Just a dog

luckiestboy

yourfriendlyfaye

I do not give a shit about patricia taxxons kinks or fetishishes. Genuinely good for her.

I care about her blatant transandrophobia and her racism that she refuses to acknowledge.

Not to mention the sexual harassment allegations, although im taking those with a grain of salt bc the whole situation is weird and complicate.

My husband used to be a HUGE fan of hers. He literally deleted tumblr for MONTHS after learning about shit bc he was devestated. I genuinely liked a lot of her you tube analyses.

I tried to genuinely explain transandrophobia to her bc a lot of people WERE being assholes without explaining shit, only to be fucking dismissed and have her followers harass me for ages.

Is the fact that she got banned when others who do similar bullshit dont transmisogyny? Yes. But saying she didn't deserve it is simply not true.

Not to mention comparing her social media account being banned to martyrdom when trans people are *literally* being killed everyday is just sickening.

luckiestboy

I'm never gonna care about someone's kinks, I care that they have hurt others.

PT literally sent porn to a 13 yr old, though the situation has nuance

she was 17-18 but that doesn't absolve her, her disability doesn't absolve her, PT being groomed around the same time also doesn't excuse victimizing someone else. and someone willing to do that should not have a platform when people document that she has yet to improve or change.

She is racist.

She is transandrophobic.

I'm not gonna stand around and let people claim "social murder" or the people documenting her behavior are "kiwi farms wannabees."

She is someone who should not have a platform at this point in time.

More you might like

Patricia Taxxon being bigoted towards trans men

whereserpentswalk asked: "Do you believe transandrophobia is real?" patricia-taxxon answered: "i think transphobia is real" whereserpentswalk reblogs: "That doesn't really answer my question. Or mabye it does in an "all lives matter" way. Do you think trans men have a unique and valid experience with transphobia that isn't lesser and/or the same as transfems? Are you upset by them discussing their experiences with oppression?" patricia-taxxon: "no and no."

(Source | Archive)

patricia-taxxon: "after being explained the concept over and over again in great detail in my askbox, i have reached the conclusion that transandrophobia is -things that trans women also experience -things that cis women also experience -repackaged misandry theory from 2014 -being accused of transmisogyny, sometimes one of them put forth *corrective rape* to me as a transmasc only oppression, this is james somerton level intersectionality allergy." patricia-taxxon reblogs her post: "i feel like i don’t really need to defend myself anymore, like it’s pretty clear what’s going on here, it feels obvious. as a reminder, this is what set this off" she posts a screenshot from an anonymous ask: anonymous: "how do you feel about transmasc's" patricia-taxxon: "at this point, vaguely threatened"

(Source | Archive)

patricia-taxxon: "being someone who is barely old enough (25 years old) to remember the height of anti-sjw youtube in that plausibly deniable era before they turned hard right in 2016, it is absurd to me how much this current wave of transandrophobia-truthers has in common with them, and many of them are a lot older than me so they’ve gotta remember it too, right"

yourfriendlyfaye asked: "Have you ever actually looked through the transandrophobia tag? Genuinely, I'm being sincere. It's less "trans-androphobia" andmore like"transandro-phobia." It's just trans men and mascs talking specifically about how being a trans masculine has unique struggles." patricia-taxxon answers: "its about ethics in games journalism"

(Source | Archive) (Source | Archive)

patricia-taxxon: "fucking "tmasc-confessions"" patricia-taxxon reblogs her post: "confessing what. the abuse and exploitation of transfem contractors"

(Source | Archive)

For context: PT had a major falling out with a former friend who identifies as trans masc. The friend had hired her to compose music for a short film but later let her go due to concerning behavior. Since then, it’s been speculated that PT has been directing her hateful views toward trans men even more aggressively. (source)

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture transandrophobia

patricia-taxxon: "one incomprehensible bit I've started doing with my friends is referring to any and all misandry as transandrophobia specifically. like applejack says "ugh, boys" when spike eats the rotten muffins and i say "wow, transandrophobia" in the discord call" patricia-taxxon reblogs her post: "i think it's funny to me because of all the times that i or one of my friends would say something generic abt men or masculinity and be accused of lumping trans men in with cis men. like sorry i guess, living and learning."

patricia-taxxon reblogs again and posts an image that reads "No Boys Allowed": "this is transandrophobia"

(Source | Archive)

This is, unironically, transandrophobia!

