Skip to content
Well that’s unexpected

Newsmax using climate change outrage to lure paid newsletter subscribers

Newsmax’s “free” anti-climate change book comes with an auto-renewing subscription.

John Timmer | 160
Credit: Aurich Lawson | Getty Images
Credit: Aurich Lawson | Getty Images

An unfortunate byproduct of the arguments over climate change has been the publication of some truly awful books. Think tank staff members, disgruntled scientists, and self-appointed experts have produced page after page of arguments we knew were wrong decades ago, framing them as earth-shattering revelations that will cause the entire scientific community to collapse. It wouldn’t be news if another one was produced.

But it was intriguing when I saw that a print ad was proudly trumpeting a “new” book that promised to explain “why there is ZERO evidence linking carbon dioxide to climate change.” The intrigue arose from the fact that the book’s author has been dead for over two years.

A quick search revealed that the supposedly new book was a not-quite-new edition of one originally published in 1997. Figuring out why it was being advertised now took me down a rabbit hole of domain registrations and paid newsletters that all led back to an unexpected source: Newsmax, best known for operating one of the Trumpier broadcasting outfits in the US.

Dead author, zombified ideas

The book in question is Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming’s Unfinished Debate, and its author is Fred Singer. Singer was involved in the use of the US’s first weather satellites, but he’s most famous for being one of the merchants of doubt from the book of the same name. From secondhand smoke to climate change, Singer saw pretty much every environmental threat as being overhyped, all of them excuses for the government to throttle private enterprise with regulations.

Cold Science is pretty standard fare for the climate denialism industry. Its summary on Amazon claims there’s no sign of a crisis, the science is weak, and warming would actually do positive things were it to actually happen (but remember, it won’t).

When it was first published in 1997, there were some significant uncertainties regarding our understanding of the present warming trend. But by 2021, when the third edition was published, most of those doubts were gone. Any temporary trends in temperatures or ice level that enabled residual arguments had long since ended, and extensive studies had shrunk a lot of the remaining uncertainties considerably. The book didn’t need a slightly revised edition; it needed to be completely rewritten or simply discarded.

And Singer wasn’t the person to make those sorts of changes—because he had died in a nursing home a year earlier.

Down the rabbit hole

So it was surprising to hear that someone took out a large print ad offering to send people free copies of Cold Science under the bold title “Global Warming Hoax.” Yet there it was in the Tulsa World, the daily newspaper for Tulsa, Oklahoma. The paper’s staff confirmed that it had appeared in print. The ad featured all the usual climate denialism tropes: references to “decades of questionable scientific data,” accusations that warnings are about controlling how we live, proclamations that there is “ZERO evidence linking carbon dioxide to climate change,” and so forth.

Readers could get the book for free, excepting a “small shipping and handling fee.”

The ad gave no clue about who was behind it; it had been placed by a New York City agency. All it offered was a URL—located at the domain ColdScience611.com—to order the book. A quick check of the domain revealed that it had only been activated last year and that the organization that registered it was a familiar one: Newsmax Media.

For those not in the US, Newsmax is notable for running a “news” channel that was extremely pro-Trump and blithely repeated many of his debunked claims about election fraud. The false claims came to a halt when the station was sued by two voting machine companies. The suits caused Newsmax to disavow its own coverage on air and later led to one of its anchors fleeing the studio when a guest started making false claims about fraud.

Things got stranger still when the original ColdScience611 immediately redirected my browser to a page at w3.ultimatewealthreport.com—also registered by Newsmax but first activated a decade ago. “Ultimate Wealth” doesn’t seem to have an obvious connection to climate change, but there’s Cold Science again—and the standard hyped verbiage, including a promise that “in the next few moments, you’ll discover why ‘global warming’ may be the BIGGEST HOAX promoted throughout the world for the past 40 years.”

This time, there was a name attached to it: Tom Luongo.

Chemistry, goats, and finance

Luongo’s connection to Ultimate Wealth makes sense, although his path there is a bit indirect. Through various public sources, Luongo indicated that he put his undergraduate degree in chemistry to work in the labs at the University of Florida. After a stint in private industry, he switched to writing and consulting about finance while raising goats on the side. Roughly 10 years ago, he took over a Newsmax newsletter called the Ultimate Wealth Report.

In addition to running a television channel, Newsmax Media is also a host of subscription-supported newsletters. There are nine listed in its financial category, and all of them offer some variation of the same procedure: Pay a small shipping and handling fee by credit card and the company will send you some free materials and sign you up for three months of free newsletters. After three months, your account will automatically roll over into a paid subscription unless you cancel.

But in the other newsletters I checked, all of the free materials were related to the financial focus of the subscription. Luongo’s seemed to be distinct in that his primary bait was a heavy dose of climate denialism. Ultimate Wealth’s free offer involved six different books and pamphlets focused on financial issues—with Cold Science thrown on top of everything.

And it’s not the only time Luongo tried to use outrage about climate change as bait. In a piece that’s visually indistinguishable from other articles in the Finance section at Newsmax, Luongo copied the entire framework. There’s heated language of climate change being a hoax and a reference to one brave author who has written a book that exposes the lies—but his ideas are being suppressed. The author in this case is John Casey, who has his own theory about climate change (it’s all the Sun’s fault!) that is inconsistent with reality.

Once again, the “column” includes a promise to send you a copy of the book, along with some other material, and a three-month newsletter trial, although this time, the newsletter is supposedly entitled “Resolute Wealth Letter.” But if you click the link that offers to let you “put an end to the ‘global warming’ lie,” you are taken to a signup page for the Ultimate Wealth Report. And there’s nothing being offered for free other than three months of the newsletter. You still have to enter your credit card for that.

Nobody’s talking

To be clear, there’s nothing illegal about any of this; similar schemes were advertised on TV decades ago. And based on the other financial newsletters at Newsmax, it’s standard practice there to offer free material as bait to get people to sign up.

The distinctive aspect of Luongo’s approach is the strategy behind the free stuff. There’s a large population in the US that suspects scientists are pulling a fast one on them (and that glaciers, wildfires, and coral reefs are all in on it). Luongo is apparently wagering that this population will want to see those beliefs confirmed badly enough that people will sign up for his newsletter based on a promise of that confirmation. I tried to find out how Luongo had come up with the idea of using climate denial as bait, but he wasn’t interested in talking.

Screen capture of a text-based conversation.

Newsmax, however, is engaged in questionable behavior by packaging this troll for subscribers as a news article. (The fact that much of the “news article” is also false isn’t entirely above-board, for that matter.) The company has a strange approach to climate change in general, publishing a variety of essays that mirror the typical dismissal of climate science while syndicating content from the Associated Press that presents the mainstream view of reality. I tried to talk to someone at Newsmax about the relationship between news and newsletters and the contrasting coverage of climate science, but a receptionist declined to connect me to anyone at the company.

I managed to travel far enough down the rabbit hole to understand what is going on: Someone seems to think climate denial will pump up subscriber numbers. But the question of why Luongo tried this tack—and whether it’s working—remains a mystery.

Listing image: Aurich Lawson | Getty Images

Photo of John Timmer
John Timmer Senior Science Editor
John is Ars Technica's science editor. He has a Bachelor of Arts in Biochemistry from Columbia University, and a Ph.D. in Molecular and Cell Biology from the University of California, Berkeley. When physically separated from his keyboard, he tends to seek out a bicycle, or a scenic location for communing with his hiking boots.
160 Comments