We use cookies to tailor your experience and present relevant ads. By clicking “Accept”, you agree that cookies can be placed per our Privacy Policy
ACCEPT
Advertisement

Was Kim Keon-hee the catalyst for South Korea’s martial law crisis?

Prosecutors now suspect ex-president Yoon’s martial law gambit was a desperate bid to shield his interfering wife from looming prison time

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
1
Listen
Advertisement
discover more stories from
Advertisement
Browse other locations
China
Asia
North America
Middle East
Europe
Russia and Central Asia
Oceania
Africa
Americas and Caribbean
NEWSLETTEREvery Monday
Pressing stories and in-depth analysis from the Asia region.  
By submitting, you consent to receiving marketing emails from SCMP. If you don't want these, tick here
By registering, you agree to ourT&CandPrivacy Policy
Before you go
scmp poll
Advertisement
Yoon Suk-yeol and Kim Keon-hee attend a dinner in Madrid, Spain, in 2022. Photo: Handout
A mounting series of corruption and influence-peddling allegations against South Korea’s former first lady, Kim Keon-hee, is fuelling accusations that an unelected figure exerted unlawful control over state affairs.
Investigators and analysts alike now question whether Kim leveraged her proximity to the presidency to meddle in personnel appointments and criminal investigations – including one targeting herself – and may even have influenced her husband Yoon Suk-yeol’s ill-fated martial law gambit.
It has long been suspected that Kim was behaving as if she were at the apex of power
Ha Sang-bok, political-science professor

The picture emerging from recent disclosures is of a shadow power centre that distorted South Korea’s official chain of command and blurred the line between private interests and public office.

Prosecutors have unearthed evidence indicating Kim intervened last year to shut down an inquiry into her own corruption case and in 2023 accepted a French luxury handbag, valued at 2.6 million won (US$1,800), from the wife of the leader of Yoon’s then ruling People Power Party – prompting accusations of brazen favour trading.

“It has long been suspected that Kim was behaving as if she were at the apex of power,” Ha Sang-bok, a political-science professor at Mokpo National University, told This Week in Asia.

He said the former first lady had “seriously undermined” the official chain of command during Yoon’s time in office, adding: “She has set an example for the roles of a first lady that went awry.”

Kim Keon-hee (centre) attends her first trial hearing on corruption charges at Seoul Central District Court on September 24. Photo: AFP
Kim Keon-hee (centre) attends her first trial hearing on corruption charges at Seoul Central District Court on September 24. Photo: AFP
Among the most damning evidence is a message Kim sent in May last year to then justice minister Park Sung-jae, inquiring about the status of investigations into her alleged involvement in corruption and stock manipulation.

The message was sent just one day after the Justice Ministry suddenly replaced the investigative team handling her case – an extraordinary reshuffle that critics say neutered the inquiry and shielded Kim from scrutiny.

Kim’s legal team has insisted the personnel changes were routine and “in accordance with established principles”. Opposition lawmakers are unconvinced.

South Korean President Lee Jae-myung and his wife Kim Hea-kyung arrive back in South Korea on Wednesday following a state visit overseas. Photo: Yonhap/EPA
South Korean President Lee Jae-myung and his wife Kim Hea-kyung arrive back in South Korea on Wednesday following a state visit overseas. Photo: Yonhap/EPA
Seo Young-kyo, a senior lawmaker from President Lee Jae-myung’s ruling Democratic Party of Korea, said the new evidence confirmed long-held suspicions.

“Exactly as we have suspected, Kim Keon-hee was commanding it all,” Seo said in a social media video, demanding full accountability.

After the reshuffle, prosecutors quietly dropped Kim’s case following an off-the-record interrogation at a safe house. Officials were reportedly asked to surrender their mobile phones before entering – a security step that, once revealed, triggered public outrage and reinforced perceptions of a cover-up.

Special prosecutors are also investigating whether the former justice minister provided Kim with confidential information on a separate investigation into her alleged role in manipulating People Power Party candidate selections for the 2022 by-election – another potential instance of an informal, personalised command network operating outside official protocols.

On Tuesday, Deputy Special Prosecutor Park Ji-young confirmed that investigators were looking into whether the widening scandal around Kim had contributed to Yoon’s decision to declare martial law, potentially as a way to protect her from legal jeopardy.
South Korea lifts president’s martial law decree after lawmakers vote against it

Yoon has been charged with masterminding an “insurrection” over what prosecutors call a self-coup attempt, while several of his top aides – including the justice minister and senior military commanders – also face criminal charges.

