Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research
  4. Volume 17, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 17, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1751-9411
  • E-ISSN: 1751-942X

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a rise of TikTok video usage and sharing worldwide. Meanwhile, the 2018 Cyber Crime Law has been activated against the so-called women TikTokers in Egypt who were accused and arrested for violating ‘family values’ and ‘inflaming debauchery’. Public opinion expressed that media control is a grey area that includes ambiguous description of these violations. Social scrutiny became viral on social media platforms, inciting a debate over the prosecution of those women. This article is a case study that explores the play behaviour of women TikTok users in Egypt. Through employing a content analysis method, it seeks to find out whether users resist or adapt to the strict media control. Findings revealed that women TikTok users have several motives for their adopted behaviours, such as the fear of missing out (FoMO) and self-expression. Audiences who interpreted the behaviours TikTok women adopted as immoral used hashtags for social activism and generated content to oppress women based on gender rather than fairly evaluating their play behaviours. The research highlights key practices that women TikTok users are currently using in order to adapt to the vague ‘Egyptian family values and morals’. Whether mimicking a meme, performing and/or singing, women TikTok users have been considering their conservative cultural context carefully to avoid the severe consequences that pervious women TikTokers have faced. Furthermore, women TikTok users are reluctant to boldly resist the strict media control in Egypt. Instead of using controversial sex appeal, they resort to using humour for garnering views and utilizing the platform’s entertainment nature.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00066_1
2023-09-04
2025-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdul Jaffar, Badriya, Riaz, Sadia and Mushtaq, Arif (2019), ‘Living in a moment: Impact of TikTok on influencing younger generation into micro-fame’, Journal of Content, Community and Communication, 10:5, pp. 187–94, https://doi.org/10.31620/JCCC.12.19/19.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aljayyousi, Ghadir Fakhri, Abu Munshar, Maher, Al-Salim, Farid and Osman, El Rayah (2019), ‘Addressing context to understand physical activity among Muslim university students: The role of gender, family, and culture’, BMC Public Health, 19:1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7670-8.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Amnesty International (2020), ‘Egypt: Survivors of sexual violence and online abuse among prosecuted women TikTok influencers’, 14 August, https://www.pressenza.com/2020/08/egypt-survivors-of-sexual-violence-and-online-abuse-among-prosecuted-women-tiktok-influencers/. Accessed 21 June 2023.
  4. Barry, Christopher T. and Wong, Megan Y. (2020), ‘Fear of missing out (FoMo): A generational phenomenon or an individual difference?’, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37:12, pp. 2952–66, https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520945394.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bresnick, Ethan (2019), ‘Intensified play: Cinematic study of TikTok mobile app’, Los Angeles: Ethan Bresnick, April, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335570557. Accessed 21 June 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Caprì, Tindara, Gugliandolo, Maria Cristina, Lannizzotto, Giancarlo, Nucita, Andrea and Fabio, Rosa Angela (2019), ‘The influence of media usage on family functioning’, Current Psychology, 1:23, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00204-1.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Dragomir, Marius (2018), ‘Control the money, control the media: How government uses funding to keep media in line’, Journalism, 19:8, pp. 1131–48, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917724621.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Egyptian Court of Cassation (2018), ‘Law No. 175 for year 2018 for combating cyber crime, 32(C)’, https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2018-10-05/egypt-president-ratifies-anti-cybercrime-law/. Accessed 21 June 2023.
  9. Egyptian Front for Human Rights (EFHR) (2020), ‘Threatening the values of the Egyptian family: How the state imposes its control on the public space by imprisoning TikTok girls’, https://egyptianfront.org/statments/position-paper/threatening-the-values-of-the-egyptian-family-how-the-state-imposes-its-control-on-the-public-space-by-imprisoning-tiktok-girls/. Accessed 21 June 2023.
