Welcome to Reddit.

Where a community about your favorite things is waiting for you.
Become a Redditor
and subscribe to one of thousands of communities.
×
0
0
0
Title. It’s hard for me to tell whether or not it’s satirical or not. I get the hate for people who make porn, don’t get me wrong, but what’s with the hate for LGBT people?
all 48 comments
[–]ILaffAtEdgeLords 21 points22 points23 points  (11 children)
Men cannot become women and women cannot become men no matter how much shit they pump into their veins or how much they have their groin flesh resculpted. The trans epidemic is a result of mental illness exacerbated by pornography.
[–]ketchupbeaver[S] comment score below threshold-20 points-19 points-18 points  (10 children)
how is it a mental illness and how the fuck does it tie into porn
[–]ILaffAtEdgeLords 12 points13 points14 points  (9 children)
How is gender dysphoria not a mental illness? People literally believing their physical body is wrong and mutilating it to conform to their broken picture of themselves? It's sad really.
Alot of male to female trans folk are porn addicts. Porn fucks with your brain chemistry pretty extensively.
[–]ketchupbeaver[S] comment score below threshold-15 points-14 points-13 points  (8 children)
A lot doesn’t mean all. I let people do what makes them happy
[–]ILaffAtEdgeLords 12 points13 points14 points  (7 children)
Oh yeah? If someone was absolutely convinced eating glass would make them happy, you wouldn't try to stop them, or at the very least warn them, before they stick a spoonful of broken glass into their mouths?
[–]ketchupbeaver[S] comment score below threshold-13 points-12 points-11 points  (6 children)
Nobody thinks like that
[–]ILaffAtEdgeLords 10 points11 points12 points  (4 children)
Plenty of mentally ill people do things that are harmful to themselves thinking it will make them happy.
[–]ketchupbeaver[S] -1 points0 points1 point  (3 children)
Fair, but how does that tie into transgender people. There’s a difference between doing something actually harmful (eating glass), and changing your body to fit the other gender
[–]ILaffAtEdgeLords 12 points13 points14 points  (0 children)
You really think chopping up perfectly functional genitalia into a non-functional frankenstein creation is healthy? You think pumping yourself full of artificial hormones is healthy?
[–]Arabic-Billie-Eilish 6 points7 points8 points  (0 children)
I agree, eating glass is temporarily and less degenerated.
[–]suthrak 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
Eating glass is probably less harmful considering the suicide rate of trans people.
[–]dudeimsosmartlmao 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
WOW STOP GLASS SHAMING YOU FUCKING NAZI.
[–]ThatCoconut 12 points13 points14 points  (1 child)
Is or is not the entire idea behind LGBT, how you identify who or what you want or prefer to coooom with?
So it's basically an entire movement around Coooooom preference.
Is it not?
[–]mmseger 10 points11 points12 points  (2 children)
Why would a sub dedicated to opposing insidious degeneracy not like an insidious, degenerate social movement? Got me, pal. The internet is full of mysteries.
[–]WeeklyWinter5 10 points11 points12 points  (25 children)
Why does this sub seem to dislike lgbt people?
Because they are degenerates.
[–]WeeklyWinter5 15 points16 points17 points  (23 children)
  • homosexuals are extremely promiscuous. This is proven by their disproportionately high rates of STDs and HIV.
  • transgenders are mentally unsound. They don't understand that dresses, make up and surgery will not change their gender.
  • the LGBT community openly display their degeneracy in parades.
  • they spread propaganda to kids to recruit them. They are directly responsible for the drag kid phenomenon of the last few years.
[–]Arabic-Billie-Eilish 10 points11 points12 points  (0 children)
And LGBT people are 5 times more likely to be pedophile.
[–]cucks_hate_lolis 3 points4 points5 points  (0 children)
Agreed. Fags are disgusting, they brainwash children into rejecting males who could save western values. Children are sacred, take them away from lgbt and liberal degeneracy
[–]dudeimsosmartlmao 3 points4 points5 points  (0 children)
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
[–]WeeklyWinter5 3 points4 points5 points  (10 children)
I'm not playing the Reddit "source" game with you. Just type in keywords into Google search and do your own research.
[–]ketchupbeaver[S] 0 points1 point2 points  (9 children)
I’ll consider your claim baseless then. Just because some people in a community act a certain way, doesn’t mean that it speaks for the community as a whole
[–]WeeklyWinter5 4 points5 points6 points  (8 children)
I’ll consider your claim baseless then
Your opinions are irrelevant. It is a well documented fact that faggots have disproportionately high rates of HIV and that trannies are several times more likely to be mentally ill and suicidal. Look it up yourself. I'm not going to spoon-feed you.
Just because some people in a community act a certain way, doesn’t mean that it speaks for the community as a whole
The community as a whole refuse to condemned those particular faggots who are getting kids involved with LGBT. So it follows that we hold the entire community responsible.
[–]ketchupbeaver[S] 1 point2 points3 points  (7 children)
How is the LGBT community getting kids involved in it?
Saying something is a well known fact means shit when you can’t back it up. Also the repeated derogatory language is unnecessary and really gives me an impression that this is a homophobic sub
[–]WeeklyWinter5 4 points5 points6 points  (6 children)
How is the LGBT community getting kids involved in it?
