Patricia Taxxon: Allegations of Sexual Harrasement and Grooming

On Oct 2021, a former member of Patricia Taxxon’s discord server had alleged that Patty had sent her furry porn while they were a minor at the time. They also allege that Patricia had masturbated in her old discord server’s VC with minors present.

The two of them spoke privately in an attempt to make amends.

In April 2023, the victim released a video “Patricia Taxxon Sexually Harrassed Me And Got Away With It”. The original video is unlisted but archives are still available.

I’ve watched the video myself. After the above thread was posted, PT blocked the victim on all platforms. The victim explained that they wanted to bring the allegations to light again because they noticed Patricia hadn’t changed and was still engaging in the same behaviors, primarily using her autism as a shield for predatory actions.

The video was soon unlisted, with PT and the victim claiming that the video had falsehoods and misnformation.

Patricia then makes a lengthy tumblr apology (Archive) that also addresses another controversy, but in summary of the discord VC and the victim:

Patricia addresses their behavior when she was 18, acknowledging that while some claims are accurate, many are exaggerated or false.
She created a Discord server, marking her first real social circle and receiving positive attention. However, she made various mistakes and was too young to manage the community, lacking understanding of the implications of sharing NSFW. She recalls using fetish images as emotes and sending feral pornographic material to others, including the victim. While apologetic, Patricia refuses to accept interpretations of their actions as predatory, viewing them as misunderstandings between peers.

"When I was 18, and just beginning to accrue an audience, I created a discord server. For a lot of external reasons, mainly spending my entire life up until this point being shuttled around different special ed schools, this ended up being the first real social circle I ever had. It represented the first positive attention I ever received from strangers. It’s a time where I made a lot of mistakes, it’s a time where I was gravely vulnerable. In all honesty, I was too young to manage a community of any kind, I was hot off the back of being desensitized in my adolescence by unrestricted access to early 2010s internet. I knew well enough to create special NSFW rooms, and was advised later to create further division by requiring users to self-apply for a special NSFW role to access those rooms This extra layer meant that the rooms wouldn’t even show up for people who didn’t have the role, which led to some believing they didn’t exist. "

ALT

3. Patricia describes feeling exploited in this environment, recalling that she shared nude images under peer pressure. She emphasizes that she was also a victim of grooming, explaining that older fans in the Discord server, particularly one moderator who showered her with praise and encouraged her to post the nudes, took advantage of her vulnerability.

"There were some moderators besides myself, two were teenagers around my age, early adopters of the server who I felt I’d become friends with. One was a woman in her late twenties, who I won’t name simply because I’m not in the business of offloading my misery onto other people, but she knows who she is. She contacted me with a shower of attention & adoration, she left positive reviews for my albums when she noticed I was upset at their critical reception, she oversaw me as I posted my nudes in that server and later on my main twitter account. She encouraged this behavior in myself and others and participated in it too. I want to make this clear, the bulk of the allegations against me boil down to punishing me for failing to surmise I was being exploited by the first social group I ever had. I jerked off in voice chats. I remember the day I started, I was surrounded by people older than me who were encouraging me to post my first nude pic in the self-nsfw channel, and I had to get hard for them first. I then considered this normal and did it often. At one point a 15 year old entered the room while I was doing it, and I went quiet until she left. I reconvened with this 15 year old recently, and she told me she only remembers being promptly told to leave. The claim that I “regularly jerked off in voice chat with minors” as if it were an orchestrated and habitual activity is an outright falsehood. "

"I was groomed, and just as I was beginning to understand what happened to me, the shame threatening to overtake me completely, I was slapped with the supposed news that I was the sole perpetrator of the entire situation that traumatized me so, that what I thought of as my first friend group all remembered me as a loathsome creep. The apology I wrote in abject panic was dissected and used as a cudgel against me in police-interrogation fashion, so I became afraid to say anything. A year and a half later, I made a post saying that I had been “groomed by a portion of my audience” and this immediately provoked a youtube video callout. I feel as if I have been beaten into silence and complicity, unable to form thoughts of my own regarding my experience. I am terrified, right now, writing this story that I firmly believe no one on earth will buy, because I have come to routinely doubt my own testimony."