This post comes off as transphobic because it mocks real conversations about transandrophobia. The joke, calling every bit of “misandry” transandrophobia, makes it seem like the concept itself is ridiculous or made up, even though it describes actual bias that trans masc people face.

Ending with a “No Boys Allowed” meme trivializes trans men’s experiences and turns a real issue, how trans men are often excluded, erased, or mocked, into a joke at their expense.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture transandrophobia I know I'm poking the hornet's nest with this one but someone else pointed out she posted this today and I was tempted lol

Pocket-Deer-Belly

While I want to keep the main focus of this blog on Patricia, one notable figure in her circle is pocket-deer-belly, also known as PDB.

PDB has a significant following on Tumblr, is a close friend of Patricia, and is one of her more vocal defenders.

When Patricia was let go from Jules’ film, PBD made several comments:

(Source) (Source)

pocket-deer-belly: "imagine getting someone to do labor for free (while she is under the impression that she's a contract worker) (which is how you typically refer to a paid position) and then when she refuses to pay for your fucking film festival circuit cause she did the labor for free (while she is under the impression that they're a contract worker) (you took advantage of her lack of knowledge and experience in the industry) (you took advantage of the fact that she did not argue her worth from the start and then blamed her for not getting paid (by you)) you spin up a fucking callout post against her (the "contract worker" you don't want to pay for) and then have the gall to call HER unproffessional (for refusing to pay for your advertising budget) (and for her getting mad that she didn't get paid and you took advantage of her) and then just to top it off you call her feminist stances some anti-man ruse as a slight against you specifically (to get you to pay money) (which you do actually owe her)" pocket-deer-belly reblogs: "and that's your professional film debut"

(Source)

PDB’s response misrepresents Jules’ statement by portraying the situation as labor exploitation, even though the collaboration was an unpaid creative partnership among friends. Jules explicitly stated that no guaranteed payment would be provided, as In Your Orbit was a student project, and any potential festival winnings would be split among contributors. Patricia was aware of and agreed to this arrangement. Claiming that Jules “took advantage” of Patricia ignores this context and falsely reframes a mutual creative agreement as wage theft, which the evidence Jules provided does not support.

In Summer 2025, PDB also faced controversy for making transphobic remarks about trans men, claiming they inherently have more privilege than trans women.

pocket-deer-belly: "we can't even get a basic "all men structurally benefit from a misogynist society" to pass on this website without a bunch of queer men shooting themselves into a panic cause they get too uncomfortable about the idea of being culpable to self" pocket-deer-belly: "i don't see how i benefit from patriarchy as a trans man" yeah that's the problem, it's invisible to you, you should fix that"

(Source)

pocket-deer-belly: "trans men have access to male privilege, just like any other group of queer men. this is the heinously transphobic take that people have been hounding me over btw. like when you see people call me transphobic this is what they're talking about" pocket-deer-belly reblogs: "i'm sick of sugarcoating this shit. denying this fact requires you to believe that trans men as a whole, or specific trans men NEVER pass or are taken seriously as their stated gender (not true, especially in queer or online spaces), are never treated preferentially to trans women (come the fuck on), or aren't men."

pocket-deer-belly reblogs again: "even when trans men are not believed about their identities as men they still hold a relative privilege over trans women. like, being treated as a "real woman", as transphobic as that is, is still a privileged position over the inescapable box of being a "fake woman" "deceiver" "invader into women's spaces" that trans women are placed into."

(for some context: at the time PDB identified as a cis man)

(Source)

By saying that “trans men have male privilege,” pocket-deer-belly implies that trans men are treated the same as cis men, when in reality trans men are still scrutinized, marginalized, and discriminated against as trans people. Claiming they have the same privilege erases these experiences and suggests that their oppression disappears once they identify or “pass” as male. Framing trans men as inherently more privileged than trans women creates a false hierarchy within the trans community, turning trans identity into a competition over who faces more discrimination instead of acknowledging that trans men and trans women experience different but equally real forms of oppression.

It’s important to note that PBD likely felt comfortable making these claims because of his close friendship with Patricia, who is also known for being hostile toward trans men.

but, please don’t take him seriously.

