The constitutive relations for the transport of heat, stress, electric charge, etc., in a continuum must be chosen so that the second law of thermodynamics is not violated; the constraints take the form of inequalities, typically requiring the entropy generated within a material element to be non-negative. The paper is concerned with this concept—its history, the physical principles on which it depends, how to apply it when second-order or non-linear effects are important and how it is widely misused in modern continuum mechanics.
The history is reduced to the contributions of five leading thermodynamicists—Clausius, Maxwell, Gibbs, Boltzmann and Duhem. The object here was to try to discover which form of the inequality one should regard as being fundamental. One important conclusion is that entropy S must be defined simultaneously with the identification of the inequality, and that in general this cannot be done until the constitutive equations are known. The empirical element enters with the notion of irreversibility, which is given a precise meaning with the aid of the motion reversed parity η(x), a variable x having η = +1 or η = −1 if, when time and motions are reversed, x → x or x → −x. The macroscopic parity of x, η*(x), is obtained by first replacing x by the constitutive equation for x.
The entropy production rate Σ has both irreversible Σ(f) and reversible Σ(r) parts. It is shown that the reciprocal relations follow from the requirement that the macroscopic parity of Σ(i) must be +1.
Continuum thermodynamics is based on various principles extracted from theory developed for uniform systems, the example chosen to illustrate the ideas being the simple monatomic gas. Second-order constitutive relations are introduced, and the expressions for entropy and its production rate per unit volume, σ, obtained. It is shown that the stability condition σ ≥ 0 cannot, in general, be satisfied merely by imposing constraints on the constitutive relations. To second-order σ = σ1 + σ2, where σ1 is the usual bilinear form, and the terms in σ2 have an additional derivative. The second-order term σ2 can have both signs, and is not dissipative. The relation between this fact and the frame-dependence of constitutive relations is explained.
The final section illustrates the errors frequently found in the thermodynamic arguments appearing in books and papers on rational continuum mechanics. The principle of these is that σ ≥ 0 is interpreted as being a constraint on the constitutive relations alone. Another is the idea that the balance equations can be set aside as constraints by regarding them as mere definitions of a heat source and a body force, an error based partly on the misconception that constitutive relations should be frame-indifferent. Finally, an inequality due to Glansdorff & Prigogine is examined and found to be in error.