Just a dog

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna

WARNING: This blog is 18+ due the severity of the topics listed below. If you’re a minor an interact with this page, you will be blocked.

TERFs, transphobes, and anyone speaking any sort of bigotry will also be blocked.

Hello, the goal of this blog is to have a straight forward archive of Patricia Taxxon’s legitimately problematic behaviors that people can hopefully refer to, as I’ve noticed that evidence here on Tumblr has been somewhat scattered.

Who is Patricia Taxxon?

image

Patricia Taxxon is an independent electronic musician known for her extensive catalog of experimental, and synth-driven albums. She also runs a Youtube channel with around 100k subscribers covering commentary, her music, video essays, and the occasional random video.

Controversies and allegations:

PT has been involved in a numerous amount of controversies, including accusations of pedophilia, zoophilia, racism, transandrophobia, along with sexually harassing a minor with furry porn and masturbating in her old discord server’s VC with minors present, all while hiding behind her gender identity, autism, pocd, and csa as shield against criticism.

As the blog updates, I’ll be updating this pinned post for ease of access.

Racism: x x

Pedophilia: x x

Grooming: x

Zoophilia: x

Transphobia: x x

Original documentation will be under the #postings tag

Notable Posts:

PT’s Apology (Archive)

Jules’ statement

Why People Don’t Trust Her Apology

Using Low Empathy as an Excuse

Comparing Her Critics to Nazis

Encouraging Minors to Lie About Their Age

The Strange Thing About the Johnsons

“taboo kinks are inexorably queer”

“the specter of the ‘pedophile’ is a mirage made up by rich white people to maintain ownership of their children”

Pinned Post patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantro mixture pinned
britts-galaxy-brain
wolfertinger

image
image

"Anon please, pocket-deer-boy supporting salem isn’t surprising since they’re willing to bat for zoos, so supporting a rape apologist means nothing to them. enough with trying to boil these things down, they are okay with people that would harm animals for sexual gratification, “problematic and illegal kinks” rape, pedophilia, incest and zoophilia aren’t kinks but they are something they support. But even then they can’t say it fully without hiding behind terms. At the end of the day these people need to just come out and say they support abuse and victims mean nothing to them."

every time i see this post. i genuinely wonder what was going through their head. because it does not say "ferals". it does not say "quad" or whatever other term they use. hell. it does not even talk about "anatomically correctness" or shit like that. it SPECIFICALLY SAYS ZOO, and follows it with "other problematic/illegal kinks".

if someone said "dni pedos, other illegal stuff" and they said the same thing, they know it would not be received as well. in all honesty someone saying "i love zoos" even as a joke or for "shock" humor should have them rethinking their life.

rambling-crerchur

image

Extremely good tags here.

So I was offline for a couple of days thanks to Tumblr acting wonky, and it turns out I’ve been hit with the anon bot spam too.

image
image

Very healthy and normal!

But yeah, anonymous messages are going to be turned off for now🤷‍♂️
If you’d like to send an ask but stay anonymous, just let me know and I’ll be happy to accommodate.

postings
thetepes

Anonymous asked:

patty's circle is actually so fucking dense it almost makes me feel a bit of pity for them.
"you're harassing a poor transfem who did absolutely NOTHING but be #problematic, kinky, and SUCCESSFUL! #call out culture sucks #i have prior bias towards Patricia taxxon" as if these same people didn't make a botnet to fire a bunch of word salad asks?? as if they're not constantly misgendering or being transphobic to you??? where is the outcry here??? aren't you part of that populace they constantly yell need protection?? it suspiciously seems like they themselves also have a "bad trans vs good trans" mentality, plus the double standard they have towards everyone else, they have this weird sense of self righteousness whenever they reblog or post a basic "eeerm don't be racist!" as if there isn't several posts where Patty is being absolutely ghoulish about people of color because she drenched the posts in vague libspeak that could go over white peoples heads, or how they call literally everything "unreasonable pedojacketing" or call it a "thought crime" when there's ALSO a trans teen girl who said Patty sent her porn but because Patty gave an insincere, slight of hand of an "apology" she herself has admitted to as being insincere? and for some reason sent her mom to bash this girl for coming out about how Patty sent her honest to god porn or how she jacked off in a call full of other teen girls but blames it on her hypersexuality and autism for some strange reason????
like Patty genuinely is not the victim here, treating her like some martyr for something she did do and then rage baiting yourself actually stalking blogs or having someone block evade to send you screenshots is like... not making you seem like you're in the right here as much as you want to seem like you are???

