tabsmao

britts-galaxy-brain

NO, I WOULDN'T ACTUALLY. If I found out ANYONE I know was getting off to children PERIOD, I'd be devastated and believe they're exactly where they should be.

And stop fucking claiming CSAM/CSEM is purely images of real children. It's not. According to the law, it's ANY DEPICTION of children in sexual circumstances that has no artistic context or value other than being tantalizing.

If you get arrested for having hordes of sexual depictions of children, regardless of the medium, you deserve to be there. You're a pedophile feeding the desire and eventually it's going to escalate to the real thing.

patricia-taxxon

i guess the rhetorical exercise doesn't work if you can't distinguish between harming a child and not harming a child

britts-galaxy-brain

You are fucking sick and deserve to be in prison for defending and consuming this shit.

But thank you for finally going mask off that you are indeed a pedophile and not just an innocent age-player.

patricia-taxxon

not an argument

britts-galaxy-brain

I don't need to argue with you.

You see nothing wrong with being attracted to children, and enjoying depictions of children in extreme sexual situations. I know I'm not going to convince YOU of shit and I have no desire to try.

Given your ongoing history, your comments about your belief that minors should be subtly encouraged to run free in sexual spaces with adults (don't pull the "I never said that" card, it's exactly what you fuckin implied and you know it), the community of self-described pedophiles you've drawn to you that gleefully reblog your rhetoric, and the fact that you have very recently exposed your followers to softcore cub art drawn by a self-described pedophile, you and your extended community are an immediate danger to anyone who falls into it, especially the minors you pretend to care about.

You specifically try to address minors who have a history of abuse, or are isolated. They would be the most vulnerable to people like you and the others that follow you.

You are not slick. You are not some uwu innocent victim. You are not a misunderstood kinkster. You are a manipulative predator.

patricia-taxxon

the "cub art" btw

britts-galaxy-brain

Why'd you leave out the artist, Patty.

Post the source.

patricia-taxxon

didn't think you were into that stuff

britts-galaxy-brain

What stuff, Patty. I thought it wasn't cub art.

What's the fucking source, Patty.

floralgoat

well would you look at the kind of "art" that Patty "i deserve to be friends with pedophiles" and "drawn child porn isnt child porn" Taxxon got from her buddy that she refuses to link.

Child porn of an Infant baby.

out right admission to being a Pedophile.

Reposting literal actual child molestation fantasies

posts incest fantasies about their little brother

rape "jokes"

this is the company that patricia taxxon keeps, defends, enjoys, ENABLES.

But we're the nazi purists terfs for trying to warn others about this behavior, right? and this is gonna be some sort of harassment campaign right? fucking disgusting.

patricia-taxxon britts-galaxy-brain floralgoat

See more posts like this on Tumblr

#patricia-taxxon #britts-galaxy-brain #floralgoat

More you might like

Patricia Taxxon comparing her critics to Nazis.

Anonymous asked: ""throwing a tantrum" "decided to liken it to sexual assault" how the hell are you gonna pretend to be righteous while talking like that about autistic children having meltdowns and being assaulted for it. ableist piece of shit" britts-galaxy-brain answered: "Patricia herself described it as "tantruming". I'm using her own words that she used to describe what she was doing. What she likened to sexual assault was someone restraining her while she was an active danger to others on a cramped public bus. Which I find telling that you intentionally left out. Your arguments only work when you maliciously leave out context to warp the narrative. Almost like what a manipulator would do."

patricia-taxxon responds: "kill yourself." patricia-taxxon reblogs herself and provides a link to encyclopediamorbidica's blog: "@encyclopediamorbidica stop fucking lying."

