Patricia’s comments describe a situation of sexual abuse involving a child and an adult, presented in a joking or self-aware tone that minimizes how serious that scenario actually is.
When someone repeatedly turns real world abuse dynamics into sexualized language or jokes, especially ones that involve children, they are normalizing predatory behavior. Patricia has a documented pattern of discussing these scenarios in ways that erase the harm and responsibility involved, and that kind of framing contributes to grooming rhetoric. Grooming is built on minimizing boundaries, reframing coercion as affection
Note: This post has been edited as I originally posted it out of frustration without highlighting why this is problematic. Calling this behavior out is not transmisogynistic. It’s a response to the way she talks about and romanticizes abuse. If you disagree with my stances, you are free to block me.
For context: PT had a major falling out with a former friend who identifies as trans masc. The friend had hired her to compose music for a short film but later let her go due to concerning behavior. Since then, it’s been speculated that PT has been directing her hateful views toward trans men even more aggressively. (source)
Hi! So, I think I may as well address a few things 😊
The main focus of this blog will continue to be Patricia Taxxon. Now that she’s been suspended, things may naturally slow down a bit, but I don’t plan on stopping.
I made two posts about Pocket-Deer-Belly because he’s a close friend of Patricia and often involves himself in drama surrounding her. I don’t intend to cover anyone else. If you’re looking for commentary on other orbiters in the sphere, you may need to look elsewhere.
As stated in my pinned post, I created this blog because evidence on tumblr can be difficult to find, and my goal has always been to maintain an archive.
I’ve received a fair amount of feedback, both hateful and constructive, that some of my posts have weak points, and I actually agree. Over the next few days, I’ll be revising and improving those posts.
I understand that I need to choose my words carefully in critical spaces, and I’m always trying to remain open to constructive criticism.
Believe it or not, I actually have very little free time outside of tumblr! I’m not as “obsessed” as some people assume. The blog looks full simply because Patricia has done, well, a lot.
As I mentioned before, things may slow down a bit while I focus on other priorities, but I don’t intend to go anywhere.
(1/2) very disappointed w/ patricia & extremely disgusted. being a youtube-only viewer i was never, ever aware of these things happening around her tumblr - as i had only watched two videos of hers. one of them being the focus on dhmis and her experiences w/ aba, and how the show reminded her so much of her own experiences of autism, and another focusing on furry art, where she included a lot of it in her own music. then i roamed around, saw her tumblr posts. and was... - 🐛
ALT
ALT
ALT
Apologies for the delayed response!
I completely understand how you feel. Many people first discovered Patricia through her videos and music, which made the reality of her behavior online even more troubling. It’s clear she tries to keep her Youtube audience separate to maintain a professional image, but seeing someone who once seemed thoughtful and creative engage in and normalize harmful behavior is really disheartening, especially when those same spaces often attract vulnerable people.
What makes it worse is how her platform ends up normalizing these ideas. It creates an environment where predatory individuals feel comfortable.
And thank you for the kind words! I’ll admit, running this blog has been a bit stressful at times, though I expected some pushback. Still, I’m glad it’s at least helping shed light Patricia’s actions. Please take care of yourself too!
PDB’s response misrepresents Jules’ statement by portraying the situation as labor exploitation, even though the collaboration was an unpaid creative partnership among friends. Jules explicitly stated that no guaranteed payment would be provided, as In Your Orbit was a student project, and any potential festival winnings would be split among contributors. Patricia was aware of and agreed to this arrangement. Claiming that Jules “took advantage” of Patricia ignores this context and falsely reframes a mutual creative agreement as wage theft, which the evidence Jules provided does not support.
In Summer 2025, PDB also faced controversy for making transphobic remarks about trans men, claiming they inherently have more privilege than trans women.
By saying that “trans men have male privilege,” pocket-deer-belly implies that trans men are treated the same as cis men, when in reality trans men are still scrutinized, marginalized, and discriminated against as trans people. Claiming they have the same privilege erases these experiences and suggests that their oppression disappears once they identify or “pass” as male. Framing trans men as inherently more privileged than trans women creates a false hierarchy within the trans community, turning trans identity into a competition over who faces more discrimination instead of acknowledging that trans men and trans women experience different but equally real forms of oppression.
It’s important to note that PBD likely felt comfortable making these claims because of his close friendship with Patricia, who is also known for being hostile toward trans men.
Saying “I love you zoos” is an endorsement of abuse. Calling zoophilia an “illegal kink” trivializes what is actually non-consensual and criminal behavior toward animals. Pocket-deer-belly claims they were “baited” into saying something negative about transmascs, but this is just a form of deflection. Their response to backlash shifts blame to others rather than taking accountability for what they said. Bringing up to unrelated discourse about trans men only minimizes the seriousness of their own words and actions.
Also, PDB seems rather unconcerned about minors accessing their page.
Their statements ignore the responsibility adults have when minors engage with adult-oriented content. Claiming that minors “follow at your own risk” or are “old enough to make that decision” overlooks that minors cannot legally or developmentally consent to sexualized material. Adults are responsible for setting and enforcing boundaries to protect vulnerable users online, rather than shifting the blame onto minors. Saying minors are “not even following” does not address the larger problem of encouraging or passively allowing access to content that can harm them.