During Yoon’s impeachment hearing in February, former chief of Seoul Metropolitan Police Kim Bong-sik testified that the president had cited unspecified “family matters” when explaining his martial law plan.

Kim recalled being summoned to a safe house three hours before the decree where Yoon railed against “pro-North Korean leftists” and the opposition-controlled National Assembly – cryptically referring to a “family issue” he did not detail amid the tirade.

Both Yoon and Kim Keon-hee are now in custody, standing trial on a litany of charges: Yoon for abusing his authority and leading the failed coup, Kim for multiple counts of corruption and influence peddling.

On Wednesday, prosecutors demanded a 15-year prison sentence for former prime minister Han Duck-soo for his role in supporting Yoon’s martial law imposition – the first sentencing recommendation among dozens of defendants in the coup case.

South Korea’s then president Yoon Suk-yeol enjoys a glass of wine during a state dinner at the White House in 2023. Photo: Yonhap/dpa
South Korea’s then president Yoon Suk-yeol enjoys a glass of wine during a state dinner at the White House in 2023. Photo: Yonhap/dpa

Drunk on power

A total of 15 people have so far been arrested and charged over the corruption and stock manipulation scandals surrounding Kim. A verdict on her alleged stock rigging, bribery and election interference could come as early as January, with Yoon’s ruling expected the following month.

Yoon was impeached and removed from office over the attempted martial-law power grab, paving the way for a snap presidential election in June that brought Lee Jae-myung to power. The trials now under way will help determine whether that political reckoning is matched by a decisive legal one.

Meanwhile, Democratic Party lawmaker Yoon Kun-young has accused the former president of dereliction of duty, alleging that Yoon Suk-yeol was so inebriated during an intelligence briefing in February 2023 that he had to be carried out by security staff.

The lawmaker also revived claims that Yoon used decoy convoys to create the appearance of punctuality, while secretly arriving late via an underground tunnel and using a sauna to recover from hangovers.

Yoon’s legal team has not responded to these allegations.

Advertisement
Park Chan-kyong
Park Chan-kyong is a journalist covering South Korean affairs for the South China Morning Post. He previously worked at the Agence France-Presse's Seoul bureau for 35 years. He studied political science at Korea University and economics at the Yonsei University Graduate School.
Advertisement
Advertisement

South Korea’s Yoon planned to capture, kill political rivals: court

In shock testimony, a former commander claims Yoon Suk-yeol ordered political rivals captured so he could ‘shoot and kill them all’ himself

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
9
Listen
Advertisement
Posters displaying images of Yoon Suk-yeol calling for his ousting are seen in Seoul on December 5, 2024, days after his declaration of martial law. Photo: AFP
South Korea’s most dramatic political trial in decades took an extraordinary turn on Monday when a former special forces commander testified that Yoon Suk-yeol had directed the capture of political opponents so the ex-president could “shoot and kill them all” himself.

The claim, delivered under oath at the Seoul Central District Court, stunned the chamber – marking a pivotal moment in a case testing the resilience of the country’s democratic institutions against the re-emergence of authoritarian impulses once thought buried.

Analysts say the revelation has deepened a sense of national reckoning over Yoon’s failed attempt to impose martial law last December and threatens to undermine his defence against insurrection charges.
Advertisement
Advertisement

Malaysian PM’s war on corruption hits snag as top political secretary quits

The senior aide allegedly demanded bribes in the form of home renovations, a massage chair and washing machines

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
0
Listen
Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin resigned on Tuesday. Photo: Handout
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s anti-graft drive has suffered a setback after a senior aide resigned over corruption claims, piling pressure on a leader already accused of abusing power and putting his ruling party at risk of rupture.
Anti-corruption authorities previously mounted a high-profile crackdown against two-time former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, his family and close associates – long seen as untouchables – as part of Anwar’s pledge to dismantle top-level corruption under his watch.

But since he declared war on corruption in 2023, Anwar’s campaign has hit numerous snags, fuelling doubts over his ability to eradicate a scourge that has cost Malaysia billions of dollars.

Anwar’s senior political secretary, Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin, announced on Tuesday that he had resigned to “defend myself” against attacks linked to issues that could “harm the image of the government”.

Shamsul did not specify the nature of the attacks, but his resignation came just hours after claims surfaced that he had allegedly received more than 600,000 ringgit (US$144,600) in bribes from a businessman linked to a mining scandal in Sabah state.

On Wednesday, Anwar said he had accepted Shamsul’s resignation and stressed that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) “is free” to conduct an immediate investigation without any external interference.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x