Why circumcision is a biomedical imperative for the 21(st) century
- PMID: 17935209
- DOI: 10.1002/bies.20654
Why circumcision is a biomedical imperative for the 21(st) century
Abstract
Circumcision of males represents a surgical "vaccine" against a wide variety of infections, adverse medical conditions and potentially fatal diseases over their lifetime, and also protects their sexual partners. In experienced hands, this common, inexpensive procedure is very safe, can be pain-free and can be performed at any age. The benefits vastly outweigh risks. The enormous public health benefits include protection from urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted HIV, HPV, syphilis and chancroid, penile and prostate cancer, phimosis, thrush, and inflammatory dermatoses. In women circumcision of the male partner provides substantial protection from cervical cancer and chlamydia. Circumcision has socio-sexual benefits and reduces sexual problems with age. It has no adverse effect on penile sensitivity, function, or sensation during sexual arousal. Most women prefer the circumcised penis for appearance, hygiene and sex. Given the convincing epidemiological evidence and biological support, routine circumcision should be highly recommended by all health professionals.
(c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
- Neonatal circumcision revisited. Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society.CMAJ. 1996 Mar 15;154(6):769-80.CMAJ. 1996.PMID: 8634956Free PMC article.Review.
- Neonatal circumcision.Urol Clin North Am. 1995 Feb;22(1):57-65.Urol Clin North Am. 1995.PMID: 7855960Review.
- Male circumcision.Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):e756-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1990. Epub 2012 Aug 27.Pediatrics. 2012.PMID: 22926175
- Routine neonatal circumcision: a reappraisal.Am Fam Physician. 1990 Mar;41(3):859-63.Am Fam Physician. 1990.PMID: 2407075Review.
- Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks.Sex Transm Infect. 1998 Oct;74(5):368-73. doi: 10.1136/sti.74.5.368.Sex Transm Infect. 1998.PMID: 10195035Free PMC article.Review.
Cited by
- Sexually transmitted infections and male circumcision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ISRN Urol. 2013 Apr 16;2013:109846. doi: 10.1155/2013/109846. Print 2013.ISRN Urol. 2013.PMID: 23710368Free PMC article.
- Critical evaluation of unscientific arguments disparaging affirmative infant male circumcision policy.World J Clin Pediatr. 2016 Aug 8;5(3):251-61. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i3.251. eCollection 2016 Aug 8.World J Clin Pediatr. 2016.PMID: 27610340Free PMC article.
- Acceptability of early infant male circumcision among Chinese parents: strategy implications of HIV prevention for China.BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 4;12:738. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-738.BMC Public Health. 2012.PMID: 22946988Free PMC article.
- [Clinical effectiveness of disposable circumcision suture in children: a prospective randomized controlled trial].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018 Jul 30;38(7):884-887. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.07.19.Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018.PMID: 33168504Free PMC article.Chinese.
- Evaluation of Male Circumcision: Retrospective Analysis of One Hundred and Ninety-eight Patients.Cureus. 2019 Apr 27;11(4):e4555. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4555.Cureus. 2019.PMID: 31275779Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