But then her group moves goalposts because there's something shown about her that they don't like, like, which is it? are people weird for cataloging Patty being racist or are people weird for NOT cataloging her being racist? or that weird argument of "degendering" Patty by using "Patty" as if its not clear its a shortened version of "Patricia" she herself and Deer have called her before??? or how there always seems to be SOME excuse for her behavior that conveniently turn every mental illness she has into "being racist disorder" like no, her giving herself "involuntary fursonas" (her direct words btw) isn't the reason why shes racist. Also, to expect trans women and transfemminine people to be into pedophilia incest off the bat because they're trans is like... the biggest stereotype there is, being in this "hyper-inclusive" space where there are no #puritans is like actually brain melting, that is actually more transphobic than claiming blogs like these are because of transphobia and how they're so against call out culture when they're not basically engaging in the same exact thing thinking that they're the good guys actually.
no this isn't about xXstrawmanthesanriopuppyk1ttayluvr08Xx saying "oh I alwayz g0t sum weird v1bez frum her :/", this is about POC and other trans women saying Patty fucking sucks, playing the "this is just because of transmisogyny" card every time there's tangible proof to try to negate any sort of criticism against someone who happens to be transfem just goes to show how little they know the meaning of the word. Its funny how these "I'M PROUD TO BE A PROBLEMATIC KINKSTER" types will immediately forget every single "block and move on"/"don't like don't look" argument they themselves make because they deem someone problematic and irredeemable for going against something or someone they like its actually pathetic.

rambling-crerchur answered:

No notes, this encapsulates my feelings beautifully and accurately.

rambling-crerchur

Anonymous asked:

You seem to not actually believe kinks don't make you a bad person given that you're still stalking and harassing a trans woman for having them.

ludledudle answered:

buudy, I got kinks you wouldn’t believe. i’m saying kinks don’t make someone bad is bc they DON’T. sending porn to a minor and wanting REAL kids to interact with REAL adults sexually does.

rambling-crerchur

image
image
image

Here are the screenshots, and here is the archive.

britts-galaxy-brain

Anonymous asked:

you do know that thought crime isn't a thing right? thinking about killing people and wanting to kill people is not a crime in any way and does not hurt anyone. They're just thoughts. no sexual fantasies are an issue. there is only an issue if a sexual fantasy is carried out on someone who doesn't consent to it. posting fantasies online is not an issue. you realize this right?

rambling-crerchur answered:

I am being told to kill myself almost a dozen times a day. I would suggest you shut the fuck up about “Its not real” these people want me to kill myself in the real world.

britts-galaxy-brain

Anon, not a single one of you have ever used "thought crime" correctly and it's time to fuckin stop.

This isn't Minority Report. People aren't being literally mind-read and then getting shit for their THOUGHTS.

Once that THOUGHT leaves your head and becomes perceivable to other people, that is no longer a THOUGHT.

That is an action. That is writing. That is art. That is spoken words. That is no longer a THOUGHT.

THOUGHTS are firmly INSIDE YOUR HEAD.

britts-galaxy-brain

Your tag game is always immaculate and I can't just leave these there

image
rambling-crerchur

Anonymous asked:

Y'know, I personally don't care if someone thinks about or even sometimes talks about their "problematic" fetishes (why/when they would and wouldn't be problematic is a whole 'nother can of worms), but if they're actually harming people or animals with their fetishes, then we have a problem. If Patricia really did go about it in a way that was harming people, then I can't and won't defend her now that she's banned (it also might explain why I felt so uneasy about her)

rambling-crerchur answered:

The thing with Patricia is that she didnt keep it in fiction. She sent porn to a real 13 year old trans girl and masturbated in a Discord VC with multiple minors present who she told afterwards. Thats why her posting fantasies about her hypersexual “littles” and her blurring of the lines between furrydom/therianism and zoophilia are worrying and worthy of discussion. She has already hurt people.

Hi! So, I think I may as well address a few things 😊

image

The main focus of this blog will continue to be Patricia Taxxon. Now that she’s been suspended, things may naturally slow down a bit, but I don’t plan on stopping.

I made two posts about Pocket-Deer-Belly because he’s a close friend of Patricia and often involves himself in drama surrounding her. I don’t intend to cover anyone else. If you’re looking for commentary on other orbiters in the sphere, you may need to look elsewhere.

As stated in my pinned post, I created this blog because evidence on tumblr can be difficult to find, and my goal has always been to maintain an archive.

I’ve received a fair amount of feedback, both hateful and constructive, that some of my posts have weak points, and I actually agree. Over the next few days, I’ll be revising and improving those posts.

I understand that I need to choose my words carefully in critical spaces, and I’m always trying to remain open to constructive criticism.

Believe it or not, I actually have very little free time outside of tumblr! I’m not as “obsessed” as some people assume. The blog looks full simply because Patricia has done, well, a lot.