(continued) "no one is saying it? no one is justifying or downplaying my abuse, no one is trying to make it look like I'm exaggerating by saying I felt sexually violated by what adults would routinely do to my body day after day and then immediately striking it down with a little "perspective"? "What she likened to sexual assault was someone restraining her while she was an active danger to others on a cramped public bus." as in, "she is likening this to sexual assault, and I am supplying additional information that challenges this notion put forward by anon, which I will now describe myself doing. how funny it is that this anon didn't supply the context that she was being restrained for a good reason, which self evidently dismantles their entire argument." it's all fucking projection. you can point them to words written in front of their face and they won't acknowledge it. they will throw tantrums over being criticized and pretend they didn't say exactly what they fucking said as long as it allows them to continue being king baby. I hope that when britt tries to explain herself the cognitive dissonance causes an aneurysm." Britts-galaxy-brain: "It is fascinating how you just. Insert things and act like they were part of the original point. No wonder so many of your headass defenders have negative reading comprehension."

Anonymous asked: "For the people in your replies that are popping off; I worked with autistic children and I have been punched, kicked, scratched, head butted, and bitten during that time period. I still have scars on my hands from being scratched up. I once had to endure being punched 40 times with only a big foam block to be my protection. I have also had to deal with any items not nailed to the ground being hurled at me. Autistic children can be aggressive and from what I've seen, Patricia has mentioned in her own experiences being incredibly aggressive to others. I still loved those children and where I worked we were taught to use minimal restraining holds, but there are instances where restraining someone is required and a large public bus full of children does seem like an example that would require that. Also Patricia Taxxon is a pedophile." britts-galaxy-brain answered: "^^^^^^"

patricia-taxxon reblogs and responds: "thank u for waking up and confirming that you're exactly the piece of shit I painted you as, I'll be expecting a written apology from encyclopediamorbidica by morning." britts-galaxy-brain responds: "Did you reblog the wrong post? Also lol. lmao even. None of your manipulative fuckin acts are going to work here. "

patricia-taxxon: "you're the useful idiot doing damage control for the SS because an officer wrote you a tip saying they were just following orders and you're still clapping back. britts-galaxy-brain: "Calling out predators with documented evidence of grooming behavior is literally nazism, guys. You are fucking disgusting to water that down the way you do."

“you’re the useful idiot doing damage control for the SS because an officer wrote you a tip saying they were just following orders and you’re still clapping back.”

patricia-taxxon, creates a new post and repeatedly tags @britts-galaxy-brain: "@britts-galaxy-brain is in favor of suffocating autistic children as young as seven years old to death in response to violent meltdowns" patricia-taxxon reblogs her own post: "@britts-galaxy-brain will, absent of any other information, assume that adults who assault and injure autistic children during meltdowns are by default rational impartial agents whose choices were at worst a necessary evil. @britts-galaxy-brain believes state violence against autistic children is justified. "

(Source | Archive) (Source | Archive) (Source | Archive)

This exchange shows a clear pattern of Patricia’s manipulative and abusive behavior. It begins with Britt pointing out that Patricia herself had described her own childhood “tantruming” and later compared being restrained during a violent meltdown on a crowded bus to sexual assault. Rather than engaging in good faith, Patricia immediately responds with “Kill yourself,” escalating the situation and framing any criticism as ableist or violent toward autistic people.

Throughout the threads, Patricia twists Britt’s words, accusing her of supporting the abuse or even the murder of autistic children, claims that were never made. This is a deliberate misrepresentation meant to vilify her critics and shut down discussion. When Britt clarifies that they were only questioning her framing of the event as sexual assault, Patricia doubles down, using exaggerated comparisons to state violence and fascism to paint herself as a victim of systemic cruelty.

Instead of engaging honestly, she turns legitimate disagreement into moral outrage, accusing others of horrific beliefs they never expressed. This pattern mirrors her broader behavior online, where she misuses “social justice” language to manipulate narratives and attack anyone who challenges her actions.

patricia-taxxon: "idk. i might die but i got them to prove that they will simply do anything in their power to deny me the capacity to feel pain. whatever." patricia-taxxon, reblogs her own post: "to a normal person, confessing to being a bully as a kid is something you do to chill the air and dress yourself down so no one feels so judged. to these people it's their way out, they found the fuckin ticket, they've found a way to discredit my pain, cus i didn't "address the trauma i caused" like anyone other than the kids i beat up would appreciate that or I "made it seem like it wasn't a big deal" because i said it was a symptom of my disorders, because disability can never ever be a cause for someone's behavior without it being an excuse to continue being a burden on the normals. they fucking hate that they have to feel bad for me, they'd prefer if it was all fake. but they're the only ones who are projecting this asinine scheme onto me where everything bad that ever happened to me is a ploy to get people to forget what a loathsome pedophile i am. this is transmisogyny." patricia-taxxon, reblogs again: "whether the SS comparison was apt or not, the important part is that they found a way to forget everything they said & move onto the next thing. i stand by it, though."