4. She reaffirms that victim unlisted the video on her own and agreed that there were falsehoods.

"I am going to restate, my accuser has *of her own volition* unlisted the offending video & understands the misinformation she spread, there is nothing to gain from seeking her out and letting her know your opinion on the situation. I waited until this agreement was reached to make any statement at all for this exact reason. "

The victim also made a follow up video that has also been delisted (but still archived) and confirms that the video contains falsehoods.

EDIT: Recent comments by the victim have stated that another reason why she unlisted the video was because she didn’t want to be known as “the girl Taxxon groomed”

EDIT 2: It’s worth noting that someone claiming to be Patricia’s mother left a comment on the victim’s video, though it’s currently unclear whether the commenter is genuinely her.

This apology could have been somewhat effective. While she attempts express remorse, she still fails to take full accountability for exposing minors to NSFW content. Genuine accountability requires confronting the real consequences of those actions. It’s possible that she was also manipulated or influenced by others, but that context does not lessen her responsibility or the harm she caused. Regardless of intent or personal circumstances, the impact on younger, vulnerable individuals remains serious and unacceptable.

Patricia shared this on her private twitter account nearly a month after her apology.

From Patricia's private twitter account @pattysdarkplace: "im so slick for writing a statement that looks like a profuse apology to the people who hate me and thorough refutation to the people who like me"

There is a lot to unpack in the screenshot above, but that will be addressed in a separate post.

Unfortunately, even now, Patricia still cannot fully take responsibility for her actions, continuing instead to deflect criticism and shift the blame onto everyone else.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantro mixture

See more posts like this on Tumblr

#patricia taxxon #anti patricia taxxon #cilantro mixture

More you might like

Patricia Taxxon being bigoted towards trans men

whereserpentswalk asked: "Do you believe transandrophobia is real?" patricia-taxxon answered: "i think transphobia is real" whereserpentswalk reblogs: "That doesn't really answer my question. Or mabye it does in an "all lives matter" way. Do you think trans men have a unique and valid experience with transphobia that isn't lesser and/or the same as transfems? Are you upset by them discussing their experiences with oppression?" patricia-taxxon: "no and no."

(Source | Archive)

patricia-taxxon: "after being explained the concept over and over again in great detail in my askbox, i have reached the conclusion that transandrophobia is -things that trans women also experience -things that cis women also experience -repackaged misandry theory from 2014 -being accused of transmisogyny, sometimes one of them put forth *corrective rape* to me as a transmasc only oppression, this is james somerton level intersectionality allergy." patricia-taxxon reblogs her post: "i feel like i don’t really need to defend myself anymore, like it’s pretty clear what’s going on here, it feels obvious. as a reminder, this is what set this off" she posts a screenshot from an anonymous ask: anonymous: "how do you feel about transmasc's" patricia-taxxon: "at this point, vaguely threatened"

(Source | Archive)

patricia-taxxon: "being someone who is barely old enough (25 years old) to remember the height of anti-sjw youtube in that plausibly deniable era before they turned hard right in 2016, it is absurd to me how much this current wave of transandrophobia-truthers has in common with them, and many of them are a lot older than me so they’ve gotta remember it too, right"

yourfriendlyfaye asked: "Have you ever actually looked through the transandrophobia tag? Genuinely, I'm being sincere. It's less "trans-androphobia" andmore like"transandro-phobia." It's just trans men and mascs talking specifically about how being a trans masculine has unique struggles." patricia-taxxon answers: "its about ethics in games journalism"

(Source | Archive) (Source | Archive)

patricia-taxxon: "fucking "tmasc-confessions"" patricia-taxxon reblogs her post: "confessing what. the abuse and exploitation of transfem contractors"

(Source | Archive)

For context: PT had a major falling out with a former friend who identifies as trans masc. The friend had hired her to compose music for a short film but later let her go due to concerning behavior. Since then, it’s been speculated that PT has been directing her hateful views toward trans men even more aggressively. (source)

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture transandrophobia

Patricia Taxxon Weirdly Defending Zoophilia

(Source | Archive)