As I mentioned before, things may slow down a bit while I focus on other priorities, but I don’t intend to go anywhere.

Thank you so much for the support! Stay safe 🙏

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture pocket-deer-belly
luckiestboy
yourfriendlyfaye

I do not give a shit about patricia taxxons kinks or fetishishes. Genuinely good for her.

I care about her blatant transandrophobia and her racism that she refuses to acknowledge.

Not to mention the sexual harassment allegations, although im taking those with a grain of salt bc the whole situation is weird and complicate.

My husband used to be a HUGE fan of hers. He literally deleted tumblr for MONTHS after learning about shit bc he was devestated. I genuinely liked a lot of her you tube analyses.

I tried to genuinely explain transandrophobia to her bc a lot of people WERE being assholes without explaining shit, only to be fucking dismissed and have her followers harass me for ages.

image

Is the fact that she got banned when others who do similar bullshit dont transmisogyny? Yes. But saying she didn't deserve it is simply not true.

Not to mention comparing her social media account being banned to martyrdom when trans people are *literally* being killed everyday is just sickening.

luckiestboy

I'm never gonna care about someone's kinks, I care that they have hurt others.

PT literally sent porn to a 13 yr old, though the situation has nuance

she was 17-18 but that doesn't absolve her, her disability doesn't absolve her, PT being groomed around the same time also doesn't excuse victimizing someone else. and someone willing to do that should not have a platform when people document that she has yet to improve or change.

She is racist.

She is transandrophobic.

I'm not gonna stand around and let people claim "social murder" or the people documenting her behavior are "kiwi farms wannabees."

She is someone who should not have a platform at this point in time.

britts-galaxy-brain

Anonymous asked:

you are not a dog. you are a stalker with serious mental issues and a freak. theres a reason you dont have friends irl yeah? you reap what you sow

hello-im-dog answered:

Actually I am a dog and I have lots of friends in fact I’m going to the dog park tomorrow and everyone I love is going to be there lalala yaaayyy yippee yay!!!!!!!

image
thetepes

britts-galaxy-brain

First they deny the identity of a trans woman speaking out and now they're denying the identity of a dog speaking out smh my head

Anonymous asked:

For the record, what PDB is doing IS a genuine targeted harassment campaign that is reportable to tumblr by you and the other people they’re targeting. The fact that he and others don’t see the difference between people cataloguing public statements by a figure with a large following and a person with a large following going out of their way to direct hate and abuse at a group of blogs they don’t like is frustrating and unsurprising. But at least these folks continue to show their true colors.

The post in question for those wondering.

image

I’m aware! I’ve already submitted everything on my end, hopefully my peers will do the same.

anon ask time pocket deer belly

im not patricia i just stole a url similar to hers. im sick of her disgusting behavior and i kinda want her to go offline forever and get help for her pedophilic and incest and real rape compulsions.

yall i doubt i'll use this blog much, everyones starting to wake up to her antics (apparently she got assblasted on twitter a couple days ago according to my friends' blogs) unless you're also a trans radfem or perhaps a legitimate sex pest. i just want my blog to come up when you csa supporters look up hers

image
image

^ comparing when a school staff person tried to control her during an autistic episode to antiblack police brutality

image
image
image
image

^ beefing with encyclopediamorbidica because he spoke about what she's doing

image
image

^ comparing thetepes and britt and encymorb and the rest of us to nazis for saying she needs to stop wanting to diddle children

here's a sample collection of her being racist (thetepes is romani, encyclopediamorbidica is black, and for the record i am also black) because its not talked about as much as her other crimes. while it is important we talk about her antiblackness, her comparing a romani person to the ss because they alerted people to your fucked up sex crimes is fucking deplorable.

"you should live in fear forever" over someone spreading awareness of your genuinely, not-in-the-fun-way, disgusting behavior? sounds like someone's afraid 🫶🏽

for organized posts about her sex pestery, go to @hello-im-dog and @encyclopediamorbidica and look around.

for a blog more like mine, where its all in one place, go to @thetepes and @britts-galaxy-brain and @rambling-crerchur.

yourfriendlyfaye
yourfriendlyfaye

I do not give a shit about patricia taxxons kinks or fetishishes. Genuinely good for her.

I care about her blatant transandrophobia and her racism that she refuses to acknowledge.

Not to mention the sexual harassment allegations, although im taking those with a grain of salt bc the whole situation is weird and complicate.

My husband used to be a HUGE fan of hers. He literally deleted tumblr for MONTHS after learning about shit bc he was devestated. I genuinely liked a lot of her you tube analyses.

I tried to genuinely explain transandrophobia to her bc a lot of people WERE being assholes without explaining shit, only to be fucking dismissed and have her followers harass me for ages.

image

Is the fact that she got banned when others who do similar bullshit dont transmisogyny? Yes. But saying she didn't deserve it is simply not true.