“whether the SS comparison was apt or not, the important part is that they found a way to forget everything they said & move onto the next thing. i stand by it, though.”

(Source | Archive)

This post shows Patricia using self-victimization and projection to avoid accountability. She frames criticism of her past bullying and abusive behavior as an attack that denies her the ability to feel pain, turning responsibility into persecution. She also uses her disability and gender as shields, calling critique “transmisogyny” and exploiting real oppression to deflect blame. Claiming her abusive behavior was a “symptom of (her) disorders” muddles the line between explanation and excuse, refusing to acknowledge harm done.

Her reference to Nazis to describe online disagreement trivializes genocide and inflates her sense of victimhood. It’s especially tone-deaf considering that one of her critics, TheTepes, is Roma and a descendant of Holocaust survivors. This is manipulative rhetoric aimed at reframing criticism as abuse and avoiding responsibility for predatory or harmful actions.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture ask to tag long post

Patricia Taxxon being bigoted towards trans men

whereserpentswalk asked: "Do you believe transandrophobia is real?" patricia-taxxon answered: "i think transphobia is real" whereserpentswalk reblogs: "That doesn't really answer my question. Or mabye it does in an "all lives matter" way. Do you think trans men have a unique and valid experience with transphobia that isn't lesser and/or the same as transfems? Are you upset by them discussing their experiences with oppression?" patricia-taxxon: "no and no."

(Source | Archive)

patricia-taxxon: "after being explained the concept over and over again in great detail in my askbox, i have reached the conclusion that transandrophobia is -things that trans women also experience -things that cis women also experience -repackaged misandry theory from 2014 -being accused of transmisogyny, sometimes one of them put forth *corrective rape* to me as a transmasc only oppression, this is james somerton level intersectionality allergy." patricia-taxxon reblogs her post: "i feel like i don’t really need to defend myself anymore, like it’s pretty clear what’s going on here, it feels obvious. as a reminder, this is what set this off" she posts a screenshot from an anonymous ask: anonymous: "how do you feel about transmasc's" patricia-taxxon: "at this point, vaguely threatened"

(Source | Archive)

patricia-taxxon: "being someone who is barely old enough (25 years old) to remember the height of anti-sjw youtube in that plausibly deniable era before they turned hard right in 2016, it is absurd to me how much this current wave of transandrophobia-truthers has in common with them, and many of them are a lot older than me so they’ve gotta remember it too, right"

yourfriendlyfaye asked: "Have you ever actually looked through the transandrophobia tag? Genuinely, I'm being sincere. It's less "trans-androphobia" andmore like"transandro-phobia." It's just trans men and mascs talking specifically about how being a trans masculine has unique struggles." patricia-taxxon answers: "its about ethics in games journalism"

(Source | Archive) (Source | Archive)

patricia-taxxon: "fucking "tmasc-confessions"" patricia-taxxon reblogs her post: "confessing what. the abuse and exploitation of transfem contractors"

(Source | Archive)

For context: PT had a major falling out with a former friend who identifies as trans masc. The friend had hired her to compose music for a short film but later let her go due to concerning behavior. Since then, it’s been speculated that PT has been directing her hateful views toward trans men even more aggressively. (source)

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture transandrophobia

hello-im-dog

Patricia Taxxon being bigoted towards trans men

whereserpentswalk

hello-im-dog

Patricia Taxxon being bigoted towards trans men

whereserpentswalk

Hey! I'm the one who sent that ask and wrote that reply! Please don't censor my name, I want to be credited!

hello-im-dog

My apologies. I usually censor the usernames of innocent parties to help prevent potential harassment. I’ll make sure to be more mindful about that in the future.

