We use cookies to tailor your experience and present relevant ads. By clicking “Accept”, you agree that cookies can be placed per our Privacy Policy
ACCEPT
Advertisement

Is Asean’s ‘meek diplomacy’ sufficient to end Myanmar conflict?

Asean’s individual members will decide whether to send observers to monitor what critics say will be a ‘sham election’ in Myanmar

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
5
Listen
Advertisement
discover more stories from
Browse other locations
China
Asia
North America
Middle East
Europe
Russia and Central Asia
Oceania
Africa
Americas and Caribbean
NEWSLETTEREvery Saturday
Hear directly from our newsroom on the biggest social, political and economic stories from China and how they impact the world.
By submitting, you consent to receiving marketing emails from SCMP. If you don't want these, tick here
By registering, you agree to ourT&CandPrivacy Policy
Before you go
scmp poll
Advertisement
Myanmar’s soldiers stand in front of a captured police station in Kyaukme, a town in Shan state that the resistance forces had controlled for more than a year. Photo: AP
As the 47th Asean summit came to a close this week, questions remained over the bloc’s handling of the Myanmar crisis and whether it had done enough to bring peace to the war-torn country.
The three-day summit saw the 11-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations discuss various issues, including the ongoing clashes between Myanmar’s junta and opposition forces. Several members also signed trade deals with the United States.

“Myanmar was lower on the agenda at the summit compared with other pressing regional economic and strategic issues, such as trade, security cooperation and managing US-China competition,” Vu Lam, a policy analyst and Asean observer, told This Week in Asia.

“Consequently, the political will and capital to address the Myanmar issue were understandably inadequate.”

In a statement issued by the bloc, the region’s foreign ministers upheld the previously agreed five-point consensus as its “main reference for addressing the political crisis in Myanmar” and urged “its full implementation to help the people of Myanmar achieve an inclusive and durable peaceful resolution”.

It called for “all parties and stakeholders … to de-escalate violence and stop targeted attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure and enhance trust-building efforts”, alongside the full implementation of an expanded ceasefire as reaffirmed by an earlier statement put out by the bloc in May.

Leaders of Asean, China, Japan and South Korea attend the Asean Plus Three summit in Kuala Lumpur on Monday. Asean has been criticised for lacking the political will to deal with the Myanmar conflict. Photo: Xinhua
Leaders of Asean, China, Japan and South Korea attend the Asean Plus Three summit in Kuala Lumpur on Monday. Asean has been criticised for lacking the political will to deal with the Myanmar conflict. Photo: Xinhua

Myanmar’s junta has largely ignored the five-point consensus, prompting Asean to ban the country’s military leadership from most of its meetings. Instead, Naypyidaw has been sending non-political representatives to Asean’s meetings, including at this year’s summit.

The impasse between Asean and Myanmar is a reflection of consensus being the bloc’s sole instrument with which to address the crisis, according to Moe Thuzar, Myanmar studies programme coordinator at the ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute.

Top diplomats from Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines were set to fly to Myanmar in August to discuss plans by the junta to hold its first general election later this year, but the trip was reportedly postponed.

While Myanmar had invited Asean to send observers to the polls, the bloc did not reach a consensus at its recently concluded summit and reportedly left its members to make decisions on the mission individually.

Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr confirmed that the bloc had “carefully discussed” deploying a monitoring team, but said “Asean is leaving it to each country to decide on their own”.

“Asean will not take a common position, because in our discussions, everyone has a different idea,” he said on Tuesday.

An election campaign poster showing Khin Yi, Myanmar’s chairman of the army-backed ruling Union Solidarity and Development Party, is seen in Yangon on Monday. Photo: AFP
An election campaign poster showing Khin Yi, Myanmar’s chairman of the army-backed ruling Union Solidarity and Development Party, is seen in Yangon on Monday. Photo: AFP

According to Thuzar, the move likely reflects Asean’s apprehension about the election, with the result “unlikely to be automatically accepted as a fait accompli” by the bloc.

Myanmar has been plagued by civil unrest and conflict over the past four years, leaving more than 7,000 killed, 30,000 imprisoned and hundreds of thousands more displaced.

The country’s elected leader, 80-year-old Aung San Suu Kyi, has been in military custody since her government was overthrown by the junta in a 2021 coup. Her son has said her health is deteriorating and there are fears she might die soon.

The junta-led government controls less than half of the country, with critics accusing the military of increasing human rights violations.

At the Asean summit, United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres urged the junta government to focus on providing aid to its people instead of its election. “I don’t think anybody believes that those elections will be free and fair,” he said. “I don’t think anybody believes those elections will contribute to the solution of the problems of Myanmar.”

Trump feels the beat in Malaysia

‘Meek diplomatic response’

Bridget Welsh, an honorary research associate at the University of Nottingham Malaysia who specialises in Southeast Asian politics, warned that Myanmar was “on the verge of a sham election” and said Asean “should have fundamentally condemned the polls”.

“Asean failed the Myanmar people again, choosing a diplomatic path rather than a principled one that put pressure on the junta … Asean is going through the motions and being played by the junta who use Asean for legitimacy,” she told This Week in Asia.

Welsh said the five-point consensus was “no longer relevant”, adding that it was an “excuse to engage, but the substance of engagement has yet to meaningfully address the crisis”.

With the Philippines taking over as Asean chair in 2026, all eyes will be on Manila and its handling of the Myanmar crisis.

Thuzar said that the Philippines was likely to seek to maintain the diplomatic momentum from 2025, including a proposal initiated by Asean this year for a more inclusive and comprehensive engagement with Myanmar stakeholders, such as the appointment of a special envoy.

