Original researchVolume 21, Issue 7p681-685July 2018

Download started

Ok

How do professional Australian Football League (AFL) players utilise social media during periods of injury? A mixed methods analysis

Brodie Nankervis
Correspondence
Corresponding author.
Affiliations
Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Australia
a brodie.nankervis@monashhealth.org
Laura Ferguson
Affiliations
Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Australia
a
Cameron Gosling
Affiliations
Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Australia
b
∙ …
Michael Storr
Affiliations
Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Australia
a
Dragan Ilic
Affiliations
Medical Education Research and Quality (MERQ) Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
c
Mark Young
Affiliations
Geelong Football Club, Australia
d
Stephen Maloney
Affiliations
Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Australia
Medical Education Research and Quality (MERQ) Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
a,c
Show more
Cover Image - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Volume 21, Issue 7

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this study was to explore how social media is used by a population of injured professional athletes, by comparing the content and frequency of posts on social media, pre and post-injury.

Design

A retrospective mixed methods design was utilised.

Methods

Professional Australian Football League (AFL) players, injured during the 2015 season, were included in the study. Publicly accessible social media profiles for these players were identified on Twitter and Instagram. All posts published on verified profiles, from four weeks prior to injury until return to play, were extracted. Thematic analysis was used to investigate the content of these posts, while univariate and multivariate linear regression was used to investigate the frequency of posts during this time period.

Results

Two reoccurring themes were identified exclusively post-injury; ‘supporting team from the sideline’ and ‘sharing information about injury and rehabilitation’. The frequency of total posts did not differ significantly pre and post-injury, but the frequency of injury related posts increased in the immediate post-injury phase, then decreased between 4–8 weeks and 8–12 weeks post-injury. The frequency of injury related posts was higher with more severe injuries.

Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest that injured players use social media to seek social support from their followers, especially in the immediate post-injury period and after sustaining a severe injury. The role of social media in injury rehabilitation may warrant further investigation, to determine if it could be used to facilitate return to play.

Keywords

  1. Sports injuries
  2. Athletic injuries
  3. Twitter
  4. Social medium
  5. Instagram
  6. Professional athlete

Get full text access

Log in, subscribe or purchase for full access.

References

1.
World Health Organisation
ICF: International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health
World Health Organisation, Geneva, 2009
2.
Walker, N. ∙ Heaney, C.
Pscyhological responses to injury: a review and critique of existing models, chapter 3
The Psychology of Sports Injury and Rehabiltation.Routledge, Oxon, 2013
3.
Wiese-bjornstal, D.M. ∙ Smith, A.M. ∙ Shaffer, S.M. ...
An integrated model of response to sport injury: psychological and sociological dynamics
J Appl Sport Psychol. 1998; 10:46-69
4.
Forsdyke, D. ∙ Smith, A. ∙ Jones, M. ...
Psychosocial factors associated with outcomes of sports injury rehabilitation in competitive athletes: a mixed studies systematic review
Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50:537-544
5.
Ardern, C.L. ∙ Taylor, N.F. ∙ Feller, J.A. ...
A systematic review of the psychological factors associated with returning to sport following injury
Br J Sports Med. 2013; 47:1120-1126
6.
Wiese-Bjornstal, D.M.
Psychology and socioculture affect injury risk, response, and recovery in high-intensity athletes: a consensus statement
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010; 20:103-111
7.
Rees, T. ∙ Mitchell, I. ∙ Evans, L. ...
Stressors, social support and psychological responses to sport injury in high- and low-performance standard participants
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2010; 11:505-512
8.
Covassin, T. ∙ Crutcher, B. ∙ Bleecker, A. ...
Postinjury anxiety and social support among collegiate athletes: a comparison between orthopaedic injuries and concussions
J Athl Train. 2014; 49:462-468
9.
Granito, V.J. ∙ Hogan, J.B. ∙ Varnum, L.K.
The performance enhancement group program: integrating sport psychology and rehabilitation
J Athl Train. 1995; 30:328-331
10.
Perrin, A.
Social Networking Usage: 2005–2015
Pew Research Center, Washington DC, 2015
11.
Pegoraro, A.
Look who’s talking—athletes on Twitter: a case study
Int J Sport Commun. 2010; 3:501-514
12.
Hambrick, M.E. ∙ Simmons, J.M. ∙ Greenhalgh, G.P. ...
Understanding professional athletes’ use of Twitter: a content analysis of athlete tweets
Int J Sport Commun. 2010; 3:454-471
13.
Johnson, R.B. ∙ Onwuegbuzie, A.J.
Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come
Educ Res. 2004; 33:14-26
14.
Glaser, B.G. ∙ Strauss, A.L.
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick, USA, 1967
15.
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee
National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research
Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2007
16.
Australian Football League. Injury Update. Available at http://www.afl.com.au/injury-list. Accessed 10 May 2015.
17.
Twitter Inc. Twitter. Available at https://twitter.com/. Accessed 10 May 2015.
18.
Instagram Inc. Instagram. Available at https://www.instagram.com/. Accessed 10 May 2015.
19.
Duggan, M.
Mobile Messaging and Social Media—2015
Pew Research Center, Washington DC, 2015
20.
QSR International. NVivo 11 for Windows, 2015.
21.
Fuller, C.W. ∙ Molloy, M.G. ∙ Bagate, C. ...
Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures for studies of injuries in rugby union
Br J Sports Med. 2007; 41:328-331
22.
Timpka, T. ∙ Alonso, J. ∙ Jacobsson, J. ...
Injury and illness definitions and data collection procedures for use in epidemiological studies in athletics (track and field): consensus statement
Br J Sports Med. 2014; 48:483-490
23.
Corbin, J. ∙ Strauss, A.
Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
SAGE publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, 2008
24.
Creative Research Systems. Sample Size Calculator. Available at http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm. Accessed 5 May 2015.
25.
Whiting, A. ∙ Williams, D.
Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach
Qual Market Res Int J. 2013; 16:362-369
26.
Podlog, L. ∙ Dimmock, J. ∙ Miller, J.
A review of return to sport concerns following injury rehabilitation: practitioner strategies for enhancing recovery outcomes
Phys Ther Sport. 2011; 12:36-42
27.
Ruddock-Hudson, M. ∙ O'Halloran, P. ∙ Murphy, G.
Exploring psychological reactions to injury in the Australian Football League (AFL)
J Appl Sport Psychol. 2012; 24:375-390
28.
Ruddock-Hudson, M. ∙ O’Halloran, P. ∙ Murphy, G.
The psychological impact of long-term injury on Australian Football League players
J Appl Sport Psychol. 2014; 26:377-394

Article metrics

Supplementary materials (1)