▶What type of poster do you hate the most????? Chud 35 minutes ago №13100030[Quote] [Voice Chat]>>13100033

▶Don Turtelli 35 minutes ago №13100033[Quote]

>>13100030 (OP)
webp posters are aryans

▶Chud 35 minutes ago №13100035[Quote]>>13100040

Stripped namefile

▶Poopson 35 minutes ago №13100040[Quote]

>>13100035
Found the glowie

▶Chud 34 minutes ago №13100046[Quote]

Marge, why do we hate these groups?

▶Dr. Fauci BUMP! 34 minutes ago №13100053[Quote]

.gif is gud o algo

▶Chud 34 minutes ago №13100054[Quote]>>13100057>>13100111

Imagine being this much of a petty faggot to unironically care about other people's filenames kek

▶Wewjak 34 minutes ago №13100055[Quote]

unix filename posters

▶Spadeson 34 minutes ago №13100057[Quote]

>>13100054
gegegegeggegegegg

▶Unknown 32 minutes ago №13100073[Quote]>>13100128>>13100350

webpfags lost

▶Cobson 32 minutes ago №13100074[Quote]

descriptive filename cisoids won

▶Chud 32 minutes ago №13100080[Quote]

Don’t dislike any of 'em

▶Coinjak 30 minutes ago №13100098[Quote]

clitboard won btw

▶Chud 30 minutes ago №13100102[Quote]>>13100423

Don't Hate Webpfags

▶Chud 30 minutes ago №13100103[Quote]

Screenshotposting won

▶Fatjak 30 minutes ago №13100107[Quote]

Hi I'm cisgender

▶Cobson 30 minutes ago №13100111[Quote]>>13100170

>>13100054
It sometimes reveals something about the poster. For instance IMG_NUMBER = it's a phonetoddler, so you know he won't be able to see or do stuff that a computer user would, like for example he might be unable to read text in an image because it's """for ants""" from his perspective due to his tiny screen. And if he's behaving in a particularly retarded way, then him being a phonetoddler is unsurprising and (at least partially) explains his retardation.

▶Brandon 29 minutes ago №13100128[Quote]

▶Chud 25 minutes ago №13100170[Quote]>>13100332

>>13100111
Okay that's one, how are the other options bad?

▶Chud 23 minutes ago №13100199[Quote]

Definitely Clitboarders and IMG niggers

▶Glibblezorpson 23 minutes ago №13100202[Quote]

No one. Content of the image matters

▶Chud BUMP! 15 minutes ago №13100298[Quote]>>13100323

why does anyone hate webp more than people who screenshot jaks instead of downloading them?

▶Chud 12 minutes ago №13100323[Quote]

>>13100298
WebP compression is harder to decode than GIF's LZW compression. I am shit at programming o algo

▶Jacobson BUMP! 11 minutes ago №13100332[Quote]>>13100357>>13100401

>>13100170
<turd-space
• "webp" in practice (it doesn't need to mean this, but 99.9999% of the time it does) means the poster took an already-lossy image like a jpg and then converted it to webp which further reduced the quality and he's posting that inferior quality version instead of the more-original and higher-quality jpg that he used as the source image to make the webp file. A webp file can of course be created manually from a lossless source, but nobody does that. In practice webp = recompressed from an already-lossy source.
<poo-space
• "Screenshot" (as in filenames that say "Screenshot" and then usually followed by a timestamp) is only acceptable if it's an actual screenshot of say a web page or of a paused video or something like that. But often the "Screenshot" poster is just lazily taking a fucking screenshot of pictures in order to show the picture… instead of posting the fucking picture. That's giga retarded behavior.
<fart-space
• ClipboardImage means the poster isn't uploading the original files directly.
<shart-space
• twatter/plebbit filenames means the poster is a twatterer/plebbitor, or at best sourced his image from twatter/plebbit which almost always means it's a low quality version of some higher quality source (twatter/plebbit destroys the quality of images), the only exception to this quality issue being if the image in question was originally uploaded to twatter/plebbit and never existed anywhere else previously but usually that's no the case. But anyway, the poster being a plebbitor/twatter / someone who browses either site / cares about either site, that's the worst aspect of such a poster.

▶Chud 9 minutes ago №13100350[Quote]

>>13100073
Tumblr fag

▶Chud 8 minutes ago №13100354[Quote]>>13100372

▶Unknown 8 minutes ago №13100357[Quote]>>13100423

>>13100332
Nobody converts their images to webp soicuck

▶Chud 7 minutes ago №13100372[Quote]>>13100388

>>13100354
You should kill yourself xitter nigger go back to xitter

▶Chud 6 minutes ago №13100388[Quote]

>>13100372
Im not from xitter doe

▶Chud 4 minutes ago №13100401[Quote]

>>13100332
And the webp posters, most of them are phoneposters and they're posting webp not because they're sitting there thinking "yeah i'm gonna convert this to webp before i post" — but rather their phones, or the "apps" they're using, is doing that conversion automatically for them without them even thinking about it or them even knowing what webp is etc… so in other words they're toddlers; they're not converting to webp by choice, it's something that's happening TO THEM - as in their phone is just doing it by itself, and they don't even consider the consequences (the loss of quality).

▶Chud 3 minutes ago №13100404[Quote]

▶Chud 2 minutes ago №13100423[Quote]

>>13100357
webp posters are rare but they've started to appear more and more often, here's one: >>13100102 — that was originally a gif.