Reply by kyleemclauren: "This starts off great, but holy shit, don't throw zoophiles under the bus? The whole start was about how the tension between bestiality and factory farming is actually worth discussing, then dismisses it immediately with "well yeah but the difference is zoophiles are terrible people who just wanna hurt animals!" No!?!? This man has never spoken to a zoophile in his life! Zoophiles like animals, that's the point. The zoophile population are, on the whole, fanatical supporters of animal rights; there is indeed an outsized population of vegans. Whenever I talk about category bigotry, this is a prime example: 'being sadists' is the one directed at zoos! There are plenty of zoos who want to make sure their dog is the best cared for and most loved dog in the entire world. There are exclusively romantic zoos. There are zoos obsessed with the mechanics of learning animal body language, to be able to accurately flirt. It's not about the power imbalance, it's about finding animals sexually attractive, and again, that's fine. There is no thought crime. The struggle of every paraphile is to get other people to look at their own disgust and ask "why?" If you want to train your dog to come to an area on command and hold still for a handjob they didn't ask for, the American Kennel Club has a guide you can download on their website. It will talk you through the full mechanics of dog breeding, which also include forcing a bitch to have sex she doesn't want, with the goal of keeping her pregnant for life so she can produce maximal economic value. Consent is not mentioned, even once. This is perfectly legal. On the other hand, if your dog is horny, and keeps humping your leg, and you think it would be hot to fuck him? ...well yeah, why is that wrong? You're both enjoying yourselves, there's not even alleged thought crime happening. The ability to consent derives from autonomy. The commercial breeding example is a situation where the dog is denied autonomy. The casual fuck is a situation where he is not. That's why the first feels like it should be wrong, and the second feels like it could be right. Zoophiles will talk your ear off about how failure to respect animal autonomy means our notions of animal consent are horribly inadequate. They fail to capture the harms of commercial farming, or really even think about human-animal relations in a meaningful way at all. Zoophiles say yes, animals have autonomy, and that means both giving them a choice, and having their choices respected. That means respecting their ability to say yes. If you do not, you haven't given them a choice. It is the job of the human partner to make sure the animal is given that choice in a meaningful way, and is protected from harm if they accept. It is not hypocritical of zoophiles to point out the answer from everyone else has been a resounding no, and that there appear to be no prohibitions on anything you might want to do to an animal for money. Anti-bestiality laws all tend to be written like "BEING ZOO IS BAD (*unless you're a farm and want to do exactly the same things on a commercial scale)", the act itself flagrantly doesn't matter, just whether or not you enjoy doing it. The resolution of this dilemma is important, it is another a queer rights issue where a very small and very unpopular minority is suffering because a much larger majority thinks it's icky. I will stand up for them too. There is a very real debate to be had here, but that minority is censored into oblivion almost everywhere, and it is in my fundamental nature to protect them."

response by patricia-taxxon: "What? I’m with you for some parts, disgust over individual deviants obfuscating broader structural issues mainly, but the important issue here is the ownership, your dog, disgust over deviant attraction need not be a part of the argument. it’s the same issue as fucking your kid or student or employee. I will not take an absolutist stance and say all of this is defacto harmful in all cases where it occurs, I know the statistics on CSA recovery tells an optimistic 25% chance of the event eventually turning into something positive for the survivor later in life, the issue is that in the cases where real harm is caused the group is wholly incapable of self-advocacy either through ignorance, practical inability or structural limitations. This feels like an argument in favor of raping one’s slaves, like it’s missing so many of the core components of consent & I’d really like you to consider expanding this logic to certain groups of structurally disadvantaged humans on this earth before saying it."

By comparing it to relationships between people with unequal power, like a teacher and a student or a boss and an employee, Patricia makes it sound like these acts exist on a scale of morality rather than being clearly abusive. She minimizes the issue of consent by claiming such acts aren’t “automatically harmful,” even though animals cannot consent. Her mention of supposed child abuse recovery statistics, that she likely made up, further blurs moral lines and attempts to justify exceptions.

Her argument centers on human control rather than animal protection, effectively defending the idea of sex with animals.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture postings

Patricia Taxxon often compares her struggles as a trans disabled woman to issues of race.

She even claimed that her being trans and disabled negates her ability to racially oppress.

