By comparing it to relationships between people with unequal power, like a teacher and a student or a boss and an employee, Patricia makes it sound like these acts exist on a scale of morality rather than being clearly abusive. She minimizes the issue of consent by claiming such acts aren’t “automatically harmful,” even though animals cannot consent. Her mention of supposed child abuse recovery statistics, that she likely made up, further blurs moral lines and attempts to justify exceptions.
Her argument centers on human control rather than animal protection, effectively defending the idea of sex with animals.
“you’re the useful idiot doing damage control for the SS because an officer wrote you a tip saying they were just following orders and you’re still clapping back.”
This exchange shows a clear pattern of Patricia’s manipulative and abusive behavior. It begins with Britt pointing out that Patricia herself had described her own childhood “tantruming” and later compared being restrained during a violent meltdown on a crowded bus to sexual assault. Rather than engaging in good faith, Patricia immediately responds with “Kill yourself,” escalating the situation and framing any criticism as ableist or violent toward autistic people.
Throughout the threads, Patricia twists Britt’s words, accusing her of supporting the abuse or even the murder of autistic children, claims that were never made. This is a deliberate misrepresentation meant to vilify her critics and shut down discussion. When Britt clarifies that they were only questioning her framing of the event as sexual assault, Patricia doubles down, using exaggerated comparisons to state violence and fascism to paint herself as a victim of systemic cruelty.
Instead of engaging honestly, she turns legitimate disagreement into moral outrage, accusing others of horrific beliefs they never expressed. This pattern mirrors her broader behavior online, where she misuses “social justice” language to manipulate narratives and attack anyone who challenges her actions.
ALT
“whether the SS comparison was apt or not, the important part is that they found a way to forget everything they said & move onto the next thing. i stand by it, though.”
This post shows Patricia using self-victimization and projection to avoid accountability. She frames criticism of her past bullying and abusive behavior as an attack that denies her the ability to feel pain, turning responsibility into persecution. She also uses her disability and gender as shields, calling critique “transmisogyny” and exploiting real oppression to deflect blame. Claiming her abusive behavior was a “symptom of (her) disorders” muddles the line between explanation and excuse, refusing to acknowledge harm done.
Her reference to Nazis to describe online disagreement trivializes genocide and inflates her sense of victimhood. It’s especially tone-deaf considering that one of her critics, TheTepes, is Roma and a descendant of Holocaust survivors. This is manipulative rhetoric aimed at reframing criticism as abuse and avoiding responsibility for predatory or harmful actions.
She says critics misunderstood her, claiming she wasn’t avoiding responsibility but pointing out her white privilege, while also saying trans men ignore her experiences of transmisogyny. However, her argument doesn’t make sense because she both downplays her power to oppress and insists she was showing her privilege, and she avoids valid criticism by acting like the victim instead of addressing concerns about her bigotry.
By comparing the rape of enslaved people to child abuse and bestiality, she dehumanizes them by placing them in the same category as animals. She made a harmful comparison that disrespects both enslaved people and abuse survivors.
On Oct 2021, a former member of Patricia Taxxon’s discord server had alleged that Patty had sent her furry porn while they were a minor at the time. They also allege that Patricia had masturbated in her old discord server’s VC with minors present.
The two of them spoke privately in an attempt to make amends.
In April 2023, the victim released a video “Patricia Taxxon Sexually Harrassed Me And Got Away With It”. The original video is unlisted but archives are still available.
I’ve watched the video myself. After the above thread was posted, PT blocked the victim on all platforms. The victim explained that they wanted to bring the allegations to light again because they noticed Patricia hadn’t changed and was still engaging in the same behaviors, primarily using her autism as a shield for predatory actions.
The video was soon unlisted, with PT and the victim claiming that the video had falsehoods and misnformation.
Patricia addresses their behavior when she was 18, acknowledging that while some claims are accurate, many are exaggerated or false.
She created a Discord server, marking her first real social circle and receiving positive attention. However, she made various mistakes and was too young to manage the community, lacking understanding of the implications of sharing NSFW. She recalls using fetish images as emotes and sending feral pornographic material to others, including the victim. While apologetic, Patricia refuses to accept interpretations of their actions as predatory, viewing them as misunderstandings between peers.
ALT
ALT
3. Patricia describes feeling exploited in this environment, recalling that she shared nude images under peer pressure. She emphasizes that she was also a victim of grooming, explaining that older fans in the Discord server, particularly one moderator who showered her with praise and encouraged her to post the nudes, took advantage of her vulnerability.
ALT
ALT
4. She reaffirms that victim unlisted the video on her own and agreed that there were falsehoods.
ALT
The victim also made a follow up video that has also been delisted (but still archived) and confirms that the video contains falsehoods.
EDIT: Recent comments by the victim have stated that another reason why she unlisted the video was because she didn’t want to be known as “the girl Taxxon groomed”
EDIT 2: It’s worth noting that someone claiming to be Patricia’s mother left a comment on the victim’s video, though it’s currently unclear whether the commenter is genuinely her.