  10. Ezzat, Ahmed, al-Haqq, Sally and Fazulla, Hossam (2014), ‘Censors of creativity: A study of censorship of artistic expressions in Egypt’, Association for Freedom of Thought and Expression and Freemuse, https://www.academia.edu/6856869/Censors_of_Creativity_A_study_of_censorship_of_artistic_expressions_in_Egypt. Accessed 21 June 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gehlbach, Scott and Sonin, Konstantin (2014), ‘Government control of the media’, Journal of Public Economics, 118:1, pp. 163–71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.004.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Ghazal, Ahmed (2020), Egyptian Cinema and the 2011 Revolution: Film Production and Representing Dissent, London: I. B. Tauris.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Global Freedom of Expression (2020), ‘The case of the Egyptian TikTok influencers’, https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/the-tiktok-girls-case/. Accessed 21 June 2023.
  14. Gugeedata (2021), ‘Social media influencer analytics platform’, https://www.gugeedata.com/influencer/gdindex/EG. Accessed 21 June 2023.
  15. Kaufmann, Eric (2021), ‘Academic freedom in crisis: Punishment, political discrimination, and self-censorship’, Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology, 1 March, https://cspicenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/AcademicFreedom.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Kennedy, Melanie (2020), ‘“If the rise of the TikTok dance and e-girl aesthetic has taught us anything, it’s that teenage girls rule the internet right now”: TikTok celebrity, girls and the coronavirus crisis’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23:6, pp. 1069–76, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420945341.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kozinets, Robert V. (2002), ‘The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities’, Journal of Marketing Research, 39:1, pp. 61–72, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Omar, Bahiyah and Dequan, Wang (2020), ‘Watch, share or create: The influence of personality traits and user motivation on TikTok mobile video usage’, International Association of Online Engineering, 14:4, pp. 121–37, https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216454/. Accessed 21 June 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ong, Elvin (2019), ‘Online repression and self-censorship: Evidence from Southeast Asia’, Government and Opposition, 56:1, pp. 141–62, https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2019.18.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Robinson, Darrel and Tannenberg, Marcus (2019) ‘Self-censorship of regime support in authoritarian states: Evidence from list experiments in China’, Research and Politics, 6:3, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019856449.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Schimpfössl, Elisabeth and Yablokov, Ilya (2020), ‘Post-socialist self-censorship: Russia, Hungary and Latvia’, European Journal of Communication, 35:1, pp. 29–45, https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119897797.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Schwartz, Shalom H. (1992), ‘Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25:1, pp. 1–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Simons, Greg and Strovsky, Dmitry (2006), ‘Censorship in contemporary Russian journalism in the age of the war against terrorism: A historical perspective’, European Journal of Communication, 21:2, pp. 189–211, https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105064045.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Solomon, Michael R. (2018), Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having and Being, 12th ed., London: Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Stokel-Walker, Chris (2020), ‘TikTok’s global surge’, New Scientist, 245:3273, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(20)30552-2.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Tager, James (2018), Forbidden Feeds: Government Controls on Social Media in China, New York: Pen America, https://pen.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/PEN-America_Forbidden-Feeds-report-6.6.18.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Valiverronen, Esa and Saikkonen, Sampsa (2021), ‘Freedom of expression challenged: Scientists’ perspectives on hidden forms of suppression and self-censorship’, Science, Technology, and Human Values, 46:6, pp. 1172–200, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920978303.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Wade, Michael R. and Shan, Jialu (2019), ‘TikTok: The world’s most valuable startup that you’ve never heard of’, IMD, January, https://www.imd.org/research-knowledge/articles/tiktok-the-worlds-most-valuable-startup-that-youve-never-heard-of/#:~:text=Meanwhile%2C%20Bytedance%20recently%20completed%20a,startup%2C%20higher%20even%20than%20Uber. Accessed 21 June 2023.
  29. Yin, Robert K. (2018), Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed., London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Yu, Jiang Xiao (2019), ‘Research on TikTok app based on user-centric theory’, Applied Science and Innovative Research, 3:1, pp. 28–36, https://doi.org/10.22158/asir.v3n1p28.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00066_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Arab media; cybercrime law; Egyptian media; Egyptian women; Middle East; play/adopted behavior; social media platforms

Most Read This Month

Article
content/journals/jammr
Journal
5
3
false
en

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test