Anonymous asked: "i feel like your comparison is a false equivalence. black people have a history of being violently and systematically oppressed by white people. for them, this fear is often based in a fear of literal life or death. it is not transmen who are oppressing transwomen on this large a scale. im not gonna deny that there are assholes and bigots, every demographic has those, but right now there is a lot of conversation aimed at transmascs by non-transmascs attempting to pick apart any language we try to use to describe our unique experience with transphobia, and it feels really unfair that we cant even try to coin a term without people outside of our niches trying to tear it down for extremely bad faith reasons." patricia-taxxon answers: "The comparison is a fairer equivalence than you think, because I am also limited in my ability to racially oppress due to being trans and disabled but remain complicit in the franchise of whiteness nonetheless. It really isn’t hard, intersectionality cuts both ways."

(Source | Archive)

Her statements after facing backlash:

patricia-taxxon: "transmisogyny isnt "worse" than any other prejudice, but it's newer, less established, less understood, and easier to ignore for certain otherwise in-the-loop progressives. i think this explains most of how it is discussed and reacted to in leftist online spaces." patricia-taxxon, reblogs her own post: "it’s very clear. like when I got an ask saying that trans men aren’t the ones oppressing trans women, i said “well, white disabled trans women are limited in their ability to racially oppress, but they still benefit from white supremacy & are complicit in whiteness and it’d be silly to say they suffer from transwhitefemphobia” and the response to that was just “that’s not how this works, how dare you, you are trying to distance yourself from your whiteness, unlike me, who remains at arms length from the franchise of patriarchy forever because of my chromosomes” like it just hasn’t been patched in yet"

patricia-taxxon: "When I said that my disability & queerness limited my ability to racially oppress, I was not distancing myself from my whiteness. I was, in fact, emphasizing my connection to it & my complicity, and this would be obvious if you just read the fucking question I was responding to. It was not in response to being called out for racist behavior, it was in response to someone specifically telling me that I wasn't justified in feeling distrustful of trans men after experiencing transmisogynist harassment from them SPECIFICALLY on the basis that individual transmascs aren't the ones oppressing trans women. I said that I too had less than average individual power to oppress, but that it would be fucking stupid to distance myself from the project of whiteness on that basis. You literally just don't think I'm oppressed in the first place, then, if you get stuck on the first part of that answer. I was literally emboldening my white privilege as a retort to someone trying to erase their own patriarchal privilege and I had the exact thing I was trying to call out maliciously stamped onto me instead. It's fucking infuriating." patricia-taxxon reblogs her own post: "I do not, apropos of nothing, tell black people to ease off because I PERSONALLY am slightly less able to kill them, that's you. you were the ones doing that and I called it out."

patricia-taxxon: "how can people understand perfectly that oppression diminishes the benefits of their privilege specifically when they want to distance themselves from patriarchy and forget it entirely as soon as they want to attack a transfem they find inconvenient? she asked, rhetorically."

(Source | Archive) (Source | Archive)

She says critics misunderstood her, claiming she wasn’t avoiding responsibility but pointing out her white privilege, while also saying trans men ignore her experiences of transmisogyny. However, her argument doesn’t make sense because she both downplays her power to oppress and insists she was showing her privilege, and she avoids valid criticism by acting like the victim instead of addressing concerns about her bigotry.

She made strange comments about black autistics:

patricia-taxxon: "i think america will fall once black autistic people realize they exist" honeybunchesobees replies: "can i ask further into what actually this means? because i am very much aware i exist!" patricia-taxxon responds: "it’s underdiagnosed still, i’ve been told that it presents differently, if u do have disruptive symptoms you get hit with an ODD diagnosis instead, i think it is a conspiracy to keep the ppl most capable of destroying america from recognizing each other and conspiring"

(Source | Archive)

She also tried to make the comparison of raping owned animals and parents raping their children to slave owners raping their slaves

patricia-taxxon: "sorry, is noticing the systemic depersoning of chattel slavery "comparing slaves to animals" now? like if I point out that thomas jefferson's sentient property had the same or less political autonomy as children and pets do today is that me comparing slaves to animals? like I think the founding fathers did it first in this case"

(Archive)

By comparing the rape of enslaved people to child abuse and bestiality, she dehumanizes them by placing them in the same category as animals. She made a harmful comparison that disrespects both enslaved people and abuse survivors.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantro mixture

patricia-taxxon: "one incomprehensible bit I've started doing with my friends is referring to any and all misandry as transandrophobia specifically. like applejack says "ugh, boys" when spike eats the rotten muffins and i say "wow, transandrophobia" in the discord call" patricia-taxxon reblogs her post: "i think it's funny to me because of all the times that i or one of my friends would say something generic abt men or masculinity and be accused of lumping trans men in with cis men. like sorry i guess, living and learning."

patricia-taxxon reblogs again and posts an image that reads "No Boys Allowed": "this is transandrophobia"

(Source | Archive)

This is, unironically, transandrophobia!