Here is the updated version:

Post by @hello-im-dog · 5 images

💬 4 🔁 13 ❤️ 61 · Patricia Taxxon being bigoted towards trans men For context: PT had a major falling out with a former friend who identif

Tumblr

Patricia Taxxon Weirdly Defending Zoophilia

(Source | Archive)

Reply by kyleemclauren: "This starts off great, but holy shit, don't throw zoophiles under the bus? The whole start was about how the tension between bestiality and factory farming is actually worth discussing, then dismisses it immediately with "well yeah but the difference is zoophiles are terrible people who just wanna hurt animals!" No!?!? This man has never spoken to a zoophile in his life! Zoophiles like animals, that's the point. The zoophile population are, on the whole, fanatical supporters of animal rights; there is indeed an outsized population of vegans. Whenever I talk about category bigotry, this is a prime example: 'being sadists' is the one directed at zoos! There are plenty of zoos who want to make sure their dog is the best cared for and most loved dog in the entire world. There are exclusively romantic zoos. There are zoos obsessed with the mechanics of learning animal body language, to be able to accurately flirt. It's not about the power imbalance, it's about finding animals sexually attractive, and again, that's fine. There is no thought crime. The struggle of every paraphile is to get other people to look at their own disgust and ask "why?" If you want to train your dog to come to an area on command and hold still for a handjob they didn't ask for, the American Kennel Club has a guide you can download on their website. It will talk you through the full mechanics of dog breeding, which also include forcing a bitch to have sex she doesn't want, with the goal of keeping her pregnant for life so she can produce maximal economic value. Consent is not mentioned, even once. This is perfectly legal. On the other hand, if your dog is horny, and keeps humping your leg, and you think it would be hot to fuck him? ...well yeah, why is that wrong? You're both enjoying yourselves, there's not even alleged thought crime happening. The ability to consent derives from autonomy. The commercial breeding example is a situation where the dog is denied autonomy. The casual fuck is a situation where he is not. That's why the first feels like it should be wrong, and the second feels like it could be right. Zoophiles will talk your ear off about how failure to respect animal autonomy means our notions of animal consent are horribly inadequate. They fail to capture the harms of commercial farming, or really even think about human-animal relations in a meaningful way at all. Zoophiles say yes, animals have autonomy, and that means both giving them a choice, and having their choices respected. That means respecting their ability to say yes. If you do not, you haven't given them a choice. It is the job of the human partner to make sure the animal is given that choice in a meaningful way, and is protected from harm if they accept. It is not hypocritical of zoophiles to point out the answer from everyone else has been a resounding no, and that there appear to be no prohibitions on anything you might want to do to an animal for money. Anti-bestiality laws all tend to be written like "BEING ZOO IS BAD (*unless you're a farm and want to do exactly the same things on a commercial scale)", the act itself flagrantly doesn't matter, just whether or not you enjoy doing it. The resolution of this dilemma is important, it is another a queer rights issue where a very small and very unpopular minority is suffering because a much larger majority thinks it's icky. I will stand up for them too. There is a very real debate to be had here, but that minority is censored into oblivion almost everywhere, and it is in my fundamental nature to protect them."

response by patricia-taxxon: "What? I’m with you for some parts, disgust over individual deviants obfuscating broader structural issues mainly, but the important issue here is the ownership, your dog, disgust over deviant attraction need not be a part of the argument. it’s the same issue as fucking your kid or student or employee. I will not take an absolutist stance and say all of this is defacto harmful in all cases where it occurs, I know the statistics on CSA recovery tells an optimistic 25% chance of the event eventually turning into something positive for the survivor later in life, the issue is that in the cases where real harm is caused the group is wholly incapable of self-advocacy either through ignorance, practical inability or structural limitations. This feels like an argument in favor of raping one’s slaves, like it’s missing so many of the core components of consent & I’d really like you to consider expanding this logic to certain groups of structurally disadvantaged humans on this earth before saying it."

