 10]."
maybe deduction/rationalism and perceptive intuition/empiricism combined: 2025.11.27/https://senseaboutscience.org/