Not to mention comparing her social media account being banned to martyrdom when trans people are *literally* being killed everyday is just sickening.

rambling-crerchur
thetepes

I love the assumption we're all white straight cis skinny queens of means that's going on for some reason.

rambling-crerchur

I love being a trans woman that, while being accused of the same crime, the people that are crying over that are trying to drive to suicide. These anons are all from within the last day. There is so much more, so much more nasty stuff.

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

Am I somehow an acceptable target? Has my identity stopped mattering? We cant stand to see the pedophile that sent a 13 year old trans girl porn suspended on tumblr but we can justify trying to harass a transfem critic of said pedophile to death? You people are spineless cowards, hiding behind anons.

Try it. Search my blogs for slurs being used against Patricia, search for me suicide baiting anyone, search for me calling for anyones death, search for me supporting harrassment. You will find nothing, yet I am the villain it is morally justified to try to kill.

You will not get me to back down. I will not back down.

Anonymous asked:

hey, JSYK! your archive 0f patricia's post, linked in your "allegations of sexual harrassment and grooming" post and your masterpost, is down! i was off anon so i can show you the screenshot of the page im redirected to before it sends me to the trending topics page, but it won't send with the image, so just know it sends me to the "there's nothing here" before redirecting.

figured you'd want to know, at the very least. tschuss! have a very good day!<3

Which Archive? The only archive I see listed on there is her apology, and I can still see it on my end.

patricia taxxon anon ask
rambling-crerchur
rambling-crerchur

PDB on "transfem culture"

image

(Post/Archive [Images are sadly broken on the archive link])

The "culture" PDB claims isff "generated" is plain sexual harrassment. Bringing your kink, which forcefem very plainly is for isff, onto the SFW posts of total strangers is sexual harrassment, and I am tired of people not realizing this or even encouraging it. Yes, isff popularized this format of blog, but she neither invented it nor is there anything inherently transfem about it. They also do not give any sort of evidence for the claims he makes here. The claim that this is something people want to see her dead over to be able to take for themselves is entierely divorced from reality.

"we want transfems for the culture they generate for us and as soon as they're done we'll steal everything she's made and if she ever speaks up about the marginalization of transmisogynized people we'll harass her till she kills herself" @/isuggestforcefem is a poorly run kink blog that has proven herself to be extremely irresponsible and repulsive in the way kinks are discussed and handled. If that is "everything she has ever made" that is on her, not on people using a gimmick blog format she didnt even come up with.

What isuggestforcefem did contribute to the "culture", or at the very least heavily popularized, is the treatment of a forcefem kink and practicing said kink as political praxis. Let me be clear: Being into forcefem neither makes you a good or bad person. It is a morally neutral action that people get off to. It is not political, and making it so is extremely unhealthy. Due to its nature as a CNC (Consensual Non-Consent) kink, it needs proper discussions of exactly that: consent. This is not the case when reblogging a random post with "I have a suggestion" on the account "isuggestforcefem". In forcing her kink onto complete strangers, isff is sexually harrassing them.

And this is what PDB considers "transfem culture". Sexual harrassment as a blog gimmick. I myself am transfem, and the conflation of this and being transfem, and by extension transgender, is horrifying and disguisting to me. Over the past few years I have watched transfem spaces at large develop a culture where how kinky an individual is an how extreme/fringe said kinks are became a measure of someones moral value/integrity, which allows predatory individuals to openly proclaim their tendencies and even be praised for it out of the misguided assumption that to be progressive any and all kinky behaviour needs to be tolerated and supported. This is a large part of what Patricia Taxxon does and why she has such large backing within transfem spaces (there are other contributing factors, but this is one of the largest ones).

Now to cover my bases, I do need to add that the account in the screenshot is a violent transphobe spewing bizarre claims. I do not tolerate transphobia/other bigottry towards anyone even if they happen to be terrible people. The accounts url is @/isuggestbanningsexpests, and I encourage anyone reading this to block them.

pocket deer belly
rambling-crerchur

Anonymous asked:

hi sorry i wanted to ask if you had the screenshot of the post where pdb said something like. "masculinity is a prison why would you transition to being a man dont you see the bars of the cage" or something along those lines. or if i entirely imagined that. because i do not put it past pdb to have said that but i also do not doubt my ability to imagine something into existence (has hallucinations and false memories, but also will forget real things that actually happened). i just wanted to like... double check with someone else to be sure.

britts-galaxy-brain answered:

@hello-im-dog has it somewhere I think

rambling-crerchur

image

I also had it on my blog.

thank you crerchur!
transmascvash
hello-im-dog

Disclaimer: the original post was submitted by a user who wishes to remain anonymous.