Just Google "kids at LGBT parade" and "Desmond is amazing" and see for yourself. The LGBT community has never condemned or shunned the particular LGBT individuals getting kids involved in LGBT stuff, so it proves that the community as a whole approve of it.
Saying something is a well known fact means shit when you can’t back it up.
I'll say it again. I'm not playing the "source" game with you. Even if I were to post relevant links, I have no guarantee that you will actually read it, instead of handwaving it away as pro-lgbt people always do on Reddit.
If you're being honest here, just know that the facts on fag gay HIV rates and tranny suicide rates can be looked up in mere seconds. It's up to you to do your own research. Maybe you don't want to look it up because you're afraid you'll have to revise your entire worldview. Not my problem.
[–]ketchupbeaver[S] -1 points0 points1 point  (5 children)
“Kids at LGBT parade?” Are you shitting me right now? How in anyway is a kid going to a pride parade bad? How old are we talking here anyway? If they are teens then you’re wrong, but if their younger I kinda see your point
Maybe those statistics are true. Knowing them won’t change my worldview. You really think every gay person has HIV? It’s not going to make me have a problem with them 🤷‍♂️ HIV isn’t some shit only gay people can get
[–][deleted]  (7 children)
[deleted]
    [–]ketchupbeaver[S] 2 points3 points4 points  (6 children)
    Nice assumption there bud. Also was that derogatory language really necessary. This is just proving my point, that you people just hate the lgbt community
    [–]cucks_hate_lolis -1 points0 points1 point  (5 children)
    the fact still stands. You libtards are "against pedophilia" just because you are in favor of white genocide
    [–]ketchupbeaver[S] 1 point2 points3 points  (2 children)
    When will you stop assuming I’m a liberal? I’d like a source on the “white genocide” thing. I do not believe for a second that anybody actually wants that.
    [–]nappiestapparatus 0 points1 point2 points  (1 child)
    The guy above is a pedo defending moron and this sub is full of literal Nazis, but there's definitely a white genocide fetish and it's vile. NSFW:
    [–]ketchupbeaver[S] 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
    Hm. Thanks for at least not being toxic. I do agree a fetish that has to with any genocide at all is horrible
    [–]HingustheBungus -1 points0 points1 point  (1 child)
    Kids aren't fertile, moron. Plus, I think the lefties would be more accepting of your filth.
    [–]cucks_hate_lolis 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
    I think the lefties would be more accepting of your filth.
    They aren't. They are pro white genocide. Right wing subs are more based, I thought we areed on this, I am baffled that we are now suddenly backpedaling and pretend we are not woke just to not be attacked by the left. We are not cowards
    [–]ezulo 4 points5 points6 points  (0 children)
    The issue imo is that the LGBT movement is rampant in intentionally sexually deviant behavior, and they are more than happy to expose that behavior to children. One only needs to go to a pride parade in any city to see this unfold.
    The other main problem is that by giving leeway to these movements instead of pushing against them from a morally absolute stance, you are jeopardizing the integrity of the family unit on which the strength of this society is founded upon. The LGBT movement has only been promoting more promiscuous lifestyles and this along with ideas pushed via the media has made waves into the mainstream. More promiscuity means higher divorce rates, more children growing up in unstable families, higher rates of failure into adulthood.
    The -T part of the movement is its own animal. I suppose ultimately what it boils down to is what you believe the rationale for men wanting to become women is (because let's face it, they greatly outnumber females who choose to become males): are they being honest with themselves about their identifying as women, or is it a coping mechanism for having failed as men when faced with hardship? Seeing as the majority of trans "women" in my anecdotal experience began feeling dysphoric through exposure to porn, I'm inclined to believe the latter. It follows that normalization and celebration of the trans phenomenon is a harmful thing: dysphoria is a consequence of an unsound mind, not the cause of it, and the treatment these poor men prescribe for themselves has irreversible, debilitating consequences. I wouldn't wish my worst enemy to go down that path, God forbid my own children. And not long from now it will be all too common for governments to coerce you into putting your child through hormone replacement therapy.
    I uses to think about the issue in a similar light. I had no qualms about LGBT identifying people aside from thinking two men holding hands is aesthetically icky. They aren't hurting anyone, so why should I care?
    Well, considering they as a movement are pushing regressive, self destructive ideals on the society that my children will inherit, it becomes my business.
    Long story short I am sick of this incessant faggotry.
    [–]john03-16 3 points4 points5 points  (0 children)
    Siri, how many sex partners do the average gay men have.
    [–]HingustheBungus 2 points3 points4 points  (2 children)
    If homosexuals kept to monogamy and stayed together mostly platonically like the ideal nuclear family, i'd be fine with it. Unfortunately, that is clearly not the case.
    [–]ketchupbeaver[S] -1 points0 points1 point  (1 child)
    So what if they don’t want to be in a platonic relationship? Not everybody wants to live in the outdated image of what a family “should” be
    [–]HingustheBungus -1 points0 points1 point  (0 children)
    Then how come poly marriages always look like this
    [–]tfwrobot -1 points0 points1 point  (0 children)

    LGBdroptheT