/meta/ - >this gets you banned for rule 1 ==GEEEEEEEEEG DO RAGETRANNY…

archived 14 Jul 2024 16:57:57 UTC

/meta/ - Meta

Complain about the party here


[New Reply]


090447 No.13206
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (192.5KB, 293x711) Reverse
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (11.6KB, 774x124) Reverse
1695084226942.png
[Hide] (138.5KB, 938x770) Reverse
>this gets you banned for rule 1 
GEEEEEEEEEG DO RAGETRANNY REALLY??
f38cd5 No.13207
Shows 2 separate bans award
Replies: >>13208
f38cd5 No.13208
>>13207
2/3 of those aren’t even bans
090447 No.13210
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (138.5KB, 938x770) Reverse
@13207 @13208
l*te literally used stock photos of kids to test his csam filter btw >>>/x/294
@ragefag and what do you mean "jartyfail"? this is beyond @stratogem wiping half of /soy/ in the name of "cleaning up sharty coal", at least he had a good reason
Replies: >>13211
ae7673 No.13211
>>13210
>l*te literally used stock photos of kids to test his csam filter btw 
Ok
>what do you mean "jartyfail"? this is 
I meant oh I’m a jarty fail oh yes I’m a jarty fail 
>@stratogem wiping half of /soy/ in the name of "cleaning up sharty coal", at least he had a good reason
Glazing
b788a5 No.13212
jartypedo.png
[Hide] (165.2KB, 609x638) Reverse
## Admin 38a4ac No.13214
ok this is clearly too far for bans and moderator action. ragefag what the fuck are you doing?
Last edited by admin
Replies: >>13219
090447 No.13215
9.jpg
[Hide] (336KB, 1920x1798) Reverse
@13214
a pot calling the kettle black
>
b788a5 No.13216
jartypedo.png
[Hide] (165.2KB, 609x638) Reverse
524a5b No.13219
>>13214
I thought threads posting children with odd replies were banned.
Replies: >>13223
b788a5 No.13220
jartypedo.png
[Hide] (165.2KB, 609x638) Reverse
090447 No.13221
1684143692471.png
[Hide] (92.5KB, 496x538) Reverse
@13219
there're no odd replies
it's simply that photo with the quote:
>/soy/

you were just projecting your own pedophilia again
Replies: >>13222
524a5b No.13222
>>13221
I left that thread up for minutes maybe an hour untill someone replied with “sexy”. Skajyos if you want threads like those just go to kohlchan you sick fuck. Stop trying to bring your pedophilic cancer over here.
Replies: >>13223
## Admin 38a4ac No.13223
>>13219
>>13222
the replies that sexualize children are not permitted, the threads themselves, if they contain children, do not violate any rules.

OP is not responsible for the replies in a thread.
090447 No.13224
Spoiler File
(109.1KB, 775x849) Reverse
Spoiler File
(1.1MB, 1006x717) Reverse
@13222
i didn't make that thread
@13223
does that mean i can post these without getting banned?
Replies: >>13225 >>13227
524a5b No.13225
>>13224
OFCOURSE you want to fucking post those. Geg.
Replies: >>13226
5a6788 No.13226
>>13225
just go on sharty's /raid/ if you want pictures and doxxes of underage kids.
## Admin 38a4ac No.13227
>>13224
jesus christ you pedo faggots are given an inch and you try to take a mile.
no, there is an inherit lewdness to scantily clad children that attracts sick fucks like you.
a82bb3 No.13228
@13227
they're allowed on google and pinterest even with safe search on therefore techinically they're more than legal to be posted than fucking nigger baby gore
Replies: >>13230 >>13232
a82bb3 No.13229
1662677160320.gif
[Hide] (141.7KB, 432x733) Reverse
@admin while you're online baiting @w7-890, i have to inform you that he's probably not gonna come back after me exposed you as a furfag >>12525 
and after the 'lita ban, the only soyjak posters on /soy/ are you and @lordofthejarty 
who's the real jarty killer here?
524a5b No.13230
>>13228
 Lute knows these images are legal, but he questions the poster's intentions. Predators often create sites with such images for their own gratification. The law doesn't intervene because it's considered freedom of speech. You and I both understand this, but you choose to act stupid. You're either genuinely clueless or aware of this but want to pressure Lute into creating a safe space for your sick pedophila.
48df15 No.13232
>>>13228
> Lute knows these images are legal, but he questions the poster's intentions. Predators often create sites with such images for their own gratification. The law doesn't intervene because it's considered freedom of speech. >You and I both understand this, but you choose to act stupid. You're either genuinely clueless or aware of this but want to pressure Lute into creating a safe space for your sick pedophila.
045341 No.13233
Uhhhh sharty bros I thought the jarty was a bunch of pedophiles, or however I project and call everyone I don’t like a pedophile
[New Reply]
22 replies | 18 files | 10 UIDs
Connected for live posts (203ms)
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons.
- news - rules - faq - privacy - DMCA -
jschan 1.6.1+LukePatch3.1
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%