As I mentioned previously in this post, Pocket-Deer-Belly not only holds a lot of contempt towards trans men, but towards masculinity in general

image
image
image
image

(Post)

image
image

(Post)

image

(Post)

PDB’s posts show a clear pattern of equating masculinity with toxicity and viewing it as inherently harmful rather than socially constructed. Their past comments about trans men reveal a bias that frames transmasculine identity as misguided or illegitimate, echoing TERF-like rhetoric.

Their arguments about gender are also inconsistent, condemning masculinity while claiming to critique essentialism.

PDB’s rhetoric reflects a transandrophobic narrative that claims to challenge patriarchy but instead undermines and invalidates trans men.

thestarbot

Wasn't this blog was calling out an racist pedophile or something, why your yapping about an fellow trans man rightfully criticizing his fellow trans men and how shitty and stupid y'all can be towards women

transmascvash

PDB not only ASSOCIATES VERY HEAVILY with said racist pedophile, but they are NOT A TRANS MAN. At the time many of their posts talking about transmasc people were made, they were identifying as a cis man.

Now they identify as nonbinary/"tma"/"transmisogynized" and use he/they, which is not the problem here. The problem is that they continue to talk about transmasc issues so frequently that people mistake them for a trans man, meaning that ACTUAL TRANSMASC PEOPLE are being shoved out of the discussion by someone who objectively cannot comment on transmasc issues from the perspective they are trying to.

image

That's on top of them talking over POC transmascs despite being white and being incredibly intersexist by saying that they don't care if CAGAB is an intersex-specific term related to genital mutilation, they wanna use it because they feel like it.

image
hello-im-dog

Well said, Vash.

PDB’s commentary has consistently come from outside the transmasc experience, which makes their claims about masculinity and trans men fundamentally misrepresentative. Positioning yourself as an authority on a group you aren’t part of, and using that position to generalize or “other” them, is bad. The screenshots above provide insight at how harmful PDB’s ideas can be.

On top of that, PDB heavily associates with PT, and the two often echo each other’s transphobic views. Together, they reinforce harmful rhetoric, push stereotypes about trans men, erase the lived experiences of actual trans men, and mirror patterns found in TERF discourse.

The focus of this blog is still very much on Patricia. As mentioned before, PDB is being discussed because he is a prominent figure in her circle, and he may come up again in future posts.

pocket deer belly long post

Disclaimer: the original post was submitted by a user who wishes to remain anonymous.

As I mentioned previously in this post, Pocket-Deer-Belly not only holds a lot of contempt towards trans men, but towards masculinity in general

image
image
image
image

(Post)

image
image

(Post)

image

(Post)

PDB’s posts show a clear pattern of equating masculinity with toxicity and viewing it as inherently harmful rather than socially constructed. Their past comments about trans men reveal a bias that frames transmasculine identity as misguided or illegitimate, echoing TERF-like rhetoric.

Their arguments about gender are also inconsistent, condemning masculinity while claiming to critique essentialism.

PDB’s rhetoric reflects a transandrophobic narrative that claims to challenge patriarchy but instead undermines and invalidates trans men.

pocket-deer-belly pocket-deer-boy transandrophobia transphobia postings cilantromixture

Anonymous asked:

(1/2) very disappointed w/ patricia & extremely disgusted. being a youtube-only viewer i was never, ever aware of these things happening around her tumblr - as i had only watched two videos of hers. one of them being the focus on dhmis and her experiences w/ aba, and how the show reminded her so much of her own experiences of autism, and another focusing on furry art, where she included a lot of it in her own music. then i roamed around, saw her tumblr posts. and was... - 🐛

"(2/2) exceedingly baffled by what her posts about coco, about the posts where her whole thing about... sexualizing incest dynamics? and being upfront w/ the noncon role-reversal shit, as well as the hypno-kink thing just... fucking baffled me. genuinely perplexing, like how is this the SAME person who made those pretty good videos + music? - 🐛"ALT
"(3/2) and then i read a lot more abt your posts + about how patricia's actions made it a better way for other pedos and grosser folks to be fine with what she's doing. it's just so goddamn disappointing because she could have genuinely like... i don't know. made an actual platform that could have protected nonwhites - queer and trans alike - but it's just fucking disgusting what she does. racist, transphobic AND she's fine w/ pedophilia + noncon? eugh. - 🐛"ALT
"(4/2) it's just disgusting. i've ended up losing a lot of respect for people like her who end up being so genuinely against what their own values should be that it's just a nosedive. anyways, thank you for archiving a lot of this stuff. hopefully you can get some cooldown and some time to breath bc eugh :( - 🐛"ALT

Apologies for the delayed response!