In a now deleted post, PDB said this:

Their statement after facing backlash:

pocket-deer-belly: "people only pass around screenshots of what you've said when it's convenient i think. people had to actively bait me to say something negative about transmascs but when they want to zoojacket me they just have to show the one screenshot and expect that to speak for itself." pocket-deer-belly: "my real opinions on both of these subjects have to be flattened but "he's a zoophile" is much easier to try to catch on and spuriously "prove" with a screenshot than "he doesn't think trans men are oppressed" which is like, very evidently not true from anything i've actually said. so they don't really provide screenshots for that as much"

(Source)

Saying “I love you zoos” is an endorsement of abuse. Calling zoophilia an “illegal kink” trivializes what is actually non-consensual and criminal behavior toward animals. Pocket-deer-belly claims they were “baited” into saying something negative about transmascs, but this is just a form of deflection. Their response to backlash shifts blame to others rather than taking accountability for what they said. Bringing up to unrelated discourse about trans men only minimizes the seriousness of their own words and actions.

Also, PDB seems rather unconcerned about minors accessing their page.

(Source)

Their statements ignore the responsibility adults have when minors engage with adult-oriented content. Claiming that minors “follow at your own risk” or are “old enough to make that decision” overlooks that minors cannot legally or developmentally consent to sexualized material. Adults are responsible for setting and enforcing boundaries to protect vulnerable users online, rather than shifting the blame onto minors. Saying minors are “not even following” does not address the larger problem of encouraging or passively allowing access to content that can harm them.

There’s honestly a lot more to say, but I’ll leave it here for now.

pocket-deer-belly pocket-deer-boy patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture transandrophobia

Anonymous asked:

https://www.tumblr.com/hello-im-dog/797422750665981952?source=share

i managed to come across this a week late but its just a mind fuck to me. to the best of my memory the anti-sjw crowd was extremely transandrophic? that crowd was one of the groups that the theyfab slur was originally popularized by before it got a resurgence somewhat recently on tumblr by a small group of trans femmes trying to gaslight the entire community about a per-existing slur. i very clearly remember anti-sjw types being obsessive about targeting femme-presenting trans mascs and neutrals and either extremely transandrophobic or exosexist towards said people.

she is referencing a incredibly transandrophobic group of people and saying that people who acknowledge that transandrophobia exist are just like said transandrophobes-words have no meaning in pattys mind.

(context)

Yeah, I remember that era too; it was peak anti-SJW culture. It’s extremely disingenuous of her to compare valid criticism of her transphobia to the same group that created a slur targeting transmascs and androgynous people. She’s distorting that history to discredit conversations about transandrophobia and paint transmascs as childish or irrational.

It’s really frustrating because she clearly has the capacity to understand, but she refuses to.

(Source | Archive) (Source | Archive)

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture transandrophobia anon ask time

Anonymous asked:

Haven't been in your blog too long, but honestly had to share it. What does Patty even mean with "as a fairly young person" - as a 25 yo - and mentioning SJW movement on YT wasn't something she lived all that much. Like??? We lived it?? A lot?? As a 21 yo, also neurodivergent, you couldn't do anything without being assaulted by people criticizing it and accusing everything. It was the 'woke culture' of our time. It's just a ridiculous point I couldn't let go.

(context)

Exactly. Her point comes across as an attempt to talk down to trans men and avoid taking responsibility for her own transphobic behavior.

It’s frustrating because she positions herself as the voice of reason while comparing trans men’s justified pushback to anti-SJW rhetoric, framing their anger as petty internet drama instead of a valid response to real harm.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture transandrophobia ask time anon

WARNING: This blog is 18+ due the severity of the topics listed below. If you’re a minor an interact with this page, you will be blocked.

TERFs, transphobes, and anyone speaking any sort of bigotry will also be blocked.

Hello, the goal of this blog is to have a straight forward archive of Patricia Taxxon’s legitimately problematic behaviors that people can hopefully refer to, as I’ve noticed that evidence here on Tumblr has been somewhat scattered.

Who is Patricia Taxxon?

Patricia Taxxon is an independent electronic musician known for her extensive catalog of experimental, and synth-driven albums. She also runs a Youtube channel with around 100k subscribers covering commentary, her music, video essays, and the occasional random video.