This apology could have been somewhat effective. While she attempts express remorse, she still fails to take full accountability for exposing minors to NSFW content. Genuine accountability requires confronting the real consequences of those actions. It’s possible that she was also manipulated or influenced by others, but that context does not lessen her responsibility or the harm she caused. Regardless of intent or personal circumstances, the impact on younger, vulnerable individuals remains serious and unacceptable.
Patricia shared this on her private twitter account nearly a month after her apology.
Unfortunately, even now, Patricia still cannot fully take responsibility for her actions, continuing instead to deflect criticism and shift the blame onto everyone else.
This rhetoric prioritizes her own narrative and desires above all else over the safety of both minors and adults.
She repeatedly references her history of sexual abuse to justify encouraging minors to enter adult sexual spaces. By presenting her own experiences as a way to empathize with teens who may have confusing thoughts, Patricia conflates offering guidance with granting permission for minors to pursue sexualized relationships with adults.
Essentially, Patricia is normalizing predatory dynamics, suggesting that such behavior is acceptable if its framed as helping minors. This framing is particularly dangerous because it encourages minors to trust adults in situations where they are especially vulnerable and may not recognize signs of coercion.
Edit: As an anon pointed out, when minors lie about their age to enter adult spaces, it also violates the consent of the adults involved. By encouraging this behavior, Patricia not only endangers minors and adults but also shows a fundamental misunderstanding of consent and safe kink practices.
Here, Patricia frames her own and others’ predatory behavior as a misunderstood aspect of queerness, and it equates queerness with trauma, abuse, and “taboo” sexuality. This reinforces long standing homophobic and transphobic stereotypes that queer people are inherently perverse.
Calling valid criticism of harmful sexual behavior “transmisogynistic” is manipulative and silences survivors under the guise of protecting marginalized people. She uses autism to justify or excuse her harmful desires, which stigmatizes autistic people by implying they naturally struggle with boundaries or consent.
What’s happening in this exchange is that Patricia tries to reframe her own grooming as something that happened “by accident,” which already minimizes what grooming actually is, a deliberate act of manipulation and abuse. When that critic pushed back, she doubled down by saying the idea of “the pedophile” is just a social invention created by rich white people to “maintain ownership of their children.”
What makes this dangerous is that it erases the reality of CSA. It implies that predators aren’t real and that child sexual violence is just a side effect of “systems” instead of something individuals choose to do. It also uses anti-capitalist language to make an excuse for harm, shifting sympathy toward abusers and away from survivors.
There’s nothing radical or insightful about denying that abuse exists. This is victim blaming disguised as theory.
EDIT: As an anon has pointed out, this framing also erases victims of color. Predators exist in every community and most often offend within their own, so implying that pedophilia was “invented by rich white people” not only erases survivors of color but also dehumanizes poc by suggesting they are incapable of wrongdoing.
For context: PT had a major falling out with a former friend who identifies as trans masc. The friend had hired her to compose music for a short film but later let her go due to concerning behavior. Since then, it’s been speculated that PT has been directing her hateful views toward trans men even more aggressively. (source)
Hi! So, I think I may as well address a few things 😊
The main focus of this blog will continue to be Patricia Taxxon. Now that she’s been suspended, things may naturally slow down a bit, but I don’t plan on stopping.
I made two posts about Pocket-Deer-Belly because he’s a close friend of Patricia and often involves himself in drama surrounding her. I don’t intend to cover anyone else. If you’re looking for commentary on other orbiters in the sphere, you may need to look elsewhere.
As stated in my pinned post, I created this blog because evidence on tumblr can be difficult to find, and my goal has always been to maintain an archive.
I’ve received a fair amount of feedback, both hateful and constructive, that some of my posts have weak points, and I actually agree. Over the next few days, I’ll be revising and improving those posts.
I understand that I need to choose my words carefully in critical spaces, and I’m always trying to remain open to constructive criticism.
Believe it or not, I actually have very little free time outside of tumblr! I’m not as “obsessed” as some people assume. The blog looks full simply because Patricia has done, well, a lot.
As I mentioned before, things may slow down a bit while I focus on other priorities, but I don’t intend to go anywhere.
(1/2) very disappointed w/ patricia & extremely disgusted. being a youtube-only viewer i was never, ever aware of these things happening around her tumblr - as i had only watched two videos of hers. one of them being the focus on dhmis and her experiences w/ aba, and how the show reminded her so much of her own experiences of autism, and another focusing on furry art, where she included a lot of it in her own music. then i roamed around, saw her tumblr posts. and was... - 🐛
ALT
ALT
ALT
Apologies for the delayed response!
I completely understand how you feel. Many people first discovered Patricia through her videos and music, which made the reality of her behavior online even more troubling. It’s clear she tries to keep her Youtube audience separate to maintain a professional image, but seeing someone who once seemed thoughtful and creative engage in and normalize harmful behavior is really disheartening, especially when those same spaces often attract vulnerable people.
What makes it worse is how her platform ends up normalizing these ideas. It creates an environment where predatory individuals feel comfortable.
And thank you for the kind words! I’ll admit, running this blog has been a bit stressful at times, though I expected some pushback. Still, I’m glad it’s at least helping shed light Patricia’s actions. Please take care of yourself too!
ALT
ALT