I completely understand how you feel. Many people first discovered Patricia through her videos and music, which made the reality of her behavior online even more troubling. It’s clear she tries to keep her Youtube audience separate to maintain a professional image, but seeing someone who once seemed thoughtful and creative engage in and normalize harmful behavior is really disheartening, especially when those same spaces often attract vulnerable people.

What makes it worse is how her platform ends up normalizing these ideas. It creates an environment where predatory individuals feel comfortable.

And thank you for the kind words! I’ll admit, running this blog has been a bit stressful at times, though I expected some pushback. Still, I’m glad it’s at least helping shed light Patricia’s actions. Please take care of yourself too!

patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture anon ask time
rambling-crerchur

velvetvexations asked:

Stop predatorjacketing trans women based on kinks or things they went through. It's really obvious you don't care about anything someone might have actually done wrong when you're lumping it in with complete bullshit that's both wildly transmisogynistic and terribly unpraxis even if they weren't trans women. Just be fucking normal.

britts-galaxy-brain answered:

At least you had the conviction to put your name on it.

“Unpraxis” to take a stand against manipulative bad actors in the community who have already victimized people and still are by trying to normalize things that should not be normalized (pedophilia and zoophilia). Fuckin wild sentence you threw at me.

It’s also “unChristian” to call out the pastor that abuses kids in the congregation, right?

It’s “killing the vibe” to not want to hang out with the person who took advantage of someone in their sleep, right?

“She’s so nice to me though”.

rambling-crerchur

Velvet.

Lily Orchard has credible rape accusations against her from her sibling. Did you take the time to listen to Courtney recounting what Lily did to them before saying this? Did you look at how Lily tried to catfish and pressure Britt into being in a relationship with her while still presenting as a cis guy? Did you look at the vile things Lily was saying while masquerading as "Tara Callie", the actions she claimed to have committed under that name? Did you know she knowingly flashed a minor on her stream? Did you see the mountain of evidence of her grooming Ginger? The horrifying twisting of the abuse Courtney suffered at her hands into her own fictional victimhood at the hand of Courtney? Did you see ANY of this and then decide to say this?

Or did you not even bother to check before being confidently wrong out of a knee jerk reaction to any trans woman potentially being a terrible person, the capacity for which we have like every other human being?

Did you not see Patricia sending a 13 year old trans girl furry porn, a young girl she would then go on to harrass and dogpile alongside her fans? Her encouragement of minors to secretly enter NSFW spaces and to engage sexually with adults? Her framing of grooming as something that can happen accidentally? Her twisting a minor being in a relationship with an adult as a way of getting agency? Does all that mean nothing to you?

Are you so blinded by your own fears and biases that you cannot see the cold truths of reality because of that? Or is there another reason for you jumping in to defend these people?

This attitude will see the transfem community and by extension both trans and queer spaces in general become dangerous to those members of the community we should protect the most, those who are underage and those who have been victimized before.

And I didnt even touch on the mountain of other horrendous things these two women that I used as examples here have done. I restricted myself to the predatory behaviour they exhibit. Were I to talk about the racism, transphobia and other bigottry these people have engaged in we would be here for much longer.

This is indistinguishable rhetoric from Patricia stans herself. I expected better from someone like you.

long post
rambling-crerchur

Anonymous asked:

PT needs to keep anything concerning race out of her cracker mouth forever. as a white person it's not her place to speak on most of these things in the first place and what she does say is pretty much always racist and disgusting. examples:

  1. "when black autistics realize their power the west will fall" (????) (paraphrased)
  2. "i can't have white privilege, I'm trans!"
  3. SS-comparisons...
  4. "wanting reparations" for... people taking her words at face value or something?? (as a recent anon pointed out)
  5. comparing slaves to animals ("sentient property" in her words, yikes), excusing it with "the slave owners did it first" as if that makes it okay (or makes any sense at all)

and the list goes on.

rambling-crerchur answered:

.

spottedsnaggletooth
hello-im-dog

I received a response to this post, but it looks like I was blocked before I could reply.

magi-official:  "High, so, like, your pro minors telling people their minors, putting big signs up saying “im under the age of 18” and that will definitely keep them safe.  Yeah yeah yeah, because when WE do purity culture it will work this time, and those pure sweet innocent teens will finnaly be shielded from all that porn that they actively searched for. And its the scary interney weirdos who are the problem(don’t actually look at statistics)  Honestly, if you cared about safety you would be championing education of the youth, and healthy communication with guardians, instead all you wanna do is punch at the goddamed marbleblast lady.  To all the minors out there, don’t tell people shit about yourself, find people you can actually communicate with if something happens, block frequently and often, and don’t join bandwagons hating on trans people for fucks sake."ALT

Hi.