There’s honestly a lot more to say, but I’ll leave it here for now.
so when she was sexting an adult (presumably??) man at 14, despite being a minor in that situation, shes still the party at fault in your mind? is that what youre trying to convey?? im just confused as to what the hell that has to do with anything
You’re right, I should’ve clarified that better. I can understand how what I said could be interpreted that way, and I deeply apologize.
I’m absolutely not blaming Patricia for being a victim of sexual abuse or for situations that occurred when she was a minor. My intent was to highlight the danger in her messaging. The reason I brought up that post wasn’t to assign her guilt for what happened at 14, but to illustrate a larger pattern in how she currently talks about consent and boundaries as an adult.
When Patricia brings up her own past experiences, she often uses them to justify encouraging minors to seek out adult sexual spaces or to claim that being neurodivergent makes it difficult to understand consent. The Omegle example shows how she frames those experiences, not as something that harmed her or reflected a lack of protection, but as “formative”.
I mentioned that example because it shows how she misrepresents power dynamics, not to say she was at fault as a child, but to show how she now uses that history to rationalize behavior that endangers both minors and adults.
This rhetoric prioritizes her own narrative and desires above all else over the safety of both minors and adults.
She repeatedly references her history of sexual abuse to justify encouraging minors to enter adult sexual spaces. By presenting her own experiences as a way to empathize with teens who may have confusing thoughts, Patricia conflates offering guidance with granting permission for minors to pursue sexualized relationships with adults.
Essentially, Patricia is normalizing predatory dynamics, suggesting that such behavior is acceptable if its framed as helping minors. This framing is particularly dangerous because it encourages minors to trust adults in situations where they are especially vulnerable and may not recognize signs of coercion.
Edit: As an anon pointed out, when minors lie about their age to enter adult spaces, it also violates the consent of the adults involved. By encouraging this behavior, Patricia not only endangers minors and adults but also shows a fundamental misunderstanding of consent and safe kink practices.
Hey I have a little idea from sone poeple why might still be on the fence about her.
You know that little comment about how minors should lie about their age to get into only adult spaces?
Well I just then recalled some artist who made a little article for adult artists who might get harrassed off the internet.
what was a little diffrent about it was that it pointed out that minors were behind most of this shit that would put live hoods at stake and would have to shut down their accounts untill it blows over.
You might be thinking why should this be important? Simple.
What Adult artist is gonna wanna accept a commission from her if she is okay with artists being harrassed by minors? Dose she even know or care about that problem that affects NSFW artists? It also is a bad look because I have seen many artists of that nature who are hellbent on keeping minors from seeing their content, I don't think they are gonna like someone who wants minors to look at their stuff.
I can see where you’re coming from. Simply put, no, she doesn’t care.
It’s worth noting that Patricia encouraging minors to lie/ obfuscate their age to access adult spaces shows a disregard for both the safety of those minors and the adult artists who could face serious consequences as a result. Many minors don’t fully understand the risks of engaging in adult spaces, and putting them in situations they aren’t prepared for can lead to exploitation.
Also, most NSFW creators make a conscious effort to keep minors out of their spaces because they understand the risk. What Patricia is promoting endangers both minors and creators and undermines the safety measures responsible adult artists rely on to protect themselves.
i managed to come across this a week late but its just a mind fuck to me. to the best of my memory the anti-sjw crowd was extremely transandrophic? that crowd was one of the groups that the theyfab slur was originally popularized by before it got a resurgence somewhat recently on tumblr by a small group of trans femmes trying to gaslight the entire community about a per-existing slur. i very clearly remember anti-sjw types being obsessive about targeting femme-presenting trans mascs and neutrals and either extremely transandrophobic or exosexist towards said people.
she is referencing a incredibly transandrophobic group of people and saying that people who acknowledge that transandrophobia exist are just like said transandrophobes-words have no meaning in pattys mind.
Yeah, I remember that era too; it was peak anti-SJW culture. It’s extremely disingenuous of her to compare valid criticism of her transphobia to the same group that created a slur targeting transmascs and androgynous people. She’s distorting that history to discredit conversations about transandrophobia and paint transmascs as childish or irrational.
It’s really frustrating because she clearly has the capacity to understand, but she refuses to.
patricia making it out that being a predator and having predatory desires/wants to act out on children is "ineroxibly queer/autistic" does SO much damage to the communities she claims to care about. this kind of stuff has killed so many people in the past. And she just keeps saying stuff like this, acting like her identity/disorder excuses all the horrific shit she does. patricia's a threat to people. idk why so many people defend this vile behavior.
thank you for keeping an archive of this. will second that patricia is known to delete things and tries to manipulate/coerce/harass others into taking down information (like the young child she harassed off of a site because they pointed out her being predatory to minors in a discord server), so try to archive her behavior on multiple archival sites. some take things down if harassed, others don't
I completely agree. What she’s saying is incredibly harmful to both queer and autistic communities. Framing predatory behavior as part of an identity is very dangerous, and I worry that her large, impressionable audience might internalize some really harmful ideas.
And of course! I’m following that anon’s advice and should have all the posts updated with archive links within the next couple of days.