Controversies and allegations:

PT has been involved in a numerous amount of controversies, including accusations of pedophilia, zoophilia, racism, transandrophobia, along with sexually harassing a minor with furry porn and masturbating in her old discord server’s VC with minors present, all while hiding behind her gender identity, autism, pocd, and csa as shield against criticism.

As the blog updates, I’ll be updating this pinned post for ease of access.

Racism: x x

Pedophilia: x x

Grooming: x

Zoophilia: x

Transphobia: x x

Original documentation will be under the #postings tag

Notable Posts:

PT’s Apology (Archive)

Jules’ statement

Why People Don’t Trust Her Apology

Using Low Empathy as an Excuse

Comparing Her Critics to Nazis

Encouraging Minors to Lie About Their Age

The Strange Thing About the Johnsons

“taboo kinks are inexorably queer”

“the specter of the ‘pedophile’ is a mirage made up by rich white people to maintain ownership of their children”

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantro mixture pinned

Patricia Taxxon often compares her struggles as a trans disabled woman to issues of race.

She even claimed that her being trans and disabled negates her ability to racially oppress.

Anonymous asked: "i feel like your comparison is a false equivalence. black people have a history of being violently and systematically oppressed by white people. for them, this fear is often based in a fear of literal life or death. it is not transmen who are oppressing transwomen on this large a scale. im not gonna deny that there are assholes and bigots, every demographic has those, but right now there is a lot of conversation aimed at transmascs by non-transmascs attempting to pick apart any language we try to use to describe our unique experience with transphobia, and it feels really unfair that we cant even try to coin a term without people outside of our niches trying to tear it down for extremely bad faith reasons." patricia-taxxon answers: "The comparison is a fairer equivalence than you think, because I am also limited in my ability to racially oppress due to being trans and disabled but remain complicit in the franchise of whiteness nonetheless. It really isn’t hard, intersectionality cuts both ways."

(Source | Archive)

Her statements after facing backlash:

patricia-taxxon: "transmisogyny isnt "worse" than any other prejudice, but it's newer, less established, less understood, and easier to ignore for certain otherwise in-the-loop progressives. i think this explains most of how it is discussed and reacted to in leftist online spaces." patricia-taxxon, reblogs her own post: "it’s very clear. like when I got an ask saying that trans men aren’t the ones oppressing trans women, i said “well, white disabled trans women are limited in their ability to racially oppress, but they still benefit from white supremacy & are complicit in whiteness and it’d be silly to say they suffer from transwhitefemphobia” and the response to that was just “that’s not how this works, how dare you, you are trying to distance yourself from your whiteness, unlike me, who remains at arms length from the franchise of patriarchy forever because of my chromosomes” like it just hasn’t been patched in yet"

patricia-taxxon: "When I said that my disability & queerness limited my ability to racially oppress, I was not distancing myself from my whiteness. I was, in fact, emphasizing my connection to it & my complicity, and this would be obvious if you just read the fucking question I was responding to. It was not in response to being called out for racist behavior, it was in response to someone specifically telling me that I wasn't justified in feeling distrustful of trans men after experiencing transmisogynist harassment from them SPECIFICALLY on the basis that individual transmascs aren't the ones oppressing trans women. I said that I too had less than average individual power to oppress, but that it would be fucking stupid to distance myself from the project of whiteness on that basis. You literally just don't think I'm oppressed in the first place, then, if you get stuck on the first part of that answer. I was literally emboldening my white privilege as a retort to someone trying to erase their own patriarchal privilege and I had the exact thing I was trying to call out maliciously stamped onto me instead. It's fucking infuriating." patricia-taxxon reblogs her own post: "I do not, apropos of nothing, tell black people to ease off because I PERSONALLY am slightly less able to kill them, that's you. you were the ones doing that and I called it out."

patricia-taxxon: "how can people understand perfectly that oppression diminishes the benefits of their privilege specifically when they want to distance themselves from patriarchy and forget it entirely as soon as they want to attack a transfem they find inconvenient? she asked, rhetorically."

(Source | Archive) (Source | Archive)

She says critics misunderstood her, claiming she wasn’t avoiding responsibility but pointing out her white privilege, while also saying trans men ignore her experiences of transmisogyny. However, her argument doesn’t make sense because she both downplays her power to oppress and insists she was showing her privilege, and she avoids valid criticism by acting like the victim instead of addressing concerns about her bigotry.