This is not about “purity culture.” Wanting minors to stay out of adult sexual spaces is a matter of safety. Purity culture focuses on controlling consenting adults and their sexuality, while this conversation centers on protecting people who cannot legally or developmentally consent from being exposed to harm. A teenager looking for NSFW content out of curiosity is not the issue. The problem arises when adults encourage or indulge that curiosity instead of maintaining boundaries. Adults are always the ones responsible for creating and enforcing those boundaries, not minors. No one is saying I support minors revealing their age in a way that increases their risk of harm.

Education and safety can exist alongside boundaries. Trusted adults teaching teens about sexuality and consent means giving them the tools to recognize unsafe situations and understand what healthy boundaries look like, not exposing them to adult sexual environments. Encouraging minors to lie about their age removes the safeguards meant to protect both minors and adult creators, putting everyone at risk. Adults should model responsible behavior by upholding those protections instead of telling minors to bypass them.

The statistics you showed on child sexual abuse show just exactly how real and pervasive these risks are.

"Facts and Stats About Child Sexual Abuse  The Facts are Staggering:      There are more than 42 million survivors of sexual abuse in America. (National Association of Adult Survivors of Child Abuse)     1 in 3 girls are sexually abused before the age of 18. (The Advocacy Center)     1 in 5 boys are sexually abused before the age of 18. (The Advocacy Center)     1 in 5 children are solicited sexually while on the Internet before the age of 18. (National Children’s Alliance: Nationwide Child Abuse Statistics)     30% of sexual abuse is never reported. (Child Sex Abuse Prevention and Protection Center)     Nearly 70% of all reported sexual assaults (including assaults on adults) occur to children age 17 and under. (Children’s Advocacy Center)     90% of child sexual abuse victims know the perpetrator in some way. (U.S. Department of Justice)     Approximately 20% of the victims of sexual abuse are under age eight. (Broward County)     95% of sexual abuse is preventable through education. (Child Molestation Research and Prevention Institute)     38% of the sexual abusers of boys are female. (Broward County)     There is worse lasting emotional damage when a child’s sexual abuse started before the age of six, and lasted for several years. Among child and teen victims of sexual abuse there is a 42 percent increased chance of suicidal thoughts during adolescence. (American Counseling Association)     “More than 90% of individuals with a developmental delay or disability will be sexually assaulted at least once in their lifetime.” (Valenti-Heim, D.m Schwartz L.)     “There are nearly half a million registered sex offenders in the U.S. – 80,000 to 100,000 of them are missing.” (The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children)     “A typical pedophile will commit 117 sexual crimes in a lifetime.” (National Sex Offenders Registry)  View and download a list of sexual abuse facts and statistics.  Remember…  Child abuse occurs at every socioeconomic level, across ethnic and cultural lines, within all religions and at all levels of education, but 95% of abuse is preventable through education and awareness."ALT

(Source)

These numbers illustrate that minors are extremely vulnerable and cannot consent to sexual situations with adults. Encouraging minors to access adult sexual spaces puts them at direct risk of abuse.

When someone with a platform encourages minors to enter adult spaces, that’s a serious issue regardless of who they are. You can value youth education, oppose purity culture, and still believe adults have a duty to keep sexual spaces age restricted.

spottedsnaggletooth

Here is an actual relevant source in regards to the effects of early (online) pornographic exposure. It is a report corroborating the outcomes of multiple studies, the link to the pdf is partway down the page.

Their chosen source is clearly hoping to play on the fact that a large percentage of (reported!) CSA is perpetrated by people the survivor knows. Beyond them ignoring that it also literally cites the issues of online perpetration, there is nothing in this list here regarding COCSA which my linked article also tackles in regards to the influence of what’s depicted in what they’re exposed to

good addition thank you!

Pocket-Deer-Belly

While I want to keep the main focus of this blog on Patricia, one notable figure in her circle is pocket-deer-belly, also known as PDB.

Screenshot of pocket-deer-belly's blog.  Title: "What Do I Do With All The Gold On My Fingers"  Bio: "'m Deer | 25 | He/they | transmisogynized | Maid of Light | a day without trans women is like a day without sunshine | I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm Deer I'm"ALT

PDB has a significant following on Tumblr, is a close friend of Patricia, and is one of her more vocal defenders.

