Your post is incredibly misleading to your readers. Like the CEDAW committee, my reports and recommendations carry an authoritative weight. My reports are not merely "personal" views. The CEDAW committee's recommendations are also authoritative. Our respective views and recommendations are not however binding in the strict sense of the word though States are encouraged to follow them.
As a mandate holder I must use international and regional law and am in a position to weigh in on the objective and meaning of international treaties and definition of State obligations towards women and girls. I also do recognize that women and girls should not be discriminated against on any grounds including their gender identity and sexual orientation and specifically spoke to the discrimination faced by lesbian women, and women who do not identify as female (otherwise referred to more loosely as "transmen" or "nonbinary" women). These women also fall under the scope of the CEDAW convention.