This post comes off as transphobic because it mocks real conversations about transandrophobia. The joke, calling every bit of “misandry” transandrophobia, makes it seem like the concept itself is ridiculous or made up, even though it describes actual bias that trans masc people face.

Ending with a “No Boys Allowed” meme trivializes trans men’s experiences and turns a real issue, how trans men are often excluded, erased, or mocked, into a joke at their expense.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture transandrophobia I know I'm poking the hornet's nest with this one but someone else pointed out she posted this today and I was tempted lol

Wow that’s crazy.

Check out my post where she sent porn to a 13 year old and masturbated in VC with minors present.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture pocket-deer-belly

WARNING: This blog is 18+ due the severity of the topics listed below. If you’re a minor an interact with this page, you will be blocked.

TERFs, transphobes, and anyone speaking any sort of bigotry will also be blocked.

Hello, the goal of this blog is to have a straight forward archive of Patricia Taxxon’s legitimately problematic behaviors that people can hopefully refer to, as I’ve noticed that evidence here on Tumblr has been somewhat scattered.

Who is Patricia Taxxon?

Patricia Taxxon is an independent electronic musician known for her extensive catalog of experimental, and synth-driven albums. She also runs a Youtube channel with around 100k subscribers covering commentary, her music, video essays, and the occasional random video.

Controversies and allegations:

PT has been involved in a numerous amount of controversies, including accusations of pedophilia, zoophilia, racism, transandrophobia, along with sexually harassing a minor with furry porn and masturbating in her old discord server’s VC with minors present, all while hiding behind her gender identity, autism, pocd, and csa as shield against criticism.

As the blog updates, I’ll be updating this pinned post for ease of access.

Racism: x x

Pedophilia: x x

Grooming: x

Zoophilia: x

Transphobia: x x

Original documentation will be under the #postings tag

Notable Posts:

PT’s Apology (Archive)

Jules’ statement

Why People Don’t Trust Her Apology

Using Low Empathy as an Excuse

Comparing Her Critics to Nazis

Encouraging Minors to Lie About Their Age

The Strange Thing About the Johnsons

“taboo kinks are inexorably queer”

“the specter of the ‘pedophile’ is a mirage made up by rich white people to maintain ownership of their children”

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantro mixture pinned

Hi! So, I think I may as well address a few things 😊

The main focus of this blog will continue to be Patricia Taxxon. Now that she’s been suspended, things may naturally slow down a bit, but I don’t plan on stopping.

I made two posts about Pocket-Deer-Belly because he’s a close friend of Patricia and often involves himself in drama surrounding her. I don’t intend to cover anyone else. If you’re looking for commentary on other orbiters in the sphere, you may need to look elsewhere.

As stated in my pinned post, I created this blog because evidence on tumblr can be difficult to find, and my goal has always been to maintain an archive.

I’ve received a fair amount of feedback, both hateful and constructive, that some of my posts have weak points, and I actually agree. Over the next few days, I’ll be revising and improving those posts.

I understand that I need to choose my words carefully in critical spaces, and I’m always trying to remain open to constructive criticism.

Believe it or not, I actually have very little free time outside of tumblr! I’m not as “obsessed” as some people assume. The blog looks full simply because Patricia has done, well, a lot.

As I mentioned before, things may slow down a bit while I focus on other priorities, but I don’t intend to go anywhere.