When Patricia was let go from Jules’ film, PBD made several comments:

image
image

(Source) (Source)

pocket-deer-belly:  "imagine getting someone to do labor for free (while she is under the impression that she's a contract worker) (which is how you typically refer to a paid position) and then when she refuses to pay for your fucking film festival circuit cause she did the labor for free (while she is under the impression that they're a contract worker) (you took advantage of her lack of knowledge and experience in the industry) (you took advantage of the fact that she did not argue her worth from the start and then blamed her for not getting paid (by you)) you spin up a fucking callout post against her (the "contract worker" you don't want to pay for) and then have the gall to call HER unproffessional (for refusing to pay for your advertising budget) (and for her getting mad that she didn't get paid and you took advantage of her) and then just to top it off you call her feminist stances some anti-man ruse as a slight against you specifically (to get you to pay money) (which you do actually owe her)"  pocket-deer-belly reblogs:  "and that's your professional film debut"ALT

(Source)

PDB’s response misrepresents Jules’ statement by portraying the situation as labor exploitation, even though the collaboration was an unpaid creative partnership among friends. Jules explicitly stated that no guaranteed payment would be provided, as In Your Orbit was a student project, and any potential festival winnings would be split among contributors. Patricia was aware of and agreed to this arrangement. Claiming that Jules “took advantage” of Patricia ignores this context and falsely reframes a mutual creative agreement as wage theft, which the evidence Jules provided does not support.

In Summer 2025, PDB also faced controversy for making transphobic remarks about trans men, claiming they inherently have more privilege than trans women.

pocket-deer-belly:  "we can't even get a basic "all men structurally benefit from a misogynist society" to pass on this website without a bunch of queer men shooting themselves into a panic cause they get too uncomfortable about the idea of being culpable to self"  pocket-deer-belly:  "i don't see how i benefit from patriarchy as a trans man" yeah that's the problem, it's invisible to you, you should fix that"ALT

(Source)

pocket-deer-belly:  "trans men have access to male privilege, just like any other group of queer men. this is the heinously transphobic take that people have been hounding me over btw. like when you see people call me transphobic this is what they're talking about"  pocket-deer-belly reblogs:  "i'm sick of sugarcoating this shit. denying this fact requires you to believe that trans men as a whole, or specific trans men NEVER pass or are taken seriously as their stated gender (not true, especially in queer or online spaces), are never treated preferentially to trans women (come the fuck on), or aren't men."ALT
pocket-deer-belly reblogs again:  "even when trans men are not believed about their identities as men they still hold a relative privilege over trans women. like, being treated as a "real woman", as transphobic as that is, is still a privileged position over the inescapable box of being a "fake woman" "deceiver" "invader into women's spaces" that trans women are placed into."ALT

(for some context: at the time PDB identified as a cis man)

(Source)

By saying that “trans men have male privilege,” pocket-deer-belly implies that trans men are treated the same as cis men, when in reality trans men are still scrutinized, marginalized, and discriminated against as trans people. Claiming they have the same privilege erases these experiences and suggests that their oppression disappears once they identify or “pass” as male. Framing trans men as inherently more privileged than trans women creates a false hierarchy within the trans community, turning trans identity into a competition over who faces more discrimination instead of acknowledging that trans men and trans women experience different but equally real forms of oppression.

It’s important to note that PBD likely felt comfortable making these claims because of his close friendship with Patricia, who is also known for being hostile toward trans men.

but, please don’t take him seriously.

In a now deleted post, PDB said this:

image

Their statement after facing backlash:

pocket-deer-belly:  "people only pass around screenshots of what you've said when it's convenient i think. people had to actively bait me to say something negative about transmascs but when they want to zoojacket me they just have to show the one screenshot and expect that to speak for itself."  pocket-deer-belly:  "my real opinions on both of these subjects have to be flattened but "he's a zoophile" is much easier to try to catch on and spuriously "prove" with a screenshot than "he doesn't think trans men are oppressed" which is like, very evidently not true from anything i've actually said. so they don't really provide screenshots for that as much"ALT

(Source)

Saying “I love you zoos” is an endorsement of abuse. Calling zoophilia an “illegal kink” trivializes what is actually non-consensual and criminal behavior toward animals. Pocket-deer-belly claims they were “baited” into saying something negative about transmascs, but this is just a form of deflection. Their response to backlash shifts blame to others rather than taking accountability for what they said. Bringing up to unrelated discourse about trans men only minimizes the seriousness of their own words and actions.

Also, PDB seems rather unconcerned about minors accessing their page.

image

(Source)

Their statements ignore the responsibility adults have when minors engage with adult-oriented content. Claiming that minors “follow at your own risk” or are “old enough to make that decision” overlooks that minors cannot legally or developmentally consent to sexualized material. Adults are responsible for setting and enforcing boundaries to protect vulnerable users online, rather than shifting the blame onto minors. Saying minors are “not even following” does not address the larger problem of encouraging or passively allowing access to content that can harm them.

There’s honestly a lot more to say, but I’ll leave it here for now.

pocket-deer-belly pocket-deer-boy patricia taxxon anti patricia taxxon cilantromixture transandrophobia