Skip to content

With your support we continue to ensure media accuracy

Media Complicity: Hamas Breaks the Ceasefire, Israel Gets the Blame

Key Takeaways Major outlets downplay or ignore Hamas’ ceasefire violations — from staged hostage recoveries to the killing of an Israeli soldier. Israel’s defensive responses dominate headlines, often framed as disproportionate aggression. By omitting crucial…

Reading time: 4 minutes

Key Takeaways

  • Major outlets downplay or ignore Hamas’ ceasefire violations — from staged hostage recoveries to the killing of an Israeli soldier.
  • Israel’s defensive responses dominate headlines, often framed as disproportionate aggression.
  • By omitting crucial context, the press acts in complicity, amplifying Hamas’ narrative while concealing its crimes.

 

They’ve done it again. Just nine days after the media ignored Hamas’ previous ceasefire violations and blamed Israel for acting in self-defense, leading outlets repeated the same distortion.

First came silence over Hamas’ actions: the staged “discovery” of an Israeli hostage’s remains — cynically returned to Israel as if belonging to another hostage — and the killing of an Israeli soldier. Then came the headlines, dominated not by Hamas’ violations, but by Israel’s response.

The Associated Press initially failed to mention that Hamas had killed an Israeli soldier. Although the IDF announced it early Wednesday, AP’s story led with Gaza’s death toll from Israel’s strikes.
Reuters took a similar approach, publishing a headline that portrayed Israel as the aggressor that “pounds Gaza.”

Neither wire service mentioned Hamas in its headline. And like most outlets, they ignored one of Hamas’ most grotesque manipulations to date: the staged “recovery” of an Israeli hostage’s body that had been buried, exhumed, and theatrically presented — an act witnessed by Palestinian Red Cross workers.

Even after the Red Cross condemned Hamas’ violation and the IDF released video evidence of the fake “burial,” most outlets stayed silent.

That silence, however, didn’t stop The New York Times from later quoting the Red Cross when it suited its preferred framing — one that shifted blame onto Israel.

Meanwhile, BBC reports vilified Israel while relying on the “spokesperson” of Gaza’s civil defense — previously unmasked as a Hamas operative.

The Washington Post also relied on the same source, treating Hamas statements as credible while describing Israel’s confirmation of Hamas’ ceasefire breach as a mere claim:

CNN, to its credit, mentioned Hamas’ violations — yet still framed them as Israeli “accusations,” casting doubt on verified facts while describing Israel’s retaliation as “the deadliest day in Gaza since the ceasefire.”

Related Reading: Media Blindness: When Hamas Breaks the Ceasefire and Headlines Blame Israel

The pattern is unmistakable. When Hamas violates the ceasefire, the media look away. When Israel defends its citizens, the headlines thunder.

This isn’t mere bias — it’s complicity. By burying the facts of Hamas’ deception and aggression, major news outlets protect a terror organization from scrutiny and shift moral and journalistic responsibility onto the democracy fighting to defend its people.

If the press won’t call out Hamas’ war crimes — from fake burials to fatal ceasefire breaches — it has not just abandoned impartiality, but the very truth it claims to serve.

Liked this article? Follow HonestReporting on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to see even more posts and videos debunking news bias and smears, as well as other content explaining what’s really going on in Israel and the region. Get updates direct to your phone. Join our WhatsApp and Telegram channels!

Image Credit: EYAD BABA/AFP via Getty Images