Thank you so much for the support! Stay safe 🙏

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture pocket-deer-belly

Anonymous asked:

(1/2) very disappointed w/ patricia & extremely disgusted. being a youtube-only viewer i was never, ever aware of these things happening around her tumblr - as i had only watched two videos of hers. one of them being the focus on dhmis and her experiences w/ aba, and how the show reminded her so much of her own experiences of autism, and another focusing on furry art, where she included a lot of it in her own music. then i roamed around, saw her tumblr posts. and was... - 🐛

"(2/2) exceedingly baffled by what her posts about coco, about the posts where her whole thing about... sexualizing incest dynamics? and being upfront w/ the noncon role-reversal shit, as well as the hypno-kink thing just... fucking baffled me. genuinely perplexing, like how is this the SAME person who made those pretty good videos + music? - 🐛"

"(3/2) and then i read a lot more abt your posts + about how patricia's actions made it a better way for other pedos and grosser folks to be fine with what she's doing. it's just so goddamn disappointing because she could have genuinely like... i don't know. made an actual platform that could have protected nonwhites - queer and trans alike - but it's just fucking disgusting what she does. racist, transphobic AND she's fine w/ pedophilia + noncon? eugh. - 🐛"

"(4/2) it's just disgusting. i've ended up losing a lot of respect for people like her who end up being so genuinely against what their own values should be that it's just a nosedive. anyways, thank you for archiving a lot of this stuff. hopefully you can get some cooldown and some time to breath bc eugh :( - 🐛"

Apologies for the delayed response!

I completely understand how you feel. Many people first discovered Patricia through her videos and music, which made the reality of her behavior online even more troubling. It’s clear she tries to keep her Youtube audience separate to maintain a professional image, but seeing someone who once seemed thoughtful and creative engage in and normalize harmful behavior is really disheartening, especially when those same spaces often attract vulnerable people.

What makes it worse is how her platform ends up normalizing these ideas. It creates an environment where predatory individuals feel comfortable.

And thank you for the kind words! I’ll admit, running this blog has been a bit stressful at times, though I expected some pushback. Still, I’m glad it’s at least helping shed light Patricia’s actions. Please take care of yourself too!

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture anon ask time

Pocket-Deer-Belly

While I want to keep the main focus of this blog on Patricia, one notable figure in her circle is pocket-deer-belly, also known as PDB.

PDB has a significant following on Tumblr, is a close friend of Patricia, and is one of her more vocal defenders.

When Patricia was let go from Jules’ film, PBD made several comments:

(Source) (Source)

pocket-deer-belly: "imagine getting someone to do labor for free (while she is under the impression that she's a contract worker) (which is how you typically refer to a paid position) and then when she refuses to pay for your fucking film festival circuit cause she did the labor for free (while she is under the impression that they're a contract worker) (you took advantage of her lack of knowledge and experience in the industry) (you took advantage of the fact that she did not argue her worth from the start and then blamed her for not getting paid (by you)) you spin up a fucking callout post against her (the "contract worker" you don't want to pay for) and then have the gall to call HER unproffessional (for refusing to pay for your advertising budget) (and for her getting mad that she didn't get paid and you took advantage of her) and then just to top it off you call her feminist stances some anti-man ruse as a slight against you specifically (to get you to pay money) (which you do actually owe her)" pocket-deer-belly reblogs: "and that's your professional film debut"

(Source)

PDB’s response misrepresents Jules’ statement by portraying the situation as labor exploitation, even though the collaboration was an unpaid creative partnership among friends. Jules explicitly stated that no guaranteed payment would be provided, as In Your Orbit was a student project, and any potential festival winnings would be split among contributors. Patricia was aware of and agreed to this arrangement. Claiming that Jules “took advantage” of Patricia ignores this context and falsely reframes a mutual creative agreement as wage theft, which the evidence Jules provided does not support.