People protest against Myanmar’s military junta at Parliament Square in London in August. Photo: EPA
People protest against Myanmar’s military junta at Parliament Square in London in August. Photo: EPA

But the Philippines may face similar constraints as Asean’s current chair Malaysia, according to Lam.

“There are stronger measures available. However, without broader shifts in Asean cohesion and consensus-building, meaningful progress is beyond any single chair’s effort,” he said.

Apart from installing a special envoy, Welsh urged Asean to ensure more inclusive representation of Myanmar’s opposition forces and take a harder line against the junta.

“Let’s see if the Philippines has any democratic principles, as Malaysia chose to meet the junta and not defend the Myanmar people adequately,” she said.

“They also allowed the scam economy to deepen, putting the region and the world more at risk. Again, a meek diplomatic response has caused harm.”

Advertisement
Sam Beltran
Sam Beltran is a journalist based in Manila who has written for publications in the Philippines and around Asia. Her stories explore food, lifestyle scenes, popular trends, and sub-cultures as windows into society and the human condition.
Advertisement
Advertisement

UN chief urges Myanmar junta to focus on boosting aid, forget about election

Antonio Guterres has also called on all parties to support Asean’s push for an immediate end to the conflict in Myanmar

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
2
Listen
Advertisement
NEWSLETTEREvery Monday
Hong Kong Politics
Latest news, analysis and opinion on politics in Hong Kong, covering Legco, John Lee’s administration and handling of the Covid-19 pandemic.
By submitting, you consent to receiving marketing emails from SCMP. If you don't want these, tick here
By registering, you agree to ourT&CandPrivacy Policy
Before you go
scmp poll
Advertisement
People drive past an election campaign billboard of Myanmar’s chairman of the army-backed ruling Union Solidarity and Development Party Khin Yi ahead of the start of the election campaign in Yangon on Monday. Photo: AFP
United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres on Monday urged Myanmar’s junta to focus on increasing aid to its struggling people instead of holding an election, which he said would be neither free nor fair.

Myanmar’s junta has been widely pilloried for pressing on with the election starting this December, while it continues to bomb civilians in a civil war that has killed thousands and displaced more than 3.5 million people.

Guterres, who was in Kuala Lumpur for a summit between the UN and Asean – of which Myanmar is a member – said the focus should be on an immediate end to the four-year civil war.

“I don’t think anybody believes that those elections will be free and fair,” he told reporters. “I don’t think anybody believes those elections will contribute to the solution of the problems of Myanmar.”

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres attends the Asean-United Nations summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on Monday. Photo: EPA
UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres attends the Asean-United Nations summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on Monday. Photo: EPA
The junta, led by Senior-General Min Aung Hlaing, sees an election as a chance to reset after four years of grinding war and an opportunity to reclaim some legitimacy in the eyes of the international community for a government that comes from polls – even if it is inevitably stacked with military figures and proxies.

Myanmar’s civil war stems from a 2021 coup by a military which was unhappy with being routed in an election a few months earlier.

It has seen the country’s economy collapse as the junta struggles to regain control over most of its borderlands from pro-democracy rebels and ethnic militias.

The coup also led to an unprecedented ban on Myanmar’s top leadership from attending any official meeting of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, including this week’s summit in Kuala Lumpur.

The regional bloc, which is normally allergic to confrontation on matters involving each other’s domestic affairs, acted after the junta failed to implement five measures it agreed to in order to stop the conflict. Those include an immediate end to the violence, allowing aid in, the appointment of an Asean special envoy and a pathway to peace talks.

Critics have piled pressure on Asean to stop what they call a “sham” election, given the junta’s lack of territorial control and the exclusion of tens of millions of people from voting as the military continues to bomb civilian areas.

In a joint statement on Sunday, Asean’s leaders said any plan by the junta to hold a national election must make sure that it would be “free, fair, peaceful, transparent, inclusive and credible”.

“We emphasise that the cessation of violence and inclusive political dialogue must precede elections,” the statement read, adding that Asean reaffirmed that a resolution of Myanmar’s civil war must continue to be guided by the five-point consensus.

01:05

Hundreds flee Myanmar’s scam compounds for Thailand

Hundreds flee Myanmar’s scam compounds for Thailand

Guterres said he was “appalled” by what was happening in Myanmar, and urged all parties to support Asean’s push for an immediate end to the conflict.

“The people of Myanmar are counting on our collective support. Let’s deliver it,” he said.

The vortex of problems caused by Myanmar’s instability extends to surging drug production, illegal mining and forest burning with consequences for Laos and Thailand, and crucially, the explosion of scam centres inside lawless parts of Myanmar.

There are also glaring practical problems with holding elections in a country lacerated by war.

Junta leader Min Aung Hlaing had admitted earlier this month that polls could not be held in the whole country “due to various reasons” despite a pledge to make the contest “strong and competitive”.

The Union Election Commission, appointed by the junta, in August said the first phase of the election would be held in 102 out of 330 townships – mostly in Yangon, Naypyidaw and other central military heartlands.

But key allies China and, to a lesser degree, Russia have voiced support for the election, banking on the junta to regain its footing after four years of war that has seen the strategically crucial nation pitched into violence and chaos.

Advertisement
Joseph Sipalan has done extensive reporting of Malaysia, specialising in politics and more recently macro-economics. An alumnus of Reuters and several major Malaysian news organisations.
Aidan Jones is a Senior Correspondent on SCMP's Asia desk. He previously worked at the Agence France-Presse.
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x