New Reply[×]
Message(0/20000)
Max 4 files24.3MB total
Tegaki
Password
[New Reply]


If (You) don't like something then post what (You) like instead
DUE TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN AND USAID FUNDING BEING CUT, ANFOO MAY EXPERIENCE OUTAGE PLEASE BE PATIENT

Remember to support your 'foo frens.

MAGAZINE MAGMA ARCHIVE

GarticPhone every Saturday at 7-8AM EST


ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (58KB, 250x229)
Reverse
Would it be a good idea if we started our own 'ki or a 'booru or would that just make no sense?
Replies: >>63202 >>63476
all-saints-church-dunwich-1903-1920-v0-x4en8kl923rf1.webp U A
[Hide] (133.2KB, 1080x1049)
Reverse
no
-me
Replies: >>63199
>>63198
/gen
1. People are too lazy to tag booru images
2. People are too lazy to write wiki articles
0d6b13d6005eb28905d1c122ca6564ed3d6bfbb53205597850213bfeaa59764d.jpg U A
[Hide] (37.8KB, 540x513)
Reverse
Fooers aren't autistic or dedicated enough to this site to have a wiki, and e6 just makes a booru redundant
>>63196 (OP) 
E6 and Wikifur already exist fur anthro media doe. Nothing that interesting really happens on here to warrant its own ‘ki like the Sharty.
Replies: >>63204 >>63205
>>63202
Even tho it would be the pinnacle of snca I still think it would be pretty funny to have a mediawiki like the sharty's and stuff. It does fall apart when we consider what would actually go on there in the first place, so yeah we don't really need one. Wikifur already exists.
>>63202
Ik i dont browse this site often, I'm sure some stuff happens.
Replies: >>63212
what would be the point? to document SNCA drama?
Replies: >>63213
>>63205
One thing’s fur sure, nobody on here is nearly as SNCA-obsessed or leaky as the sharty, I think that’s enough to confirm why this website doesn’t need a ‘ki
>>63207
This but unironically, everyfur needs to know how Purrgem hurt my feelings.
Could you just hijack wikifur? I guess you can’t NYAGGER NYAGGER NYAGGER on there.
>>63196 (OP) 
what the fluff are we going to write on a wiki? the history behind averi?

MAKE A BOORU
Replies: >>63479
>>63476
History of the fooey, fooey culture and memes or something, significant people. Idk I think the fooey rabbit hole is too shallow
Replies: >>63480
>>63479
There's life outside the Internet you know, saving things is all well and good if it's something creative
That's a tremendous waste of time and resources fur something that brings edification fur absolutely nobody.
[New Reply]
15 replies | 3 files | 12 UIDs
Connected for live posts (144ms)
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- faq - rules -
anthrochan 1.8.0