By comparing it to relationships between people with unequal power, like a teacher and a student or a boss and an employee, Patricia makes it sound like these acts exist on a scale of morality rather than being clearly abusive. She minimizes the issue of consent by claiming such acts aren’t “automatically harmful,” even though animals cannot consent. Her mention of supposed child abuse recovery statistics, that she likely made up, further blurs moral lines and attempts to justify exceptions.

Her argument centers on human control rather than animal protection, effectively defending the idea of sex with animals.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture postings

WARNING: This blog is 18+ due the severity of the topics listed below. If you’re a minor an interact with this page, you will be blocked.

TERFs, transphobes, and anyone speaking any sort of bigotry will also be blocked.

Hello, the goal of this blog is to have a straight forward archive of Patricia Taxxon’s legitimately problematic behaviors that people can hopefully refer to, as I’ve noticed that evidence here on Tumblr has been somewhat scattered.

Who is Patricia Taxxon?

Patricia Taxxon is an independent electronic musician known for her extensive catalog of experimental, and synth-driven albums. She also runs a Youtube channel with around 100k subscribers covering commentary, her music, video essays, and the occasional random video.

Controversies and allegations:

PT has been involved in a numerous amount of controversies, including accusations of pedophilia, zoophilia, racism, transandrophobia, along with sexually harassing a minor with furry porn and masturbating in her old discord server’s VC with minors present, all while hiding behind her gender identity, autism, pocd, and csa as shield against criticism.

As the blog updates, I’ll be updating this pinned post for ease of access.

Racism: x x

Pedophilia: x x

Grooming: x

Zoophilia: x

Transphobia: x x

Original documentation will be under the #postings tag

Notable Posts:

PT’s Apology (Archive)

Jules’ statement

Why People Don’t Trust Her Apology

Using Low Empathy as an Excuse

Comparing Her Critics to Nazis

Encouraging Minors to Lie About Their Age

The Strange Thing About the Johnsons

“taboo kinks are inexorably queer”

“the specter of the ‘pedophile’ is a mirage made up by rich white people to maintain ownership of their children”

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantro mixture pinned

Patricia Taxxon often compares her struggles as a trans disabled woman to issues of race.

She even claimed that her being trans and disabled negates her ability to racially oppress.

Anonymous asked: "i feel like your comparison is a false equivalence. black people have a history of being violently and systematically oppressed by white people. for them, this fear is often based in a fear of literal life or death. it is not transmen who are oppressing transwomen on this large a scale. im not gonna deny that there are assholes and bigots, every demographic has those, but right now there is a lot of conversation aimed at transmascs by non-transmascs attempting to pick apart any language we try to use to describe our unique experience with transphobia, and it feels really unfair that we cant even try to coin a term without people outside of our niches trying to tear it down for extremely bad faith reasons." patricia-taxxon answers: "The comparison is a fairer equivalence than you think, because I am also limited in my ability to racially oppress due to being trans and disabled but remain complicit in the franchise of whiteness nonetheless. It really isn’t hard, intersectionality cuts both ways."

(Source | Archive)

Her statements after facing backlash:

patricia-taxxon: "transmisogyny isnt "worse" than any other prejudice, but it's newer, less established, less understood, and easier to ignore for certain otherwise in-the-loop progressives. i think this explains most of how it is discussed and reacted to in leftist online spaces." patricia-taxxon, reblogs her own post: "it’s very clear. like when I got an ask saying that trans men aren’t the ones oppressing trans women, i said “well, white disabled trans women are limited in their ability to racially oppress, but they still benefit from white supremacy & are complicit in whiteness and it’d be silly to say they suffer from transwhitefemphobia” and the response to that was just “that’s not how this works, how dare you, you are trying to distance yourself from your whiteness, unlike me, who remains at arms length from the franchise of patriarchy forever because of my chromosomes” like it just hasn’t been patched in yet"

