Louis Rossmann likes to use the phrase "death by a thousand cuts". I have created this timeline of major anti-consumer decisions that accumulated over time. My post is in the public domain under , so you can copy and paste it all you like.
-
2003: Apple iPod with non-replaceable battery. Thankfully roasted by Casey Neistat. Little did the people know back then, this horror would be the norm in mobile phones in little more than over a decade.
-
2007: Apple releases iPhone without replaceable battery or MicroSD support. Back then, the back cover could still be opened with little effort, but in the following years, "little efford" turned into a glue seal. "Unibody", ugh.
-
2010: iPhone 4 introduces "fasionable premium" fragile glass backs to the smartphone world. No technical/practical benefits.
-
2011, 2012: Mass storage access (including for MicroSD) gradually removed from Android by Google and vendors. There are understandable technical restrictions for internal storage (see ), but that doesn't justify also removing it for MicroSD, where there are no such restrictions.
-
2013: Sony and HTC jump on non-replaceable battery bandwagon with Xperia Z and HTC One M7.
-
2014: Android 4.4 forcibly disables write access to MicroSD cards for all user-installed apps including file managers "for our protection". No opt-out besides rooting. The were poor.
-
2014: Around that time, laptops started having batteries that can not be externally removed, only with screws opening the complete bottom part, which also exposes other parts.
-
2015: Samsung releases Galaxy S6. No MicroSD and no user-replaceable battery. Broken phone? All data gone. Don't like slow charging? Too bad, your battery will die quickly. But hey, it allows for a !
-
2016: Android 6.0 introduces "adopted storage" feature for MicroSD cards, defeating all benefits (modularity, external data recovery, immediate reuse in new device). Thankfully just optional, but I bet my _rse Google would love to have it mandatory.
-
2016 (Android 6.0):
-
2016: Apple removes 3.5mm headphone plug because it is "old-fasioned" (if "new"/"modern" means less freedom, I prefer "old").
-
2017: LG joins non-replaceable battery bandwagon with their G6 smartphone.
-
2017 (Android 7.0): Read access to USB-On-The-Go devices disabled entirely through the main storage API.
-
2018 (Android 9.0): Granting permissions to apps from outside the Google Play Store (through APK files) requires restarting the app for each permission.
-
2018 (Android 9.0): Call recording disabled for user-installed apps. , .
-
2019: . Certain access requires approval by Google "to protect us".
-
May 2019: Malfunction in the Mozilla Firefox "add-on signing" (Microsoft-resembling tyranny that exists "to protect users") forcibly disables all extensions.
-
2019: iPhone 12 locks out "unofficial"/"non-genuine" replacement parts. Operating system refuses to boot upon detection of such.
-
2020: The typical laptop has a non-replaceable battery and no proper full-sized SD card slot, only difficult-to-handle and lower-capacity MicroSD. Also lacks write protection switch. (Mounting as read-only depends on a functioning file system driver, which often does not work: , .).
-
circa 2020: Xiaomi violates a sacred consumer right by forcing a one-week wait before users are able to unlock the bootloader. Ideally, Xiaomi would be banned like Huawei until they stop this abuse.
-
2021:
-
2021: Galaxy S21 without MicroSD after it was brought back with the S7 in 2016.
-
2021: Windows 11 and TPM ("trusted" platform module). Microsoft: "no, you can't use non-Microsoft operating systems".
-
2022: Android 12 restricts battery statistics.
-
2022: Firefox performeance analysis tool is moved to an online service, meaning it can have downtimes and be deprecated. ("New: Firefox Profiler is now integrated into Developer Tools. […] For a limited time, you can access the original Performance panel via Advanced settings"). What's next?.
-
2022: Android 13
-
2022: Android 13 imposes .
-
2023: Samsung starts serializing batteries with the Galaxy S23, calling replacements "unauthorized".
-
2023: Play Store starts requiring real-life identification for developers. Phew, thank god they don't do the same thing for APKs. Or....?
-
19842025: Google announces that starting with Android 17, only APKs created by developers manually approved by Google will be able to run on Android devices with Google Play services. Requesting approval requires disclosing real-life identification to Google. This defeats the whole benefit of APK files: being able to run software on your device, your property, that big corporations want to block you (or how they call it, "protect you") from.
I hereby release this post into the public domain, CC0 1.0.