She made strange comments about black autistics:

patricia-taxxon: "i think america will fall once black autistic people realize they exist" honeybunchesobees replies: "can i ask further into what actually this means? because i am very much aware i exist!" patricia-taxxon responds: "it’s underdiagnosed still, i’ve been told that it presents differently, if u do have disruptive symptoms you get hit with an ODD diagnosis instead, i think it is a conspiracy to keep the ppl most capable of destroying america from recognizing each other and conspiring"

(Source | Archive)

She also tried to make the comparison of raping owned animals and parents raping their children to slave owners raping their slaves

patricia-taxxon: "sorry, is noticing the systemic depersoning of chattel slavery "comparing slaves to animals" now? like if I point out that thomas jefferson's sentient property had the same or less political autonomy as children and pets do today is that me comparing slaves to animals? like I think the founding fathers did it first in this case"

(Archive)

By comparing the rape of enslaved people to child abuse and bestiality, she dehumanizes them by placing them in the same category as animals. She made a harmful comparison that disrespects both enslaved people and abuse survivors.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantro mixture

Patricia Taxxon comparing her critics to Nazis.

Anonymous asked: ""throwing a tantrum" "decided to liken it to sexual assault" how the hell are you gonna pretend to be righteous while talking like that about autistic children having meltdowns and being assaulted for it. ableist piece of shit" britts-galaxy-brain answered: "Patricia herself described it as "tantruming". I'm using her own words that she used to describe what she was doing. What she likened to sexual assault was someone restraining her while she was an active danger to others on a cramped public bus. Which I find telling that you intentionally left out. Your arguments only work when you maliciously leave out context to warp the narrative. Almost like what a manipulator would do."

patricia-taxxon responds: "kill yourself." patricia-taxxon reblogs herself and provides a link to encyclopediamorbidica's blog: "@encyclopediamorbidica stop fucking lying."

(continued) "no one is saying it? no one is justifying or downplaying my abuse, no one is trying to make it look like I'm exaggerating by saying I felt sexually violated by what adults would routinely do to my body day after day and then immediately striking it down with a little "perspective"? "What she likened to sexual assault was someone restraining her while she was an active danger to others on a cramped public bus." as in, "she is likening this to sexual assault, and I am supplying additional information that challenges this notion put forward by anon, which I will now describe myself doing. how funny it is that this anon didn't supply the context that she was being restrained for a good reason, which self evidently dismantles their entire argument." it's all fucking projection. you can point them to words written in front of their face and they won't acknowledge it. they will throw tantrums over being criticized and pretend they didn't say exactly what they fucking said as long as it allows them to continue being king baby. I hope that when britt tries to explain herself the cognitive dissonance causes an aneurysm." Britts-galaxy-brain: "It is fascinating how you just. Insert things and act like they were part of the original point. No wonder so many of your headass defenders have negative reading comprehension."

Anonymous asked: "For the people in your replies that are popping off; I worked with autistic children and I have been punched, kicked, scratched, head butted, and bitten during that time period. I still have scars on my hands from being scratched up. I once had to endure being punched 40 times with only a big foam block to be my protection. I have also had to deal with any items not nailed to the ground being hurled at me. Autistic children can be aggressive and from what I've seen, Patricia has mentioned in her own experiences being incredibly aggressive to others. I still loved those children and where I worked we were taught to use minimal restraining holds, but there are instances where restraining someone is required and a large public bus full of children does seem like an example that would require that. Also Patricia Taxxon is a pedophile." britts-galaxy-brain answered: "^^^^^^"

patricia-taxxon reblogs and responds: "thank u for waking up and confirming that you're exactly the piece of shit I painted you as, I'll be expecting a written apology from encyclopediamorbidica by morning." britts-galaxy-brain responds: "Did you reblog the wrong post? Also lol. lmao even. None of your manipulative fuckin acts are going to work here. "

patricia-taxxon: "you're the useful idiot doing damage control for the SS because an officer wrote you a tip saying they were just following orders and you're still clapping back. britts-galaxy-brain: "Calling out predators with documented evidence of grooming behavior is literally nazism, guys. You are fucking disgusting to water that down the way you do."