patricia-taxxon: "When I said that my disability & queerness limited my ability to racially oppress, I was not distancing myself from my whiteness. I was, in fact, emphasizing my connection to it & my complicity, and this would be obvious if you just read the fucking question I was responding to. It was not in response to being called out for racist behavior, it was in response to someone specifically telling me that I wasn't justified in feeling distrustful of trans men after experiencing transmisogynist harassment from them SPECIFICALLY on the basis that individual transmascs aren't the ones oppressing trans women. I said that I too had less than average individual power to oppress, but that it would be fucking stupid to distance myself from the project of whiteness on that basis. You literally just don't think I'm oppressed in the first place, then, if you get stuck on the first part of that answer. I was literally emboldening my white privilege as a retort to someone trying to erase their own patriarchal privilege and I had the exact thing I was trying to call out maliciously stamped onto me instead. It's fucking infuriating." patricia-taxxon reblogs her own post: "I do not, apropos of nothing, tell black people to ease off because I PERSONALLY am slightly less able to kill them, that's you. you were the ones doing that and I called it out."

patricia-taxxon: "how can people understand perfectly that oppression diminishes the benefits of their privilege specifically when they want to distance themselves from patriarchy and forget it entirely as soon as they want to attack a transfem they find inconvenient? she asked, rhetorically."

(Source | Archive) (Source | Archive)

She says critics misunderstood her, claiming she wasn’t avoiding responsibility but pointing out her white privilege, while also saying trans men ignore her experiences of transmisogyny. However, her argument doesn’t make sense because she both downplays her power to oppress and insists she was showing her privilege, and she avoids valid criticism by acting like the victim instead of addressing concerns about her bigotry.

She made strange comments about black autistics:

patricia-taxxon: "i think america will fall once black autistic people realize they exist" honeybunchesobees replies: "can i ask further into what actually this means? because i am very much aware i exist!" patricia-taxxon responds: "it’s underdiagnosed still, i’ve been told that it presents differently, if u do have disruptive symptoms you get hit with an ODD diagnosis instead, i think it is a conspiracy to keep the ppl most capable of destroying america from recognizing each other and conspiring"

(Source | Archive)

She also tried to make the comparison of raping owned animals and parents raping their children to slave owners raping their slaves

patricia-taxxon: "sorry, is noticing the systemic depersoning of chattel slavery "comparing slaves to animals" now? like if I point out that thomas jefferson's sentient property had the same or less political autonomy as children and pets do today is that me comparing slaves to animals? like I think the founding fathers did it first in this case"

(Archive)

By comparing the rape of enslaved people to child abuse and bestiality, she dehumanizes them by placing them in the same category as animals. She made a harmful comparison that disrespects both enslaved people and abuse survivors.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantro mixture

Patricia Taxxon Encouraging Minors to Lie About Their Age.

Just wanted to talk about this post a bit more since I’ve been meaning to:

patricia-taxxon: "i'm not mad at baby patty for seeking out kinky spaces online anymore & i'm not mad at the internet for indulging me, i was victimized long before then and this was my first step towards clarity" patricia-taxxon: "i don't want to just point to the 18+ sign on my bio and wipe my paws of responsibility, I know there's minors lurking this blog, i also know that if I had come across someone like me when I was 15 it would have saved me from the greatest depths of shame a living being can experience. I want to tell the teens who are developing unspeakable abnormal "adult" feelings that paralyze them into silence and isolation that they are not broken, they are not alone, they can love, they can be loved. you must not be afraid of your own love. (for your safety, though, you should probably lie about your age.)"

patricia-taxxon: "Posting this again, because I was clear the first time. Maybe I’m touchy about the ways that minors are treated as being completely without agency, to be shepherded by adults who know better than them until the very moment they turn 18 where they must suddenly be accountable as an adult because that’s what happened to me. I was victimized as a child, I sought out adult spaces as a young teenager because I was failed by the authority figures around me. I wanted autonomy, I wanted the pleasure that I felt was taken from me when he realized his mistake, I wanted to be understood, but I knew completely and utterly that I could never say it out loud, I could never be heard, it would only mean further isolation. And then I turned 18, and was instantly sexually exploited by multiple older adults and blamed for all of it because I had run out of innocence before I even knew what was happening to me. "

(continued) "I say I know there are minors lurking this blog because I know there are minors who will seek out relations with adults no matter what, and I know that because I was one. I know that just telling them to defer to the authority of different adults will solve nothing because I know what it’s like to have no safe adults in your life, I know being a kid and developing unspeakable age-inappropriate feelings is a terrifying and isolating experience because it happened to me. The only thing left to do is to say that I know what it’s like, you must know that you aren’t broken and that you can have fulfilling relationships now and when you grow up, this will all make sense someday, but you should also exercise safety precautions. This is the smoking gun? Speaking frankly to minors instead of silently allowing sexual abuse to beget more sexual abuse? Go to hell."