In Summer 2025, PDB also faced controversy for making transphobic remarks about trans men, claiming they inherently have more privilege than trans women.

pocket-deer-belly: "we can't even get a basic "all men structurally benefit from a misogynist society" to pass on this website without a bunch of queer men shooting themselves into a panic cause they get too uncomfortable about the idea of being culpable to self" pocket-deer-belly: "i don't see how i benefit from patriarchy as a trans man" yeah that's the problem, it's invisible to you, you should fix that"

(Source)

pocket-deer-belly: "trans men have access to male privilege, just like any other group of queer men. this is the heinously transphobic take that people have been hounding me over btw. like when you see people call me transphobic this is what they're talking about" pocket-deer-belly reblogs: "i'm sick of sugarcoating this shit. denying this fact requires you to believe that trans men as a whole, or specific trans men NEVER pass or are taken seriously as their stated gender (not true, especially in queer or online spaces), are never treated preferentially to trans women (come the fuck on), or aren't men."

pocket-deer-belly reblogs again: "even when trans men are not believed about their identities as men they still hold a relative privilege over trans women. like, being treated as a "real woman", as transphobic as that is, is still a privileged position over the inescapable box of being a "fake woman" "deceiver" "invader into women's spaces" that trans women are placed into."

(for some context: at the time PDB identified as a cis man)

(Source)

By saying that “trans men have male privilege,” pocket-deer-belly implies that trans men are treated the same as cis men, when in reality trans men are still scrutinized, marginalized, and discriminated against as trans people. Claiming they have the same privilege erases these experiences and suggests that their oppression disappears once they identify or “pass” as male. Framing trans men as inherently more privileged than trans women creates a false hierarchy within the trans community, turning trans identity into a competition over who faces more discrimination instead of acknowledging that trans men and trans women experience different but equally real forms of oppression.

It’s important to note that PBD likely felt comfortable making these claims because of his close friendship with Patricia, who is also known for being hostile toward trans men.

but, please don’t take him seriously.

In a now deleted post, PDB said this:

Their statement after facing backlash:

pocket-deer-belly: "people only pass around screenshots of what you've said when it's convenient i think. people had to actively bait me to say something negative about transmascs but when they want to zoojacket me they just have to show the one screenshot and expect that to speak for itself." pocket-deer-belly: "my real opinions on both of these subjects have to be flattened but "he's a zoophile" is much easier to try to catch on and spuriously "prove" with a screenshot than "he doesn't think trans men are oppressed" which is like, very evidently not true from anything i've actually said. so they don't really provide screenshots for that as much"

(Source)

Saying “I love you zoos” is an endorsement of abuse. Calling zoophilia an “illegal kink” trivializes what is actually non-consensual and criminal behavior toward animals. Pocket-deer-belly claims they were “baited” into saying something negative about transmascs, but this is just a form of deflection. Their response to backlash shifts blame to others rather than taking accountability for what they said. Bringing up to unrelated discourse about trans men only minimizes the seriousness of their own words and actions.

Also, PDB seems rather unconcerned about minors accessing their page.

(Source)

Their statements ignore the responsibility adults have when minors engage with adult-oriented content. Claiming that minors “follow at your own risk” or are “old enough to make that decision” overlooks that minors cannot legally or developmentally consent to sexualized material. Adults are responsible for setting and enforcing boundaries to protect vulnerable users online, rather than shifting the blame onto minors. Saying minors are “not even following” does not address the larger problem of encouraging or passively allowing access to content that can harm them.

There’s honestly a lot more to say, but I’ll leave it here for now.

pocket-deer-belly pocket-deer-boy patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture transandrophobia

Anonymous asked:

so when she was sexting an adult (presumably??) man at 14, despite being a minor in that situation, shes still the party at fault in your mind? is that what youre trying to convey?? im just confused as to what the hell that has to do with anything

(context)

You’re right, I should’ve clarified that better. I can understand how what I said could be interpreted that way, and I deeply apologize.

I’m absolutely not blaming Patricia for being a victim of sexual abuse or for situations that occurred when she was a minor. My intent was to highlight the danger in her messaging. The reason I brought up that post wasn’t to assign her guilt for what happened at 14, but to illustrate a larger pattern in how she currently talks about consent and boundaries as an adult.

When Patricia brings up her own past experiences, she often uses them to justify encouraging minors to seek out adult sexual spaces or to claim that being neurodivergent makes it difficult to understand consent. The Omegle example shows how she frames those experiences, not as something that harmed her or reflected a lack of protection, but as “formative”.

I mentioned that example because it shows how she misrepresents power dynamics, not to say she was at fault as a child, but to show how she now uses that history to rationalize behavior that endangers both minors and adults.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture ask time anon

Just a dog — Patricia Taxxon: Allegations of Sexual Harrasement...

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.