“you’re the useful idiot doing damage control for the SS because an officer wrote you a tip saying they were just following orders and you’re still clapping back.”

patricia-taxxon, creates a new post and repeatedly tags @britts-galaxy-brain: "@britts-galaxy-brain is in favor of suffocating autistic children as young as seven years old to death in response to violent meltdowns" patricia-taxxon reblogs her own post: "@britts-galaxy-brain will, absent of any other information, assume that adults who assault and injure autistic children during meltdowns are by default rational impartial agents whose choices were at worst a necessary evil. @britts-galaxy-brain believes state violence against autistic children is justified. "

(Source | Archive) (Source | Archive) (Source | Archive)

This exchange shows a clear pattern of Patricia’s manipulative and abusive behavior. It begins with Britt pointing out that Patricia herself had described her own childhood “tantruming” and later compared being restrained during a violent meltdown on a crowded bus to sexual assault. Rather than engaging in good faith, Patricia immediately responds with “Kill yourself,” escalating the situation and framing any criticism as ableist or violent toward autistic people.

Throughout the threads, Patricia twists Britt’s words, accusing her of supporting the abuse or even the murder of autistic children, claims that were never made. This is a deliberate misrepresentation meant to vilify her critics and shut down discussion. When Britt clarifies that they were only questioning her framing of the event as sexual assault, Patricia doubles down, using exaggerated comparisons to state violence and fascism to paint herself as a victim of systemic cruelty.

Instead of engaging honestly, she turns legitimate disagreement into moral outrage, accusing others of horrific beliefs they never expressed. This pattern mirrors her broader behavior online, where she misuses “social justice” language to manipulate narratives and attack anyone who challenges her actions.

patricia-taxxon: "idk. i might die but i got them to prove that they will simply do anything in their power to deny me the capacity to feel pain. whatever." patricia-taxxon, reblogs her own post: "to a normal person, confessing to being a bully as a kid is something you do to chill the air and dress yourself down so no one feels so judged. to these people it's their way out, they found the fuckin ticket, they've found a way to discredit my pain, cus i didn't "address the trauma i caused" like anyone other than the kids i beat up would appreciate that or I "made it seem like it wasn't a big deal" because i said it was a symptom of my disorders, because disability can never ever be a cause for someone's behavior without it being an excuse to continue being a burden on the normals. they fucking hate that they have to feel bad for me, they'd prefer if it was all fake. but they're the only ones who are projecting this asinine scheme onto me where everything bad that ever happened to me is a ploy to get people to forget what a loathsome pedophile i am. this is transmisogyny." patricia-taxxon, reblogs again: "whether the SS comparison was apt or not, the important part is that they found a way to forget everything they said & move onto the next thing. i stand by it, though."

“whether the SS comparison was apt or not, the important part is that they found a way to forget everything they said & move onto the next thing. i stand by it, though.”

(Source | Archive)

This post shows Patricia using self-victimization and projection to avoid accountability. She frames criticism of her past bullying and abusive behavior as an attack that denies her the ability to feel pain, turning responsibility into persecution. She also uses her disability and gender as shields, calling critique “transmisogyny” and exploiting real oppression to deflect blame. Claiming her abusive behavior was a “symptom of (her) disorders” muddles the line between explanation and excuse, refusing to acknowledge harm done.

Her reference to Nazis to describe online disagreement trivializes genocide and inflates her sense of victimhood. It’s especially tone-deaf considering that one of her critics, TheTepes, is Roma and a descendant of Holocaust survivors. This is manipulative rhetoric aimed at reframing criticism as abuse and avoiding responsibility for predatory or harmful actions.

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture ask to tag long post

whereserpentswalk

hello-im-dog

Patricia Taxxon being bigoted towards trans men

whereserpentswalk

Hey! I'm the one who sent that ask and wrote that reply! Please don't censor my name, I want to be credited!

hello-im-dog

My apologies. I usually censor the usernames of innocent parties to help prevent potential harassment. I’ll make sure to be more mindful about that in the future.

Here is the updated version:

Post by @hello-im-dog · 5 images

💬 4 🔁 13 ❤️ 61 · Patricia Taxxon being bigoted towards trans men For context: PT had a major falling out with a former friend who identif

Tumblr