(Source| Archive)

This rhetoric prioritizes her own narrative and desires above all else over the safety of both minors and adults.

She repeatedly references her history of sexual abuse to justify encouraging minors to enter adult sexual spaces. By presenting her own experiences as a way to empathize with teens who may have confusing thoughts, Patricia conflates offering guidance with granting permission for minors to pursue sexualized relationships with adults.

Essentially, Patricia is normalizing predatory dynamics, suggesting that such behavior is acceptable if its framed as helping minors. This framing is particularly dangerous because it encourages minors to trust adults in situations where they are especially vulnerable and may not recognize signs of coercion.

Edit: As an anon pointed out, when minors lie about their age to enter adult spaces, it also violates the consent of the adults involved. By encouraging this behavior, Patricia not only endangers minors and adults but also shows a fundamental misunderstanding of consent and safe kink practices.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture postings

Patricia Taxxon made this infamous statement on her private twitter account about a month after she made her apology:

When confronted, she had this to say:

(Archive)

Why do people make private Twitter accounts? One reason is to share personal confessions with trusted peers, giving them the freedom to post without public scrutiny.

She focuses more on the fact that her private account was leaked instead of addressing what she actually said. She downplays her words by calling them a joke, even though her original post clearly described making an apology that looked good to both sides on purpose. She also argues it doesn’t count as a real admission since it was said in private, but people are often more honest with close friends, not less. By bringing up her past trauma and calling herself “trained to think of myself as a manipulator,” she shifts attention away from taking responsibility and makes it harder for people to criticize her. The long explanation only makes the issue more confusing, but the main point remains: she admitted to being dishonest and is now trying to pass it off as harmless.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon postings

Hi! So, I think I may as well address a few things 😊

The main focus of this blog will continue to be Patricia Taxxon. Now that she’s been suspended, things may naturally slow down a bit, but I don’t plan on stopping.

I made two posts about Pocket-Deer-Belly because he’s a close friend of Patricia and often involves himself in drama surrounding her. I don’t intend to cover anyone else. If you’re looking for commentary on other orbiters in the sphere, you may need to look elsewhere.

As stated in my pinned post, I created this blog because evidence on tumblr can be difficult to find, and my goal has always been to maintain an archive.

I’ve received a fair amount of feedback, both hateful and constructive, that some of my posts have weak points, and I actually agree. Over the next few days, I’ll be revising and improving those posts.

I understand that I need to choose my words carefully in critical spaces, and I’m always trying to remain open to constructive criticism.

Believe it or not, I actually have very little free time outside of tumblr! I’m not as “obsessed” as some people assume. The blog looks full simply because Patricia has done, well, a lot.

As I mentioned before, things may slow down a bit while I focus on other priorities, but I don’t intend to go anywhere.

Thank you so much for the support! Stay safe 🙏

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture pocket-deer-belly

Just a dog — NO, I WOULDN'T ACTUALLY. If I found out ANYONE I...

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

well would you look at the kind of "art" that Patty "i deserve to be friends with pedophiles" and "drawn child porn isnt child porn" Taxxon got from her buddy that she refuses to link.

Child porn of an Infant baby.

out right admission to being a Pedophile.

Reposting literal actual child molestation fantasies

posts incest fantasies about their little brother

rape "jokes"

this is the company that patricia taxxon keeps, defends, enjoys, ENABLES.

But we're the nazi purists terfs for trying to warn others about this behavior, right? and this is gonna be some sort of harassment campaign right? fucking disgusting.

More you might like

Patricia Taxxon comparing her critics to Nazis.

Patricia Taxxon Weirdly Defending Zoophilia

Patricia Taxxon Encouraging Minors to Lie About Their Age.